Abstract
Given the systemic challenges Including the COVID-19 pandemic (see Chapter 1), the way of approaching and thinking to know and understand the problem seems neither to give a perfect answer nor a clear direction to follow to the emerging sustainability challenges that the world faces now. This is because the causes and impacts of a single problem are complexly connected to the causes and impacts of other problems. The adaptive approach seems to be effective and appropriate to these wicked problems. With this, diverse stakeholders participate in finding a solution by bringing their knowledge and experiences. This is an educative process that can be called Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) in a community context. Stakeholders mutually learn and co-create new knowledge, through dialogues, collaborations and even through a clash of tensions between different interests and positionality. This chapter illustrates how the adaptive approach, or co-learning and co-creation of knowledge for sustainability, took place during the COVID-19 pandemic, drawing the experience of the Regional Centre for Expertise on ESD (RCEs) in the Asia and Pacific region by United Nations University. It discusses the factors that promote or hinder the activities and supporting mechanisms are examined. In particular, it highlights the issue of ‘digitalisation’ that was emerged in the community-based ESD efforts that brought an opportunity and a challenge to multistakeholder participation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Carr, P. (2020). Returning to ‘normal’ post-coronavirus would be inhuman. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/returning-to-normal-post-coronavirus-would-be-inhumane-136558. Accessed 8 February 2022.
Fien, J., & Tilbury, D. (2002). The global challenge of sustainability. Education and Sustainability: Responding to the Global Challenge, 1.
Giannini, S. (2020). School, health and nutrition: Why COVID-19 demands a rethink of education to address gender inequalities. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/news/school-health-and-nutrition-why-covid-19-demands-rethink-education-address-gender-inequalities. Accessed 8 February 2022.
Haski-Leventhal, D. (2020). The lighthouse: Seven positive outcomes of COVID-19. The Lighthouse, Issue. https://lighthouse.mq.edu.au/article/april-2020/seven-positive-outcomes-of-covid-19. Accessed 27 October 2021.
Jacobson, C., Allen, W., Veltman, C., Ramsey, D., Forsyth, D., Nicol, S., Allen, R., Todd, C., & Barker, R. (2009). Collaborative learning as part of adaptive management of forests affected by deer. In C. A. G. Stankey (Ed.), Adaptive environmental management: A practitioner’s guide (pp. 275–294). Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
Kingsford, R., Roux, D., McLoughlin, C., Conallin, J., & Norris, V. (2017). Strategic adaptive management (SAM) of intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams. In T. Datry, N. Bonada, & A. Boulton (Eds.), Intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams (pp. 535–562). Academic Press.
Noguchi, F. (2016). Radical approach from the periphery: Informal ESD through rights recovery for indigenous Ainu. In J. Singer, T. Gannon, F. Noguchi, & Y. Mochizuki (Eds.), Educating for sustainability: Fostering resilient communities after the triple disaster (pp. 201–215). Routledge.
Noguchi, F. (2022). Rethinking Education for Sustaianable Development in a Local Community Context. Springer.
OECD. (2020). Building back better: A sustainable, resilient recovery after COVID-19. Tackling coronavirus (COVID-19), Issue. https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/building-back-better-a-sustainable-resilient-recovery-after-covid-19-52b869f5/. Accessed 8 February 2022.
Stankey, G. H. (2005). Adaptive management of natural resources: Theory, concepts, and management institutions. Department of Agriculture.
UNESCO. (2019). Framework for the implementation of education for sustainable development (ESD) beyond 2019. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000370215. Accessed 8 February 2022.
UNESCO. (2021a). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000374802. Accessed 8 February 2022.
UNESCO. (2021b). Global action programme on education for sustainable development (2015–2019): GAP partner networks. UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/gap/partner-networks. Accessed 27 October 2021b.
UNESCO. (2022a). UN decade of ESD. https://en.unesco.org/themes/education-sustainable-development/what-is-esd/un-decade-of-esd. Accessed 8 February 2022.
UNESCO. (2022b). Global action programme on education for sustainable development (2015–2019). https://en.unesco.org/globalactionprogrammeoneducation. Accessed 8 February 2022.
UNGA. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1). https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E. Accessed 8 February 2022.
United Nations. (2020). Shared responsibility, global solidarity: Responding to the socio-economic impacts of COVID-19. United Nations. https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/SG-Report-Socio-Economic-Impact-of-Covid19.pdf. Accessed 8 February 2022.
UNU-IAS. (2014). Ten years of regional centres of expertise on education for sustainable development. UNU-IAS. https://www.rcenetwork.org/portal/sites/default/files/public_resource/01_UNU_10yearsBook_web.pdf. Accessed 8 February 2022.
UNU-IAS. (2020a). The 13th Asia-Pacific RCE regional meeting emphasises collaboration to build capacity for sustainability. UNU-IAS. https://www.rcenetwork.org/portal/13th-asia-pacific-rce-regional-meeting-emphasises-collaboration-build-capacity-sustainability. Accessed 27 October 2021.
UNU-IAS. (2020b). Webinar series ‘ESD action in COVID-1 9 ERA: Experiences of RCEs of the Asia Pacific region’ concluded. UNU-IAS. https://www.rcenetwork.org/portal/webinar-series-esd-action-covid-19-era-experiences-rces-asia-pacific-region-concluded. Accessed 27 October 2021.
UNU-IAS. (2021). RCE vision and mission. UNU-IAS. https://www.rcenetwork.org/portal/rce-vision-and-mission. Accessed 27 October 2021.
Vaughter, P., & Noguchi, F. (2020). RCE project trends during the global action programme on ESD. UNU-IAS. https://rcenetwork.org/portal/sites/default/files/flipping_book/pdf/RCE_Project%20Database%20insights_online.pdf. Accessed 8 February 2022.
WSU & RCE Srinagar. (2021). Webinar series report: ESD action in COVID-19 era: Experiences of RCEs of Asia-Pacific region. https://westernsydney.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/1749331/ESD_COVID_Report_Final.pdf. Accessed 8 February 2022.
Acknowledgements
To conduct a data collection of RCEs in the Asia Pacific region, the Asia Pacific RCE Coordinating Committee, the Asia Pacific RCE Advisors, the UNU-IAS ESD Programme staff provided their extensive advice and support. I would like to thank all of them for their valuable contributions. I would also many RCEs in this region, who shared their experiences during the pandemic. Lastly, I would like to acknowledge that this study was carried out as part of the RCE project funded by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. I would also like to thank their continual support for this global network.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Noguchi, F. (2022). Local Community-Based Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Asia and Pacific Region. In: Shimizu, M. (eds) A Resilience Approach to Acceleration of Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4345-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4345-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-4344-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-4345-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)