Abstract
Tensile strength and unconfined compressive strength of cement-treated soil are crucial mechanical parameters in soil stabilization by the cement mixing method. Although the unconfined compressive strength of soil-cement mixture has been well-documented, tensile strength has not received much concern. The purpose of this paper is to study the tensile strength of cement-treated soil using Portland Cement Blended PCB 40 and figure out the relationship between these two parameters. Totally, 54 soil-cement specimens were prepared with different cement-soil ratios (i.e., C/S = 10%, 15%, 20%) and stored at room temperature under air-humid condition. The results of laboratory Brazilian tests and unconfined compression tests show that the average ratio of tensile strength and unconfined compressive strength corresponding to the air-humid curing condition is about 0.08. There is not much difference in the ratio of the tensile strength to the unconfined compressive strength regardless of cement-soil ratio with curing time. The tensile strength achieved 0.78 MPa with a cement content of 20% at a curing day of 15 days.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Portland cement is widely used in soft soil stabilization, in Vietnam and worldwide, due to its effectiveness in the improvement of soil-bearing capacity and convenience in construction operations. There are publications on this topic [5,6,7,8,9, 12]. Soil-cement mixtures, unlike soils, may be able to sustain some tensile stresses. Nguyen (2009) studied the influence of the cement-soil ratio on the tensile strength of soil cement mixing after 28 days of curing time. Because soil properties vary in a wide range from site to site, the properties of the soil-cement mixture also vary accordingly. The application of the empirical relations between tensile strength and unconfined compressive strength, which have been proposed in the world, to the soil-cement mixture in Vietnamese conditions may further amplify the errors. In addition, research on the tensile strength of soil-cement mixing and the relationship between tensile strength and unconfined compressive strength of soil-cement mixing is still limited in Vietnam. This paper aims to figure out the tensile strength and propose the relationship between the tensile and unconfined compressive strength of the soil-cement mixing by carrying out unconfined compressive tests and Brazilian tests on 54 soil-cement specimens, using Portland Cement Blended PCB 40, at different cement-soil ratios (i.e., C/S) with 10%, 15%, and 20%. After the mixing procedure, all the specimens were stored at room temperature under air-humid condition.
2 Methods and Implementations
2.1 Materials
The soil used for the mixing was fine yellow dry sand, a type of fill soil. Particle size distribution, carried out by dry sieving, according to ASTM D422–63 [4], as shown in Fig. 1, was uniformly graded with particle size varying in a wide range of 0.075 mm to 4.75 mm. As stated by USCS (Unified Soil Classification System-ASTM D2487-83) [2], the soil is classified as poorly graded sand (SP).
The cement used for the mixing was Portland PCB40. The basic properties of this cement are shown below in Table 1.
2.2 Procedure of Mixing and Curing Condition
Soil-cement specimens consisted of cement, soil, and water and were prepared with different cement-soil ratios (C/S). The cement content, i.e., C/S, is defined as the weight of dry cement divided by the weight of dry soil (e.g., 10%, 15%, 20%). Firstly, soil and cement were put in a mixer and dry-mixed for 15 min with two mixing modes such as surrounding mode (7.5 min) and bottom mode (7.5 min). Then, water was added to the mixture and continued mixing for 6 min (e.g., 3 min in the surrounding mode, followed by 3 min in the bottom mode) after TCVN 9403:2012 [11]. It should be noted that the water-dry soil ratio for all specimens is 22%. The amount of added water was calculated from the water content of sand at the field corresponding to the saturation degree of 85%. It is also assumed that the dry unit weight of sand is 15.7 kN/m3 (i.e., 90% of the maximum dry unit weight derived from the standard compaction test).
A mold made of the cylindrical plastic pipe (PVC, 60 \(\pm 2\) mm in diameter and 120 \(\pm 2\) mm in height) was used for casting soil-cement specimens for the UCS test (ASTM D2166-00) [1]. The mold, which was sealed at one end, was filled with three layers of soil cement paste. Each layer was stamped 15 times on a wooden base to compact it. The mold was then covered and turned upside down while being stamped 15 times.
For the Brazillian test, cylindrical plastic containers with 60 mm in diameter and 30 mm in height were used as a mold (ASTM D3967-95a) [3]. Put the soil-cement paste into the mold which is sealed on one side and oily-coated inside, and regularly stamp it for 30 times.
Totally, 54 soil-cement specimens including 27 specimens for the Brazillian test and 27 specimens for UCS tests were prepared in this study. All 54 specimens are stored at room temperature under air-humid condition for 8, 15, and 29 days. After a curing period, specimens are extracted from the container by splitting a line on it, using a thumb to push the specimen gently and the cement-soil specimen will be slipped out of the mold. Then, the height and diameter of the specimens were measured.
2.3 Laboratory UCS and Brazilian Testing
The UCS test followed the standard ASTM D2166-00 [1]. After the specimen was placed at the center of the compression platform, adjust the loading device carefully so that the upper platen just makes contact with the specimen surface. Continuously increase the load at a loading speed of 1.0 mm/min until failure. The vertical displacement and axial force were measured by using a LVDT displacement transducer with measuring ranges from ±25 mm and a load cell with a capacity of 30 kN respectively. Figure 2a shows a specimen at failure in the UCS test with C/S of 15% and curing time of 15 days.
The Brazilian test follows standard ASTM D3967-95a [3]. In this test, the specimen was subjected to a uniform vertical line load diametrically with the 0.5 mm/min load until failure. The vertical displacement and axial force were measured by using two LVDT displacement transducers with measuring ranges from ±25 mm and a load cell with a capacity of 5 kN respectively. Figure 2b shows a specimen at failure in the Brazilian test with C/S of 15% and curing time of 15 days.
3 Test Results and Discussions
3.1 Test Results
Unconfined Compressive Strength
The relationship between the unconfined compressive strength and curing time corresponding to 3 different ratios (C/S) 10%, 15%, and 20% is shown in Fig. 3a, where it can be seen that the unconfined compressive strength increases with the curing time. This is due to the cement hydration.
The unconfined compressive strength of soil-cement specimen increases significantly with increasing in the cement-soil (C/S) ratio, Fig. 3b. In addition, the unconfined compressive strength at 15 days of curing gets close to the corresponding strength at 29 days of curing.
In general, elastic modulus E50 increases in accordance with curing time for different cement-soil ratios, except for C/S = 10% the E50 tends to decrease with curing time, Fig. 4a. The reason may be during the tests, the contact between the specimen surface and the loading platen was not adjusted appropriately. From Fig. 4b, it can be seen that E50 steadily increases with cement-soil ratios of 10%, 15%, and 20%.
Tensile Strength
Figure 5a shows how curing time corresponding to the cement-soil ratios of 10%, 15%, and 20% affects the tensile strength. The tensile strength increases with curing time, in period of 8 days to 15 days of curing. The values of tensile strength after 29 days are slightly smaller than those after curing 15 days. The reason may be due to the drying of the specimens and the appearance of small cracks during curing the specimens in the air. There has been a significant increase in tensile strength with the cement-soil ratio as in Fig. 5b. The tensile strength is at peak for C/S = 20% at 15 days curing reached 0.78 (MPa).
Variations of the Ratio of Tensile Strength and Unconfined Compressive Strength
The ratio of tensile strength and unconfined compressive strength (denoted as TS/UCS) for all C/S values gradually decreases with the curing time described in Fig. 6a. The average ratio for all specimens is 0.08, in other words, the tensile strength is 0.08 times unconfined compressive strength.
At the same C/S value, the TS/UCS ratio decreases with curing time which can be explained that the longer the curing time is, the stronger the cement hydration reacts, leading to significantly higher unconfined compressive strength but the tensile strength enhances slightly. Therefore, the TS/UCS ratio decreases.
The TS/UCS ratios of 8 days, 15 days, and 29 days of curing increase slightly with the cement-soil ratio, Fig. 6b. However, for 29 days of curing the ratio decreases due to error in experiment operation or uneven mixing. In general, the more the cement content, the higher the TS/UCS value.
3.2 Discussions
The TS/UCS value of 0.08 from this study is not much different from the ones studied by Clough W (i.e., 0.10) and Consoli N (i.e., 0.15) [5, 6]. This result indicates that the tensile strength of cement-treated soil is significantly lower than the unconfined compressive strength.
Based on available publications the elastic modulus increases with curing time, the result of this study confirms again that statement. However, Fig. 4a shows that at 29 days of curing for C/S of 10%, the E50 decreased. This may be due to heterogeneous specimens, and unsmooth specimens’ surfaces which affect the load’s impact on these surfaces.
Correlations between UCS, TS, E50, and C/S are established. The results show that R2 values are very high, in other words, the correlations are considered strong shown in Table 2.
4 Conclusions and Recommendations
Based on the result of the UCS test and Brazillian test on 54 soil-mixing specimens with different C/S ratios (i.e., 10%, 15%, and 20%), the following conclusions can be drawn:
-
Unconfined compressive strength steadily increases when cement content and curing time increase. Compared to curing time, the C/S ratio shows a clearer influence on the unconfined compressive strength. The maximum value of unconfined compressive strength is 7.8 MPa with a cement content of 20% after 29 days of curing.
-
Modulus E50 greatly depends on the cement-soil ratio. E50 value has increased and reached 4746.6 MPa for C/S = 20% and 29 days curing.
-
Tensile strength greatly increases with cement content but does not increase much (even decrease) with curing time. The maximum amount of tensile strength is 0.78 MPa, with 20% of cement content at a curing time of 15 days.
-
The ratio of tensile strength and unconfined compressive strength decreases if the cement content in specimens increases. The average value of this ratio is about 0.08.
In this paper, only air-humid curing condition was considered. Because the enhancement of low-bearing soil in real-life situations does consider soil-cement specimens in submerged curing conditions, further studies should be done for the underwater curing condition.
References
ASTM D2166-00 (2000) Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
ASTM D2487-83 (1983) Standard Practice for Classification of Soil for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
ASTM D3967-95a (2001) Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Intact Rock Core. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
ASTM D422-63 (2007) Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
Clough W, Sitar N, Bachus R (1981) Cemented sands under static loading. J Geotech Eng Div 107:799–817. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJGEB6.0001152
Consoli N, Cruz R, Floss M, Festugato L (2010) Parameters controlling tensile and compressive strength of artificially cemented sand. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000278
Do HD, Phan CT (2015) Cement soil piles—environmentally friendly foundation solutions for construction works. The Univ Danang J Sci Technol 11(96)
Mai AP, Nguyen BT, Truong DC, Tran NHH (2014) Study on behavior of soil mixed with cement by wet mixing and deep mixing technology in An Giang. J Geotech (Vietnam) 2(2014):34–43
Nguyen QD (2009) Research on the solution of foundation treatment with soil cement piles. Southern Institute of Water Resources Research
TCVN 6260:2009 (2009) Portland blended cement—specifications. Ministry of Science and Technology, Hanoi Vietnam
TCVN 9403:2012 (2012) Stabilization of soft soil—the soil cement column method. Ministry of Science and Technology, Hanoi Vietnam
Vu BT, Nguyen TH, Quach HH (2018) Test soil strength cement reinforced for roadbed Hoa Lac Hi-tech Park. J Geotech (Vietnam) 4(2018):32–38
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge Ho Chi Minh City University of Technology (HCMUT), VNU-HCM for supporting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ngo, T.P. et al. (2024). Evaluation of Tensile Strength of Cement-Treated Soil Based on Laboratory Tests. In: Reddy, J.N., Wang, C.M., Luong, V.H., Le, A.T. (eds) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering and Architecture. ICSCEA 2023. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 442. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7434-4_119
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7434-4_119
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-7433-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-7434-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)