Skip to main content

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Considering a Criminal Case on Its Merits as One of the Safeguards of Legal and Reasonable Sentencing by a Judge

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technological Trends in the AI Economy

Abstract

In view of the rapidly developing digital technologies and artificial intelligence software in various areas of human activity, there emerges a necessity to study the possibility of implementing the artificial intelligence technologies in criminal proceedings, with identifying the possibility of transferring justice to artificial intelligence. During the research, the authors applied basic scientific methods of inquiry. The conclusions set forth below were made as a result of the conducted study. The implementation of artificial intelligence software into administering justice in criminal cases is currently impossible. However, it is possible to implement these technologies into criminal proceedings in the area of monitoring compliance by the participants in the process, including the judge, with the requirements of criminal procedure legislation. It is also possible to use artificial intelligence software to record all procedural actions in legal proceedings and draw up a trial transcript. As we suggest, the application of artificial intelligence software in this way would increase the legality and reasonability of the imposed sentences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). (2018). European Ethical Charter on the use of artificial intelligence in judicial systems and their environment (adopted at the 31st plenary meeting of the CEPEJ). Council of Europe. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c. Accessed August 10, 2021.

  2. European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ). (2020, December 8). Possible introduction of a mechanism for certifying artificial intelligence tools and services in the sphere of justice and the judiciary: Feasibility Study. Council of Europe. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/feasability-study-en-cepej-2020-15/1680a0adf4. Accessed August 10, 2021.

  3. Government of the Russian Federation. (2021). Draft law On Amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation regarding the regulation of remote participation in legal proceedings (April 6, 2021 No. 1144921–7). Moscow, Russia. Retrieved from: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/1144921-7. Accessed August 10, 2021.

  4. Judicial Department at the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (n.d.). Court statistics. Retrieved from: http://cdep.ru/index.php?id=79. Accessed August 10, 2021.

  5. Kushchevsky District Court of the Krasnodar Region. (2015). Materials of the criminal case No. 13257030, on charges of M., of committing a crime under Art. 285 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. Kushchevskaya, Russia.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. (n.d.). Other key projects in the field of digital economy regulation. Retrieved from: https://www.economy.gov.ru/material/directions/gosudarstvennoe_upravlenie/normativnoe_regulirovanie_cifrovoy_sredy/inye_klyuchevye_proekty_v_sfere_regulirovaniya_cifrovoy_ekonomiki/. Accessed August 10, 2021.

  7. Presidential Executive Office. (2019). Decree On the development of artificial intelligence in the Russian Federation (October 10, 2019 No. 490). Moscow, Russia. Retrieved from: http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/news/61785. Accessed August 10, 2021.

  8. Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2020). Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and Presidium of the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation (dated April 8, 2020 No. 821). Moscow, Russia. Retrieved from: http://www.supcourt.ru/press_center/news/28836/. Accessed August 10, 2021.

  9. Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2020). Resolution of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and Presidium of the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation (dated April 8, 2020 No. 821, amended April 29, 2020 No. 822). Moscow, Russia. Retrieved from: http://www.supcourt.ru/press_center/news/28875/. Accessed August 10, 2021.

  10. Apostolova, N. N. (2019). Artificial intelligence in legal proceedings. North Caucasian Legal Bulletin, 3, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.22394/2074-7306-2019-1-3-135-141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Association of Lawyers of Russia. (2021, May 19). Digitalization of the Russian judicial system in an international context. Retrieved from: https://alrf.ru/news/tsifrovizatsiya-rossiyskoy-sudebnoy-sistemy-v-mezhdunarodnom-kontekste/. Accessed August 10, 2021.

  12. Bondar, N. S. (2013). Russian legal education as a constitutional value: National traditions and cosmopolitan illusions. Yurist.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chupilkin, Yu. B. (2016). How to break the “accusatory link” between the court and law enforcement agencies? Law Practice, 3, 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Council of Judges Russian Federation. (2019, April 4). Statement of the Chairman of the Council of Judges of the Russian Federation V. V. Momotov at the plenary session of the VI Moscow Legal Forum on the topic Judicial power in the context of modern digital technologies. Retrieved from: http://www.ssrf.ru/news/vystuplieniia-intierv-iu-publikatsii/32548. Accessed August 10 2021.

  15. Davydov, M. I., Gladyshev, P. S., Golovshchinsky, K. I., & Shishkin, E. A. (2019). Rationing of case-load in federal courts of general jurisdiction and federal arbitration courts: An expert report from the Higher School of Economics. Editorial of the Higher School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gavritsky, A. V., Demidchenko, Yu. V., Palieva, O. N., Paliev, V. B., Poltavtseva, L. I., & Tsoi, B. A. (2020). Information technologies in criminal proceedings of Russia: Controversial issues of proof. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 8(4), 598–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Haenlein, M., & Kaplan, A. (2019). A brief history of Artificial Intelligence: On the past, present, and future of Artificial Intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619864925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirsanova, E. E. (2021). Legal regulation of the turnover of rights to the results of intellectual activity in the digital economy (Dissertation … of Candidate of Legal Sciences). Lomonosov Moscow State University.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kudryavtseva, A. V. (2003). Internal conviction of an expert and his role in the process of expert research. In Z. D. Enikeev (Ed.), Actual questions of the criminal process of modern Russia: Interuniversity collection of scientific works (pp. 43–48). Bashkir State University.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Larina, E., & Ovchinsky, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence: Ethics and law. Knizhnyy mir.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meretukov, G. M. (2012). Reasonability of the court’s sentence. Society and Law, 1(38), 190–194.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morkhat, P. M. (2018). Legal personality of artificial intelligence in the area of intellectual property law: civil-law problems (Dissertation ... Doctor of Legal Sciences). Russian State Academy of Intellectual Property.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ponkin, I. V., & Redkina, A. I. (2018). Artificial intelligence from the point of view of law. RUDN Journal of Law, 22(1), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2018-22-1-91-109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Procedural violations, the scourge of a judge. (2021). Bulletin of the High Qualification Collegium of Judges of the Russian Federation, 1(75), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yatsishina, O. E. (2004). Internal conviction as the basis for the freedom of evaluating evidence in Russian criminal proceedings (Abstract of Dissertation … Candidate of Legal Sciences). South Ural State University.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zakirov, R. F. (2018). The use of modern IT-technologies as a means of achieving the main tasks of legal proceedings. Bulletin of Civil Procedure, 8(1), 211–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Demidchenko, Y.V., Kobleva, M.M., Tsoi, B.A., Poltavtseva, L.I., Poltavtseva, A.V. (2023). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Considering a Criminal Case on Its Merits as One of the Safeguards of Legal and Reasonable Sentencing by a Judge. In: Makarenko, E.N., Vovchenko, N.G., Tishchenko, E.N. (eds) Technological Trends in the AI Economy. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 625. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7411-3_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics