Skip to main content

Snooping for Fake News: A Cascaded Approach Using Stance Detection and Entailment Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Big Data and Cloud Computing (ICBCC 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 1021))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 226 Accesses

Abstract

In this digital era, the dissemination of news is increasingly done online among the exploding population of Internet users. Due to the low cost involved and vanishing journalistic integrity, the spreading of unverified news, also called “fake news,” has become commonplace, often with long-lasting consequences to society. In these times of “digital deceit,” identifying fake news has become very important. This paper proposes a two-step approach using linguistic techniques in a deep learning framework to tackle the problem of fake news. Fake news may comprise fabricated news stories as well as “click baits.” Our approach involves identifying both these fake categories through a cascaded approach employing stance detection and entailment classification by building a complex model involving multiple deep neural networks. We use Term Frequency (TF), Cosine Similarity, and Word2Vec as features at different stages in the model. The datasets from Fake News Challenge 1 (FNC 1) and the Sentences Involving Compositional Logic (SICK) are used for stance detection and entailment classification, respectively. The focus of this work is, given an article, not to establish its credibility by identifying whether the article is counterfeit or not but to identify and eliminate the spread of fake news articles with respect to any particular spurious source.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allcott H, Gentzkow M (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J Econ Perspect 31(2):211–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Conroy NK, Rubin VL, Chen Y (2015) Automatic deception detection: methods for finding fake news. Proc Assoc Inf Sci Technol 52(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Y, Conroy NJ, Rubin VL (2015) Misleading online content: recognizing click bait as “false news”. In: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on workshop on multimodal deception detection, pp 15–19. (Nov 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Granik M, Mesyura V (2017). Fake news detection using naive Bayes classifier. In: 2017 IEEE first Ukraine conference on electrical and computer engineering (UKRCON), pp 900–903. IEEE. (May 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bajaj S (2017) The pope has a new baby! Fake news detection using deep learning

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kaggle, Getting real about fake news. https://www.kaggle.com/mrisdal/fake-news/. Accessed 2020

  7. Corney D, Albakour D, Martinez-Alvarez M, Moussa S (2016) What do a million news articles look like? In NewsIR@ ECIR, pp 42–47. (March 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feng VW, Hirst G (2013) Detecting deceptive opinions with profile compatibility. In: Proceedings of the sixth international joint conference on natural language processing, pp 338–346. (Oct 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baird S, Sibley D, Pan Y(2017) Talos targets disinformation with fake news challenge victory. https://blog.talosintelligence.com/2017/06/talos-fake-news-challenge.html

  10. Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, Corrado GS, Dean J (2013) Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, pp 3111–3119

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hanselowski A, Avinesh PVS, Schiller B, Caspelherr F (2017) Team Athene on the fake news challenge. https://medium.com/@andre134679/team-athene-on-the-fake-news-challenge-28a5cf5e017b

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riedel B, Augenstein I, Spithourakis GP, Riedel S (2017) A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for the Fake News Challenge stance detection task. arXiv:1707.03264

  13. Le Q, Mikolov T (2014) Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: International conference on machine learning, pp 1188–1196. (Jan 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Graves A (2012) Supervised sequence labelling. In: Supervised sequence labelling with recurrent neural networks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 5–13

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yih WT, Toutanova K, Platt JC, Meek C (2011) Learning discriminative projections for text similarity measures. In: Proceedings of the fifteenth conference on computational natural language learning, pp 247–256. (June 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mueller J, Thyagarajan A (2016) Siamese recurrent architectures for learning sentence similarity. In: Thirtieth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence. (Mar 2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marelli M, Menini S, Baroni M, Bentivogli L, Bernardi R, Zamparelli R (2014) A SICK cure for the evaluation of compositional distributional semantic models. In: LREC, pp 216–223. (May 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tai KS, Socher R, Manning CD (2015) Improved semantic representations from tree-structured long short-term memory networks. arXiv:1503.00075

  19. Kingma DP, Ba J (2014) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv:1412.6980

  20. Miller GA (1995) WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun ACM 38(11):39–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors discussed the contents of the manuscript and contributed to its preparation. While E. A. W and K. M designed the model and implemented the system, H. M and S. N helped with the manuscript. S. A and N. K. A provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Harshithaa Murali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Williams, E.A., Karthik, M., Shahina, A., Murali, H., Safiyyah, N., Nayeemulla Khan, A. (2023). Snooping for Fake News: A Cascaded Approach Using Stance Detection and Entailment Classification. In: Venkataraman, N., Wang, L., Fernando, X., Zobaa, A.F. (eds) Big Data and Cloud Computing. ICBCC 2022. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 1021. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-1051-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics