Abstract
An enduring problem in English curriculum and pedagogy is that listening and speaking, as intricately interconnected interactional practices, are often treated separately. In classroom discussions, attention is predominantly drawn to vocalisation as the key element of dialogue. Furthermore, listening as a silent embodied activity, is often taken to be either passive or a behavioural performance to be demonstrated; yet understanding what this means in practice remains not well understood by teachers. This article considers how different responses demonstrate listening actively in classroom lessons. Drawing on data gathered in practitioner action research conducted in twelve primary classrooms where teachers deliberately sought to promote dialogic pedagogies, lesson transcripts are examined to further understand how listening is connected to recipiency, meaning-making and co-production in talk-in-interaction in the multipartied conversations experienced in lessons. Conversation analysis delineates five interaction responses practices displaying activeness in listening. By drawing attention to the intricacies and multidimensionality of listening in classroom discussions, how the different dimensions align with a dialogic ideology are considered. It is argued that teacher knowledge of these realms of listening will assist teachers to recognise ‘active’ listening among and between
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. (4th ed.). Cambridge: Dialogos UK Ltd.
Alexander, R. (2010). Speaking but not listening. Accountable talk in an unaccountable context. Literacy, 44 (3), 103–111.
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2018a). Australian curriculum: English. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/national-literacy-and-numeracy-learningprogressions/national-literacy-learning-progression/speaking-and-listening/?subElementId=50872&scaleId=0
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2018b). Literacy learning progressions. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/resources/national-literacy-and-numeracy-learningprogressions/national-literacy-learning-progression/speaking-and-listening/?subElementId=50872&scaleId=0
Atkinson, M. & Heritage, J. (1999). Jefferson’s transcript notation. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (pp. 158–166). London: Routledge.
Bakhtin, M.M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (V. McGee, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Bignell, C. (2012). Talk in the primary curriculum: Seeking pupil empowerment in current curriculum approaches. Literacy, 46 (1), 48–55. doi:10.1111/j.1741–4369.2011.00602
Brown, G. (1995). Speakers, listeners, and communication: Explorations in discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, E. & B. Hecht (1983). Comprehension, production, and language acquisition. Annual Review of Psychology, 34, 325–349.
Coates, J. (1986). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of sex differences in language. London: Longman.
Edwards-Groves, C. (2003). On task: Focused literacy learning. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association (PETA).
Edwards-Groves, C. (2014). Talk moves: A repertoire of practices for productive classroom dialogue. PETAA PAPER 195. Newtown, Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association Australia.
Edwards-Groves, C. (2018). Knowing pedagogical dialogues for learning: Establishing a repertoire of classroom interaction practices as core teaching practice. In Y. Weinberger & Z. Libman (Eds.), Contemporary pedagogies in teacher education and development, (pp. 67–85). Retrieved from https://www.intechopen.com/books/contemporarypedagogies-in-teacher-education-and-development/knowing-pedagogical-dialogues-for-learning-establishinga-repertoire-of-classroom-interaction-practi http://mts.intechopen.com/articles/show/title/knowing-pedagogicaldialogues-for-learning-establishing-a-repertoire-ofclassroom-interaction-practice
Edwards-Groves, C., Anstey, M. & Bull, G. (2014). Classroom talk: Understanding dialogue, pedagogy and practice. Newtown, Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association Australia.
Edwards-Groves, C. & Davidson, C. (2017). Becoming a meaning maker: Talk and interaction in the dialogic classroom. Primary English Teachers Association Australia.
Gardner, R. (1998). Between speaking and listening: The vocalisation of understandings. Applied Linguistics, 19 (2), 204–224.
Gardner, R. (2001). When listeners talk: Response tokens and listener stance. Amsterdam; PA: John Benjamins.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture as a resource for the organization of mutual orientation. Semiotica, 62(1–2): 29–49.
Halliday, M.A.K. (1970). Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language, 6 (3), 322–361.
Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T.A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 95–117), Vol. III. London: Academic Press.
Hester, S. & Francis, D. (1997). Reality analysis in a classroom storytelling. British Journal of Sociology, 48 (1), 96–112.
Kazemi, E. & Hintz, A. (2014). Intentional talk: How to structure and lead productive mathematical discussions. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R. & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner. Doing critical participatory action research. Singapore: Springer.
Maine, F. (2015). Dialogic readers: Children talking and thinking together about visual texts. London: Routledge.
McGregor, G. & White, R. (1990). Introduction. In G. McGregor & R. White (Eds.), Reception and response: Hearer creativity and the analysis of spoken and written texts (pp. 1–36). London: Routledge.
Mercer, N., Dawes, L. & Staarman, J.K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 23 (4), 353–369. doi: 10.1080/09500780902954273
Michaels, S., O’ Connor, C., & Resnick, L.B. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27 (4), 283–297.
Muhonen, H., Rasku-Puttonen, H., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A-M. & Lerkkanen, M-K. (2016). Scaffolding through dialogic teaching in early years classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 55, 143–154. doi:.10.1016/j.tate.2016.01.007
Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Pellowe, J. (1986). The art of listening. London, UK: Croom Helm.
Rost, M. & Candlin, C. (1991). Listeniarning. London: Routledge.
Rubin, D.L. (1990). Introduction: Ways of talking about talking and learning. In S. Hynds & D.L. Rubin (Eds.), Perspectives on talk and learning (pp. 1–17). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation/Harvey Sacks; edited by Gail Jefferson; with an introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50 (4), 696–735.
Schatzki, T. (2017). Sayings, texts and discursive formations. In A. Hui, T. Schatzki & E. Shove (Eds.), The nexus of practices: Connections, constellations, practitioners (pp. 126–140). New York, NY: Routledge.
Schegloff, E.A. (1992). On talk and its institutional occasions. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work: Interaction in institutional settings (pp. 101–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schultz, K. (2010). After the blackbird whistles: Listening to silence in classrooms. Teachers College Record, 112 (11), 2833–2849.
Skidmore, D. & Murakami, K. (Eds.). (2016). Dialogic pedagogy: The importance of dialogue in teaching and learning. Bristol, UK: Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data.
Winograd, T. & Flores, F. (1987). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Yngve, V. (1970). On getting a word in edge wise. In Papers from the 6th Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society, April 16–18, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edwards-Groves, C., Davidson, C. Noticing the multidimensionality of active listening in a dialogic classroom. AJLL 43, 83–94 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652045
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652045