Abstract
This chapter explores the conceptual approaches to research integrity in Austria and Canada, and the governance structures that support those approaches.
In Austria, research integrity is synonymous with good scientific practice. Universities and other research institutions publish their own definitions, which vary in content, clarity and binding force. The Austrian Agency for Research Integrity, the main body responsible for promoting research integrity, is an independent association of research-related organizations. The Agency’s Commission on Research Integrity conducts independent investigations of alleged research misconduct. The Agency is now creating a set of national guidelines for research integrity, and offers educational workshops and seminars to foster a critical approach to research. Training in good scientific practice is almost unavailable at Austrian universities.
In contrast, research integrity in Canada is defined to be one part of responsible conduct of research, encompassing all aspects of research from funding applications to dissemination of results. The main guidance document is the Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research, developed by Canada’s three main research funding agencies. They also established a Secretariat and Panel on Responsible Conduct of Research to interpret the RCR Framework and advise the agency Presidents of appropriate recourse in cases of breach. Investigations are conducted by academic institutions. Researchers, institutions and the funding agencies share responsibility for responsible conduct of research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austrian Agency for Research Integrity: Guidelines on good scientific practice (as of April 2015). http://www.oeawi.at/downloads/Richtlinien_OeAWI_final_April%02015_e.pdf. Accessed July 6, 2015.
Austrian Agency for Research Integrity: Statutes. http://www.oeawi.at/en/statutes.html. Accessed January 26, 2015.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (2011). Tri-agency framework: Responsible conduct of research. http://rcr.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/framework-cadre/. Accessed November 10, 2014.
Council of Canadian Academies (2010). Honesty, accountability and trust: Fostering research integrity in Canada. http://www.scienceadvice.ca/en/assessments/completed/research-integrity.aspx. Accessed February 13, 2015.
Medical Research Council of Canada, Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. (1994). Integrity in research and scholarship.
Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research. (2011). Course on research ethics (CORE). http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/eng/education/tutorial-didacticiel/. Accessed November 10, 2014.
Stockley, D., Egan, R., Lam, C., & Kinderman, L. (2013). Evaluating the efficacy of the education and training program for the Tri-Council Policy Statement (TCPS 2). Report prepared for the Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research, Ottawa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada
About this entry
Cite this entry
Foeger, N., Zimmerman, S. (2015). Research Integrity: Perspectives from Austria and Canada. In: Bretag, T. (eds) Handbook of Academic Integrity. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_41-2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_41-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-079-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education
Publish with us
Chapter history
-
Latest
Research Integrity: Perspectives from Austria and Canada- Published:
- 19 November 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_41-2
-
Original
Research Integrity: Perspectives from Austria and Canada- Published:
- 29 June 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_41-1