Abstract
Concrete is the inevitable product of the construction industry without that, construction may not be possible in the current scenario. However, concrete is having several issues such as cracks, lack of workability and effect of chemical attack. Out of these issues, formation of micro-cracks is a bigger problem in terms of durability because micro-cracks will lead to macro-cracks and contribute to the increase in permeability of concrete. In this regard, a self-healing bio-mineralization of bacterial species is used as the aid for the decrease in the permeability and increases of the durability of the structure. In the present study, M20 grade concrete was used to understand the durability of concrete with three different bacterial species for different bacterial cell concentrations. From the results, it can be seen that the permeability of concrete decreases with increase in cell concentrations from 104 to 107 with a maximum of 64% reduction in Water absorption of concrete along with reduction in weight loss was also observed for 2 and 4 weeks of acid attack test with a maximum of 39%. This is mainly due to calcium carbonate deposition in micro-cracks which has inhibited the propagation of cracks from micro to macro and indirectly contributes to the betterment of durability of the concrete and reduction in corrosion.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
In the construction sector usually, contractor wants to achieve early concrete strength so that the job can be finished on time or before schedule [1, 2]. The use of high initial strength cement and low water/cement ratio addresses this requirement. But this process leads to a large degree of heat liberation, drying shrinkage, elasticity modulus and a lower creep. Concrete also displays greater cracking behavior with an upper quantity of concrete due to increased thermal shrinkage and drying shrinkage, but many of the time it is not possible to reduce these problems only with variation in ingredients of concrete and due to congestion in the work difficult to repair also, on this regard autogenous self-healing mechanism is required which will heal these cracks and increase the durability. One such mechanism is bio-mineralization [3,4,5,6].
2 Self-healing Material
Based on the CaCO3 precipitation, calcifying bacteria are collected from various sources such as soil and water. Calcification of bacteria yields an enzyme termed urease that transforms the urea into ammonia and CO2. Reactions are reported as follows [7, 8].
The reaction between CO2 acquired from urea with the Ca(OH)2 of concrete is as follows
The precipitated calcium carbonate will deposit in the cracks and seal the opening which in turn reduces the permeability of the concrete.
2.1 Types of Bacteria
-
1.
Bacillus subtilis
-
2.
Bacillus sphaericus
-
3.
Bacillus pasteurii
All of these bacterial species can precipitate calcium carbonate in different quantities and are best suited for the investigation and also nonpathogenic. Out of these three Bacillus pasteurii bacteria have got better calcium carbonate precipitation.
2.2 Objectives
An objective of the current investigation is to understand the durability performance of low-strength (M20) bacterial concrete.
3 Materials and Properties
3.1 Bacterial Source
Bacillus sphaericus bacteria was procured from (MTCC) Microbial Technology Institute and Bacillus, subtilis, and Bacillus pasteurii bacteria are isolated from soil and water source respectively and same has been shown Fig. 1.
4 Experimental Investigation
4.1 Cement
In the present study, the same brand OPC 43 grade cement is used. Different basic experimental investigations were performed to understand the property of cement, and their findings are enumerated in Table 1.
4.2 Aggregates
Coarse and fine aggregates were tested in the laboratory to confirm IS 383-1970 obtained from the nearest source; the baseline test results are shown in Table 2.
4.3 Culturing of Bacteria
The evolution of a single colony of bacteria took place in the research laboratory, while the development of other bacteria in the medium was limited and various chemical formulations were prepared for the media [8, 9] as per Table 3.
4.4 Inoculation of Bacteria
Due to agar, the media became solid once the media had been shifted to Petri dish plates and tubes. Bacteria are inoculated with the aid of a needle, commonly known as nichrome, made of nickel and chromium. Figure 1 shows the growth of the presence and bacteria for Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus pasteurii and Bacillus sphaericus, respectively [9,10,11,12].
4.5 Broth Preparation
Broth preparation required the same nutrients; however, due to the exclusion of agar broth will be in liquid form. Figures 2 and 3 show the broth before bacteria inoculation and the development of bacteria after bacteria inoculation correspondingly [13,14,15,16,17].
4.6 Mix Design
Mix design was made using Indian standard codes the IS 456-2000 and IS 10262-2009, and these codes were used to assess the coarse aggregate, fine aggregate and cement ratios. The found quantities are shown in Table 4.
5 Results and Discussion
Evidence and analysis were presented on various investigations conducted on the specimen. Mainly here slump test, compressive strength, split tensile strength, flexural strength, modulus of elasticity, water absorption and acid attack test results are discussed.
5.1 Slump Test
Slump test was carried out on various M20 grade concretes. The mixes and values obtained are described below. From Table 5, it can be seen that there is no considerable impact on the slump of concrete due to incorporation of bacteria. This is due to no effect of bacteria or cell concentration on concrete as the size of bacteria is very small and no calcium carbonate precipitation is started initially. Hence, bacteria do not affect the workability of concrete.
5.2 Compressive Strength Test
From Fig. 4, variation of compressive strength of concrete with different cell concentrations, 104 to 107 with 3 different bacteria for 28, 56 and 90 days, is shown and it can be observed that as the cell concentration increases the strength of the concrete also increases, especially 106 and 107 cell concentration; a maximum of 37% increase in the compressive strength was observed. This increase in strength is mainly due to the closing of micro-cracks due to microbiological calcite precipitation. Combination of two different bacteria also showed similar characteristics as single inoculation of bacteria.
5.3 Split Tensile Strength
Figure 5 shows variation of splitting tensile strength with different cell concentrations 104 to 107 with 3 different bacteria for 28 days. It can be understood from the figure that there is an increase in the splitting tensile strength of concrete with a maximum of 51% for 106 cell concentration. This is also due to the addition of bacteria and calcite precipitation which sealed the micro-cracks and decreased the week one in the concrete.
5.4 Flexural Strength
From Fig. 6, variation of flexural strength of concrete with different cell concentrations, 104 to 107 with 3 different bacteria for 28 days, can be seen. And here also as cell concentration increased, the strength of the concrete also got increased. But for 104 and 105, a slight increase was observed compared to 106 and 107 where a maximum of 36% increase was observed.
5.5 Modulus of Elasticity
From Fig. 7, variation of modulus of elasticity of concrete with different cell concentrations, 104 to 107 with 3 different bacteria for 28 days, can be seen. And it was observed from the figure that for 106 and 107 bacterial cell concentration modulus of elasticity was more. A maximum of 34% increase was observed with Bacillus sphaericus bacteria for 107 cell concentration.
5.6 Water Absorption Test
Water absorption test was conducted on concrete to understand the permeability characteristics. For testing BS 1881: Part 122 (1983), guidelines are followed and the test results are presented in the graph.
In Fig. 8, water absorption of M20 grade concrete for different cell concentrations with different bacteria is shown. It can be seen that as cell concentration increases permeability decreases which were mainly due to deposition of calcium carbonate precipitation from bacteria in micropores. Also, a maximum of 64% reduction in water absorption was observed in Bacillus pasteurii for 107 bacterial cell concentrations.
5.7 Acid Attack Test
The resistance of concrete cube specimens to acids was found out by conducting an acid attack tests suggested by Murthi and Sivakumar (2008) [18, 19]. The samples were cured in water for 28 days after which they were immersed in 3% H2SO4 and 3% HCl solutions in plastic tubs. After 2 and 4 weeks, the cubes are weighed and compared with initial weight. The results of the experiments are shown in Fig. 8.
In Fig. 9, resistances to the acid attack of M20 grade concrete for different cell concentrations with different bacteria for 2 and 4 weeks are shown. Calcium carbonate deposition at micro-cracks and decrease in permeability of concrete resistance to acid attack increased greatly for 2 weeks to 4 weeks. And here also cell concentration played a very important role, and for 107 cell concentrations resistance was shown up to 45% to acid attack compared to normal concrete for 2 weeks.
5.8 SEM AND XRD analysis
SEM and XRD images of the calcium carbonate deposition in concrete are shown in Figs. 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14; also, it clearly shows that as the cell concentration increases the calcium carbonate count also increases compared to controlled concrete and 106 and 107 bacterial cell concentration displayed a higher range of calcium carbonate which will validate the decrease of permeability and increase in the mechanical properties of bacterial concrete.
5.9 Discussions
In the present scenario of change with respect to advancement in construction sector, bacterial concrete is very much essential also by seeing its mechanical and durability performance, especially increase in compressive strength and decrease in permeability which leads to decrease in corrosion and increase of durability of structure which is required for the present that too without human interventions for any repair.
References
Wiktor V, Jonkers HM (2011) Quantification of crack-healing in novel bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Cement Concr Compos 33(7):763–770
Jonkers HM (2007) Self healing concrete: a biological approach. In: Self healing materials. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 195–204
Jonkers HM, Schlangen E (2008) Development of a bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Proc Int FIB Symp 1:425–430
Khaliq W, Ehsan MB (2016) Crack healing in concrete using various bio influenced self-healing techniques. Constr Build Mater 102: 349–357
Ghosh P, Mandal S, Pal S, Bandyopadhyaya G, Chattopadhyay BD (2006) Development of bioconcrete material using an enrichment culture of novel thermophilic anaerobic bacteria
Achal V, Abhijit M, Sudhakara Reddy M (2010) Microbial concrete: way to enhance the durability of building structures. J Mater Civil Eng 23(6):730–734
Luo M, Qian C-X, Li R-Y (2015) Factors affecting crack repairing capacity of bacteria-based self-healing concrete. Constr Build Mater 87:1–7
Wang J (2013) Self-healing concrete by means of immobilized carbonate precipitating bacteria. PhD diss., Ghent University
Van Breugel K (2007) Is there a market for self-healing cement-based materials. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on self-healing materials, pp 1–9
Jonkers HM, Thijssen A, Muyzer G, Copuroglu O, Schlangen E (2010) Application of bacteria as self-healing agent for the development of sustainable concrete. Ecol Eng 36(2):230–235
Van Tittelboom K, De Belie N, De Muynck W, Verstraete W (2010) Use of bacteria to repair cracks in concrete. Cement Concr Res 40(1): 157–166
De Belie N, De Muynck W (2008) Crack repair in concrete using biodeposition. In: Proceedings of the international conference on concrete repair, rehabilitation and retrofitting (ICCRRR), Cape Town, South Africa, pp 291–292
De Muynck W, Kathelijn C, De Belie N, Verstraete W (2008) Bacterial carbonate precipitation as an alternative surface treatment for concrete. Constr Build Mater 22(5): 875–885
Siddique R, Chahal NK (2011) Effect of ureolytic bacteria on concrete properties. Constr Build Mater 25(10): 3791–3801
Ramakrishnan V, Ramesh KP, Bang SS (2001) Bacterial concrete. Smart Mater 4234:168–176
Achal V, Abhijit M, Sudhakara Reddy M (2011) Effect of calcifying bacteria on permeation properties of concrete structures. J Industr Microbiol Biotech 38(9):1229–1234
Krishnapriya S, Venkatesh Babu DL (2015) Isolation and identification of bacteria to improve the strength of concrete. Microbiological Res 174:48–55
Chahal N, Siddique R, Rajor A (2012) Influence of bacteria on the compressive strength, water absorption and rapid chloride permeability of fly ash concrete. Constr Build Mater 28(1):351–356
Murthi P, Sivakumar V (2008) Studies on the chloride permeability of fly ash and silica fume based ternary blended concrete. Int J Appl Eng Res 3(11):1481–1495
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shashank, B.S., Nagaraja, P.S. (2021). Durability Studies on Low-Strength Bacterial Concrete. In: Biswas, S., Metya, S., Kumar, S., Samui, P. (eds) Advances in Sustainable Construction Materials. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 124. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4590-4_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4590-4_60
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4589-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4590-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)