Abstract
Indo-Pacific region has been a great testing ground for analysing the politico-economic and geo-strategic dynamics of the great powers’ competition. Since the early 1990s, China and the US have had constant sporadic contestations about their control over the Western Pacific. The end of the Cold War has seen the Indo-Pacific gradually emerge as the epicentre of their strategic pursuits. Attempting to elucidate underpinning theoretical debates of this competition, this study revolves around various evolving push and pull factors undergirding the dynamics of this region where all global as well as regional powers have remained trapped in their ever-expanding complex interdependence. The fact that the Indo-Pacific has also gained spotlight due to its increasing economic significance has increased the US–China competition and consequently drastically altered its geo-strategic and security dynamics as well. This chapter contends that in spite of their expanding complex economic interdependence, it is the clash of geopolitical interests of the two “great powers” that has driven this perpetual politico-economic insecurity across this region. While the US has sought to persistently defend mechanisms that explain and legitimise its sole “superpower” status, China being a revisionist state, has striven hard to evolve an alternate “balance of power” that the US sees as a challenge to its global dominance. The US, therefore, has been reviving its time-tested hub-and-spokes security architecture and cultivating new friends where India has come to be its new strategic partner for countering rising China. The chapter shows how, in the short term, a clash between the US and China is less likely as quintessential China will continue to avoid directly confronting the US pre-eminence unless its defined “redlines” or core interests are threatened. The two sides therefore will continue with their off-again-on-again interactions to manage their trust deficit and to carve out a sustainable future for themselves.
The views expressed are those of the author and not to be taken to represent the views of NDU.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
“Alliance and Partnerships: US Commitments in the Asia-Pacific,” (2016) Brookings, https://www.brookings.edu/research/alliances-partnerships-u-s-commitments-in-the-asia-pacific/.
“Anti-China ‘QUAD Alliance’ between US, India, Australia and Japan could soon be a Reality,” (2020) The Eurasian Times, https://eurasiantimes.com/anti-china-quad-alliance-between-us-india-australia-japan-could-soon-be-a-reality/.
Allison, Graham. (2017) Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 210.
Barbieri, Katherine. (2002) The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Buraga, Manoj Babu. (2016) “India, China and the EU in a Multipolar World Order: A Perception,” European Academic Research 9, no. 6: 1–2, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324586285_India_China_and_the_EU_in_a_Multipolar_World_Order_A_Perception.
Dixon, Jonathan. (2014) “From ‘Pearls’ to ‘Arrows’: Rethinking the ‘String of Pearls’ Theory of Chinas Naval Ambitions,” Comparative Strategy 33, no. 4: 389–400, https://doi.org/10.1080/%2001495933.2014.941730.
Fact Sheet. (2021a) “EU Strategy for Cooperation in the Indo-Pacific, EU IP Strategy,” https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/default/files/eu-indo-pacific_factsheet_2021a-04_v.5.pdf.
Fact Sheet. (2021b) “Indo-Pacific Strategy,” https://ustda.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021b-Indo-Pacific-Strategy-Fact-Sheet.pdf.
Gartzke, Erik. (2007) “The Capitalist Peace,” American Journal of Political Science 51, no. 1: 166–191.
Hass, Ryan, Mira Rapp-Hooper. (2019) “Responsible Competition and the future of US-China Relations,” Brookings, February 6, https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2019/02/06/responsible-competition-and-the-future-of-u-s-china-relations/
Jacobs, Andrew, Jane Perlez. (2017) “U.S. Wary of Its New Neighbor in Djibouti: A Chinese Naval Base,” The New York Times.
Kahler, Miles. (2012) “Regional Institutions and East Asian Security,” in The Nexus of Economics and International Relations in East Asia Security, eds. Avery Goldstein and Edward D. Mansfield, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 72.
Kaplan, Robert D. (2009) “Center Stage for the 21st Century,” Foreign Affairs Magazine, April 15, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/east-asia/2009-03-01/center-stage-21st-century.
Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. and Nye, J. (1977) Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston: Little Brown, 25.
Laurenceson, James. (2020) “China’s Trade Confound Australia’s Indo-Pacific Shift,” East Asia Forum, https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2020/01/05/china-trade-questions-confound-australias-indo-pacific-shift/.
Majeed Khan, Minhas, Ahmad Rashid Malik, Saira Ijaz, Ume Farwa (eds.) (2017) China-Pakistan Economic Corridor A Game Changer, Islamabad: Institute of Strategic Studies, 6.
Mansfield, Edward, Brian Pollins. (2003) “Interdependence and Conflict: An Introduction,” in Economic Interdependence and International Conflict: New Perspectives on an Enduring Debate, eds. Edward Mansfield and Brian Pollins, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1–30.
Nye, Joseph S. (2010) “American and Chinese Power after the Financial Crisis,” The Washington Quarterly 33, no. 4: 143–153.
Parameswaran, Prashant. (2019) “Managing the Rise of China’s Security Partnerships in the South East Asia,” Brookings, https://www.wilsoncenter.org/publication/managing-the-rise-chinas-security-partnerships-southeast-asia.
Pejsova, Eva. (2018) “The Indo-Pacific: A Passage to Europe,” European Union Institute for Security Studies, March.
Report. (2019) “A Free and Open Indo-Pacific: Advancing a Shared Vision,” Department of State, United States of America, November 4, 2019, https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Free-and-Open-Indo-Pacific-4Nov2019.pdf.
Rolland, Nadege. (2020) “An Emerging China-Centric Order: China’s Vision for a New World Order in Practice”, The National Bureau of Asian Research, 3–4, https://www.nbr.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/publications/sr87_aug2020.pdf
Rosecrance, Richard. (1986) The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World, New York: Free Press.
Simmons, Beth. (2003) “Pax Mercatoria and the Theory of the State,” in New Perspectives on Economic Exchange and Armed Conflict, eds. Brian Pollins and Edward Mansfield, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 31–43.
Welle, Deutsche. (2021) “Can China Impose Military Force Against Taiwan?” Taiwan News, March 25, https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/4160570.
Wright, Thomas. (2013) “Sifting through Interdependence,” The Washington Quarterly, 36, no. 4: 7–23.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Waseem, R. (2023). US–China Strategic Competition: Through the Matrix of Complex Interdependence. In: Singh, S., Marwah, R. (eds) China and the Indo-Pacific. Palgrave Series in Asia and Pacific Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7521-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7521-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7520-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7521-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)