Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender Quotas and Representation in Politics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook on Economics of Discrimination and Affirmative Action

  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

The controversy over affirmative action policies, quotas, or reservations for historical injustice constitutes the most salient current battlefront in the conflict over the status of social justice. No debate has been more protracted or more riddled with complex issues. This chapter addresses three themes about the significance of gender in implementing quotas: The first is gender quotas as a form of affirmative action that reverse discrimination and increase women’s participation in political democracy. The second relates to how female legislators become equal players in the policymaking process through gender quotas. The third is the challenges of intersectionality and the gradual withdrawal of the state from some of these policies. The chapter relies upon various significant findings regarding quotas and affirmative action by addressing these themes. It argues that to make this strategy successful, the context in which quotas are debated and implemented has to be explored. The review of research suggests that quotas for women are broadly effective at achieving political equality and opening new avenues for representation. However, political institutions are gendered; therefore, the adoption of gender quotas is linked to the implementation processes. Even while women have access to quota seats, informal norms dilute the impact of the implementation of gender quotas. Breaking through male-dominated institutions often requires the presence of laws attacking gender discrimination. A closer look at explanatory accounts suggest that it might be helpful to encourage women’s participation in many forms of associations and grassroots organizations that can impact their role in decision-making in politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam K (1997) The politics of redress: south African style affirmative action. J Mod Afr Stud 35(2):231–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander A, Jalazai F (2020) Symbolic empowerment and female heads of states and government: a global, multilevel analysis. Polit Groups Ident 8(1):1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E (2010) The imperative of integration. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi CL (1999) Women, policy and politics. The construction of policy problems. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bacchi CL (2006) Arguing for and against quotas: theoretical issues. In: Dahlerup D (ed) Women, quota and politics. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 32–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldez L (2002) Why Women Protest: Women’s Movements in Chile. Cambridge, UK: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen WG, Bok D (1998) The shape of the river: long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions. Princeton Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Banaszak LA (2010) The women’s movement inside and outside the state. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beamen L, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P (2012) Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: a policy experiment in India. Science 335(6068):582–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamen L, Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P (2009) Power women: quotas and affirmative action. Does exposure reduce bias? Q J Econ 124:1497–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonomi G, Brosio G, Di Tommaso M (2013) The impact of gender quotas on votes for women candidates. Evidence from Italy. Fem Econ 19:48–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bush S (2011) International politics and the spread of quotas for women in legislatures. Int Organ 65(1):103–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler J (1992) Feminists theorise the political. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brule R (2020) Women, power, and property: the paradox of gender equality laws in India. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney EM (1979) Supermadre: women in politics in Latin America. Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas, Austin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Craske N (1999) Women and politics in Latin America. Polity, Cambridge Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw K (1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev 43(6):1241–1299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darhour H, Dahlerup D (2013) Sustainable representation of women through gender quotas. A decade’s experience in Morocco. Women’s Stud Int Forum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.04.008

  • Dahlerup DZ Hilal NK, Kandawasvika-Nhundu R (2013) Atlas of electoral gendered quotas. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance, IDEA, Inter-Parliamentary Union, and Stockholm University. Downloaded 18 Feb 2021

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlerup D (ed) (2007) Women, quota and politics. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Devlin C, Elgie R (2008) The effect of increased women’s participation in parliament, the case of Rwanda. Parliam Aff 61(2):237–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande A (2013) Affirmative action in India. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon K, Swiss ML, Viterna J (2012) Resolving the democracy paradox: democratisation and women’s legislative representation in developing nations 1975–2009. Am Sociol Rev 77(3):380–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel (1980) Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972–77 (C. Gordon. ed). Harvester, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Franceschet S, Piscopo JM (2008) Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation: lessons from Argentina. Polit Gend 4(3):393–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy (1998) Social justice in the age of identity politics: Redistribution, recognition, participation, WZB Discussion Paper, No. FS I 98–108, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/44061/1/269802959.pdf

  • Geisel B, Hust E (2005) Democratic mobilisation through quotas: experiences in India and Germany. Commonw Comp Polit 43(2):222–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisler G (2000) “Parliament is another terrain of struggle”: Women, men and politics in South Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies, 38(4):616–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilardi F (2015) The temporary importance of role models for women’s political representation. Am J Polit Sci 59(4):957–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray T (2003) Electoral gender quotas: lessons from Argentina and Chile. Bull Lat Am Res 22:52–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Htun M (2002) Puzzles of women’s rights in Brazil. Soc Res 69(3):733–751. https://www.muse.jhu.edu/article/558530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Htun M (2003) Women and democracy. In: Dominguez JI, Shifter M (eds) Constructing democratic governance in Latin America. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Htun M, Power TJ (2006) Gender, parties and support for equal rights in the Brazilian congress. Latin Am Polit Soc 48(4):83–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Htun M, Weldon SL (2010) When do governments promote women’s rights? A framework for the comparative analysis of sex equality policy. Perspect Polit 8(1):207–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones M (1997) Legislator gender and legislator policy priorities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives. Policy Studies Journal 25(4):613–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittelson MC, Schwindt-Bayer LA (eds) (2012) The gendered effects of electoral institutions: political engagement and participation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Krook ML (2009) Quotas for women in politics: gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. Oxford University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krook ML, Childs S (eds) (2015) Women, gender and politics: a reader. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar M (2005) Politicizing gender in discourse: feminist critical discourse analysis as political perspective and praxis. In: Lazar M (ed) Feminist critical discourse analysis. Macmillan Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901_1

  • Lister R (2003) Citizenship: feminist perspectives. Macmillan, Palgrave

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S-JS, Banaszak LA (2017) Do government positions held by women matter? Polit Gend 13(1):132–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge J (1999) Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent yes. J Polit 61:628–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel LG (2008) Political representation and gender in Brazil: quotas for women and their impact. Bull Lat Am Res 27:197–2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier P (2008) A gender gap not closed by quotas. Int Fem J Polit 10:329–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux M (2001) Women’s movements in international perspective: Latin America and beyond. Palgrave, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa S (2020) Shaheen Bagh and the Idea of India. Writings on a movement for justice, liberty, and equality. Speaking Tiger Books LLP,125-A, Shahpur Jat, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel T (1973) Equal treatment and compensatory discrimination. Philos Public Aff 2(4):348–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir L, McClurg SD (2015) How institutions affect gender gaps in public opinion expression. Public Opin Q 79(2):544–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novi Rusnarty Usu. (2010). Affirmative action in Indonesia: the Gender Quota system in the 2004 and 2009 elections, ASIA ONLINE. Downloaded https://www.catalogue.nla.gov.au/Record/4979285 on 19 February 2021

  • Parpart J, Connelly P, Barriteau E (2000) Theoretical perspectives on gender and development. The International Development Research Centre, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Paxton P, Hughes MM, Barnes TD (2020) Women, politics and power: a global perspective. Rowman and Littlefield, Maryland, USA and London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin H (1967) The concept of representation. The University of California Press, Berkeley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Piscopo JM (2011) Do women represent women? Gender and policy in Argentina and Mexico, Phd Thesis, University of California, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick S (1995) Maternal thinking. Towards a politics of peace. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawer M, Tremblay M, Trimble L (2006) Representing women in parliament. A comparative study. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sawer M (2002) The representation of women in Australia: meaning and make-believe. In: Ross K (ed) Women, politics and change. Oxford University Press, New York, 5–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwindt-Bayer LA (2006) Still supermadres? Gender and policy priorities of Latin American legislators. Am J Polit Sci 50(3):570–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma K (1998) Power vs. representation: feminist dilemmas, ambivalent state and the debate on reservation for women in India. Occasional paper no 28. CWDS, Delhi, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Susan F, Jennifer M. Piscopo (2008) Gender Quotas and Women’s Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics and Gender, 4(03): 393–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamerius K (1995) Sex, gender and leadership in the representation of women. In: Georgina-Lahti D, Kelly RM (eds) Gender, power and leadership, and governance. Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JJ (1973) Preferential hiring. Philos Public Aff 2:364–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay M (ed) (2008) Women and legislative representation: electoral systems, political parties, and sex quotas. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay M (2007) Democracy, representation, and women: a comparative analysis. Democratization 14(4):533–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340701398261

  • Tripp AM, Kang A (2008) The global impact of quotas on the fast track to increased female legislative representation. Comp Polit Stud 41(3):338–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006297342

  • Tronto J (1993) Moral boundaries. Routledge, Great Britain

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull B (2019) Quotas as opportunities and obstacles: revisiting gender quotas in India. Polit Gend 17:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Viterna J, Fallon K (2008) Democratization, women’s movements, and the gender equitable states: a framework for comparison. Am Sociol Rev 73(4):668–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma V (2012) Non-discrimination and equality. Contesting boundaries of social justice in India. Routledge, London. (2017 Paperback edition for South Asia Routledge)

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma, Vidhu (2002) Malaysia: State and Civil Society in Transition. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Colorado, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon SL (2002) Beyond bodies: institutional sources of representation for women in democratic policymaking. J Polit 64(4):1153–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young I (1990) Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Zettererg P (2009) Do gender quotas foster women’s political engagement? Lessons from Latin America. Polit Res Q 62(4):715–730

    Google Scholar 

Reports

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Political Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India

    Vidhu Verma

Authors
  1. Vidhu Verma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, New Delhi, India

    Ashwini Deshpande

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Verma, V. (2022). Gender Quotas and Representation in Politics. In: Deshpande, A. (eds) Handbook on Economics of Discrimination and Affirmative Action. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4016-9_43-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4016-9_43-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-33-4016-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-33-4016-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation