Abstract
The motivation for Australian teachers of English to expand their expertise in grammar has been sharpened by the introduction of the Australian Curriculum: English (AC:E), whose knowledge base is broad and multifaceted. Teachers at all levels are required to have a stronger linguistic subject knowledge which includes knowledge of the structures and functions of word and sentence-level grammar, as this relates to a wide range of texts in different modes. They also need to apply linguistic understandings in practical tasks of planning, teaching and assessment. The expanded nature of this subject content may have stretched teachers beyond their comfort zones and assessment is needed of the profession’s current levels of understanding of and confidence to teach language. This paper reports on a national survey of 373 English teachers who expressed their views on linguistic subject knowledge and linguistic pedagogic subject knowledge. It focuses on teachers’ views of the importance of grammatical knowledge, approaches to this, levels of confidence with language and professional learning needs. The quantitative and qualitative data offers a complex picture of Australian teachers’ beliefs and their preparedness to teach what the curriculum now demands of them from early to later years of schooling in English.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Andrews, R. (2005). Knowledge about the teaching of (sentence) grammar: The state of play. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4 (3), 69–76.
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2012). Australian Curriculum: English. Version 3.0. Sydney: ACARA. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/English/Curriculum/F-10
Brumfit, C., Mitchel, R. & Hooper, R. (1996). Grammar, language and classroom practice. In M. Hughes (Ed.), Teaching and learning in changing times, (pp. 173–201). Oxford, Blackwell.
Cameron, D. (1997). Sparing the rod: what teachers need to know about grammar. Changing English: Studies in Reading and Culture, 4 (2), 229–239.
Cajkler, W. & Hislam, J. (2010). Trainee teachers’ grammatical knowledge: The tension between public expectations and individual competence. Language Awareness, 11 (3), 161–177.
Callow, J. (2013). The shape of text to come: How image and text work. Sydney, Australia: Primary English Teachers Association Australia (PETAA).
Carter, R. Ed. (1990). Knowledge about Language. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Commonwealth of Australia, (2009). The shape of the Australian Curriculum. National Curriculum Board: ACT, Australia.
Coffin, C. (2010). Language support in EAL contexts: Why systemic functional linguistics? Editorial Special Issue of NALDIC Quarterly (pp. 2–5), Reading, UK.
Derewianka, B. (2012). Knowledge about language in the Australian Curriculum: English In Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35 (2), 127–146.
Fearn, L. & Farnan, N. (2007). When is a verb? Using functional grammar to teach writing. Journal of Basic Writing, 26 (1), 63–87.
Freebody, P. (2007). Literacy Education in School: Research perspectives from the past for the future. Australian Council for Education Research. Camberwell, Victoria.
Glaser, B.G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Gordon, E. (2005). Grammar in New Zealand schools: Two case studies. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4: 48–68.
Hammond, J. & Macken-Horarik, M. (2001). Teachers’ voices, teachers’ practices. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 24 (2), 112–132.
Harper, H. & Rennie, J. (2009). ‘I had to go out and get myself a book on grammar’: A study of pre-service teachers’ knowledge about language. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33 (1), 22–37.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London and New York, Routledge.
Hudson D. & Walmsley, J. (2005). The English Patient: English grammar and teaching in the Twentieth Century. Journal of Linguistics, 41 (3), 593–622.
Jones, P. & Chen, H. (2012). Teachers’ knowledge about language: Issues of pedagogy and expertise. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35 (2), 147–169.
Jones, S., Myhill, D. & Bailey, T. (2013). Grammar for writing? An investigation into the effect of Contextualised Grammar Teaching on Student Writing. Reading and Writing, 26 (8), 1241–1263.
Kolln, M. & Hancock, C. (2005). The story of English grammar in United States schools. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4 (3), 11–31.
Louden, W., Rohl, M., Gore, J., Greaves, D., McIntosh, A., Wright, R., Siemon, D. & House, H. (2005). Prepared to teach: An investigation into the preparation of teachers to teach literacy and numeracy. Canberra, ACT.
Louden, B. (2008). 101 Damnations: the persistence of criticism and the absence of evidence about Teacher Education in Australia. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice. 14 (4), 357–368.
Love, K., Macken-Horarik, M., Sandiford, C. & Unsworth, L. (2014). From ‘bored witless’ to ‘rhetorical nous’: Teacher orientation to knowledge about language and strengthening student persuasive writing. In English in Australia 49 (3), 43–56.
Luke, A. & Freebody, P. (1999). Further notes on the four resources model. In Reading onlinehttp://readingonline.org/research/lukefreebody.html (retrieved on 8/6/2015).
Macken-Horarik, M., Love, K. & Unsworth, L. (2011). A grammatics ‘good enough’ for school English in the 21st century: Four challenges in realising the potential. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 34 (1), 9–21.
Myhill, D. (2005). Ways of knowing: Writing with grammar in mind. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4 (3), 77–96.
Myhill, D., Jones, S., Lines, H. & Watson, A. (2012). Re-thinking grammar: the impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers in Education, 27 (20), 139–166.
Myhill, D., Jones, S., Watson, A. & Lines, H. (2013). Playful explicitness with grammar: a pedagogy for writing, Literacy, 47 (2), 103–111.
NSW Board of Studies (1998). English K–6 North Sydney. Board of Studies NSW.
Sangster, P., Anderson, C. & O’Hara, P. (2012). Perceived and actual levels of knowledge about language amongst primary and secondary student teachers: do they know what they think they know? Language Awareness, 22 (4), 1–27.
Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 97–118). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Unsworth, L. (2013). Re-configuring image-language relations and interpretive possibilities in picture books as animated movies: A site for developing multi-modal literacy pedagogy. lha do Desterro: A journal of English language, literature in English and cultural studies, 64, 15–47.
Williams, G. (2005). Grammatics in schools. In R. Hasan, C. Matthiessen & J. Webster (Eds.), Continuing discourse on language: A functional perspective (Vol 1 pp. 281–310). London: Equinox.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Love, K., Macken-Horarik, M. & Horarik, S. Language knowledge and its application: A snapshot of Australian teachers’ views. AJLL 38, 171–182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651898
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651898