Abstract
A powerful aspect of effective field theories is connecting scales through renormalisation group (RG) flow. The anomalous dimension matrix of the Standard Model Effective Field Theory (SMEFT) encodes clues to where to find relics of heavy new physics in data, but its unwieldy 2499 × 2499 size (at operator dimension 6) makes it difficult to draw general conclusions. In this paper, we study the flavour structure of the SMEFT one loop anomalous dimension matrix of dimension 6 current-current operators, a 1460 × 1460 submatrix. We take an on-shell approach, laying bare simple patterns by factorising the entries of the matrix into their gauge, kinematic and flavour parts. We explore the properties of different diagram topologies, and make explicit the connection between the IR-finiteness of certain diagrams and their gauge and flavour structure. Through a completely general flavour decomposition of the Wilson coefficient matrices, we uncover new flavour selection rules, from which small subsystems emerge which mix almost exclusively amongst themselves. We show that, for example, if we neglect all Yukawa couplings except for that of the top quark, the selection rules produce block diagonalisation within the current-current operators in which the largest block is a 61 × 61 matrix. We provide all the ingredients of the calculations in comprehensive appendices, including SM and SMEFT helicity amplitudes, and explicit results for phase space integrals and gauge contractions. This deconstruction of the matrix, and its resulting block-diagonalisation, provides a first step to understanding the IR-relevant directions in the SMEFT parameter space, hence closing in on natural places for heavy new physics to make itself known.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators. Part I. Formalism and lambda Dependence, JHEP 10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].
E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators. Part II. Yukawa Dependence, JHEP 01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators. Part III. Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology, JHEP 04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, DsixTools: The Standard Model Effective Field Theory Toolkit, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 405 [arXiv:1704.04504] [INSPIRE].
J. Fuentes-Martin, P. Ruiz-Femenia, A. Vicente and J. Virto, DsixTools 2.0: The Effective Field Theory Toolkit, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 167 [arXiv:2010.16341] [INSPIRE].
J. Aebischer, J. Kumar and D.M. Straub, Wilson: a Python package for the running and matching of Wilson coefficients above and below the electroweak scale, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (2018) 1026 [arXiv:1804.05033] [INSPIRE].
S. Di Noi and L. Silvestrini, RGESolver: a C++ library to perform renormalization group evolution in the Standard Model Effective Theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 200 [arXiv:2210.06838] [INSPIRE].
C. Bobeth and U. Haisch, Anomalous triple gauge couplings from B-meson and kaon observables, JHEP 09 (2015) 018 [arXiv:1503.04829] [INSPIRE].
J. Aebischer, A. Crivellin, M. Fael and C. Greub, Matching of gauge invariant dimension-six operators for b → s and b → c transitions, JHEP 05 (2016) 037 [arXiv:1512.02830] [INSPIRE].
T. Hurth, S. Renner and W. Shepherd, Matching for FCNC effects in the flavour-symmetric SMEFT, JHEP 06 (2019) 029 [arXiv:1903.00500] [INSPIRE].
R. Aoude, T. Hurth, S. Renner and W. Shepherd, The impact of flavour data on global fits of the MFV SMEFT, JHEP 12 (2020) 113 [arXiv:2003.05432] [INSPIRE].
J. de Blas, M. Chala and J. Santiago, Renormalization Group Constraints on New Top Interactions from Electroweak Precision Data, JHEP 09 (2015) 189 [arXiv:1507.00757] [INSPIRE].
J. Kumar, Renormalization group improved implications of semileptonic operators in SMEFT, JHEP 01 (2022) 107 [arXiv:2107.13005] [INSPIRE].
S. Dawson and P.P. Giardino, Flavorful electroweak precision observables in the Standard Model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 073006 [arXiv:2201.09887] [INSPIRE].
J. de Blas, J.C. Criado, M. Perez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary, JHEP 03 (2018) 109 [arXiv:1711.10391] [INSPIRE].
D.A. Faroughy, G. Isidori, F. Wilsch and K. Yamamoto, Flavour symmetries in the SMEFT, JHEP 08 (2020) 166 [arXiv:2005.05366] [INSPIRE].
A. Greljo, A. Palavrić and A.E. Thomsen, Adding Flavor to the SMEFT, JHEP 10 (2022) 010 [arXiv:2203.09561] [INSPIRE].
R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins and A.V. Manohar, Holomorphy without Supersymmetry in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, Phys. Lett. B 739 (2014) 95 [arXiv:1409.0868] [INSPIRE].
C. Cheung and C.-H. Shen, Nonrenormalization Theorems without Supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 071601 [arXiv:1505.01844] [INSPIRE].
S. Caron-Huot and M. Wilhelm, Renormalization group coefficients and the S-matrix, JHEP 12 (2016) 010 [arXiv:1607.06448] [INSPIRE].
P. Baratella, C. Fernandez, B. von Harling and A. Pomarol, Anomalous Dimensions of Effective Theories from Partial Waves, JHEP 03 (2021) 287 [arXiv:2010.13809] [INSPIRE].
P. Baratella, C. Fernandez and A. Pomarol, Renormalization of Higher-Dimensional Operators from On-shell Amplitudes, Nucl. Phys. B 959 (2020) 115155 [arXiv:2005.07129] [INSPIRE].
P. Baratella, S. Maggio, M. Stadlbauer and T. Theil, Two-Loop Infrared Renormalization with On-shell Methods, arXiv:2207.08831 [INSPIRE].
L. Delle Rose, B. von Harling and A. Pomarol, Wilson coefficients and natural zeros from the on-shell viewpoint, JHEP 05 (2022) 120 [arXiv:2201.10572] [INSPIRE].
M. Jiang, T. Ma and J. Shu, Renormalization Group Evolution from On-shell SMEFT, JHEP 01 (2021) 101 [arXiv:2005.10261] [INSPIRE].
Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez and E. Sawyer, Structure of two-loop SMEFT anomalous dimensions via on-shell methods, JHEP 10 (2020) 211 [arXiv:2005.12917] [INSPIRE].
J. Elias Miró, J. Ingoldby and M. Riembau, EFT anomalous dimensions from the S-matrix, JHEP 09 (2020) 163 [arXiv:2005.06983] [INSPIRE].
M. Accettulli Huber and S. De Angelis, Standard Model EFTs via on-shell methods, JHEP 11 (2021) 221 [arXiv:2108.03669] [INSPIRE].
J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao and Y.-H. Zheng, Constructing the general partial waves and renormalization in EFT, arXiv:2111.08019 [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu and Y.-H. Zheng, Complete set of dimension-nine operators in the standard model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 015025 [arXiv:2007.07899] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu and Y.-H. Zheng, Complete set of dimension-eight operators in the standard model effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 015026 [arXiv:2005.00008] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li, Z. Ren, M.-L. Xiao, J.-H. Yu and Y.-H. Zheng, Operators for generic effective field theory at any dimension: on-shell amplitude basis construction, JHEP 04 (2022) 140 [arXiv:2201.04639] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, L. Martucci and R. Torre, Symmetries, Sum Rules and Constraints on Effective Field Theories, JHEP 09 (2014) 100 [arXiv:1405.2960] [INSPIRE].
T. Trott, Causality, unitarity and symmetry in effective field theory, JHEP 07 (2021) 143 [arXiv:2011.10058] [INSPIRE].
M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, The Bases of Effective Field Theories, Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 556 [arXiv:1307.0478] [INSPIRE].
N. Craig, M. Jiang, Y.-Y. Li and D. Sutherland, Loops and Trees in Generic EFTs, JHEP 08 (2020) 086 [arXiv:2001.00017] [INSPIRE].
G. Durieux and C.S. Machado, Enumerating higher-dimensional operators with on-shell amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 095021 [arXiv:1912.08827] [INSPIRE].
T. Ma, J. Shu and M.-L. Xiao, Standard model effective field theory from on-shell amplitudes, Chin. Phys. C 47 (2023) 023105 [arXiv:1902.06752] [INSPIRE].
M. Jiang, J. Shu, M.-L. Xiao and Y.-H. Zheng, Partial Wave Amplitude Basis and Selection Rules in Effective Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 011601 [arXiv:2001.04481] [INSPIRE].
Y. Shadmi and Y. Weiss, Effective Field Theory Amplitudes the On-Shell Way: Scalar and Vector Couplings to Gluons, JHEP 02 (2019) 165 [arXiv:1809.09644] [INSPIRE].
R. Aoude and C.S. Machado, The Rise of SMEFT On-shell Amplitudes, JHEP 12 (2019) 058 [arXiv:1905.11433] [INSPIRE].
G. Durieux, T. Kitahara, Y. Shadmi and Y. Weiss, The electroweak effective field theory from on-shell amplitudes, JHEP 01 (2020) 119 [arXiv:1909.10551] [INSPIRE].
G. Durieux, T. Kitahara, C.S. Machado, Y. Shadmi and Y. Weiss, Constructing massive on-shell contact terms, JHEP 12 (2020) 175 [arXiv:2008.09652] [INSPIRE].
Z.-Y. Dong, T. Ma and J. Shu, Constructing on-shell operator basis for all masses and spins, arXiv:2103.15837 [INSPIRE].
A. Azatov, R. Contino, C.S. Machado and F. Riva, Helicity selection rules and noninterference for BSM amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 065014 [arXiv:1607.05236] [INSPIRE].
Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez and E. Sawyer, Nonrenormalization and Operator Mixing via On-Shell Methods, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 051601 [arXiv:1910.05831] [INSPIRE].
R. Britto, Loop Amplitudes in Gauge Theories: Modern Analytic Approaches, J. Phys. A 44 (2011) 454006 [arXiv:1012.4493] [INSPIRE].
P. Baratella, D. Haslehner, M. Ruhdorfer, J. Serra and A. Weiler, RG of GR from on-shell amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2022) 156 [arXiv:2109.06191] [INSPIRE].
Q. Jin, K. Ren and G. Yang, Two-Loop anomalous dimensions of QCD operators up to dimension-sixteen and Higgs EFT amplitudes, JHEP 04 (2021) 180 [arXiv:2011.02494] [INSPIRE].
W. Cao, F. Herzog, T. Melia and J.R. Nepveu, Renormalization and non-renormalization of scalar EFTs at higher orders, JHEP 09 (2021) 014 [arXiv:2105.12742] [INSPIRE].
B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
H.-L. Li, Y.-H. Ni, M.-L. Xiao and J.-H. Yu, The bottom-up EFT: complete UV resonances of the SMEFT operators, JHEP 11 (2022) 170 [arXiv:2204.03660] [INSPIRE].
N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang and Y.-t. Huang, Scattering amplitudes for all masses and spins, JHEP 11 (2021) 070 [arXiv:1709.04891] [INSPIRE].
J.J. de Swart, The Octet model and its Clebsch-Gordan coefficients, Rev. Mod. Phys. 35 (1963) 916 [INSPIRE].
T.A. Kaeding, Tables of SU(3) isoscalar factors, Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tabl. 61 (1995) 233 [nucl-th/9502037] [INSPIRE].
G. Passarino and M.J.G. Veltman, One Loop Corrections for e+e− Annihilation Into μ+μ− in the Weinberg Model, Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 151 [INSPIRE].
S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr and E. Gardi, From multiple unitarity cuts to the coproduct of Feynman integrals, JHEP 10 (2014) 125 [arXiv:1401.3546] [INSPIRE].
S. Catani, The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order, Phys. Lett. B 427 (1998) 161 [hep-ph/9802439] [INSPIRE].
E.P. Wigner, Characteristic vectors of bordered matrices with infinite dimensions, Ann. Math. 62 (1955) 548.
Z.D. Bai, Circular law, Ann. Probab. 25 (1997) 494.
G.N. Remmen and N.L. Rodd, Signs, spin, SMEFT: Sum rules at dimension six, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 036006 [arXiv:2010.04723] [INSPIRE].
J. Gu and L.-T. Wang, Sum Rules in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory from Helicity Amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2021) 149 [arXiv:2008.07551] [INSPIRE].
A. Azatov, D. Ghosh and A.H. Singh, Four-fermion operators at dimension 6: Dispersion relations and UV completions, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 115019 [arXiv:2112.02302] [INSPIRE].
G.N. Remmen and N.L. Rodd, Spinning sum rules for the dimension-six SMEFT, JHEP 09 (2022) 030 [arXiv:2206.13524] [INSPIRE].
B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Miró, R. Rattazzi, M. Riembau and F. Riva, Positive moments for scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 036006 [arXiv:2011.00037] [INSPIRE].
M. Chala and J. Santiago, Positivity bounds in the standard model effective field theory beyond tree level, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) L111901 [arXiv:2110.01624] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality in beauty-quark decays, Nature Phys. 18 (2022) 277 [arXiv:2103.11769] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality with B0 → K*0ℓ+ℓ− decays, JHEP 08 (2017) 055 [arXiv:1705.05802] [INSPIRE].
HFLAV collaboration, Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2018, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021) 226 [arXiv:1909.12524] [INSPIRE].
HFLAV collaboration, Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2021, arXiv:2206.07501 [INSPIRE].
Belle collaboration, Measurement of \( \mathcal{R} \)(D) and \( \mathcal{R} \)(D*) with a semileptonic tagging method, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 161803 [arXiv:1910.05864] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the ratio of the B0 → D*−τ+ντ and B0 → D*−μ+νμ branching fractions using three-prong τ-lepton decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 171802 [arXiv:1708.08856] [INSPIRE].
Belle collaboration, Measurement of the τ lepton polarization and R(D*) in the decay \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\ast }{\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \), Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 211801 [arXiv:1612.00529] [INSPIRE].
LHCb collaboration, Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions \( \mathcal{B}\left({\overline{B}}^0\to {D}^{\ast +}{\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau}\right)/\mathcal{B}\left({\overline{B}}^0\to {D}^{\ast +}{\mu}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\mu}\right) \), Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 111803 [Erratum ibid. 115 (2015) 159901] [arXiv:1506.08614] [INSPIRE].
Belle collaboration, Measurement of the branching ratio of \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}{\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) relative to \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}{\ell}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\ell } \) decays with hadronic tagging at Belle, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 072014 [arXiv:1507.03233] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, Evidence for an excess of \( \overline{B}\to {D}^{\left(\ast \right)}{\tau}^{-}{\overline{\nu}}_{\tau } \) decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 101802 [arXiv:1205.5442] [INSPIRE].
S.L. Glashow, D. Guadagnoli and K. Lane, Lepton Flavor Violation in B Decays?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 091801 [arXiv:1411.0565] [INSPIRE].
F. Feruglio, P. Paradisi and A. Pattori, Revisiting Lepton Flavor Universality in B Decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 011801 [arXiv:1606.00524] [INSPIRE].
F. Feruglio, P. Paradisi and A. Pattori, On the Importance of Electroweak Corrections for B Anomalies, JHEP 09 (2017) 061 [arXiv:1705.00929] [INSPIRE].
D. Buttazzo, A. Greljo, G. Isidori and D. Marzocca, B-physics anomalies: a guide to combined explanations, JHEP 11 (2017) 044 [arXiv:1706.07808] [INSPIRE].
E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and P. Stoffer, Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Operators and Matching, JHEP 03 (2018) 016 [arXiv:1709.04486] [INSPIRE].
E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and P. Stoffer, Low-Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Anomalous Dimensions, JHEP 01 (2018) 084 [arXiv:1711.05270] [INSPIRE].
H.K. Dreiner, H.E. Haber and S.P. Martin, Two-component spinor techniques and Feynman rules for quantum field theory and supersymmetry, Phys. Rept. 494 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0812.1594] [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2210.09316
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Machado, C.S., Renner, S. & Sutherland, D. Building blocks of the flavourful SMEFT RG. J. High Energ. Phys. 2023, 226 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2023)226
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP03(2023)226