Abstract
This chapter offers a critical introduction to issues pertaining to gender and disaster, showing that creation of peaceful and inclusive societies where people of all genders are equal is key for successful disaster risk reduction and support. It begins with a review of the literature, illustrating that women are generally more vulnerable than men during and after disasters, and noting that the needs of other genders, too, must also be addressed. Socially constructed gender roles and norms make women more vulnerable than men when disaster strikes, but not all women are vulnerable, and some women regardless of their vulnerability can be proactive in changing their situation. Gender sensitive disaster support should support women in their leadership roles and be cognizant of women's ways of knowing and the important roles they play in informal economies and in their communities. The creation of better societies after disaster through the transformation of gender requires an understanding of gender as more than the roles that women and men play in their societies. Underlying power and social relations, including patriarchal gender hierarchies, must also be considered, and binary understandings of gender challenged. Because vulnerability is not determined entirely by gender, the importance of taking an intersectional approach is also emphasized. The Chapter concludes with examples from the field in Northeast Japan after the 2011 earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster that show ways women do, and do not, seek change and empowerment after disaster.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
A gender approach and/or gender-sensitive approach to disaster should include all genders, not only women and men. This chapter focuses on women, however, it recognizes the importance of addressing the needs of all sexual and/or gender identities, including non-binary and non-conforming people.
- 2.
These stories are among those collected between 2011 and 2018 during Popoki Friendship Story activities conducted by the Popoki Peace Project. The Popoki Peace Project was begun in 2006 and uses stories, drawings, and other modes of expression to imagine, and then work to create peace in a broad range of fields and situations [1, 2, 5]. Popoki Friendship Story activities were begun soon after the 2011 Great Northeast Japan earthquake, tsunami and nuclear explosions. These activities involve drawing freely on a long (45 cm x 500 cm) cloth and create spaces for communication and connection. They were begun in communities devasted by the 2011 tsunami, but have spread to other places around the world, inviting participants to express being and feeling safe. Learn more about the Popoki Peace Project at https://www.popokipeaceproject.org/ including monthly activity reports in English and Japanese.
References
Alexander, R. (2018a). Drawing disaster: Reflecting on the six years of the Popoki Friendship Story project. Journal of International Cooperation Studies, 25(2), 59–96.
Alexander, R. (2018b). Teaching peace with Popoki. Peace Review, 30(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2017.1419669
Alexander, R. (2018c). Feeling unsafe: Exploring the impact of nuclear evacuation. Journal of Narrative Politics, 4(1), 65–87.
Alexander, R. (2018d). Living with disaster capitalism after Fukushima. Peace Review, 30(2), 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2018.1458942
Alexander, R. (2012). Popoki’s friendship story: Our peace journey born out of the Great Eastern Japan Earthquake. Epic.
Alway, J., Belgrave, L., & Smith, K. (1998). Back-to-normal: Gender and disaster. Symbolic Interaction, 21(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1525/si.1998.21.2.175
Ariyabandu, M. (2009). Sex, gender, and gender relationships in disasters. In E. Enarson & D. P. G. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Women, gender, and disaster: Global issues and initiatives (pp. 5–17). Sage.
Blanchard, K. (2015). Gender and Sendai Framework. Crisis Response Journal, 10(4), 52–53.
Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. Routledge.
Ciampi, M., Gell, F., Lasap, L., & Turvil, E. (2011). Gender and disaster risk reduction: A training pack. Oxfam. Retrieved February 7, 2022, from https://policy-practice.oxfam.org/resources/gender-and-disaster-risk-reduction-a-training-pack-136105/
Clifton, D., & Gell, F. (2001). Saving and protecting lives by empowering women. Gender and Development, 9(3), 8–18.
Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Psychology Press.
Colvin, H., & Taylor, R., Rapporteurs (2012). Building a resilient workforce: Opportunities for the Department of Homeland Security, Workshop Summary. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Building a Resilient Workforce Washington: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13380
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
Dabby, C., & Poore, G. (2007). Engendering change: Transforming gender roles in Asian & Pacific Islander Communities. Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based Violence.
Enarson, E. (2000). Gender and natural disaster (Working Paper 1), Infocus Programme on Crisis Response and Reconstruction, International Labor Organization.
Enarson (2017). Gender and disaster: Foundations and new directions for research and practice. In R. Havidán, W. Donner & J. Trainor (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63254-4_11
Enarson (2016). Men, masculinities, and disasters: an action research agenda. In E. Enarson & B. Pease (Eds.), Men, masculinities, and disaster. Routledge.
Enarson, E., & Chakrabarti, D. G. (Eds.). (2018). Women, gender, and disasters: Global issues and initiatives (1st ed.). Sage.
