Abstract
In recent years, advances in biotechnology, nanotechnology and materials science have led to the development of revolutionizing applications in Internet of Things (IoT). In particular, the interconnection of nanomaterials, nanoimplants, and nanobiosensors with existing IoT networks has inspired the concepts of Internet of Nano Things (IoNT), and Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT). To date, although there are several survey papers that addressed these concepts separately, there is no current survey covering all studies in IoNT and IoBNT. Therefore, in this paper, we provide the complete overview of the recent studies in these three areas. Furthermore, we emphasize the research challenges, potential applications, and open research areas.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Introduction
The number of Internet usage and Internet-based applications in our daily life is increasing day by day [1]. This increase also brings about an exponential increase in number of devices with internet access. In this context, it is estimated that the number of connected devices to the Internet will exceed 75 billion by 2025 [2]. As a natural consequence of these developments, the concept of the Internet of Things (IoT) has become the focus of research and development, especially in the last 15 years [3]. IoT concept represents the connection and communication of all kinds of physical things such as sensors, actuators, personal electronic devices in the real world via the Internet [4]. Today, IoT applications appear in many areas such as smart transportation, real-time monitoring systems, smart cities, smart grids, smart environmental monitoring, medical and health systems, and smart buildings [5]. On the other hand, thanks to the advancements in materials science and nanotechnology, IoT application areas are expanding further and beating a path for the formation of new concepts like the Internet of Nano Things (IoNT) and the Internet of Bio-Nano Things (IoBNT).
Although these concepts are just emerging today, the history of nanotechnology, which forms the basis of these concepts, goes back to the 1950s. In 1959, Richard Feynman first discussed the possibility of straightly handling materials at the atomic scale and the idea of reproducing everything by miniaturization on nano-scale in his famous talk entitled “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom” [11]. In 1974, the term “Nanotechnology” was first coined by Norio Taniguchi to describe dimensional accuracy [12]. Nanotechnology is the study and use of extremely small objects on an atomic and molecular scale. It has the potential to produce many new technological materials and devices for the benefit of people by bringing together many disciplines such as engineering, medicine, biology, physics, and chemistry [6]. Nano things are devices ranging from 1 to 100 nanometers (nm) and can perform tasks such as collecting, creating, computing, processing, and transmitting data at nanoscale [13, 14]. Today, it has revealed promising networking paradigms such as IoNT and IoBNT, which are formed by interconnecting nano-things with existing communication networks via high-speed Internet. These network paradigms have high application potential in different fields such as healthcare, biomedical, military, smart environment, industry, energy, and multimedia [4, 7]. Therefore, there is a need for up-to-date studies that comprehensively explain all these network paradigms. As shown in Table 1, although there are several studies in the literature that individually address IoT, IoNT, and IoBNT, there is currently no review article that encompasses all three subjects together. This suggests a need for a comprehensive examination of these related technologies in a single publication. Based on this motivation, in this paper, we present a survey that fills the existing gaps in the literature. The following is a summary of the survey’s main contributions:
-
We present a review paper on IoNT and IoBNT network paradigms, which may have many potential applications in the future.
-
We then detail the potential application areas, architectural models, and communication structures of all presented network paradigms.
-
We also discuss several IoNT and IoBNT problems, outstanding topics, and future research possibilities.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we provide an overview of IoNT, IoBNT, and their applications. In Sect. 3, We also discuss several IoNT and IoBNT problems, outstanding topics, and future research possibilities. Finally, Sect. 4 concludes the paper.
2 Internet of Nano Thing and Internet of Bio-Nano Things
The interconnection of nano-scale devices and machines via the Internet has paved the way for the emergence of new network architectures such as IoNT and IoBNT. These network architectures are based on existing technologies such as IoT, sensor networks, edge, fog, cloud computing and newly developed nano-scale sensor, machine, and smart antenna technologies [15]. In this context, the concept of IoNT was described as “The interconnection of nanoscale devices with existing communication networks and ultimately the Internet defines a new networking paradigm that is further referred to as the Internet of Nano Things” in 2010 by Ian F. Akyildiz and Josep Miguel Jornet from the Georgia Institute of Technology [16]. On the other hand, IoBNT is a developed version from IoNT and focuses on information exchange, interaction, and networking within the biochemical field using synthetic biology and nanotechnology tools [4]. The main purpose of IoBNT is to communicate with cells that enable real-time and accurate detection and control of complex biological dynamics occurring in the human body [17]. In other words, while IoNT is based on the integration of nanoscale devices with existing network and communication technologies, IoBNT is additionally based on the behavior and properties of in vitro environments such as molecular communication, Ca\(^{2+}\) communication, hormonal communication [18]. The nanodevices used in these network architectures can be created from materials such as biological materials, magnetic fragments, or gold nanoparticles. Here, biological devices are created by reprogramming many biological materials such as cells, viruses, bacteria, bacterial phages,erythrocytes [19].
In recent years, scientific and technological developments in biomaterial fields have enabled the development of smart biomaterials with high bio functions. The smartness level of these biomaterials is divided into four classes as inert, active, responsive, and autonomous. Showing their biofunctionality, these smart materials require a wide range of internal and exterior stimuli. Examples of internal stimuli are proteins, enzymes, molecules, antigens, and ionic factors. Examples of external factors are magnetic field, electric fields, light, temperature, and mechanicalstress [20].
In the light of the information given above, nano and bio-nano device-based network architectures have many potential application areas such as health, military, environmental monitoring, multimedia, and entertainment. Therefore, we first present the network architectures and communication models of IoNT and IoBNT in Sect. 2.1. We then provide comprehensive examples of application areas in Sect. 2.2 (Fig. 1).
2.1 Network Architecture and Communication in IoNT and IoBNT
Effective integration and communication between nanodevices and macroscale components are required for the IoNT and IoBNT network paradigms to be fully operational. For this reason, the design of network architectures that include several alternative communication paradigms, such as electromagnetic, acoustic, mechanical, and molecular communication, comes to the fore [21]. Within these networks, nano-things are expected to interact with each other by exchanging various types of information such as synchronization signals, sensed chemical/physical parameter values, logical operation results, instruction sets, and commands [4].
For the time being, communication in IoNT and IoBNT networks is mainly envisaged as molecular communication and nano-electromagnetic communication [22]. Since these two network paradigms are intertwined, similar technologies can be used in terms of communication. Molecular communication is created by releasing and reacting to certain molecules to transmit or receive information. on the other hand, the transmission and receiving of electromagnetic radio-frequency waves in the terahertz (THz) range constitute nano-electromagnetic communication[23]. However, there are difficulties in using these communication technologies such as coverage, compatibility, energy, and transferred data rate. Although there are strong theoretical knowledge and practical models in the literature on communication today, communication at the nanoscale is quite complex and difficult due to the biocompatibility problems of nanodevices and the signal propagation properties of tissues in the body [21] (Table 2).
IoNT and IoBNT network architectures consist of a series of components that connect the electrical field and the biochemical field with devices at the nano or bio-nano-scale. More specifically, the main components of the IoNT architecture are nano-nodes, nano-routers, nano-micro interface devices, and gateways [13]. IoBNT, on the other hand, may contain additional components that have the function of reading and transferring biochemical domain information. In this context, IoBNT architecture can consist of Bio-cyber interface, gateway, and application-specific server components [19]. All these components are described in Table 3.
2.2 IoNT and IoBNT Applications
IoNT and IoBNT network paradigms have added new dimensions to the existing application areas of IoT such as healthcare and communication networking. Therefore, in this section, we present current studies on these two application areas.
In healthcare, it has been shown that these network paradigms can be used in the treatment of circulatory system diseases, infectious diseases, diabetes, thrombosis, and many physical or psychological diseases. Today, due to the Covid-19 pandemic, remote work has become increasingly common in many areas. In this context, studies have been carried out regarding the electronic and remote provision of healthservices [19]. In this way, it has become possible to transmit data collected from patients connected to the IoNBT network directly and in real time to healthcare professionals. Thanks to the remote collection of patient data, the patient may not need to go to the laboratory for testing. In addition, in case of any infection, the disease can be detected even before the patient shows symptoms and medical support can be given to the patient [17]. Telemedicine applications related to these sample scenarios have been included in our lives with the Covid-19 epidemic. For example, Jarmakiewicz et al. set forth standards and guidelines for the research and development of nano-sensor networks for some telemedicine applications. They also demonstrated that some applications can be implemented with a nano-sensor network by testing it with a nano-network developed for human circulatory system [24].
Thrombosis is one of the most common causes of mortality in the world, killing one out of every four individuals. In thrombosis, a blood clot forms in a vein, once the blood clot forms, it can stop or delay blood flow, or it can be found in organs. Froud et al. [3] developed a new IoBNT model with a bio-cyber communication interface that allows for better prediction and analysis of blood vessel coagulation. Thanks to this model, the information in the blood vessel is collected and the bio-cyber interface is used to convert the information into electrical equivalent. Moreover, the optical or thermal response has also been used to stimulate the release of certain nanocarrier molecules such as liposomes, nanodevices that can be transported through the bloodstream and predict clots.
IoBNT can also be used in the early diagnosis and mitigation of infectious diseases. For instance, cystic fibrosis disease is a genetic disease that can be seen in organs and systems such as lungs, pancreas, intestines, and sweat glands. It develops in waves and causes the death of patients. In [17], Akyildiz et al. proposed an IoBNT network called PANACEA, which provides an end-to-end solution to infectious diseases. In this network, a submillimeter implantable bio-electronic device that senses communication within body cells is used to determine the level of infection.
Another common disease today is diabetes. Abbasi et al. [25] focused on modeling IoBNT applications that will improve the diagnosis, management, and treatment practices of the insulin-glucose system for this disease. Through an IoBNT network to be developed, insulin and glucose concentration values can be transmitted directly to healthcare providers. In this way, besides monitoring the health status, pump life can be extended by ensuring that the insulin cartridge lasts longer. In addition, thanks to such smart systems, the body is protected from the side effects of excess insulin. On the other hand, preventive health services can be provided by methods such as pre-illness therapy with a holistic approach to physical and psychological diseases. In this context, it is predicted that healthy living conditions can be created by making changes in people’s lifestyles with IoBNT [26].
Since IoNT and IoBNT are emerging network paradigms, the developed applications in these networks are also at the beginner level. Moreover, the integration of nanomachines into the human body, their architectural design, and efficient operation (communication, computing, storage, etc.) of these devices within the heterogeneous network structure are among the main challenges. Therefore, there is an increasing number of research efforts aimed at eliminating existing and potential challenges. Al-Turjman proposed an energy-efficient framework focusing on data delivery in nano-networks. With this framework, it is aimed to realize data distribution with energy-sensitive routing protocols by considering the shortest path [14].
It is clear that IoNT has different architectural requirements for different network models and applications. In these networks, communication model design is also another challenge. In [8], Ali et al. investigated the structure of communication models in the IoNT network that was developed for drug delivery and disease detection. In the study, they evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of these two models by establishing non-additive and single-layer communication models. In [27], Stelzner et al. introduced a new concept of function-centered Nano-network (FCNN) focusing on intra-body communication scenarios. FCNN aims to minimize memory requirements by combining the location and function capabilities of nanomachines. In another study, Canovas-Carrasco et al. [28] emphasized that the development of optimal transmission policies to be used in nano-networks, reducing implementation costs and in vivo monitoring of nano-sensors depending on the generation of smart policies. For this reason, the authors proposed the Markov decision process model, which enables the derivation of smart policies.
From the network architecture perspective, Galal and Hesselbach [29] presented a multi-layered architectural model in nano networking that combines software-defined networking (SDN), network function virtualization (NFV), and IoT technologies. In the study, the authors proposed a number of functionalities and usage scenarios that could be implemented for nanodevices. In addition, significant challenges and gaps in implementing the proposed functions with nanotechnology are discussed. In [6], the usage possibilities, architecture, communication models, advantages, and challenges of nanotechnology through nano biosensors and IoNT in modern health care were determined. It has been emphasized that the concept of placing nanoscale devices in the human body has the potential to be used in all health and medical applications that exist today (Table 4).
3 Challenges, Open Issues, and Future Research Directions
IoNT and IoBNT networks have wide application potential to improve the health and quality of life of living things. However, many challenges are encountered in real-life applications of these networks. These challenges also present the topic of open research issues and future research directions.
-
Nano-network architecture: Traditional IoT networks are usually built with three, five, and seven layers. In nano-networks, it is very difficult to establish a layered network structure in terms of device size, computation, storage capacity, and communication types.
-
Nano communication and Standards: There are short and limited (from 1 nm to 1 m) in vivo communication modes in nano-networks. There is also a high level of biological noise in the environment. These communication difficulties can cause data loss, delay, and network congestion in nano communication. In addition, since these networks differ from conventional networks in many aspects such as operating environment and communication mode, the OSI/TCP model is not fully suitable for these networks. In this context, the foundation of new communication standards is quite necessary [6, 10].
-
Bio-cyber Interface: As mentioned earlier, different bio-cyber interfaces have been proposed for each considered network. However, these interfaces are not yet at the practical and clinically desirable level. For these reasons generalized and realistic biointerface deployments are needed [10, 31].
-
Data Management and Analysis: It is predicted that there will be a rapid increase in the number of new devices connected to the internet together with nano-networks. Currently, data method and analysis are a serious challenge. This challenge will become a hot topic with nano-networks. In addition, the development of smart data analysis algorithm models that can work on nano-scale devices is open toresearch [32].
-
Smart Biomaterials: Although there are many types of biocompatible in-capsular sensors (camera, pH, temperature, gas, ultrasound imaging, physisorption, surface acoustic wave, etc.), the field of ingestible sensors and smart biomaterials is still in its absolute infancy [20, 33].
-
Security and Privacy: The new nano-network paradigms mostly include applications that have not yet established standards and frameworks in the medical, biological, chemical, or personal fields. Therefore, these networks are now exposed to a wide range of threats, including multidimensional attack vectors [34]. At this point, ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the data stored and circulating on the network is more critical than other application areas. The weakness that will arise in this regard may harm individuals and societies by laying the groundwork for negative situations such as data manipulation, theft, espionage and even bioterrorism [35]. Therefore, trust management systems, user access control systems, lightweight data encryption, and compression models are needed.
-
Other challenges:Besides the current challenges, there are many uncovered research topics such as content management, mobility management, service aggregation and discovery, energy conservation, energy harvesting, power transfer, nanodevice addressing, integration with next-generation technologies (SDN, NFV, Blockchain, NFTs, Metaverse and etc.) [10, 32].
4 Conclusion
This paper provides comprehensive literature to contribute to a holistic understanding of emerging nano-networks. For this purpose, we present all of the promising network paradigms such as IoNT, and IoBNT that have emerged based on nanoscale devices and materials in connection with the “All-thing connected” vision. We give comprehensive explanations of communication, network architecture, and application domains of these network paradigms. Moreover, we comprehensively provide the challenges of these networks, open issues, and future research guidelines. In this work, we comprehensively present all emerging nano-network paradigms in a single survey paper, and we hope that the paper will shed light on future works.
References
Miraz MH, Ali M, Excell PS, Picking R (2018) Internet of nano-things, things and everything: future growth trends. Future Internet 10(8):68
Nawaratne R, Alahakoon D, De Silva D, Chhetri P, Chilamkurti N (2018) Self-evolving intelligent algorithms for facilitating data interoperability in IOT environments. Future Gener Comput Syst 86:421–432
Fouad H, Hassanein AS, Soliman AM, Al-Feel H (2020) Analyzing patient health information based on IOT sensor with AI for improving patient assistance in the future direction. Measurement 159:107,757
Akyildiz IF, Pierobon M, Balasubramaniam S, Koucheryavy Y (2015) The internet of bio-nano things. IEEE Commun Mag 53(3):32–40
Kök İ, Özdemir S (2020) Deepmdp: a novel deep-learning-based missing data prediction protocol for IOT. IEEE Internet Things J 8(1):232–243
Pramanik PKD, Solanki A, Debnath A, Nayyar A, El-Sappagh S, Kwak KS (2020) Advancing modern healthcare with nanotechnology, nanobiosensors, and internet of nano things: taxonomies, applications, architecture, and challenges. IEEE Access 8:65230–65266
Cruz Alvarado MA, Bazán P (2019) Understanding the internet of nano things: overview, trends, and challenges. E-Ciencias de la Información 9(1):152–182
Ali NA, Aleyadeh W, AbuElkhair M (2016) Internet of nano-things network models and medical applications. In: 2016 international wireless communications and mobile computing conference (IWCMC). IEEE, pp 211–215
Velvizhi G, Shanthakumar S, Das B, Pugazhendhi A, Priya TS, Ashok B, Nanthagopal K, Vignesh R, Karthick C (2020) Biodegradable and non-biodegradable fraction of municipal solid waste for multifaceted applications through a closed loop integrated refinery platform: paving a path towards circular economy. Sci Total Environ 731:138,049
Kuscu M, Unluturk BD (2021) Internet of bio-nano things: a review of applications, enabling technologies and key challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.09249
Feynman RP (1992) There’s plenty of room at the bottom [data storage]. J Microelectromech Syst 1(1):60–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/84.128057
Hulla J, Sahu S, Hayes A (2015) Nanotechnology: history and future. Hum Exp Toxicol 34(12):1318–1321
Nayyar A, Puri V, Le DN (2017) Internet of nano things (iont): next evolutionary step in nanotechnology. Nanosci Nanotechnol 7(1):4–8
Al-Turjman F (2020) A cognitive routing protocol for bio-inspired networking in the internet of nano-things (iont). Mob Netw Appl 25(5):1929–1943
Atlam HF, Walters RJ, Wills GB (2018) Internet of nano things: Security issues and applications. In: Proceedings of the 2018 2nd international conference on cloud and big data computing, pp 71–77
Akyildiz IF, Jornet JM (2010) The internet of nano-things. IEEE Wireless Commun 17(6):58–63
Akyildiz IF, Ghovanloo M, Guler U, Ozkaya-Ahmadov T, Sarioglu AF, Unluturk BD (2020) Panacea: an internet of bio-nanothings application for early detection and mitigation of infectious diseases. IEEE Access 8:140,512–140,523
Bi D, Almpanis A, Noel A, Deng Y, Schober R (2021) A survey of molecular communication in cell biology: establishing a new hierarchy for interdisciplinary applications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 23(3):1494–1545
Zafar S, Nazir M, Bakhshi T, Khattak HA, Khan S, Bilal M, Choo KKR, Kwak KS, Sabah A (2021) A systematic review of bio-cyber interface technologies and security issues for internet of bio-nano things. IEEE Access
Montoya C, Du Y, Gianforcaro AL, Orrego S, Yang M, Lelkes PI (2021) On the road to smart biomaterials for bone research: definitions, concepts, advances, and outlook. Bone Res 9(1):1–16
Agoulmine N, Kim K, Kim S, Rim T, Lee JS, Meyyappan M (2012) Enabling communication and cooperation in bio-nanosensor networks: toward innovative healthcare solutions. IEEE Wireless Commun 19(5):42–51
Zafar S, Nazir M, Sabah A, Jurcut AD (2021) Securing bio-cyber interface for the internet of bio-nano things using particle swarm optimization and artificial neural networks based parameter profiling. Comput Biol Med 136:104,707
Ali NA, Abu-Elkheir M (2015) Internet of nano-things healthcare applications: Requirements, opportunities, and challenges. In: 2015 IEEE 11th international conference on wireless and mobile computing, networking and communications (WiMob). IEEE, pp 9–14
Jarmakiewicz J, Parobczak K, Maślanka K (2016) On the internet of nano things in healthcare network. In: 2016 international conference on military communications and information systems (ICMCIS). IEEE, pp 1–6
Abbasi NA, Akan OB (2017) An information theoretical analysis of human insulin-glucose system toward the internet of bio-nano things. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 16(8):783–791
Sarker SH (2019) Holistic health improvement using the internet of bio-nano things based treatment
Stelzner M, Dressler F, Fischer S (2017) Function centric nano-networking: addressing nano machines in a medical application scenario. Nano Commun Netw 14:29–39
Canovas-Carrasco S, Sandoval RM, Garcia-Sanchez AJ, Garcia-Haro J (2019) Optimal transmission policy derivation for IoNT flow-guided nano-sensor networks. IEEE Internet Things J 6(2):2288–2298
Galal A, Hesselbach X (2018) Nano-networks communication architecture: modeling and functions. Nano Commun Netw 17:45–62
Dressler F, Fischer S (2015) Connecting in-body nano communication with body area networks: challenges and opportunities of the internet of nano things. Nano Commun Netw 6(2):29–38
Bakhshi T, Shahid S (2019) Securing internet of bio-nano things: Ml-enabled parameter profiling of bio-cyber interfaces. In: 2019 22nd international multitopic conference (INMIC). IEEE, pp 1–8
Balasubramaniam S, Kangasharju J (2012) Realizing the internet of nano things: challenges, solutions, and applications. Computer 46(2):62–68
Kalantar-Zadeh K, Ha N, Ou JZ, Berean KJ (2017) Ingestible sensors. ACS Sens 2(4):468–483
Ali O, Ishak MK, Bhatti MKL (2021) Emerging IoT domains, current standings and open research challenges: a review. Peer J Comput Sci 7:e659
Giaretta A, Balasubramaniam S, Conti M (2015) Security vulnerabilities and countermeasures for target localization in bio-nanothings communication networks. IEEE Trans Inform Forensics Secur 11(4):665–676
Acknowledgements
Seyda Sentürk is supported by the Council of Higher Education (CoHE) under the special 100/2000 scholarship program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Şentürk, Ş., Kök, b., Şentürk, F. (2023). Internet of Nano and Bio-Nano Things: A Review. In: Jain, S., Groppe, S., Bhargava, B.K. (eds) Semantic Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 964. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7126-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7126-6_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7125-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7126-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)