Abstract
Philosophy of science is a fairly new discipline. Many of the problems in this discipline were discussed by both Muslim and Western philosophers alike without putting these issues into a uniform body of knowledge identifying it as a new field with its specific problems, theories and proper methodology. After the rise of a new philosophical approach in the West, however, some more scientific issues were gathered under the aegis of this name and these were introduced to replace the classical metaphysical approach in philosophy. This new philosophical movement is known as ‘logical atomism’. Evaluating this new approach from an Islamic perspective, we see that it eliminates all kinds of metaphysics in the first place and introduces instead a new discipline that can be called ‘scientific metaphysics’ or ‘meta-philosophical scientism’. Secondly, this philosophical approach attempts to destroy the main perspective of other scientific traditions. We are then forced either to accept this position and thus move within its limits of reasoning or develop a totally new alternative to defend cogently our own perspective.
This article pursues the second alternative to establish afresh a philosophy of science from an Islamic perspective, which is also acceptable by other scientific approaches. To do that, we shall try to abstract ourselves from specific tenets of our tradition without losing its main ground and then try to reach universal characteristics of science that are applicable in all traditions. As history of science instructs, every science has its specific subject matter, method, theories and accumulation of discoveries. We need to identify then the subject matter of philosophy of science, its proper method, theories thus far accumulated and its discoveries. Since science is primarily a knowledge acquisition activity, its essence is imbedded in epistemology which makes it mainly a cognitive activity. Consequently, in this endeavour, our method should also be epistemological. Hopefully, this article exposes philosophy of science as a new discipline from the Islamic perspective with an epistemological approach.
The research involved in this paper was funded by the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TUBA).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For a detailed analysis of this process, see Açıkgenç (2014), especially Chapter 1.
- 2.
Gender indications are by the present writer.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
For a detailed analysis of these concepts and the way they are deduced epistemologically, see Açıkgenç (2014), pp. 32–58.
- 6.
For a detailed exposition of these concepts, see Açıkgenç (1996), pp. 86–92.
- 7.
For example, see Nursi (1996), pp. 251–252.
References
Açıkgenç, A. (1996). Islamic science: Towards a definition. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.
Açıkgenç, A. (2013). The manifestation of scientific cultures: A sociophilosophical study of Islamic scientific tradition. In M. Kuhnand & K. Okamoto (Eds.), Spatial social thought: Local knowledge in global science encounters (pp. 217–240). Stuttgart: Ibidem Verlag.
Açıkgenç, A. (2014). Islamic scientific tradition in history. Kuala Lumpur: IKIM.
Barber, B. (1952). Science and the social order. New York: The Free Press.
Barber, B. (1972). The sociology of science. In D. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social sciences. New York: The Macmillan Company and the Free Press.
Boyd, R. et al. (Eds.). (1991). The philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.
Nursi, B. (1992). The words (trans: Sükran Vahide). Istanbul: Sözler Nesriyat.
Nursi, B. (1996). Sözler in nursi’s collected works: Risâle-i Nur Külliyâtı (Vol. 2). Istanbul: Nesil Basım-Yayın, 2 volumes.
Rosenthal, F. (1970). Knowledge triumphant: The concept of knowledge in medieval Islam. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Snyder, L. J. (2012). William Whewell. In E. N. Zalta (Ed), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012 edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/whewell/. Accessed 15 May 2015.
Sorokin, P. (1937–1941). Social and cultural dynamics. New York: American Book Co, 4 volumes.
Thompson, M. (2001). Philosophy of science. London: Hodder Headline Ltd.
Whewell, W. (1847). The philosophy of the inductive sciences, founded upon their history (Vol. 1, 2nd edn). London: John W. Parker, 2 volumes.
Whewell, W. (1896). History of the inductive sciences, from the earliest to the present time (Vol. 2). London: John W. Parker, 3 volumes.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Açıkgenç, A. (2016). Philosophy of Science in Epistemological Perspective. In: Kamali, M., Bakar, O., Batchelor, DF., Hashim, R. (eds) Islamic Perspectives on Science and Technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-778-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-778-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-777-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-778-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)