Abstract
The beliefs teachers hold about children’s imaginative capabilities directly influence their classroom practices. This paper reports on a small research study where the authors drew on an arts-based framework discussing two of Kieran Egan’s cognitive tools—in particular, the Somatic and the Mythic—to better understand the drawings of 5–12 years old about their imaginations. Drawing is valued as a process of metacognitive and creative meaning making that helps to explain the children’s thinking about where their imaginations are located and how they access their imaginations and creative ideas. The findings highlight the important role drawing can play in enabling teachers to access children’s conceptual thinking. They also offer some insight into how children understand the role imagination plays in their lives and learning.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ACARA. (2017). Australian Curriculum. Sydney, New South Wales.
Barone, T. & Eisner, E. (2012). Arts based research. London: Sage Publishing Inc.
Britsch, S. (2013). Visual language and science understanding: A brief tutorial for teachers. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 36 (1), 17–27.
Brooks, M. (2009). What Vygotsky can teach us about young children’s drawing. International Art in Early Childhood Research Journal, 1 (1), 1–6.
Brann, E. (1993). The world of the imagination: Sum and substance. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefeld.
Cahnmann-Taylor, M. & Siegesmund, R. (Eds.). (2008). Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice. New York: Routledge.
Callow, J. (2012). The shape of text to come: How image and text work. Newtown, NSW: PETAA.
Cope, B. & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Abingdon, UK: Psychology Press.
Cox, S. (2005). Intention and meaning in young children’s drawing. In International Journal of Art and Design Education, 24 (2), 115–125.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience (3rd ed.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Diamond, C.T.P. & Mullen, C.A. (1999). The postmodern educator: arts-based inquiries and teacher development. New York: Peter Lang.
Dweck, C. & Dweck, C.S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
Dweck, C.S. (2012). Mindset: How you can fulfl your potential. London: Constable & Robinson Limited.
Egan, K. (1992). Imagination in teaching and learning: The middle years. Chicago: The University Press.
Egan, K. & Madej, K. (Eds.). (2010). Engaging imagination and developing creativity in education. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Eisner, E. (2002). The arts and the creation of the mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ewing, R. & Hughes, R. (2008). Arts-informed inquiry in teacher education: contesting the myths. European Education Research Journal, 7 (4), 512–522.
Fettes, M. (2010). Imagination and experience: An integra-tive framework. Democracy & Education, 21 (1), 1–11.
Fettes, M., Nielsen, T.W., Haralambous, B. & Fitzgerald, R. (2010). Imagination and education: A many-sided vision. In T.W. Nielsen, R. Fitzgerald & M. Fettes (Eds.), Imagination in educational theory and practice: A many-sided vision (pp. 1–20). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Fransecky, D.F. & Debes, J.L. (1972). Visual literacy: A way to learn–a way to teach. University of Michigan: Association for Education Communication and Technology.
Frisch, N.S. (2012, March). ‘The wildfre effect: Learning to draw as a social process.’ Paper presented at the National Art Education Association Conference, New York.
Gelman, S.A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essen-tialism in everyday thought. USA: Oxford University Press.
Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination: Essays on education, the arts, and social change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Greene, M. (Winter, 1985). Imagination and learning: A reply to Kieran Egan. Teachers College Record, 87 (2), 167–171.
Greene, S. & Hogan, D. (Eds.). (2005). Researching children’s experience: Approaches and methods. London, England: Sage.
Heath, S. & Wolf, S. (2005). Focus in creative learning: Drawing on art for language development. Literacy, 39 (1), 38–45.
Hope, G. (2008). Thinking and learning through drawing in primary classrooms. London: Sage.
Jay, M. (2004). Songs of experience: Modern American and European variations on a universal theme. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kalantzis, M., Cope, B., Chan, E. & Dalley-Trim, L. (2016). Literacies (2nd ed.). Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.
Kendrick, M. & McKay, R. (2004). Drawings as an alternative way of understanding young children’s construction of literacy. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 4 (1), 109–128.
Kitchener, R. (1990). Do children think philosophically? Metaphilosophy, 21 (4), 427–428.
Knowles, J.G. & Cole, A.L. (2008a). Handbook of the arts in qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.
Knowles, J.G. & Cole, A.L. (2008b). Through pre-service teachers’ eyes: exploring feld experiences through narrative and inquiry. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Backalong Books.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Kress, G. & Jewitt, C. (2003). Introduction. In C. Jewitt & G. Kress (Eds.), Multimodal literacy (pp. 1–18). New York: Peter Lang.
Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: A grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Kress, G. & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Edward Arnold.
Latham, G. & Ewing, R. (2018). Generative conversations for creative learning: Re-imagining literacy education and understanding. Melbourne, Palgrave Macmillan.
Leslie, A. (1984). Pretence and representation: The origins of theory of mind. American Psychological Association, 94 (4), 412–426.
Lo Bianco, J. & Freebody, P. (1997). Australian literacies. Melbourne: Language Australia Publications.
Mackenzie, N. (2011). From drawing to writing: What happens when you shift teaching priorities in the frst six months of school. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34 (3), 322–340.
Mackenzie, N.M. (2018). The drawing and writing journey: progressions in children’s learning. In N.M. Mackenzie & J. Scull (Eds.), Understanding and supporting young writers from birth to 8 (pp. 9–29). Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
Madison, G.B. (1988). The hermeneutics of postmodernity. Indianapolis: University of Indiana Press.
Matthews, J. (1992) The genesis of aesthetic sensibility. In D. Thistlewood (ed.), Drawing, research and development (pp. 26–39). Boston: MA: NSEAD and Longman.
Matthews, J. (1994). Helping children to draw and paint in early childhood. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Matthews, J. (1999) The art of childhood and adolescence: The construction of meaning. London: Falmer Press.
Mavers, D. (2011). Children’s drawing and writing: The remarkable in the unremarkable. London: Routledge.
McArdle, F. & Bolt, G. (2013). Young children, pedagogy, and the arts. Changing images of early childhood. New York: Routledge.
Messer, M. (2001). Pencil Dancing: New ways to free your creative spirit. Cincinatti, Ohio: Walking Stick Press.
Murris, K. (1997). ‘Metaphors of the child’s mind; Teaching philosophy to young children’ (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Kingston upon Hull, UK: University of Hull.
Murris, K. (1990). Can children do philosophy? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34 (2), 261–279.
National Education Association (2013) Preparing 21st century students for a global society. An educator’s guide to the four C’s. Washington: National Education Association.
Painter, C., Martin, J.R. & Unsworth, L. (2014). Reading visual narratives: Image analysis of children’s picture books. Sheffeld, UK: Equinox Publishing.
Pink, D. (2005). A whole new mind: Why right brainers will rule the future. New York: Riverhead Books.
Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does a chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1 (4), 515–526.
Prosser, J. & Burke, C. (2008). Image-based Educational Research: Childlike Perspectives. In J.G. Knowles and A.L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples and issues. Sage, pp. 407–419.
Seligman, M.E.P. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000), Positive psychology, American Psychologist, 55 (1), 5–14.
Spiegelman, A. (1991). The Complete Maus. London: Penguin Books.
The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multilit-eracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66 (1), pp. 60–93.
Vygotsky, L. (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
White, J. (1992). The roots of philosophy; In A.P. Griffths (Ed.), The impulses to philosophise. Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992, pp. 73–88.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Latham, G., Ewing, R. Children’s images of imagination: The language of drawings. AJLL 41, 71–81 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652008
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03652008