Endo, K. (2012). Issues in disaster and gender (Saigai to Jenda wo meguru shomondai). GEMC Journal, 2012(3), 7–15.
Enloe, C. (2017). Big push: Exposing and challenging the persistence of patriarchy. The University of California Press.
Ferris, E., Petz, D., & Stark, C. (2013). The year of recurring disasters: A review of natural disasters in 2012. The Brookings Institution: London School of Economics, Project on Internal Displacement.
Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343390027003005
Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP) (2017). Positive Peace Report 2017. Institute for Economics and Peace.
Inter-Agency Standing Committee. (2007). IASC guidelines on mental health and psychosocial support in emergency settings. Inter-Agency Standing Committee.
International Recovery Platform. (n.d.). Why gender issues in recovery are important. (Knowledge for recovery series information kit 1). Retrieved on October 4, 2018, from https://www.recoveryplatform.org/assets/tools_guidelines/Why%20gender.pdf
Launius, C., & Hassel, H. (2018). Threshold concepts in women’s and gender studies: Ways of seeing, thinking and knowing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Le Masson, V., Lim, S., Budimir, M., & Podboj, J. S. (2016). Disasters and violence against women and girls: Can disasters shake social norms and power relationships? Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved on February 7, 2022, https://odi.org/en/publications/disasters-and-violence-against-women-and-girls-can-disasters-shake-social-norms-and-power-relations/
Mason, B. (2006). Community disaster resilience: A summary of the March 20, 2006, workshop of the disaster roundtable. National Research Council. National Academy Press. Retrieved on February 7, 2022, https://doi.org/10.17226/11769
McOmber, C., Audia, C., & Crowley, F. (2019). Building resilience by challenging social norms: Integrating a transformative approach within the BRACED consortia. Disasters, 43(S3), S271−S294. https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12341
Nikkan Iwate Construction Industry Daily Newspaper (Nikkan Iwate Kensetsu Gyokai Shimbun). (2016). Women construction workers—Tomiyama Construction operator Sasaki Sachiko “built on experience to improve her skill (Kensetu joshi – Tomiyama Kensetsu Operator Sasaki Sachiko-san ‘Keiken wo kasanete gijutu koujou he’). 2016.3.22. Retrieved on 5 October 2018 from: http://www.iwaken.or.jp/info/2016/03/22_1552.html
Pincha, C. (2008). Gender sensitive disaster management: A toolkit for practitioners. Earthworm Books for Oxfam America and NANBAN Trust
Reardon, B., & Snauwaert, D. (2015). Betty A. Reardon: A pioneer in education for peace and human rights. State University of New York Press.
Ryder, S. (2017). A bridge to challenging environmental inequality: Intersectionality, environmental justice, and disaster vulnerability. Social Thought and Research, 34, 85–115.
Seto, M., Nemoto, H., Kobayashi, N., Kikuchi, S., Honda, N., Kim, Y., Kelman, I., & Tomita, H. (2019). Post-disaster mental health and psychosocial support in the areas affected by the Great East Japan Earthquake: A qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry, 19, 261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2243-z
Shenhav, S. (2015). Analyzing Social Narratives. Routledge.
Skakun, Z., Smyth, I., & Minne, V. (2021). Transforming gender inequalities: Practical guidance for achieving gender transformation in resilient development. Oxfam Resilience Knowledge Hub, Oxfam.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2003). Gender equality guidelines for UNESCO publications Annex 3: Key definitions and terms. Retrieved on February 7, 2022, https://en.unesco.org/system/files/ge_guidelines_for_publications_-_annex_3.pdf
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (2017). Declaration on the Right to Peace. A/RES/71/189. Retrieved on October 4, 2018, from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/858594?ln=en
United Nations News. March 22, 2022. Retrieved on June 2, 2022, from https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/03/1114072
United Nations Secretariat for International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNSIDR). (2015). Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction 2015–2030. Retrieved on October 3, 2018, from https://www.unisdr.org/files/43291_sendaiframeworkfordrren.pdf.
Valdés, H. M. (2018). A gender perspective on disaster risk reduction. In E. Enarson & D. P. G. Chakrabarti (Eds.), Women, gender, and disaster: Global issues and initiatives (pp. 18–28). Sage.
Yamaji, K. (2013). Recovery and urban policy—Reflecting diversity in community building (Fukkou to toshiseisaku - machizukuri he no tayousei no hanei). Academic trends, special issue on disaster recovery and gender (Gakujutsu no doukou, tokushuu: saigaifukkou to jenda), 18(10), 20–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alexander, R. (2023). A Critical Introduction to Gender and Disaster: Learning from Women Survivors in Northeast Japan. In: Alexander, R., Wajjwalku, S. (eds) Making Disaster Safer. Kobe University Monograph Series in Social Science Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4546-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4546-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-99-4545-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-99-4546-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)