Abstract
This chapter reports subjective experiences in nature of five children aged 6–10 years collected during a 5-day camp in a botanical garden. Creative expressive visual methods and semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. Inductive analysis produced three themes: (1) caring, children being positioned to take care of nature and to be taken care of by nature; (2) protecting, nature needing protection from children and children needing protection from nature; and (3) the roles of gatekeepers in mediating attraction to and repulsion from nature were also highlighted. We examine these in the context of sociocultural constraints and invitations that children experience in developing these relationships. These themes are discussed using a theoretical framework that blends Vygotsky’s sociocultural development theory with Gibson’s theory of affordances. Bronfenbrenner’s ecological model is used to highlight, in a layered format, complexities of influence that can impact a child’s experiencing of nature and risk. We argue that children seek out and benefit from manageable experiences with risk. This chapter reconceptualizes children’s experiences with nature as being socially and culturally mediated and situates the natural environment in a key position to affect developmental outcomes in children. This integrated understanding of how children relate with their natural environment supports a reconceptualization of development as a series of experiences where children engage in a transactional relationship with their physical and sociocultural environments. We argue that practitioners occupy a valuable position because they interact with all three: children, nature, and the sociocultural environment. We conclude by identifying the need for a greater foundation of interdisciplinary research such as this that draws from areas such as geography, psychology, and social theory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adis, O. (1975). Play fighting. New York: Academic.
Aitken, S. C., & Herman, T. (1997). Gender, power and crib geography: Transitional spaces and potential places. Gender, Place and Culture, 4(1), 63–88.
Alerby, E. (2000). A way of visualizing children’s and young people’s thoughts about the environment: A study of drawings. Environmental Education Research, 6(3), 205–222.
Almon, J. (2013). Adventure: The value of risk in children’s play. Annapolis: Alliance for Childhood.
Anderson, J., Adey, P., & Bevan, P. (2010). Positioning place: Polylogic approaches to research methodology. Qualitative Research, 10(5), 589–604.
Ansell, N. (2009). Childhood and the politics of scale: Descaling children’s geographies? Progress in Human Geography, 33(2), 190–209.
Anthias, F. (2002). Where do I belong? Narrating collective identity and translocation positionality. Ethnicities, 2(4), 491–508.
Backet-Milburn, K., & Harden, J. (2004). How children and their families construct and negotiate risk, safety and danger. Childhood, 11(4), 429–447.
Bærentsen K.B., & Trettvik, J. (2002). An activity theory approach to affordance. In NordiCHI’02: Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on human-computer interaction (pp. 51–60). Aarhus: ACM Press, 19–23 Oct 2002.
Barker, J., & Smith, F. (2001). Power, positionality and practicality: Carrying out fieldwork with children. Ethics, Place & Environment: A Journal of Philosophy and Geography, 4(2), 142–147.
Barker, J., & Weller, S. (2003). Geography of methodological issues in research with children. Qualitative Research, 3(2), 207–227.
Barraza, L. (1999). Children’s drawings about the environment. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 49–67.
Bixler, R. D., & Floyd, M. F. (1997). Nature is scary, disgusting and uncomfortable. Environment and Behavior, 29(4), 443–467.
Bixler, R. D., Carlisle, C. L., Hammitt, W. F., & Floyd, M. F. (1994). Observed fears and discomforts among urban students on school field trips to wildland areas. The Journal of Environmental Education, 26(1), 24–33.
Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (2007). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. In T. Husen & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 1643–1647). Oxford: Elsevier.
Brussoni, M., Olsen, L. L., Pike, I., & Sleet, D. A. (2012). Risky play and children’s safety: Balancing priorities for optimal child development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(9), 3134–3148.
Cachelin, A., Paisley, K., & Blanchard, A. (2009). Using significant life experience research to inform program evaluation: A case study of the nature conservancy’s wings and water wetlands education program. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 2–14.
Castree, N. (2001). Socializing nature: Theory, practice, and politics. In N. Castree & B. Braun (Eds.), Social nature: Theory, practice, and politics (pp. 1–21). Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Chawla, L. (1998). Significant life experiences, revisited: A review of the research. Journal of Environmental Education, 29(3), 11–22.
Chawla, L. (2006). Learning to love the natural world enough to protect it. Barn nr, 2, 57–58.
Chawla, L. (2007). Childhood experiences associated with care for the natural world: A theoretical framework for empirical results. Children, Youth and Environments, 17(4), 144–170.
Clark, C., & Uzzell, D. (2006). The socio-environmental affordances of adolescents’ environments. In C. Spencer & M. Blades (Eds.), Children and their environments (pp. 176–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, S., & Horm-Wingerd, D. (1993). Children and the environment: Ecological awareness among preschool children. Environment and Behavior, 25(1), 103–120.S.
Costall, A. (1995). Socializing affordances. Theory & Psychology, 5(4), 467–481.
Daniels, H. (2001). Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York: Routledge Falmer.
Derr, V. (2002). Children’s sense of place in Northern New Mexico. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 125–137.
Demeritt, D. (2001). Being constructive about nature. In N. Castree & Braun, B. (Eds.), Social nature: Theory, practice, and politics (pp. 22–40). Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge.
Dovey, K. (1990). Refuge and imagination: Places of peace in childhood. Children’s Environmental Quarterly, 7(4), 13–17.
Drake, K. (1992). Myths of nature: Culture and the social construction of risk. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 21–37.
Etherington, K. (2004). Becoming a reflexive researcher: Using ourselves in research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Ewert, A., Place, G., & Sibthorp, J. (2005) Early-life outdoor experiences and an individuals environmental attitudes. Leisure Sciences, 27(3), 225–239.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Gibson, E. J. (2000). Where is the information for affordances? Ecological Psychology, 12(1), 53–56.
Gill, T. (2007). No fear: Growing up in a risk averse society. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.
Good, J. M. M. (2007). The affordances for social psychology of the ecological approach to social knowing. Theory & Psychology, 17(2), 265–295.
Greenfield, C. (2003). Outdoor play- the case of risks and challenges in children’s learning and development. Safekids News, 21, 5.
Greider, T., & Garkovich, L. (1994). Landscapes: The social construction of nature and the environment. Rural Sociology, 59(1), 1–24.
Greene, S., & Hill, M. (2005). Researching children’s experience: methods and methodological issues. In S. Greene & D. Hogan (Eds.), Researching children’s experience: Approaches and methods (pp. 1–21). London: Sage Publications.
Gurevitz, R. (2000). Affective approaches to environmental education: Going beyond the imagined worlds of childhood? Ethics, Place and Environment, 3(3), 253–268.
Heft, H. (1988). Affordances of children’s environments: A functional approach to environmental description. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 5(3), 29–37.
Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2000). Children’s geographies and the new social studies of childhood. In S. L. Holloway & G. Valentine (Eds.), Children’s geographies. Playing, living, learning. London: Routledge.
James, J. J., & Bixler, B. D. (2008). Children’s role in meaning making through their participation in an environmental education program. Journal of Environmental Education, 39(4), 44–59.
Kals, E., & Ittner, H. (2003). Children’s environmental identity: Indicators and behavioral impacts. In S. Clayton & S. Opotow (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment (pp. 135–158). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kellert, S. R. (2002). Experiencing nature: Affective, cognitive and evaluative development in children. In P. H. Kahn & S. R. Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural and evolutionary investigations (pp. 117–151). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Kirkby, M. (1989). Nature as refuge in children’s environments. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 6, 1–12.
Korpela, K., Kytta, M., & Hartig, T. (2002). Restorative experience, self-regulation, and children’s place preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 387–398.
Kyle, G., & Chick, G. (2007). The social construction of a sense of place. Leisure Sciences, 29(3), 209–225.
Kytta, M. (2003). Children in outdoor contexts: Affordances and independent mobility in the assessment of environmental child friendliness. Unpublished Dissertation, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland.
Kytta, M. (2004). The extent of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria of a child-friendly environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 179–198.
Kytta, M. (2006). Environmental child-friendliness in the light of the Bullerby model. In C. Spencer & M. Blades (Eds.), Children and their environments (pp. 141–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, S. H. (1999). The cognition of playground safety and children’s play: A comparison of traditional, contemporary, and naturalized playground types. In M. L. Christiansen (Ed.), Proceedings of the international conference of playground safety. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University.
Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
Lester, S., & Russell, W. (2008). Play for a change. Play policy and practice: A review of contemporary perspectives. London: Play England.
Leudar, I. (1991). Sociogenesis, coordination and mutualism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 21, 197–220.
Linzmayer, C. D., & Halpenny, E. A. (2013). “It was Fun”: An evaluation of sand tray pictures, an innovative visually expressive method for researching children’s experiences with nature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 310–337.
Linzmayer, C. D., & Halpenny, E. A. (2014b). “I Might Know When I’m an Adult”: Making sense of children’s relationships with nature. Children’s Geographies 12(4), 412–428.
Linzmayer, C. D., Halpenny, E. A., & Walker, G. J. (2014). A multidimensional investigation into children’s optimal experiences with nature. Landscape Research, 39(5), 481–501.
Little, H. (2010). Relationship between parents’ beliefs and their responses to children’s risk-taking behaviour during outdoor play. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8, 315–330.
Loveland, K. A. (1991). Social affordances and interaction II: Autism and the affordances of the human environment. Ecological Psychology, 3(2), 99–119.
Maher, F. A., & Tetreault, M. K. (1993). Frames of positionality: Constructing meaningful dialogues about gender and race. Anthropological Quarterly, 66(3), 118–126.
Matthews, H., & Limb, M. (1999). Defining an agenda for the geography of children: Review and prospect. Progress in Human Geography, 23(1), 61–90.
Milligan, C., & Bingley, A. (2007). Restorative places or scary spaces? The impact of woodland on the mental well-being of young adults. Health and Place, 13, 799–811.
Milton, K. (2002). Loving nature: Towards an ecology of emotion. New York: Routledge.
Mitchell, L. M. (2006). Child centered? Thinking critically about children’s drawings as a visual research method. Visual Anthropology Review, 22(1), 60–73.
Moore, R. C. (1986). The power of nature: Orientations of girls and boys toward biotic and abiotic play settings on a reconstructed school yard. Children’s Environments Quarterly, 3(3), 52–69.
Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning and memory. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in quantitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137–145.
Pollio, H. R., & Heaps, C. (2004). Themes in the human experience of nature. Psychological Reports, 94, 35–47.
Rasmussen, K. (2004). Places for children – Children’s places. Childhood, 11(2), 155–173.
Risotto, A., & Giuliani, M. V. (2006). Learning neighbourhood environments: The loss of experience in a modern world. In C. Spencer & M. Blades (Eds.), Children and their environments (pp. 75–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roe, J., & Aspinall, P. (2011). The emotional affordances of forest settings: An investigation in boys with extreme behavioural problems. Landscape Research, 36, 1–18.
Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: Positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320.
Sandseter, E. B. H. (2007). Categorising risky play – How can we identify risk-taking in Children’s play? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(2), 237–252.
Sandseter, E. B. H. (2009a). Characteristics of risky play. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 20(9), 3–21.
Sandseter, E. B. H. (2009b). Affordances of risky play in preschool: The importance of features in the play environment. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 439–446.
Sandseter, E. B. H. (2014). Early childhood education and care practitioners’ perceptions of children’s risky play; examining the influence of personality and gender. Early Childhood Development and Care, 184(3), 434–449.
Schneekloth, L. H. (1989). Play environments for visually impaired children. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 83(4), 196–201.
Sebba, R. (1991). The landscapes of childhood: The reflection of childhood’s environment in adult memories and in children’s attitudes. Environment and Behaviour, 23(4), 395–422.
Smith, F., & Barker, J. (2001). Commodifying the countryside: The impact of out-of-school care on rural landscapes of children’s play. Area, 33(2), 169–176.
Sobel, D. (1993). Children’s special places. Tucson: Zephyr Press.
Sobel, D. (1996). Beyond ecophobia. Massachusetts: Orion Society.
Stallings, R. A. (1990). Media discourse and the social construction of risk. Social Problems, 37(1), 80–95.
Stephenson, A. (2003). Physical risk-taking: Dangerous or endangered? Early Years, 23(1), 35–43.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sutton-Smith, B. (2003). Play as a parody of emotional vulnerability. In J. L. Roopnarine (Ed.), Play and educational theory and practice, play and culture studies (Vol. 5). Connecticut: Praeger.
Tapsell, S., Tunstall, S., House, M., Whomsley, J., & Macnaghten, P. (2001). Growing up with rivers? Rivers in London children’s worlds. Area, 33(2), 177–189.
Thomson, J. L., & Philo, C. (2004). Playful spaces? A social geography of children’s play in Livingston, Scotland. Children’s Geographies, 2(1), 111–130.
Tovey, H. (2007). Playing outdoors: Spaces and places, risk and challenge. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
United Nations. (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx
Valenti, S. S., & Gold, J. M. M. (1991). Social affordances and interaction I: Introduction. Ecological Psychology, 3(2), 77–98.
Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wake, S. J. (2008). ‘In the Best Interests of the Child’: Juggling the geography of children’s gardens (Between adult agendas and children’s needs). Children’s Geographies, 6(4), 423–435.
Wals, A. E. J. (1994). Nobody planted it, it just grew! Young adolescents’ perceptions and experiences of nature in the context of urban environmental education. Children’s Environments, 11(3), 177–193.
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia: The human bond with other species. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wyndham, F. S. (2010). Environments of learning: Rarámri Children’s plant knowledge and experience of schooling, family and landscapes in the Sierra Tarahumara, Mexico. Human Ecology, 38, 87–99.
Wyver, S., Bundy, A., Naughton, G., Tranter, P., Ragen, J., & Hansen, E. B. H. (2010, November/December). Safe outdoor play for young children: Paradoxes and consequences. Australian Association for Research in Education Conference. University of Melbourne, Melbourne.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this entry
Cite this entry
Linzmayer, C., Halpenny, E. (2015). Children’s Experiences in a Botanical Garden: Nature of Risk and the Risk of Nature. In: Freeman, C., Tranter, P., Skelton, T. (eds) Risk, Protection, Provision and Policy. Geographies of Children and Young People, vol 12. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-99-6_25-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-99-6_25-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-4585-99-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences