Skip to main content

Developmentalism, Forest Protection, and the Idea of Greater Justice in India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law 2020

Part of the book series: The Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law ((IYCL))

  • 47 Accesses

Abstract

In the wake of climate change, the classical debate between environment and development is required to be revisited. The paper analyzes the policies of the Indian Government that primarily treat economic development as freedom. This excessive focus on economic development benefitted India in terms of raising the living standards of its people overall, but at the same time this process also created new victims of development and led to risks or actual deterioration of the environment. By using the case of national forest policy, this paper tries to understand how the Indian Government navigates between the issues of environment and development, given the constitutional mandate of “complete” justice, environmental protection, and aspirations of the people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Baldev Raj Nayar, India’s Mixed Economy: The Role of Ideology and Interest in its Development (Popular Parkashan 1989).

  2. 2.

    N.A. Sarma, ‘Economic Development in India: The First and Second Five Year Plans’ (International Monetary Fund Staff Papers, 6(2) 1958). <www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/024/1958/001/article-A002-en.xml?ArticleTabs=fulltext> accessed on 10 August 2021.

  3. 3.

    Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, GOI, Jawaharlal Nehru’s Speeches: March 1953– August 1957, (vol 3, Publication Division 1957) 3.

  4. 4.

    S. Gopal and Uma Iyengar (eds), The Essential Writings of Jawaharlal Nehru (vol. 2, OUP 2003) 49.

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    Anthony J. Parel, ‘Introduction’ in Anthony J. Parel (ed), Gandhi, Freedom, and Self-Rule. (Lexington Books 2000) 18.

  7. 7.

    Ramachandra Guha, Environmentalism: A Global History (Longman 1999) 63–68.

  8. 8.

    Mukund Gobind Rajan, Global Environmental Politics: India and the North-South Politics of Global Environmental Issues (OUP1997).

  9. 9.

    Ramachandra Guha, ‘Ecological Roots of Development Crisis’ (1986) 21(15) EPW, 623–625.

  10. 10.

    Rajan (8) 35.

  11. 11.

    Jairam Ramesh, Indira Gandhi: A Life in Nature (Simon and Schuster 2017).

  12. 12.

    M.M. Cernea and K. Schmidt-Soltau, ‘Poverty Risks and National Park: Policy Issues and Conservation and Resettlement’ (2006) 34(10) World Development, 1808–1830.

  13. 13.

    Sumi Krishna, Environmental Politics: People's Lives and Developmental Choices (Sage 1996) 37.

  14. 14.

    DET Staff, ‘Looking back at Stockholm 1972: What Indira Gandhi said half a century ago on man & environment’ (31 May 2022) Down to Earth <https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/environment/looking-back-at-stockholm-1972-what-indira-gandhi-said-half-a-century-ago-on-man-environment-83060> accessed 22 May 2023; Gandhi as quoted in Shyam Divan and Armin Rosencranz, Environmental Laws and Policy in India: Cases, Materials and Statutes (Oxford University Press 2001) 31–32.

  15. 15.

    Krishna (no. 13) 38.

  16. 16.

    Wu and Clemente as quoted in R.P. Anand, ‘Development and Environment: The Case of the Developing Countries’ [1980] 20(1) Indian Journal of International Law: A Quarterly, 1–19.

  17. 17.

    DET Staff, 14.

  18. 18.

    Manmohan Singh, ‘Environment and the New Economic Policies’ (15 September 1992) 36(16) Yojana 4–10 and 28.

  19. 19.

    Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, National Environment Policy 2006 (GOI 2006). <https://www.indiawaterportal.org/sites/default/files/iwp2/National_Environment_Policy__MoEF_2006.pdf> accessed 1 August 2021.

  20. 20.

    Ramachandra Guha, ‘Forestry in British and Post-British India: A Historical Analysis’ [1983] 18(44) EPW 1884.

  21. 21.

    E.A. Smythies, India’s Forest Wealth: India of Today (vol. 6, Humphery Milford 1925).

  22. 22.

    Guha (no 21) 1888.

  23. 23.

    Department of Environment, Forest and Wildlife, National Forest Policy (GOI 1988).

  24. 24.

    Ibid.

  25. 25.

    Ananda Banerjee, ‘Why India’s draft national forest policy needs and urgent course correction’ Mint (New Delhi 9 April 2018). <https://www.livemint.com/Politics/vWEeMB1KZvvE2VzvJ0zv9I/Why-Indias-draft-national-forest-policy-needs-an-urgent-cou.html> accessed 14 August 2022.

  26. 26.

    Ibid.

  27. 27.

    Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Draft National Forest Policy 2018 (GOI 2018).

  28. 28.

    Ibid.

  29. 29.

    Ishan Kukerti, ‘Draft National Forest Policy Cleared: Cabinet to take decision’ (2019) Down to Earth <https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/forests/draft-national-forest-policy-cleared-cabinet-to-take-decision-67945> accessed on 18 August 2021.

  30. 30.

    Gopikrishna S. Warrier, ‘India’s new forest policy draft draws criticism for emphasis on industrial timber’ Mongabay (New Delhi 9 April 2018). <https://news.mongabay.com/2018/04/indias-new-forest-policy-draft-draws-criticism-for-emphasis-on-industrial-timber/amp/?print> accessed on 19 August 2021.

  31. 31.

    Armin Rosencranz and Sharachchandra Lele, ‘Supreme Court and India’s Forests’ (2008) 43(5) EPW 11–14; Naveen Thayyil, ‘Judicial Fiats and Contemporary Enclosures’, Conservation and Society (2009) 7(4) 268–282; See also Ayesha Dias, ‘Judicial Activism in the Development and Enforcement of Environmental Law: Some Comparative Insights from the Indian Experience’, (1994) 6(2) Journal of Environmental Law, 243–262.

  32. 32.

    Raghav Srivastava, ‘What’s worrying about the SC order on FRA?’ (2019) Down to Earth <https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/forests/what-s-worrying-about-the-sc-order-on-fra--63330> accessed 15 July 2021; Geetanjoy Sahu,. ‘Forest Rights Act: A litmus test for govt to protect forest dwellers’ (2019) Down to Earth <https://www.downtoearth.org.in/blog/forests/forest-rights-act-a-litmus-test-for-govt-to-protect-forest-dwellers-65816> accessed 8 August 2021.

  33. 33.

    Krishnadas Rajagopal, ‘SC stays Feb 13 order for eviction of tribals, forest dwellers’ The Hindu (28 February 2019). <https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/sc-stays-feb-13-order-for-eviction-of-tribals-forest-dwellers/article26396154.ece >accessed 16 August 2021.

  34. 34.

    Nishant Sirohi, ‘Forest Rights Act case: Supreme Court directing eviction of over a million tribals is gross injustice’ The Leaflet: Constitution First (24 February2019). <https://www.theleaflet.in/validity-of-the-forest-rights-act-supreme-court-directing-eviction-of-almost-two-million-tribal-peoples-is-a-gross-travesty-of-justice/> accessed 17 August 2021.

  35. 35.

    The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act 2006 (aip 6).

  36. 36.

    Rajagopal (34).

  37. 37.

    Sirohi (35).

  38. 38.

    Bhasker Tripathi, ‘Forest Rights could Decide Election Results in 133 (25%) Seats’ India Spend (20 March 2019). <https://www.indiaspend.com/forest-rights-could-decide-election-results-in-133-25-seats/> accessed 20 September 2021.

  39. 39.

    Aniruddha Jena, ‘Communities of Judges, Protection of Tribal Cultures, and the Principle of ‘Complete Justice”’ 2021 41(3) South Asia Research.

  40. 40.

    Werner Menski, ‘Final Rallying Call on the Brutal Realities of the Anthropocene and the Necessity of Cosmoprudence to Minimise Human Suffering’ in Domenico Amirante and Silvia Bagni (eds), Environmental Constitutionalism in the Anthropocene: Values, Principles and Actions (Routledge 2022).

  41. 41.

    Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Draft National Resource Efficiency Policy 2019 (GOI 2019).

  42. 42.

    Annapurna Mitra, (ed), Reconciling India’s Climate and Industrial Targets: A Policy Roadmap (ORF 2021).

  43. 43.

    Ibid.

  44. 44.

    Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, ‘Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana’ (GOI 2016) <https://www.pmuy.gov.in/about.html> accessed 20 September 2021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajnish Saryal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saryal, R. (2023). Developmentalism, Forest Protection, and the Idea of Greater Justice in India. In: John, M., Devaiah, V.H., Baruah, P., Tundawala, M., Kumar, N. (eds) The Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law 2020. The Indian Yearbook of Comparative Law. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5467-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5467-4_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-99-5466-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-99-5467-4

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics