Skip to main content

Effect of Ultrasound Treatment on the Evolution of Solubility of Milk Protein Concentrate Powder

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Ultrasonics and Sonochemistry
  • 318 Accesses

Abstract

Low-frequency ultrasound has long been used to break and dissociate insoluble particles at a molecular level. In solution, power ultrasound of approximately 20 kHz generates sufficient shear to break agglomerates apart through acoustic cavitation, and this phenomenon has been reviewed in the context of powder solubility. Dairy powders are a dehydrated nonperishable globally important food commodity providing nutrition in both developed and developing regions around the world. The ability to rehydrate powders for use as food ingredients differs depending on the composition, processing history, and handling conditions with certain powders being more difficult to solubilize than others. In this chapter we focus mainly on the easily hydrated whey protein-based powders and the often more difficult powders to solubilize in the form of milk protein concentrates. Taking frequency into account, we discuss the use of high-power ultrasound as a method to aid powder solubilization through particle dissociation. Ultrasound as a technology is yet to be adopted commercially as a processing tool by the food-manufacturing industry, and limitations associated with the technique including equipment design are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tamime AY (ed) (2009) Dried milk products. Dairy powders and concentrated milk products. Blackwell, Oxford, UK, pp 231–245

    Google Scholar 

  2. Singh H, Newstead DF (1992) Aspects of proteins in milk powder manufacture. In: Fox PF (ed) Advanced dairy chemistry, vol 1, 2nd edn, Proteins. Elsevier, New York, pp 735–765

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fang Y, Selomulya C, Ainsworth S, Palmer M, Chen XD (2011) On quantifying the dissolution behavior of milk protein concentrate. Food Hydrocoll 25:503–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaiani C, Schuck P, Scher J, Desobry S, Banon S (2007) Dairy powder rehydration: influence of protein state, incorporation mode, and agglomeration. J Dairy Sci 90:570–581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anema SG, Pinder DN, Hunter RJ, Hemar Y (2006) Effects of storage temperature on the solubility of milk protein concentrate (MPC85). Food Hydrocoll 20:386–393

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anema SG, Li YM (2003) Association of denatured whey proteins with casein micelles in heated reconstituted skim milk and its effect on casein micelle size. J Dairy Res 70:73–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Singh H (2007) Interactions of milk proteins during the manufacture of milk powders. Lait 87:413–423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Havea P (2006) Protein interactions in milk protein concentrate powders. Int Dairy J 16:415–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kher A, Udabage P, McKinnon I, McNaughton D, Augustin MA (2007) FTIR investigation of spray-dried milk protein concentrate powders. Vib Spectrosc 44:375–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pavlovskaya G, McClements DJ, Povey MJW (1992) Ultrasonic investigation of aqueous-solutions of a globular protein. Food Hydrocoll 6:253–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Suzuki N, Tamura Y, Mihashi K (1996) Compressibility and specific volume of actin decrease upon G to F transformation. Biochim Biophys Acta-Protein Struct Mol Enzymol 1292:265–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zwijgers A (1992) Outline of milk protein concentrate. Int Food Ingredients 3:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  13. Povey MJW (1998) Ultrasonics of food. Contemp Phys 39:467–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mason TJ (1998) Power ultrasound in food processing – the way forward. In: Povey MJW, Mason TJ (eds) Ultrasound in food processing. Blackie Academic %26 Professional, London, pp 105–126

    Google Scholar 

  15. Earnshaw RG (1998) Ultrasound: a new opportunity for food preservation. In: Povey MJW, Mason TJ (eds) Ultrasound in food processing. Blackie Academic %26 Professional, London, pp 183–192

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hem SL (1967) The effect of ultrasonic vibrations on crystallization processes. Ultrasonics 5:202–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Laborde JL, Bouyer C, Caltagirone JP, Gerard A (1998) Acoustic bubble cavitation at low frequencies. Ultrasonics 36:589–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mizrach A (2008) Ultrasonic technology for quality evaluation of fresh fruit and vegetables in pre- and postharvest processes. Postharvest Biol Technol 48:315–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Coupland JN (2004) Low intensity ultrasound. Food Res Int 37:537–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Curt C (1994) Evaluation of emulsion stability – principle, applications, advantages and drawbacks. Sciences Des Aliments 14:699–724

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Demirdoven A, Baysal T (2009) The use of ultrasound and combined technologies in food preservation. Food Rev Intl 25:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jafari SM, He YH, Bhandari B (2007) Role of powder particle size on the encapsulation efficiency of oils during spray drying. Drying Technol 25:1081–1090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiranek V, Grbin P, Yap A, Barnes M, Bates D (2008) High power ultrasonics as a novel tool offering new opportunities for managing wine microbiology. Biotechnol Lett 30:1–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vilkhu K, Mawson R, Simons L, Bates D (2008) Applications and opportunities for ultrasound assisted extraction in the food industry – a review. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 9:161–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Zheng L, Sun DW (2006) Innovative applications of power ultrasound during food freezing processes – a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 17:16–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jambrak AR, Mason TJ, Lelas V, Herceg Z, Herceg IL (2008) Effect of ultrasound treatment on solubility and foaming properties of whey protein suspensions. J Food Eng 86:281–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Knorr D, Zenker M, Heinz V, Lee DU (2004) Applications and ultrasonics in food potential of processing. Trends Food Sci Technol 15:261–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zisu B, Bhaskaracharya R, Kentish S, Ashokkumar M (2010) Ultrasonic processing of dairy systems in large scale reactors. Ultrason Sonochem 17:1075–1081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ashokkumar M, Kentish SE, Lee J, Zisu B, Palmer M, Augustin MA (2009) Processing of dairy ingredients by ultra-sonication, PCT International Application WO 2009079691 A1

    Google Scholar 

  30. Muthupandian A, Bhaskaracharya R, Kentish S, Lee J, Palmer M, Zisu B (2010) The ultrasonic processing of dairy products –an overview. Dairy Sci Technol 90:147–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Leong T, Johansson L, Juliano P, Mawson R, McArthur S, Manasseh R (2014) Design parameters for the separation of fat from natural whole milk in an ultrasonic litre-scale vessel. Ultrason Sonochem 21:1289–1298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Dincer TD, Zisu B, Vallet CGMR, Jayasena V, Palmer M, Weeks M (2014) Sonocrystallisation of lactose in aqueous system. Int Dairy J 35:43–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Koh LLA, Chandrapala J, Zisu B, Martin GJO, Kentish SE, Ashokkumar M (2014) A comparison of the effectiveness of sonication, high shear mixing and homogenisation on improving the heat stability of whey protein solutions. Food Bioprocess Technol 7:556–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McCarthy NA, Kelly PM, Maher PG, Fenelon M (2014) Dissolution of milk protein concentrate (MPC) powders by ultrasonication. J Food Eng 126:142–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Contamine RF, Wilhelm AM, Berlan J, Delmas H (1995) Power measurement in sonochemistry. Ultrason Sonochem 2:S43–S47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kimura T, Sakamoto T, Leveque JM, Sohmiya H, Fujita M, Ikeda S, Ando T (1996) Standardization of ultrasonic power for sonochemical reaction. Ultrason Sonochem 3:S157–S161

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zisu B, Lee J, Chandrapala J, Bhaskaracharya R, Palmer M, Kentish SE, Ashokkumar M (2011) Effect of ultrasound on the physical and functional properties of reconstituted whey protein powders. J Dairy Res 78:226–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Onwulata CI, Konstance RP, Tomasula PM (2002) Viscous properties of microparticulated dairy proteins and sucrose. J Dairy Sci 85:1677–1683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kresic G, Lelas V, Jambrak AR, Herceg Z, Brncic SR (2008) Influence of novel food processing technologies on the rheological and thermophysical properties of whey proteins. J Food Eng 87:64–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mistry VV, Pulgar JB (1996) Physical and storage properties of high milk protein powder. Int Dairy J 6:195–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. McKenna AB (2000) Effect of processing and storage on the reconstitution properties of whole milk and ultrafiltered skim milk powders. Institute of Food Nutrition and Human Health, no. Palmerston North, Massey University

    Google Scholar 

  42. Thomas MEC, Scher J, Desobry-Banon S, Desobry S (2004) Milk powders ageing: effect on physical and functional properties. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 44:297–322

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Birchal VS, Passos ML, Wildhagen GRS, Mujumdar AS (2005) Effect of spray-dryer operating variables on the whole milk powder quality. Drying Technol 23:611–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tamime AY (2007) Structure of dairy products. Blackwell, Oxford, xvi + 288 pp

    Google Scholar 

  45. Zisu B, Chandrapala J (2015) High power ultrasound processing in milk and dairy products. In: Datta N, Tomasula P (eds) Emerging dairy processing technologies: opportunities for the dairy industry. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester/Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  46. McKenna AB, Lloyd RJ, Munro PA, Singh H (1999) Microstructure of whole milk powder and of insolubles detected by powder functional testing. Scanning 21:305–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mimouni A, Deeth HC, Whittaker AK, Gidley MJ, Bhandari BR (2009) Rehydration process of milk protein concentrate powder monitored by static light scattering. Food Hydrocoll 23:1958–1965

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Yanjun S, Jianhang C, Shuwen Z, Hongjuan L, Jing L, Lu L, Uluko H, Yanling S, Wenming C, Wupeng G, Jiaping L (2014) Effect of power ultrasound pre-treatment on the physical and functional properties of reconstituted milk protein concentrate. J Food Eng 124:11–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Mistry VV, Hassan HN (1991) Delactosed, high milk protein powder. 2. Physical and functional properties. J Dairy Sci 74:3716–3723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bhesh Bhandari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bhandari, B., Zisu, B. (2015). Effect of Ultrasound Treatment on the Evolution of Solubility of Milk Protein Concentrate Powder. In: Ashokkumar, M. (eds) Handbook of Ultrasonics and Sonochemistry. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-470-2_70-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-470-2_70-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-287-470-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Chemistry and Mat. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Chemistry, Materials and Physics

Publish with us

Policies and ethics