Skip to main content

Tweets Reporting Abuse Classification Task: TRACT

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Congress on Intelligent Systems (CIS 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1335))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 461 Accesses

Abstract

In recent decades, we have noticed a considerable increase in reports or confession posts of abuse victims on Twitter. Most of the time victims do not report it to their guardians or the concerned authorities. Teenagers and minorities are the most affected group of abuse. Part of these victims tweets about their incident to let go of pain and suffering or as a cry for help. Identifying such reports is challenging, to address such an important task. In this study, we define a new task, tweets reporting abuse classification task (TRACT), and construct a new dataset related to the online abuse reporting. A detailed comparison with existing supervised models and detailed error analysis explores the merit of our proposed model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/abuse.

  2. 2.

    https://www.savethechildren.in/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.tweepy.org/.

  4. 4.

    https://www.kaggle.com/saichethanmreddy/tract-corpus.

References

  1. Chaudhari, P., Agrawal, H., Kotecha, K.: Data augmentation using MG-GAN for improved cancer classification on gene expression data. Soft Comput. 1–11 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kouloumpis, E., Wilson, T., Moore, J.: Twitter sentiment analysis: the good the bad and the omg! In: Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, H., et al.: A system for real-time twitter sentiment analysis of 2012 us presidential election cycle. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sikdar, U.K., Ekbal, A., Saha, S.: Differential evolution based feature selection and classifier ensemble for named entity recognition. In: Proceedings of COLING 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Derczynski, L., et al.: Analysis of named entity recognition and linking for tweets. Inf. Process. Manag. 512, 32–49 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, A., et al.: Named entity disambiguation in streaming data. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Long Papers, vol. 1. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chowdhury, A.G., et al.: # YouToo? detection of personal recollections of sexual harassment on social media. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Subramani, S., et al.: Deep learning for multi-class identification from domestic violence online posts. IEEE Access 7, 46210–46224 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davidov, D., Tsur, O., Rappoport, A.: Enhanced sentiment learning using twitter hashtags and smileys. In: Coling 2010: Posters (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khatua, A., Cambria, E., Khatua, A.: Sounds of silence breakers: exploring sexual violence on twitter. In: 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Park, M., McDonald, D.W., Cha, M.: Perception differences between the depressed and non-depressed users in twitter. In: Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Finin, T., et al.: Annotating named entities in Twitter data with crowdsourcing. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Workshop on Creating Speech and Language Data with Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miriyala Reddy, S., Tyagi, K., Anand Tripathi, A., Deoli, R.: TRACT: Tweets Reporting Abuse Classification Task Corpus. Mendeley Data, v2 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17632/my2vkfyffd.2

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions which helped us in improving overall paper quality further. We also like to thank Hostel 5 Bois who helped and supported us in developing this dataset.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ambika Pawar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Reddy, S.M., Tyagi, K., Tripathi, A.A., Pawar, A., Kotecha, K. (2021). Tweets Reporting Abuse Classification Task: TRACT. In: Sharma, H., Saraswat, M., Yadav, A., Kim, J.H., Bansal, J.C. (eds) Congress on Intelligent Systems. CIS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1335. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-6984-9_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics