Skip to main content

De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unpacking the Death Penalty in ASEAN

Abstract

While there appears to be a movement decidedly towards the universal abolition of capital punishment, ASEAN seems to be bucking the trend with only two of its Member-States currently abolitionists de jure. This paper examines anew the Cambodian and Philippine experiences of abolition, both the historical contexts as well as the domestic and international factors influencing them. In addition, this chapter discusses the challenges still faced by the two countries given that even while classified as abolitionist, the situations in both Cambodia and the Philippines are not unreservedly ideal—Cambodia has not ratified the Second Optional Protocol and the Philippine government’s recent authoritarian turn has seen an intensified campaign to reimpose capital punishment through legislation. The chapter concludes by conceding that while neither can be considered model abolitionist States and despite the persistence of imperfect situations, lessons can still be learned from their experiences such as the superiority of constitutional proscriptions. Hopefully, the notion that capital punishment is deeply entrenched, intractable, and necessary in the legal systems of ASEAN Member-States can soon be dispelled as fallacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam (ECPM, 2020).

  2. 2.

    Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam (ECPM 2020).

  3. 3.

    ADPAN, in collaboration with the Advocates for Human Rights (TAHR), Capital Punishment Justice Project (CPJP), Ensemble Contre La Peine De Mort (ECPM), Harm Reduction International (HRI), World Coalition against the Death Penalty (WCADP), Eleos Justice, Monash University, and Malaysian against Death Penalty & Torture (MADPET) (Anti-Death Penalty Asia Network et al., 2021, p. 2).

  4. 4.

    In June 2022, the Malaysian government announced a shift in policy in that it will abolish capital punishment in the country by substituting mandatory death penalty in relation to a substantial number of crimes with alternative non-lethal sentences (UNOHCHR, 2022). This is a positive development that hopefully will lead to the Malaysian Parliament passing legislation institutionalising the same.

  5. 5.

    “SECTION 1. The imposition of the penalty of death is hereby prohibited. Accordingly, Republic Act No. Eight Thousand One Hundred Seventy-Seven (R.A. No. 8177), otherwise known as the Act Designating Death by Lethal Injection is hereby repealed, Republic Act No. Seven Thousand Six Hundred Fifty-Nine (R.A. No. 7659), otherwise known as the Death Penalty Law, and all other laws, executive orders and decrees, insofar as they impose the death penalty are hereby repealed or amended accordingly” (Philippine Republic Act No. 9346, Sect. 1).

References

Books and Articles

Legal Sources and Materials

  • Bayan (Bagong Alyansang Makabayan) v. Zamora, 342 SCRA 449 (Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines), G.R. No. 138570 (10 October 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Committee. (2019). General Comment No. 36: Article 6: Right to Life (2019 September 3). U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/GC/36. https://undocs.org/CCPR/C/GC/36. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • Kingdom of Cambodia. Constitution of the Kingdom of Cambodia (1993) [1993 Cambodian Constitution] (unofficial translated version supervised by the Constitutional Council, October 2015). https://www.ccc.gov.kh/datapublic/subdata/Constitution%20of%20the%20Kingdom%20of%20Cambodia.pdf. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • People v. Echegaray, 267 SCRA 682 (Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines), G.R. No. 117472 (7 February 1997) (resolution of motion for reconsideration).

    Google Scholar 

  • People v. Mateo, 433 SCRA 640 (Supreme Court of the Republic of the Philippines), G.R. Nos. 147678–87 (7 July 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of the Philippines, 1987 Constitution [1987 Philippine Constitution]. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/constitutions/1987-constitution/. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • Republic of the Philippines, Commission on Human Rights [Philippine CHR]. (2017). Advisory on the Validity of the Philippines’ Ratification of the Second Optional Protocol. CHR (V) A2020–017. https://chr.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/07082020_Advisory_on_Ratification-Death-Penalty.pdf. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • Republic of the Philippines, Constitutional Commission of 1986 [1986 Philippine Constitutional Commission]. (1986). Record of the Constitutional Commission [R.C.C.]: Proceedings and Debates, Volume 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of the Philippines, House of Representatives, Congressional Record [Philippine Congressional Record]. (2006). Congressional Record: Vol. 13, No. 67, 13th Congress, 2nd Regular Session (6 June 2006). https://hrep-website.s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/legisdocs/congrec/13th/2nd/2RS-67.pdf. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • Republic of the Philippines, House of Representatives, House Bill No. 1 [Philippine House Bill No. 1]. (2016). House Bill No. 1: An Act Imposing the Death Penalty on Certain Heinous Crimes, Repealing for the Purpose Republic Act No. 9346, Entitled “An Act Prohibiting the Imposition of Death Penalty in the Philippines” and Amending Act No. 3815, as Amended, Otherwise Known as the “Revised Penal Code”, and Other Special Penal Laws, House Bill No. 1, 17th Congress, 1st Reg. Session (2016). https://hrep-website.s3.ap-southeast-1.amazonaws.com/legisdocs/basic_17/HB00001.pdf. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • Republic of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 7659 [Philippine Republic Act No. 7659]. (1993). An Act to Impose the Death Penalty on Certain Heinous Crimes, Amending for That Purpose the Revised Penal Code, as Amended, Other Special Laws, and for Other Purposes. (13 December 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of the Philippines, Republic Act No. 9346. [Philippine Republic Act No. 9346]. (2006). An Act Prohibiting the Imposition of Death Penalty in the Philippines. (24 June 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of the Philippines, Senate, Journal [Philippine Senate Journal]. (2006). Senate Journal: Session No. 89, 13th Congress, 2nd Regular Session (6 June 2006). http://legacy.senate.gov.ph/lisdata/57666101!.pdf. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Aiming at the Abolition of the Death Penalty [ICCPR-OP2], adopted 15 December 1989, 1642 U.N.T.S. 414 (entered into force on 11 July 1991). https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%201642/v1642.pdf. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Aiming at the Abolition of the Death Penalty, Ratification: Philippines [ICCPR-OP2 Ratification: Philippines], 2482 U.N.T.S. 262 (deposit of instrument with the Secretary-General of the United Nations: 20 November 2007; date of effect: 20 February 2008). https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%202482/v2482.pdf. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • Supreme National Council (SNC) of Cambodia. (1992). Provisions Relating to the Judiciary and Criminal Law and Procedure Applicable in Cambodia during the Transitional Period [SNC Cambodia Provisions]. Decision of 10 September 1992 (unofficial English translation by United National Development Fund and the Council of Jurists of the Office of the Council of Ministers of Cambodia). https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl-nat.nsf/xsp/.ibmmodres/domino/OpenAttachment/applic/ihl/ihl-nat.nsf/B7C708687DC5D7D8C1256A3F0055A780/TEXT/Provisions%20Judiciary%20and%20Criminal%20Law%20-%20Cambodia%20-%20EN.pdf. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • United Nations General Assembly [UNGA]. (2007). United Nations General Assembly Resolution, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty. U.N. Doc. A/RES/62/149 (18 December 2007). https://undocs.org/A/RES/62/149. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2008a). Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its sixty-second session, Volume 1, Resolutions, 18 September—22 December 2007. U.N. Doc. A/62/49 (Vol. I). https://undocs.org/A/62/49(Vol.I)(SUPP). Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2008b). United Nations General Assembly Resolution, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty. U.N. Doc. A/RES/63/168 (18 December 2008). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/63/168. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2009). Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its sixth-third session, Volume 1, Resolutions, 16 September—24 December 2008. U.N. Doc. A/63/49 (Vol. I). https://undocs.org/A/63/49(Vol.I)(SUPP). Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2010). United Nations General Assembly Resolution, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty. U.N. Doc. A/RES/65/206 (21 December 2010). https://undocs.org/A/RES/65/206. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2011). Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its sixty-fifth session, Volume 1, Resolutions, 14 September—24 December 2010. U.N. Doc. A/65/49 (Vol. I). https://undocs.org/A/65/49(Vol.I). Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2012). United Nations General Assembly Resolution, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty. U.N. Doc. A/RES/67/176 (20 December 2012). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/67/176. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2013). Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its sixty-seventh session, Volume 1, Resolutions, 18 September—24 December 2012. U.N. Doc. A/67/49 (Vol. I). https://undocs.org/A/67/49(Vol.I). Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2014). United Nations General Assembly Resolution, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty. U.N. Doc. A/RES/69/186 (18 December 2014). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/69/186. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2015). Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its sixth-ninth session, Volume 1, Resolutions, 16 September—29 December 2014. U.N. Doc. A/69/49 (Vol. I). https://undocs.org/en/A/69/49(Vol.I). Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2016a). United Nations General Assembly Resolution, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty. U.N. Doc. A/RES/71/187 (19 December 2016a). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/71/187. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2016b). United Nations General Assembly Seventy-first session: Official Records, Third Committee, Summary record of the 50th meeting, Held at Headquarters, New York, on Thursday, 17 November 2016b, at 10 a.m. U.N. Doc. A/C.3/71/SR.50. https://undocs.org/A/C.3/71/SR.50. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2016c). Promotion and protection of human rights: Human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms: Report of the Third Committee, Rapporteur: Cécile Mballa Eyenga (Cameroon). U.N. Doc. A/71/484/Add.2. https://undocs.org/A/71/484/Add.2. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2017a). Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its seventy-first session, Volume 1, Resolutions, 13 September—23 December 2016. U.N. Doc. A/71/49 (Vol. I). https://undocs.org/en/A/71/49(Vol.I). Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2018). United Nations General Assembly Resolution, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty. U.N. Doc. A/RES/73/175 (17 December 2018). https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/73/175. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2019). Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its seventy-third session, Volume 1, Resolutions, 18 September—22 December 2018. U.N. Doc. A/73/49 (Vol. I). https://undocs.org/en/A/73/49(Vol.I). Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2020a). United Nations General Assembly Resolution, Moratorium on the Use of the Death Penalty. U.N. Doc. A/RES/75/183 (16 December 2020a). https://undocs.org/A/RES/75/183. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2020b). United Nations General Assembly, Seventy-fifth session, Third Committee, Antigua and Barbuda, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belize, Botswana, Brunei Darussalam, China, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Jamaica, Jordan, Kuwait, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Libya, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Qatar, Russian Federation, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Viet Nam, Yemen and Zimbabwe: Amendment to draft resolution A/C.3/75/L.41. U.N. Doc. A/C.3/75/L.54. https://undocs.org/A/C.3/75/L.54. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2020c). Promotion and protection of human rights: Human rights questions, including alternative approaches for improving the effective enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms: Report of the Third Committee, Rapporteur: Ms. Myriam Oehri (Liechtenstein). U.N. Doc. A/75/478/Add.2. https://undocs.org/A/75/478/Add.2. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNGA. (2021a). Resolutions and Decisions adopted by the General Assembly during its seventy-fifth session, Volume 1, Resolutions, 15 September—31 December 2020. U.N. Doc. A/75/49 (Vol. I). https://undocs.org/en/A/75/49(Vol.I). Accessed 16 December 2021a.

  • UNGA. (2021b). Role and achievements of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights in assisting the Government and people of Cambodia in the promotion and protection of human rights: Report of the Secretary-General (15 August 2014). https://undocs.org/A/HRC/48/49. Accessed 16 December 2021b.

  • UNGA & United Nations Security Council [UNSC]. (1991). Letter dated 30 October 1991 from the Permanent Representative of France and Indonesia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, U.N. Doc. A-46/608-S/23177. https://undocs.org/S/23177. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • United Nations Economic and Social Council [ECOSOC]. (2020). Capital punishment and implementation of the safeguards guaranteeing protection of the rights of those facing the death penalty: Report of the Secretary-General, U.N. Doc. E/2020/53 (17 April 2020). https://undocs.org/en/E/2020/53. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • United Nations Peacekeeping. Cambodia—UNTAC Mandate [UN Peacekeeping, Cambodia—UNTAC Mandate]. https://peacekeeping.un.org/sites/default/files/past/untacmandate.html. Accessed 16 December 2021.

  • UNSC. (1992). Resolution 745 (1992) of 28 February 1992 on establishment of the UN Transitional Authority in Cambodia (UNTAC), U.N. Doc. S/RES/745 (1992) (28 February 1992). https://undocs.org/S/RES/745(1992). Accessed 16 December 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ma. Ngina Teresa V. Chan-Gonzaga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chan-Gonzaga, M.N.T.V. (2023). De Jure Abolition of the Death Penalty: Cambodia and the Philippines. In: Petcharamesree, S., Capaldi, M.P., Collins, A. (eds) Unpacking the Death Penalty in ASEAN. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8840-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8840-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-19-8839-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-19-8840-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics