Skip to main content

Exploring the Human USP Gene Family and Its Association with Cancer: An In Silico Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Data Science and Computing Technologies (ADSC 2022)

Abstract

Ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs) play a major role in the progression of cancers. In this chapter, the presence and relative abundance of paralogous genes in the USP family were studied along with their respective interaction patterns. The effect of the gene duplication events on the overall gene expression in various cancer types was also investigated. Functional divergence of the paralogous genes was evaluated and their corresponding evolution rates were also determined. It was found that the USP family contains an abundance of paralogous genes, among which most paralogous gene pairs display diverging functionalities. Furthermore, higher proportions of genes that promote cancer exist and are thus, implicated in a larger number of protein–protein interaction networks. Also, gene duplication events that lead to the production of noncancerous paralogs were observed to be preferred in this family. Lastly, it was observed that the group of paralogs which display different roles in cancer has the highest rate of evolution among all other paralogs. This evolutionary investigation would provide a further insight into the interconnection of the USP family with the JAK-STAT pathway as well as would inhibit tumorigenesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clague MJ, Urbé S, Komander D (2019) Breaking the chains: deubiquitylating enzyme specificity begets function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 20:338–352. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-019-0099-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mevissen TET, Komander D (2017) Mechanisms of deubiquitinase specificity and regulation. Annu Rev Biochem 86:159–192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-044916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheffner M, Nuber U, Huibregtse JM (1995) Protein ubiquitination involving an E1–E2–E3 enzyme ubiquitin thioester cascade (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/373081a0

  4. Aggarwal K, Massagué J (2012) Ubiquitin removal in the TGF-β pathway. Nat Cell Biol 14:656–657. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jin J, Liu J, Chen C, Liu Z, Jiang C, Chu H, Pan W, Wang X, Zhang L, Li B, Jiang C, Ge X, Xie X, Wang P (2016) The deubiquitinase USP21 maintains the stemness of mouse embryonic stem cells via stabilization of Nanog. Nat Commun 7:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zeng H, Qu J, Jin N, Xu J, Lin C, Chen Y, Yang X, Cell XH-C (2016) Undefined: Feedback activation of leukemia inhibitory factor receptor limits response to histone deacetylase inhibitors in breast cancer. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng YC, Shieh SY (2018) Deubiquitinating enzyme USP3 controls CHK1 chromatin association and activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:5546–5551. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719856115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang YC, Wu YS, Hung CY, Wang SA, Young MJ, Hsu TI, Hung JJ (2018) USP24 induces IL-6 in tumor-associated microenvironment by stabilizing p300 and β-TrCP and promotes cancer malignancy. Nat Commun 9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-06178-1

  9. Zhang C, Lu J, Zhang QW, Zhao W, Guo JH, Liu SL, Wu YL, Jiang B, Gao FH (2016) USP7 promotes cell proliferation through the stabilization of Ki-67 protein in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 79:209–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2016.08.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Q, Aminu B, Roscow O, Zhang W (2021) Targeting the ubiquitin signaling cascade in tumor microenvironment for cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci 22:1–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22020791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu Y, Hong Y, Xu Y, Liu P, Guo DH, Chen Y (2014) Inhibition of the JAK/STAT pathway with ruxolitinib overcomes cisplatin resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer NSCLC. Apoptosis 19:1627–1636. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10495-014-1030-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yeh C-T, Huang W-C, Rao YK, Ye M, Lee W-H, Wang L-S, Tzeng DTW, Wu C-H, Shieh Y-S, Huang C-YF, Chen Y-J, Hsiao M, Wu ATH, Yang Z, Tzeng Y-M (2013) A sesquiterpene lactone antrocin from Antrodia camphorata negatively modulates JAK2/STAT3 signaling via microRNA let-7c and induces apoptosis in lung cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 34, 2918–2928 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/CARCIN/BGT255

  13. Dandage R, Landry CR (2019) Paralog dependency indirectly affects the robustness of human cells. Mol Syst Biol 15:1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20198871

  14. Hsiao TL, Vitkup D (2008) Role of duplicate genes in robustness against deleterious human mutations. PLoS Genet 4. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000014

  15. Chen WH, Zhao XM, van Noort V, Bork P (2013) Human monogenic disease genes have frequently functionally redundant paralogs. PLoS Comput Biol 9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003073

  16. Bateman A (2019) UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D506–D515. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yates AD et al (2020) Ensembl 2020. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D682–D688. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pruitt KD et al (2009) The consensus coding sequence (CCDS) project: identifying a common protein-coding gene set for the human and mouse genomes. Genome Res 19:1316–1323. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.080531.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keshava Prasad TS et al (2009) Human protein reference database—2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res 37:767–772. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkn892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuo HC, Lin PY, Chung TC, Chao CM, Lai LC, Tsai MH, Chuang EY (2011) DBCAT: database of CpG islands and analytical tools for identifying comprehensive methylation profiles in cancer cells. J Comput Biol 18:1013–1017. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2010.0038

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen D, Ning Z, Chen H, Lu C, Liu X, Xia T, Qi H, Wang W, Ling T, Guo X, Tekcham DS, Liu X, Liu J, Wang A, Yan Q, Liu JW, Tan G, Piao HI (2020) An integrative pan-cancer analysis of biological and clinical impacts underlying ubiquitin-specific-processing proteases. Oncogene 39:587–602. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-019-1002-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wei R, Liu X, Yu W, Yang T, Cai W, Liu J, Huang X, Xu Gt, Zhao S, Yang J, Liu S (2015) Deubiquitinases in cancer. Oncotarget 6:12872–12889. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.3671

  23. Young MJ, Hsu KC, Lin TE, Chang WC, Hung JJ (2019) The role of ubiquitin-specific peptidases in cancer progression. J Biomed Sci 26:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-019-0522-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z (2017) GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W98–W102. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dimmer EC, Huntley RP, Barrell DG, Binns D, Draghici S, Camon EB, Hubank M, Talmud PJ, Apweiler R, Lovering RC (2008) The gene ontology—providing a functional role in proteomic studies. Proteomics 8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800002

  26. Baudot A, Jacq B, Brun C (2004) A scale of functional divergence for yeast duplicated genes revealed from analysis of the protein-protein interaction network. Genome Biol 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r76

  27. Goh KIl, Cusick ME, Valle D, Childs B, Vidal M, Barabási AL (2007) The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:8685–8690. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701361104

  28. He X, Zhang J (2006) Why do hubs tend to be essential in protein networks? PLoS Genet 2:0826–0834. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0020088

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are thankful to the Ms. Alankar Roy (Enrollment no: A91704120067) from Amity Institute of Biotechnology, Amity University, Kolkata for the support. Authors are also grateful to Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of Kalyani, West Bengal for the cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujay Ray .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding states that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ray, S., Banerjee, A. (2023). Exploring the Human USP Gene Family and Its Association with Cancer: An In Silico Study. In: Chakraborty, B., Biswas, A., Chakrabarti, A. (eds) Advances in Data Science and Computing Technologies. ADSC 2022. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1056. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3656-4_70

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics