Abstract
Prominent lesser trochanter shown in the hip AP images indicates the external rotation of the proximal fragment. Internal rotation of the proximal fragment provides clear anatomic landmarks in the superior border of the femur, such as the superior cortex of the femoral neck, trochanteric fossa, and medial slope of the greater trochanter. Those structures are essential in selecting an appropriate entry point. The position of the guide pin must be checked in the lateral view and the AP view. Do not hesitate to spend valuable time making a correct entry site even though you might experience a few unsuccessful attempts. After insertion of the femoral nail and interlocking screws, confirmation of the femoral neck in the internal rotation is again essential to check the possibility of an occult ipsilateral femoral neck fracture.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
4.1 Position of the Patient
IM nailing for femoral shaft fracture can be performed in supine or lateral position under general or regional anesthesia. Even though preparation time may increase, positioning the patient on the fracture table in a supine position is the most popular method because the maintenance of steady traction is the most crucial point in closed reduction, reaming process, insertion of the nail, and distal interlocking, especially in highly comminuted fracture (Figs. 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3) [1]. The biggest drawback of this position is difficulty in making proper piriformis entry (trochanteric fossa—see below) in some patients. The bulky soft tissue in obese patients, narrow space between the greater trochanter and iliac crest in the small patients, and overhanging of the greater trochanter over the trochanteric fossa are the sources of trouble [2, 3]. The contralateral limb can be placed on the leg holder for free access for the image intensifier (hemi-lithotomy position); however, prolonged operation time and low diastolic pressure may evoke compartment syndrome of the leg [1]. In that case, the scissoring leg position is advocated. Some surgeons prefer lateral position on the fracture table, especially in subtrochanteric fracture. Flexion of the hip makes it possible to find an unobstructed route to the entry site without difficulties [1, 4].
4.2 Entry Point (for the Straight Femoral Nail)
Defining the appropriate entry point is a problematic issue in antegrade femoral nailing. Nowadays, most surgeons agree that the ideal entry site is a proximal exit of the bisecting line of the medullary cavity of the femur. Küntscher inserted the straight open section cloverleaf nail from the tip of the greater trochanter, namely the piriformis fossa. The piriform fossa is an insertion site of the piriform tendon and represents a slight, shallow depression located on the tip of the greater trochanter. The tip of the greater trochanter was used as an entry point to avoid possible violation of blood supply to the femoral head and septic arthritis following intracapsular infection at that time [5,6,7,8]. However, over one-half of the cases show that insertion of the straight femoral nail from the tip of the greater trochanter (GT, X in the Fig. 4.4) may result in lateral insertion. Lateral insertion of the stiff straight femoral nail is detrimental in some cases (Fig. 4.4a and b), resulting in varus tilting of the proximal fragment and bursting of the medial cortex of the proximal fragment and fracture of the greater trochanter (Fig. 4.5) [2, 3].
As a result, the surgeons sought more medial entry sites, namely trochanteric fossa, to avoid lateral insertion in these cases (Fig. 4.4a and b). The proximal exit of a bisecting line of the medullary canal passes around the trochanteric fossa. The trochanteric fossa is a deep depression on the inner surface of the greater trochanter and represents the insertion of the obturator externus muscle. Contrary to the concern during the early development of IM nailing, the use of trochanteric fossa as an entry point in adult femoral nailing does not violate the circulation of the femoral head. These days, people agree that the trochanteric fossa is an appropriate entry point for antegrade femoral nails in adults. Many surgeons have shifted the entry site from the tip of the greater trochanter (piriformis fossa) to the trochanteric fossa for mechanical reasons. They, however, have kept using the term “piriform entry” incorrectly in many published articles (Fig. 4.6) [2, 3, 6].
The chief problem in using trochanteric fossa as the entry point is hiding of entry point by an overhang of the greater trochanter in some cases (Fig. 4.7). External rotation of the proximal fragment, especially in subtrochanteric fracture, aggravates the situation. The greater trochanter starting femoral nails have been developed and released in the twenty-first century to overcome these problems. Preoperative planning is important in selecting the proper entry point for the intended use of the femoral nail; piriformis fossa (it is a misnomer; trochanteric fossa is correct) vs. greater trochanter starting femoral nail.
Since the tip of the greater trochanter is easily palpable through the surgical incision, I would focus on preparing the entry point on the trochanteric fossa in this chapter. If the patient is prepared on the fracture table in a supine position, adduction of the injured limb and deviation of the trunk to the intact side is necessary. However, excessive adduction tightens the lateral fascia and iliotibial band, making it difficult to palpate the deeply seated trochanteric fossa [6]. Under the guidance of a fluoroscope, the tip of the guide pin is inserted into the medial aspect of the greater trochanter. If the tip of the guide pin is located in the superior part of basi-cervical region in the hip AP view, it is located too anterior and vice versa. In some cases, the trochanteric fossa is visible in the fluoroscopic image (Fig. 4.8).
Suppose external rotation of the proximal fragment hinders the proper evaluation of the anatomy. In that case, you may insert the long curved hemostatic forceps at the level of lesser trochanter through a small stab wound on the posterolateral aspect of the thigh. Elevation of the handle of hemostatic forceps rotates the proximal fragment internally and visualizes the greater trochanter’s medial aspect clearly. It was a great discovery improving visualization of the medial aspect of the greater trochanter, as shown in the following figures (Fig. 4.8) [8]. With the help of a curved cannulated awl or similar equipment, we can bend the tip of the guidewire smoothly to advance it into the center of the medullary canal (Fig. 4.7). Otherwise, it hits the medial cortex of the proximal femur. The unexpected beneficial effect of internal rotation of the proximal fragment is a simultaneous correction of associated flexion and abduction deformity of the proximal fragment (Figs. 4.9 and 4.10). After advancing a guidewire for 5–10 cm, check out the lateral image of whether the guidewire is located in the center of the medullary canal. After final confirmation of the guide pin position, entry site reaming can be performed with a trochanteric reamer. Some surgeons use a cannulated curved awl to enlarge the entry site to pass a ball-tip guide pin. It is crucial to avoid the trochanter fossa in the juvenile patient to prevent avascular necrosis of the femoral head after antegrade femoral nailing (Figs. 4.11 and 4.12).
Summary of Entry Point (Fig. 4.13)
Prominent lesser trochanter (black arrow) shown in the hip AP images indicates the external rotation of the proximal fragment. Internal rotation of the proximal fragment provides clear anatomic landmarks in the superior border of the femur, such as the superior cortex of the femoral neck, trochanteric fossa (white arrow), and medial slope of the greater trochanter. Those structures are essential in selecting an appropriate entry point. The position of the guide pin must be checked in the lateral view and the AP view. After insertion of the femoral nail and interlocking screws, confirmation of the femoral neck in the internal rotation is again essential to check the possibility of an occult ipsilateral femoral neck fracture. The prophylactic femoral head and neck screw is inserted due to the “positive CT capsular sign” (see Chap. 5) in this case. Correct entry point leads to successful IM nailing. So, do not hesitate to spend valuable time making a correct entry site even though you might experience a few unsuccessful attempts.
4.3 Reduction Technique
Fracture reduction for IM nailing means restoration of the anatomic alignment of the femur. It consists with:
-
(a)
Restoration of length,
-
(b)
Reduction of the fragments for passage of a ball-tip guidewire,
-
(c)
Correction of angulation and displacement during nail insertion,
-
(d)
Prevention of malrotation.
(a) Restoration of length is usually achieved by longitudinal traction of the injured limb on the fracture table. Some surgeons performed femoral nailing in a supine position on the ordinary table. There is no problem with the cases with simple or less comminuted femoral shaft fractures. However, the fatigue limit of the assistant may hinder the precise positioning of a nail, blocking screws, and interlocking procedure in highly comminuted fractures. A simple length measure of the intact side femur from the greater trochanter to the upper pole of the patella is helpful before positioning the patient on the fracture table. In the case of both femora fractures, try to perform the less comminuted side first and use the nail of the same length on the more comminuted side [1, 10, 11]. I prefer a combination technique with an external fixator (two-staged operation) in open fracture with loss of large segment (Fig. 4.14).
(b) Reduction of the fragments for passage of a ball-tip guidewire.
One of the most challenging deformities during the reduction of femoral shaft fracture is sagging at the fracture. This is caused by an inherent anterolateral bowing of the femur, the tension of the gastrocnemius muscle due to traction in knee extension, and the weight of the thigh. You will fail to pass the ball-tip guidewire if you attempt to correct it with more traction force. The best way is (Figs. 4.15 and 4.16):
-
(1)
Ream the proximal fragment only until 12 mm,
-
(2)
Insert the reduction finger (instrument) to the end of the proximal fragment,
-
(3)
Face the fingertip toward the displaced distal fragment,
-
(4)
Aggravate the deformity temporarily and manipulate the reduction finger so that the fingertip can catch the entry of the medullary in the distal fragment,
-
(5)
Turn the reduction finger 90°–180° to correct the sagging deformity,
-
(6)
Advance the reduction finger into the distal medullary canal for a few centimeters,
-
(7)
Advance the ball-tip guidewire to the distal fragment.
A more displaced fracture is usually hard to get closed reduce in the segmental fracture. The introduction of a curved hemostatic forceps through a stab wound into the fracture site again helps reduce the fracture by leverage technique (Fig. 4.17). When displacement occurs in the long spiral fracture in the proximal or distal metaphysis, wiring the fracture after the open or semi-open technique is preferable to leaving a large gap. Cerclage wiring of the displaced fracture with minimal soft tissue handling gets popular these days. It helps reduce the long spiral fracture or large butterfly fragment and enhances stability during and after nailing (Figs. 4.18, 4.19, and 4.20).
(c) Correction of angulation and displacement is less problematic in the shaft area than in the infra-isthmic area because occupancy of the medullary canal with the largest nail possible after adequate reaming automatically realigns the diaphysis unless the isthmic area is highly comminuted. However, in the distal metaphyseal area, the medullary canal widens like the bell of a trumpet, negating the effect of the IM nail. Use of Poller screw or blocking screw is highly advocated in this area when angulation of the distal fragment hinders the restoration of anatomical alignment. Advantages of Poller screw are enhancement of distal fixation by preventing recurrence of angular displacement as well as correction of angular malalignment during nail insertion (Figs. 4.21 and 4.22) [1, 11, 13].
Displacement frequently occurs in the distal femoral fracture. The use of various bone clamps is necessary to get the reduction. Ugly displacement at the supracondylar area is challenging to be reduced by ordinary methods. A Schanz pin at the lateral femoral condyle for manipulation, a Poller screw on the nail’s lateral side, and a collinear clamp are useful tools for closed reduction (Fig. 4.23).
(d) Rotational alignment. Once length and correction of the angular deformity are achieved, it is time to think of the rotational status of the nailed femur. Anteversion of the femur is different from person to person (Fig. 4.24). In general, restoration of rotational alignment between 0° and 15° is advocated unless the angle of anteversion is measured by computed tomography in the contralateral femur beforehand. Malrotation over 15° is not recommended. The lesser trochanteric sign is extremely valuable, but the surgeons frequently focus on IM nailing procedure itself and omit to get the AP image of the contralateral hip with the patella forward beforehand (Figs. 4.25 and 4.26) [11, 13,14,15,17]. Taking advantage of an inherent anteversion of the intramedullary nail is a useful tip to avoid the malrotation in the highly comminuted femur fractures, which includes fracture of the lesser trochanter (Fig. 4.27) (Table 4.1).
4.4 Reaming of the Medullary Canal
The Küntscher nail was inserted into the medullary canal after the medullary reaming. The purpose of medullary reaming is to insert a large diameter nail which provides more nail strength and more significant contact areas with the femoral shaft. However, medullary reaming violates medullary circulation. In addition, the inadequate reaming procedure may cause excessive embolism of medullary contents and heat necrosis. In that context, unreamed IM nails were popular in the late twentieth century due to shorter operation times and minimally invasive procedures. However, after reamed IM nailing, overall results are better than those of unreamed ones. Thus, insertion of a reamed interlocked femoral nail after minimal cortical reaming has become the major trend in femoral nailing [7, 8, 11, 21,22,24]. After successfully positioning the ball-tip guidewire into the center of the femoral condyle through the medullary canal, the reaming process can be started from 7 mm (diameter of the reamer head) end-cutting reamer. Then the reamer size can be increased by 1 mm until it touches the endocortex (the inside layer of the cortex). I prefer an additional 0.5–1.0 mm increment in reaming for proper contact between the nail and endocortex. The edges of the reamer head must be sharp and rotate fast. It must be advanced slowly within the medullary canal to prevent heat necrosis and embolism of medullary contents. Use of ball-tip guidewire is mandatory to withdraw the broken reamer. It is also helpful in the case of reamer head jamming. In the past century, the reamer shaft was made of a spring coil, so reverse rotation (counterclockwise rotation) of the motor uncoils the reamer shaft. The modern reamer shaft is made of a hollow cylinder (stainless steel) so reverse rotation is possible when the reamer head is jammed in the medullary canal.
The IM pressure in the distal medullary cavity may increase if the reamer head advances too fast (Fig. 4.28). I prefer making a ventilating hole at the distal femoral shaft in case of subtrochanteric fracture (long distal fragment) and prophylactic femoral nailing for the incomplete atypical femoral fracture to decrease the IM pressure during the reaming process. Careless rapid reaming may cause pulmonary embolism of the medullary contents, as shown in the lung of the canine model (Fig. 4.28) [25].
The shape of the reamer head is also critical to decrease the medullary pressure. The figure shows the difference in the distance between the reamer core and the cutting edge. It must be good enough to expel the reaming debris behind (Fig. 4.29) [25, 26].
The careless reaming causes cortical heat necrosis. It seems harmless in the early postoperative period but eventually results in nonunion because of the necrotic sector in the cortical bone. Therefore, wide debridement of necrotic tissue, including cortical segment and reconstruction of the defect, is necessary (Fig. 4.30) [25,26,29].
The Reamer Irrigator Aspirator (RIA; Synthes) is a surgical instrumentation system that uses negative pressure to circulate fluid through the intramedullary canal during reaming of long bones (Fig. 4.31). Compared to the traditional methods of reaming, the RIA is designed to lower intramedullary pressure and temperature in order to reduce the incidence of fat embolization and thermal necrosis. The RIA system is also commonly used to collect autologous bone grafts as an alternative to iliac crest bone graft [30, 31].
IM nailing is the optimal solution in specific metabolic bone diseases. It can be performed in some cases of autosomal dominant type II (AD II) osteopetrosis with special care on reaming. In AD II osteopetrosis, the medullary canal is extraordinarily narrow and obliterated in some segments. Therefore, it needs careful preoperative planning and slow but steady procedures confirming safety step by step. Evaluation of the medullary canal size using CT axial views is mandatory. Since reaming of hard cortical bone is necessary, slow reamer advancement with high RPM (revolutions per minute) is crucial. See Chap. 11 for details (Fig. 4.32) [32].
4.5 Insertion of the Femoral Nail
After adequate reaming of the medullary canal, the femoral nail can be advanced without difficulties. A loud hammering sound indicates that something is wrong. Smooth advancement of the nail by each blow of a hammer is essential. In case of excessive femoral bowing, it is necessary to rotate the femoral nail externally while it passes the curve’s apex (see Chap. 8) [33]. In a long oblique or spiral fracture at the isthmus, the flexible reamers move like snakes in the fracture zone, missing one cortex. Unreamed portion in the inner cortex (bump) also causes bursting of the cortex (Fig. 4.33).
Hard endosteal callus in case of atypical femoral fracture after long-term bisphosphonate intake may also cause jamming or bursting of the cortex. Therefore, it is sometimes necessary to remove it using a long narrow chisel to widen the medullary canal (Fig. 4.34). Otherwise, it may also cause bursting of the femoral cortex during the hard insertion of a femoral nail [31,32,35].
If the fracture locates in the distal part of the femoral shaft, the nail tip must be placed in the femoral condyle for distal interlocking. How deeply can the nail be inserted? The nail tip can be advanced until it touches the V-shaped corner, which is made by the upper intercondylar articular and the lower Blumensaat lines. An undisplaced intercondylar fracture, usually an extension of the primary distal femoral fracture, can be fixed with one or two lag screws before femoral nailing (Fig. 4.35).
4.6 Mode of Interlocking
In the late twentieth century, most nails were equipped with static round holes alone; therefore, removing all interlocking screws from one main fragment was inevitable to achieve the dynamization effect. Advocates for routine dynamization believed that load-bearing on the fracture callus promoted fracture healing and rehabilitation of patients. However, Brumbeck et al. reported that most fractures were healed when treated with the static mode; thus, routine dynamization was not indicated. Moreover, the dynamic unlocking mode sometimes resulted in angular instability and excessive shortening due to displacement of the undetected fracture line in 10% of patients. Therefore, the static mode became the standard method of interlocking fixation in femoral nailing [4, 23, 36].
Modern femoral nail systems usually provide dual options for interlocking fixation, namely dynamic and static modes, in both the distal and proximal portions. There is one dynamic hole in each proximal and distal portion. The dynamic mode is subclassified into unlocking (no interlocking screw fixation) and dynamic locking (interlocking screw fixation at the dynamic hole only) modes. The static mode is subclassified into static locking (interlocking screw fixation at the static hole only) and hybrid locking (interlocking screw fixation at both the dynamic and static holes) modes. In the status of hybrid locking mode, conversion to the dynamic locking mode (dynamization) can be achieved easily by removing the static interlocking screws located beside the dynamic interlocking screw. Do not forget to remove the ball-tip guidewire before drilling for interlocking!
Modern femoral nails also provide various proximal and distal interlocking options to treat associated proximal (femoral neck and trochanteric) and distal (supracondylar) fractures (Fig. 4.36). Proximal interlocking screws are usually inserted through the holes in the attached targeting guide. Please choose the best option for proximal fixation among them.
-
1.
One of the difficulties in proximal interlocking is the correct positioning of the femoral neck and head screw (reconstruction screw). Unlike insertion of the oblique screw from the greater trochanter to the lesser trochanter, the reconstruction screw needs unique technique, especially when two reconstruction screws must be inserted. The level of the proximal interlocking holes in the nail must match with that of the femoral neck and anteversion. To insert the long reconstruction screw properly in the femoral head, the tip of the reconstruction screw must be placed at the center of the femoral head in the lateral view. We found a helpful tip for correcting a guide pin that is inserted in an improper position. The movement of the guide pin in the posterior direction in the lateral view is associated with inferior migration of the guide pin in the AP view. The greater the anteversion of the femur, the more significant the shift of guide pin in AP view per degree of correction in the lateral view (Fig. 4.37) [37].
-
2.
Skidding the guidewire frequently happens, especially in young patients. Principal compression trabecula is dense, so a guide pin may miss the tract and bend upward. Fig. 4.38 shows the solution to this troublesome problem.
-
(a)
Skidding the guidewire for a lag screw frequently happens, especially in young patients. Principal compression trabecula is dense, so a guide pin may miss the tract and bend upward. Forceful reaming would damage and break the guidewire (white arrow in Fig. 4.38).
-
(b)
Withdraw a lag screw reamer and a guide pin. Confirm the damage to the guidewire. If damaged, it must be replaced.
-
(c)
Then, insert the lag screw reamer through the targeting guide and confirm the AP and lateral view position. If the imaginary extension line from the lag screw reamer hits the intended point in the femoral head, insert the guide pin.
-
(d)
Tap the end of the guide pin and advance the reaming along the guide pin for a few centimeters. Repeat the procedure if necessary.
-
(e)
Keep identifying the tip of the guide pin in AP and lateral views.
-
(f)
Confirm the final position of the lag screw.
-
(a)
Distal interlocking screw insertion can be performed using one of the three methods: a) freehand technique using targeting wand (Figs. 4.39 and 4.40), b) distal targeting device (Figs. 4.11, 4.41 and 4.42), and c) electromagnetic tracking device (Fig. 4.42).
References
Nork SE. Femoral shaft fracture. In: Court-Brown CM, et al., editors. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adult. 8 th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2015. p. 2149–228.
Grechenig W, Pichler W, Clement H, Tesch NP, Grechenig S. Anatomy of the greater femoral trochanter: clinical importance for intramedullary femoral nailing anatomic study of 100 cadaver specimens. Acta Orthop. 2006;77(6):899–901.
Farhang K, Desai R, Wilber JH, Cooperman DR, Liu RW. An anatomical study of the entry point in the greater trochanter for intramedullary nailing. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B:1274–81.
Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr, Clawson DK. Closed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures. A report of five hundred and twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(4):529–39.
Lakhwani OP, Mittal PS, Naik DC. Piriformis fossa–an anatomical and orthopedics consideration. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(3):96–7.
Papadakis SA, Shepherd L, Babourda EC, Papadakis S. Piriform and trochanteric fossae. A drawing mismatch or a terminology error? A review. Surg Radiol Anat. 2005;27:223–6.
Küntscher G: The marrow nailing method, translation by U.S. Fleet Naval Forces, Germany, 1947 (reprint of the original edition by Stryker).
Kempf L, Grosse A, Lafforrgned L. L’enclouae avec blocage de la rotation on clou bloque principles, technique, indications et premiers resultants. Communication ala journee d’hiver SOFCOT. 1976;
Park J, Yang KH. Correction of malalignment in proximal femoral nailing—reduction technique of displaced proximal fragment. Injury. 2010;41:634–8.
Yang KH, Won YG, Kim SB, Oh BH, YC, Jeong SJ. Plate augmentation and autologous bone grafting after intramedullary nailing for challenging femoral bone defects: a technical note. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136(10):1381–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2522-9.
Court-Brown CM, Browner BD. Locked nailing of femoral fractures. In: Browner BD, editor. The science and practice of intramedullary nailing. 2nd ed. William & Wilkins; 1996. p. 161–82.
Won YK, Yang KH, Kim KK, Weaver MJ, Allen EM. Amputated limb by cerclage wire of femoral diaphyseal fracture: a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016;136:1691–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2580-z.
Krettek C, Stephan C, Schandelmaier P, Richter M, Pape HC, Miclau T. The use of Poller scrrews as blocking screws in stabilizing tibial fracture treated with small diameter intramedullary nails. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988;81-B:963–8.
Yang KH, Han DY, Jahng JS, Shin DE, JPark JH. Prevention of malrotation deformity in femoral shaft fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:558–62.
Espinoza C, Sathy AK, Moore DS, Starr AJ, Reinert CM. Use of inherent anteversion of an intramedullary nail to avoid malrotation in femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(2):e34–8.
Han CD, Lee YH, Yang KH, Yang IH, Lee WS, Park YJ, Park KK. Predicting proximal femur rotation by morphological analyses using translucent 3-dimensional computed tomography. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012;132:1747–52.
Ju B, Moon YJ, Lee KB. Use of lesser trochanter profile as a rotational alignment guide in intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103:e89(1–6).
Dickson KF, Sorkin AT, Van Waksum ADP, Weber D. T2 ™ recon nailing system operative technique Stryker. Trauma GmbH. 2004:1–32.
Russell T, Sanders R. Trigen IM nail system; smith and nephew. Surgical technique Trochanateric Antegrade Nail (TAN). 1999:1–24.
Femoral recon nail (FRN) system, surgical technique. DePuy Synthes. 2017:1–69.
Zimmer Natural Nail (ZNN) System. Antegrade femoral nail surgical technique. Zimmer-Biomet. 2015:1–31.
Clatworthy MG, Clark DI, Gray DH, Hardy AE. Reamed versus unreamed femoral nails a randomised prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 1998;80-B:485–9.
Brumback RJ, Uwagie-Ero S, Lakatos RP, Poka A, Bathon GH, Burgess AR. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Part II: fracture-healing with static interlocking fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(10):1453–62.
Li AB, Zhang WJ, Guo WJ, Wang XH, Jin HM, Zhao YM. Reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femoral fractures. A meta-analysis of prospective randomized controlled trials. Medicine. 2016;95(29):e4248.
Hӧgel F, Gerlach UV, Südkamp NP, Müller CA. Pulmonary fat embolism after reamed and unreamed nailing of femoral fractures. Injury. 2010;41:1317–22.
Bixcut IM, reamer system. Stryker trauma GmbH. 2009:1–8.
Leunig M, Hertel R. Thermal necrosis after tibial reaming for intramedullary nail fixation. J Bone Joint Surg. 1996;78B:584–7.
Ochsner PE, Baumgart F, Kohler. Heat-induced segmental necrosis after reaming of one humeral and two tibial fractures with a narrow medullary canal. Injury. 1998;29(Suppl 2):1–10.
Olerud S. The effects of intramedullary nailing. In: Browner BD, editor. The science and practice of intramedullary nailing. 2nd ed. William & Wilkins; 1996. p. 71–6.
Reamer/Irrigator/Aspirator (RIA). For intramedullary reaming and bone harvesting. Syntehs.
Wessel AR, Crist BD BD, Stannard JP, Della Rocca GJ, Stoker AM, Bozynski CC, Cook CR, Kuroki K, Ahner CE, Cook JL. Assessment of reamer irrigator aspirator system (RIA) filtrate for its osteoinductive potential in a validated animal model. Injury. 2018;49:1046–51.
Kim JY, Park YC, Moon HS, Do WS, Yang KH. Intramedullary nailing for subtrochanteric fracture in autosomal dominant type II osteopetrosis case report of 2 patients. Medicine. 2020;99(32):e21648.
Park YC, Song HK, Zheng XL, Yang KH. Intramedullary nailing for atypical femoral fracture with excessive anterolateral femoral bowing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99:726–35.
Kim SJ, Yang KH, Lim HS, Lee YK, Yoon HK, Oh CW, Park KK, Min BW, Ryu JA, Kwack KS, Lee YH. Detection of prefracture hip lesions in atypical subtrochanteric fracture with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry images. Radiology. 2014;270(2):487–95.
Yang KH, Min BW, Ha YC. Atypical femoral fracture: position statement of the korean society for bone and mineral research. J Bone Metab. 2015;22:87–91.
Brumback RJ, Reilly JP, Poka A, Lakatos RP, Bathon GH, Burgess AR. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Part I: decision-making errors with interlocking fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988;70(10):1441–52.
Park J, Park SY, Yoon HK, Kim DY, Lee HY, Yang KH. Correction of lag screw guide pins inappropriately placed during intramedullary hip nailing. Injury. 2008;39:1134–40.
Distal targeting system. Gamma3 long nail R1.5/T2 recon nail R1.5. Operative Technique Stryker. 2013:1–24.
Sureshot T. Distal targeting system V2.1. User manual. Smith and Nephew:1–38.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yang, K.H. (2022). Antegrade Femoral Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fracture. In: The Art of Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Fracture. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3730-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3730-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-3729-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-3730-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)