Abstract
Various smart products with sensing and intelligent features have been emerging in the market, the design of which encounters new challenges from continuous technological advancement related to hardware, software, and the Internet. Among them, the communication barrier between designers and stakeholders from disparate backgrounds is a crucial one to overcome, considering that the information explained by the designers strongly depends on their professional experience. Previous literature clearly highlights the importance of prototyping in product development to support communication and development of ideas as they emerge in the team and beyond. The importance of communication and collaborative work/development of ideas is even more emphasised on smart product development because of its interdisciplinary nature; hence, appropriate prototyping is also vital. However, research related to prototyping in smart product design is scarce. This study aims to comprehensively understand the differences in the prototyping between smart products and traditional ones (non-smart features). A survey was conducted to capture prototyping practices in the early stage of smart product design (SPD) compared to traditional product design (TPD) group. It is found that there are differences in the frequency of use and satisfaction with different prototyping tools between the SPD and TPD groups. From the perspective of prototyping tools’ dimensions (of fidelity), SPD designers pay more attention to the interactivity and environment of the tools, especially at the front end of the design process. The findings contribute to better supporting practices, and potentially guide the development of future prototyping tools that are specific to SPD.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akoğlu, C., Er, H.A.: The role of interaction design in smart product development activities. Online J. Art Design (2015)
Al-Fedhly, H.A., Elmaraghy, W.: Design methodology framework for cyber-physical products. Int. J. Indust. Sustain. Develop. 1, 64–75 (2020)
Bao, Q., Faas, D., Yang, M.: Interplay of sketching, prototyping in early stage product design. Int. J. Design Creativ. Innov. 6, 146–168 (2018)
Benmahmoud-Jouini, S., Midler, C.: Unpacking the notion of prototype archetypes in the early phase of an innovation process. Creativ. Innov. Manag. 29, 49–71 (2020)
Camburn, B., et al.: A systematic method for design prototyping. J. Mech. Design 137 (2015)
Camburn, B., et al.: Design prototyping methods: state of the art in strategies, techniques, and guidelines. Design Sci. 3 (2017)
Chowdhury, S., Haftor, D., Pashkevich, N.: Smart product-service systems (Smart PSS) in industry firms: a literature review. In: Procedia Cirp, pp. 26–31. Elsevier (2018)
Cooper, A., Reimann, R., Cronin, D., Noessel, C.: About Face: The Essentials of Interaction Design. Wiley (2014)
Coutts, E., Pugsley, C.: Physical versus virtual prototyping and their effect on design solutions. In: DS 89: Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC 2018), University of Bath, Bath, pp. 346–353 (2018)
Coutts, E.R., Wodehouse, A., Robertson, J.: A comparison of contemporary prototyping methods. In: Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, pp. 1313–1322. Cambridge University Press (2019)
Dawid, H., Muehlheusser, G.: Smart products: liability, timing of market introduction, and investments in product safety (2019)
Deininger, M., Daly, S.R., Lee, J.C., Seifert, C.M., Sienko, K.H.: Prototyping for context: exploring stakeholder feedback based on prototype type, stakeholder group and question type. Res. Eng. Design 30(4), 453–471 (2019)
Deininger, M., Daly, S.R., Sienko, K.H., Lee, J.C.: Novice designers’ use of prototypes in engineering design. Des. Stud. 51, 25–65 (2017)
Feliciano Filho, M., Liao, Y., Loures, E.R., Junior, O.C.: Self-aware smart products: systematic literature review, conceptual design and prototype implementation. Procedia Manuf. 11, 1471–1480 (2017)
Fiorineschi, L., Rotini, F.: Unveiling the multiple and complex faces of fidelity. In: Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, pp. 1723–1732. Cambridge University Press (2019)
Häggman, A., Tsai, G., Elsen, C., Honda, T., Yang, M.C.: Connections between the design tool, design attributes, and user preferences in early stage design. J. Mech. Design 137 (2015)
Hallgrimsson, B.: Prototyping and Modelmaking for Product Design. Laurence King (2012)
Hoffman, D.L., Novak, T.P.: Consumer and object experience in the internet of things: an assemblage theory approach. J. Consum. Res. 44, 1178–1204 (2018)
Houde, S., Hill, C.: What do prototypes prototype? In: Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction. Elsevier (1997)
Isa, S.S., Liem, A., Steinert, M.: The value of prototypes in the early design and development process. In: DS 80-5 Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED 15) Vol 5: Design Methods and Tools-Part 1, Milan, 27–30 July 2015, pp. 235–242 (2015)
Jensen, M.B., Elverum, C.W., Steinert, M.: Eliciting unknown unknowns with prototypes: Introducing prototrials and prototrial-driven cultures. Des. Stud. 49, 1–31 (2017)
Kleinsmann, M., Ten Bhömer, M.: The (new) roles of prototypes during the co-development of digital product service systems. Int. J. Des. 14, 65–79 (2020)
Lauff, C.A., Knight, D., Kotys-Schwartz, D., Rentschler, M.E.: The role of prototypes in communication between stakeholders. Des. Stud. 66, 1–34 (2020)
Lauff, C.A., Kotys-Schwartz, D., Rentschler, M.E.: What is a Prototype? What are the Roles of Prototypes in Companies? J. Mech. Design 140 (2018)
Li, Y., Roy, U., Saltz, J.S.: Towards an integrated process model for new product development with data-driven features (NPD 3). Res. Eng. Design 30, 271–289 (2019)
Liu, B.: Integration of Physical and Virtual Prototyping. Loughborough University (2011)
Mathias, D., Hicks, B., Snider, C., Ranscombe, C.: Characterising the affordances and limitations of common prototyping techniques to support the early stages of product development. DS 92: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference, pp. 1257–1268 (2018)
Mathias, D., Snider, C., Hicks, B., Ranscombe, C.: Accelerating product prototyping through hybrid methods: coupling 3D printing and LEGO. Des. Stud. 62, 68–99 (2019)
Mcelroy, K.: Prototyping for Designers: Developing the Best Digital and Physical Products. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2016)
Miles, M.B.: Qualitative Data Analysis : An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)
Neyer, A., Doll, B., Möslein, K.: Mission (im)possible?–prototyping service innovation. In: Supporting Service Innovation Through Knowledge Management: Practical Insights and Case Studies, pp. 143–164 (2009)
Ng, I.C., Wakenshaw, S.Y.: The Internet-of-Things: review and research directions. Int. J. Res. Mark. 34, 3–21 (2017)
Nunes, M.L., Pereira, A., Alves, A.C.: Smart products development approaches for Industry 4.0. Procedia Manuf. 13, 1215–1222 (2017)
Otto, K., Wood, K.: Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development. Prentice Hall. Inc, Upper Saddle River (2001)
Petric, J., Lindsay, M.: Digital prototyping (2003)
Porter, M.E., Heppelmann, J.E.: How smart, connected products are transforming companies. Harv. Bus. Rev. 93, 96–114 (2015)
Qutb, A.: Smart Product Design Methodology. University of Windsor (2020)
Raff, S., Wentzel, D., Obwegeser, N.: Smart products: conceptual review, synthesis, and research directions. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. (2020)
Ramli, S.H.: Mocking up: Strategies to Engage Expert Users in Designerly Thinking. Sheffield Hallam University (2014)
Ranscombe, C., Bissett-Johnson, K.: Digital sketch modelling: integrating digital sketching as a transition between sketching and CAD in industrial design education. Design Technol. Educ. 22 (2017)
Ranscombe, C., Bissett-Johnson, K., Mathias, D., Eisenbart, B., Hicks, B.: Designing with LEGO: exploring low fidelity visualization as a trigger for student behavior change toward idea fluency. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 30(2), 367–388 (2019)
Sanders, E.B.-N., Stappers, P.J.: Probes, toolkits and prototypes: three approaches to making in codesigning. CoDesign 10, 5–14 (2014a)
Sanders, L., Stappers, P.J.: From designing to co-designing to collective dreaming: three slices in time. Interactions 21, 24–33 (2014b)
Sauer, J., Seibel, K., Rüttinger, B.: The influence of user expertise and prototype fidelity in usability tests. Appl. Ergon. 41, 130–140 (2010)
Subramanya, T.N., Chakravarthy, B.K.: Standardization of terminologies for physical models in design process. In: Chakrabarti, A. (ed.) Research into Design for a Connected World. SIST, vol. 135, pp. 3–20. Springer, Singapore (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5977-4_1
Tomiyama, T., Lutters, E., Stark, R., Abramovici, M.: Development capabilities for smart products. CIRP Ann. 68, 727–750 (2019)
Virzi, R.A.: What can you learn from a low-fidelity prototype? In: Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, pp. 224–228. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (1989)
Virzi, R.A., Sokolov, J.L., Karis, D.: Usability problem identification using both low-and high-fidelity prototypes. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 236–243 (1996)
Yang, M.C.: An examination of prototyping and design outcome. In: ASME 2004 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, pp. 497–502. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection (2004)
Zheng, P., Wang, Z., Chen, C.-H., Khoo, L.P.: A survey of smart product-service systems: key aspects, challenges and future perspectives. Adv. Eng. Inform. 42, 100973 (2019)
Zink, L., Hostetter, R., Böhmer, A.I., Lindemann, U., Knoll, A.: The use of prototypes within agile product development explorative case study of a Makeathon. In: 2017 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC), pp. 68–77. IEEE (2017)
Acknowledgments
The China Scholarship Council (CSC) funds this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wang, J., Ranscombe, C., Eisenbart, B. (2022). Understanding Designers’ Use of Prototypes in Smart Product Design. In: Bruyns, G., Wei, H. (eds) [ ] With Design: Reinventing Design Modes. IASDR 2021. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_174
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4472-7_174
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4471-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4472-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)