Abstract
The prison system of Indonesia faces complex legal issues related to the principles of criminal law. Given the abuse often found in prisons, there has recently been a radical idea to replace imprisonment with other forms of punishment, where possible. Article 10 of the Indonesian Penal Code lists the primary sanctions, which include imprisonment and additional sanctions. Imprisonment consists of two types, that is, life imprisonment and imprisonment for a fixed term. Article 12 of the Penal Code refers to life imprisonment but offers no further explanation about what it means. The Penal Code, like other Indonesian laws, spells out the offences for which life imprisonment can be imposed. Some scholars believe that life imprisonment in Indonesia means imprisonment for as long as the prisoner lives, that is, until their death. The Indonesian legal system recognizes the President’s prerogative right to grant clemency, which can also be granted to life-sentenced prisoners. Life imprisonment does not facilitate the reintegration of prisoners serving this sentence, but the community gets protection from crime during their detention. The law and practice in Indonesia should be reformed to create an opportunity for these prisoners to return to society as rehabilitated individuals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Pancasila is the Indonesia state ideology (philosophy) which is believed to epitomize the way of life of Indonesian people. Pancasila have five principles, that is. belief in one God, just and civilized humanity, Indonesian Unity, democracy under the wise guidance of representative consultation, and social justice for all the people of Indonesia.
- 2.
The Clemency Law does not set any clear indicators that the President must consider in granting or refusing the requested clemency. The reasons cannot be accessed publicly, and are not transparent. However, the Clemency Law does not require the president to be transparent and accountable regarding his decision. Lamintang (1984, pp. 287–288) has mentioned that there at least two reasons of granting clemency, that is, reason of justice and humanity.
References
Anwar, U. (2016). Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati Bagi Bandar Narkoba Ditinjau Dari Aspek Hak Asasi Manusia (Analisa Kasus Hukuman Mati Terpidana Kasus Bandar Narkoba; Freddy Budiman). [Case Analysis on the death penalty of drug dealer; Freddy Budiman]. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13, 241–252.
BPHN. (2008). Perencanaan Pembangunan Hukum Nasional Bidang Hukum Pidana dan Sistem Pemidanaan (Politik Hukum dan Pemidanaan) [National law development planning on criminal law and punishment system (politics of law and punishment)]. Departemen Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional. Retrieved April 20, 2022, from https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/pphn_bid_polhuk&pemidanaan.pdf
Hamzah, A. (1991). Perkembangan Hukum Pidana Khusus [Criminal law development]. Rineka Cipta.
Hiariej, E. O. (2014). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana [The principles of criminal law]. Cahaya Atma Pustaka.
Lamintang, P. A. F. (1984). Hukum Penitensier Indonesia [Indonesian penitentiary law]. Armico.
Lisanawati, G. (2013). Menyoal Pemberatan Pidana Sepertiga dan Dua pertiga Pada UU ITE Dan Harmonisasinya Atas RUU KUHP [Questioning the weighting of the two-thirds penalty in the electronic information and transaction law and the harmonization] in Komisi Hukum Nasional (Ed.), Problematika Pembaharuan Hukum Nasional [The problem of national law reform] (pp. 107–115). Komisi Hukum Nasional.
Ramadhan, D. I. (2022, April 5), 6 Fakta Terbaru di Balik Vonis Mati Herry Wirawan (6 facts behind the death penalty verdict of Herry Wirawan). Retrieved April 20, 2022, from https://www.detik.com/jabar/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-6016631/6-fakta-terbaru-di-balik-vonis-mati-herry-wirawan
Reid, S. T. (1985). Crime and criminology. CBS Colleges.
Sajarwo, G. (2014, December 9). Jokowi Tolak Permohonan Grasi 64 Terpidana Mati Kasus Narkoba [Jokowi rejects the clemency request of 64 convicts of drugs cases that imposed with death penalty]. Retrieved April 20, 2022, from
Waluyo, B. (2004). Pidana Dan Pemidanaan [Punishment and sentencing]. Sinar Grafika.
van Zyl Smit, D., & Appleton, C. (2019). Life imprisonment: A global human rights analysis. Harvard University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lisanawati, G. (2023). Life Imprisonment in Indonesia: Is Its Use Appropriate in the National Criminal Justice System?. In: van Zyl Smit, D., Appleton, C., Vucong, G. (eds) Life Imprisonment in Asia. Palgrave Advances in Criminology and Criminal Justice in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4664-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4664-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4663-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4664-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)