Abstract
In the current chapter, we are interested in ways of examining the general timing properties of L2 speech (with a focus on how these properties relate to the perception of foreign accent). We consider several novel measures that index the temporal patterns of speech that occur across a hierarchy of time scales. In our view, considering multiple time scales is important since a key property of speech energy is that it fluctuates and correlates across different grain-sizes. Furthermore, whereas traditional indices of L2 speech rhythm are based on measuring speech timing as it relates to the structural aspects of a language (e.g., syllable composition, segmental inventories), the measures we review relate more to aspects of the speech production style of the L2 talker.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh University Press.
Abney, D. H., Paxton, A., Dale, R., & Kello, C. T. (2014). Complexity matching in dyadic conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(6), 2304.
Abney, D. H., Kello, C. T., & Warlaumont, A. S. (2015). Production and convergence of multiscale clustering in speech. Ecological Psychology, 27(3), 222–235.
Abney, D. H., Kello, C. T., & Balasubramaniam, R. (2017). Introduction and application of the multiscale coefficient of variation analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 49(5), 1571–1581.
Allan, D. W. (1966). Statistics of atomic frequency standards. Proceedings of the IEEE, 54(2), 221–230.
Araùjo, J., Flanagan, S., Castro-Caldas, A., & Goswami, U. (2018). The temporal modulation structure of illiterate versus literate adult speech. PLoS One, 13(10), e0205224.
Aubanel, V., Cooke, M., Davis, C., & Kim, J. (2018). Temporal factors in cochlea-scaled entropy and intensity-based intelligibility predictions. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(6), EL443–EL448.
Bohn, O.-S., & Flege, J. E. (1992). The production of new and similar vowels by adult German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(02), 131–158.
Cummins, F. (2002). Speech rhythm and rhythmic taxonomy. In The proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002, International Conference, Aix-en-Provence, France, April 11–13, 2002.
Dauer, R. M. (1983). Stress-timing and syllable-timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 51–62.
Davis, C., & Kim, J. (2018). Characterizing rhythm differences between strong and weak accented L2 speech. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2018 (pp. 2568–2572).
Davis, C., & Kim, J. (2019). Temporal variability in strong versus weak foreign accented speech. In Proceedings of ICPhS 2019.
Dellwo, V. (2006). Rhythm and speech rate: A variation coefficient for ∆C. In Language and language-processing (pp. 231–241).
Dellwo, V., & Wagner, P. (2003). Relations between language rhythm and speech rate. In Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences (pp. 471–474). Barcelona.
Dellwo, V., Steiner, I., Aschenberner, B., Dankovičová, J., & Wagner, P. (2004). The BonnTempo-Corpus and BonnTempo-Tools: A database for the study of speech rhythm and rate. In Proceedings of the 8th ICSLP, Jeju Island, Korea.
Falk, S., & Kello, C. T. (2017). Hierarchical organization in the temporal structure of infant-direct speech and song. Cognition, 163, 80–86.
Fernald, A., Taeschner, T., Dunn, J., Papousek, M., de Boysson-Bardies, B., & Fukui, I. (1989). A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers’ and fathers’ speech to preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 16(3), 477–501.
Fuchs, R. (2016). Speech rhythm in varieties of English. In Speech rhythm in varieties of English (pp. 87–102). Springer.
Fuchs, R. (2014). Integrating variability in loudness and duration in a multidimensional model of speech rhythm: Evidence from Indian English and British English. In N. Campbell, D. Gibbon & D. Hirst (Eds.), Social and Linguistic Speech Prosody. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2014, Dublin, Ireland (pp. 290–294).
Fuchs, R., & Maxwell, O. (2016). The effects of mp3 compression on acoustic measurements of fundamental frequency and pitch range. In Speech Prosody 2016, Boston, USA (pp. 523–527).
Fuchs, R., & Wunder, E. M. (2015). A sonority-based account of speech rhythm in Chinese learners of English. In U. Gut, R. Fuchs & E.-M. Wunder (Eds.), Universal or diverse paths to English phonology. Topics in English Linguistics [TiEL] (Vol. 86, pp. 165–184).
Grabe, E., & Low, E. L. (2002). Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Papers in laboratory phonology (Vol. 7, pp. 515–546).
Kawase, S., Kim, J., & Davis, C. (2016a). The relative contributions of duration and amplitude to the perception of Japanese-accented English as a Function of L2 Experience. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology (pp. 81–84).
Kawase, S., Kim, J., & Davis, C. (2016b). The influence of second language experience on Japanese-accented English rhythm. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Speech Prosody 2016b, Boston, USA (pp. 746–750).
Kello, C. T., Bella, S. D., Médé, B., & Balasubramaniam, R. (2017). Hierarchical temporal structure in music, speech and animal vocalizations: Jazz is like a conversation, humpbacks sing like hermit thrushes. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 14(135), 20170231.
Kewley-Port, D., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Aikawa, K. (1996). Intelligibility and acoustic correlates of Japanese accented English vowels. Presented at the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (Vol. 96, pp. 450–453).
Kim, J., Davis, C., & Cutler, A. (2008). Perceptual tests of rhythmic similarity: II. Syllable rhythm. Language and Speech, 51(4), 343–359.
Knight, R. A. (2011). Assessing the temporal reliability of rhythm metrics. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 41(3), 271–281.
Kohler, K. J. (2009). Rhythm in speech and language. Phonetica, 66(1–2), 29–45.
Leong, V. (2012). Prosodic rhythm in the speech amplitude envelope: Amplitude modulation phase hierarchies (AMPHs) and AMPH models. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Leong, V., Kalashnikova, M., Burnham, D., & Goswami, U. (2017). The temporal modulation structure of infant-directed speech. Open Mind, 1(2), 79–90.
Liberman, M., & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(2), 249–336.
Low, E. L. (1998). Prosodic prominence in Singapore English. University of Cambridge.
Low, E. L., Grabe, E., & Nolan, F. (2000). Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language and Speech, 43(4), 377–401.
Munro, M. J. (1995). Nonsegmental factors in foreign accent: Ratings of filtered speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(1), 17–34.
Ordin, M., & Polyanskaya, L. (2015). Acquisition of speech rhythm in a second language by learners with rhythmically different native languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 533–544.
Polyanskaya, L., Ordin, M., & Busa, M. G. (2017). Relative salience of speech rhythm and speech rate on perceived foreign accent in a second language. Language and Speech, 60(3), 333–355.
Ramirez-, A. G., Médé, B., & Kello, C. T. (2018). Complexity matching in speech: Effects of speaking rate and naturalness. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 111, 175–179.
Ramus, F., Nespor, M., & Mehler, J. (1999). Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. Cognition, 73, 265–292.
Rathcke, T. V., & Smith, R. H. (2015). Speech timing and linguistic rhythm: On the acoustic bases of rhythm typologies. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(5), 2834–2845.
Sereno, J., Lammers, L., & Jongman, A. (2016). The relative contribution of segments and intonation to the perception of foreign-accented speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(2), 303–322.
Stilp, C. E., & Kluender, K. R. (2010). Cochlea-scaled entropy, not consonants, vowels, or time, best predicts speech intelligibility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(27), 12387–12392.
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 1–30.
Weinberger, S. (2015). Speech accent archive. George Mason University. Retrieved from http://accent.gmu.edu
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Victoria Leong for her tutorial on conducting the S-AMPH analysis and acknowledge the support of an Australian Research Council grant DP150104600.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davis, C., Kim, J. (2023). Novel Methods for Characterising L2 Speech Rhythm. In: Fuchs, R. (eds) Speech Rhythm in Learner and Second Language Varieties of English. Prosody, Phonology and Phonetics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8940-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8940-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8939-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8940-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)