Abstract
Low-pressure turbine (LPT) blades at high altitude present complex flow situations due to presence of separation and subsequent transition. These relatively low Reynolds number flows are challenging to simulate in a computationally affordable framework. Present work addresses this issue by providing solutions of such LPT flows using Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations. The simulations are performed on a cascade with Pratt & Whitney blade T106A. Simulation conditions are based on the experiments carried out at a transitional Re = 51,831 at a relatively high angle of incidence of 45.5°. Simulations were performed using several turbulence and transitional models. The computed results are compared with the experimental data as well as available Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) results. All three turbulence models used for the study- Spalart-Allmaras (SA), k-ω SST and Realizable k-є - predict the flow well on the pressure side of the blade but fail to capture the flow on the suction side due to involvement of separation and transition. However, when these simulations are performed with transition models (γ-Reθ and the laminar kinetic energy (LKE)) on the same grid, significant improvements were seen in the prediction of the separation region. Both the models predicted the pressure plateau near the trailing edge of the suction side related to the separation region. A detailed flow analysis, further, suggests that compared to the γ-Reθ model, the LKE model reproduces the separation bubble structure more accurately, close to that obtained from high-resolution direct numerical simulations in the literature.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. Mazareanu, Commercial airlines worldwide - fuel consumption 2005-2021. statista.com. Retrieved. August 8, 2021 from https://www.statista.com/statistics/655057/fuel-consumption-of-airlines-worldwide/
V. Michelassi, L.-W. Chen, R. Pichler, and R. D. Sandberg, “Compressible Direct Numerical Simulation of Low-Pressure Turbines—Part II: Effect of Inflow Disturbances,” Journal of Turbomachinery, vol. 137, no. 7, Jul. 2015.
R. Ranjan, S. M. Deshpande, & R. Narasimha. A High-Resolution Compressible DNS Study of Flow Past a LowPressure Gas Turbine Blade. Advances in Computation, Modeling and Control of Transitional and Turbulent Flows, 2015, 291–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814635165_0028
R. E. Mayle. Closure to “Discussion of ‘The Role of Laminar-Turbulent Transition in Gas Turbine Engines’” (1991, ASME J. Turbomach., 113, pp. 536–537). Journal of Turbomachinery, 113(4), 1991, 537–537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2929112
H. P. Hodson, and R. J. Howell, Bladerow interactions, transition, and high-lift aerofoils in low-pressure turbines, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 37(1), pp.71–98. 2005. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.37.061903.175511.
R. D. Stieger, and H. P. Hodson, The Transition Mechanism of Highly-Loaded LP Turbine Blades, Volume 5: Turbo Expo 2003, Parts A and B. 2003. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2003-38304.
H. D. Akolekar, Turbulence Model Development & Implementation for Low Pressure Turbines Using a Machine Learning Approach. (Doctoral thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia). (August 2019).
A. Hatman, and T. Wang, A Prediction Model for SeparatedFlow Transition. Journal of Turbomachinery, 121(3), 1999, pp.594–602. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2841357.
V. Marciniak, R. Kuegeler, and M. Franke, Predicting Transition on Low-Pressure Turbine Profiles. V European conference on computational fluid dynamics ECCOMAS CFD. Vol. 2010, 2010
R. Skoda, R. Schilling, and M. T. Schobeiri, Numerical Simulation of the Transitional and Unsteady Flow through a Low-Pressure Turbine. International Journal of Rotating Machinery, 2007, 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2007/10940
P. Stadtmüller, L. Fottner, and A. Fiala, Experimental and Numerical Investigation of Wake-Induced Transition on a Highly Loaded LP Turbine at Low Reynolds Numbers. Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2000: Power for Land, Sea, and Air. Volume 3: Heat Transfer; Electric Power; Industrial and Cogeneration. Munich, Germany. May 8–11, 2000. V003T01A074. ASME. https://doi.org/10.1115/2000- GT-0269
L. Hilgenfeld, P. Stadtmüller, and L. Fottner, Experimental Investigation of Turbulence Influence of Wake Passing on the Boundary Layer Development of Highly Loaded Turbine Cascade Blades. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 69, 229 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027351020947
G. Kalitzin, X. Wu, and P.A. Durbin, DNS of fully turbulent flow in a LPT passage. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 24(4), pp.636–644., 2003. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-727x(03)00057-2.
R. Ranjan, S. M. Deshpande, and R. Narasimha, New insights from high-resolution compressible DNS studies on an LPT blade boundary layer. Computers & Fluids, 153, 2017, 49– 60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2017.05.004
Y. Zhao, H. D. Akolekar, J. Weatheritt, V. Michelassi, and R. D. Sandberg, RANS turbulence model development using CFD-driven machine learning. Journal of Computational Physics, 411, 2020. 109413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109413
R. Ranjan, S. M. Deshpande, and R. Narasimha, A High-Resolution Compressible DNS Study of Flow Past a Low-Pressure Gas Turbine Blade. Advances in Computation, Modeling and Control of Transitional and Turbulent Flows, 2015, 291–301. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814635165_0028
R. Pichler, R. D. Sandberg, V. Michelassi, and R. Bhaskaran, Investigation of the Accuracy of RANS Models to Predict the Flow Through a Low-Pressure Turbine. ASME. J. Turbomach. December 2016; 138(12): 121009. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033507
R. Ranjan, S. M. Deshpande, and R. Narasimha, Prediction of separation and transition on a low-pressure turbine blade using a RANS grid, 2020
P. Stadtmuller, Investigation of wake-induced transition on the LP turbine cascade T106A-EIZ. Tech. Rep. 2002
R. D. Sandberg, R. Pichler, and L. Chen, Assessing the sensitivity of turbine cascade flow to inflow disturbances using direct numerical simulation. 13th International Symposium for Unsteady Aerodynamics, Aeroacoustics and Aeroelasticity in Turbomachinery (ISUAAAT), Tokyo, Japan. 10 - 13 Sep 2012.
V. Michelassi, J. Wissink, and W. Rodi, Analysis of DNS and LES of Flow in a Low-Pressure Turbine Cascade with Incoming Wakes and Comparison with Experiments. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion 69, 2002, 295–329. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027334303200
G. S. François, About Boussinesq's turbulent viscosity hypothesis: historical remarks and a direct evaluation of its validity, Comptes Rendus Mécanique, Volume 335, Issues 9– 10, 2007, Pages 617-627, ISSN 1631-0721, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crme.2007.08.004.
M. Leschziner, Statistical Turbulence Modelling for Fluid Dynamics - Demystified: an Introductory Text for Graduate Engineering Students. World Scientific. 2015.
ANSYS Fluent User’s Guide v 2020 R1
R. D. Sandberg, V. Michelassi, R. Pichler, L. Chen, R. Johnstone, Compressible Direct Numerical Simulation of Low-Pressure Turbines —Part I: Methodology; ASME. J. Turbomach. 2015;137(5):051011.
R. Ranjan, S. M. Deshpande, and R. Narasimha, A Critical Comparison of RANS, LES, Hybrid LES/RANS and DNS Studies of the Flow Past a Low-Pressure Turbine Blade in a Cascade, 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saha, G., Ranjan, R. (2023). Transition Modelling For Flow Separation In Low-Pressure Turbine Cascades. In: Bhattacharyya, S., Chattopadhyay, H. (eds) Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power (Vol. 1). FMFP 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7055-9_54
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7055-9_54
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-7054-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-7055-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)