Abstract
Iran is a heterogeneous and pluralistic nation in terms of both ethnicity and religion. Ignoring the needs and demands of minorities upon manufacturing governmental policies and social and developmental planning weakens the minorities’ nationalistic cohesion, but it also consolidates their minority favoritism attitudes. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to sociologically analyze the factors affecting the social trust of Zoroastrians in Tehran and the main question of this study is, what factors may decrease or increase the Tehrani Zoroastrians’ social trust? According to the main purpose of this study and the status of the statistical population of the research, the theory of Putnam, Giddens, Coleman, Inglehart, Sztompka, Offe, and Johnson was selected as the theoretical framework of the study. For methodology, survey and multi-stage (cluster) sampling and sampling techniques were employed. Since most Zoroastrians live in specific parts of Tehran and given the principle of randomness of the sample, in this study, multi-stage cluster sampling was used to identify the respondents. This method is often used in large-scale studies, where the geographical distribution of people is scattered and wide. In this study, in the first stage, out of the twenty-two districts of Tehran, three districts (districts 4, 6, and 12), regions with the most Zoroastrian population, have been randomly selected. In the next stage, from each district, several neighborhoods with the most Zoroastrian population (Tehranpars, Amirabad, Takht Tavous, Yousefabad, and 30 Tir), and then from each neighborhood two or three blocks were selected. Finally, a number of houses were randomly selected from each block in the form of circular block; eventually, a single person from each household was selected, as the respondent, if he was a Zoroastrian. The statistical population of the study consists of all Zoroastrians living in Tehran, which according to the Zoroastrian Association of Tehran are about 7000 people. The sample size is 210 people. The results showed the social trust level of 20.9 percent of the respondents is low, the social trust level of 52.4 percent of respondents is moderate, and the social trust level of 26.7 percent of them is high. The relationship among the variables of socio-economic status, sense of social security, life satisfaction, sense of discrimination, social exclusion, and social trust is significant. Also, the factors of feeling of discrimination and social exclusion were found to have the greatest impact on social trust; however, any relationship among personal characteristics (except age) and social trust was denied.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asgari, H., and S. Sharafat. 2013. Analysis of Effective Factors on the Formation of Social Trust in Rural Communities’ Case Study: Hojdan Dasht Rural District, Mehran City. Rural Research 4 (4): 851–879.
Bolourchi, N. 2018. The Sacred Defense: Sacrifice and Nationalism Across Minority Communities in Post-Revolutionary Iran. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 86 (3): 724–758.
Cecolin, A. 2016. Iranian Jews in Israel Between Persian Cultural Identity and Israeli Nationalism. London, New York: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.
Coleman, J. 2011. Foundations of Social Theory. Trans. Manouchehr Sabouri. Tehran: Ney Publishing.
Deihey, J. 2003. Lebensbedingungen und Wohlbefinden in Europa. In Datenreport, Bundeszentrale fur politische, ed. Statistiches Bundesamt. Bonn: Bildung.
Durani, K. and Z. Rashidi. 2008. Examining the Definitions of Concepts and How the Dimensions of Social Capital (with Emphasis on Social Trust). Cultural Engineering Monthly, Third Year, No. 17–18, pp. 8–19.
Farzbad, M.M. 2011. Social Capital and Its Effect on Social Welfare: A Case Study of Rural Areas in Taleghan Region. Master Thesis in Social Welfare, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran.
Firoozi Zargar, A., and M. Elmi. 2013. Study of the Relationship Between Life Satisfaction and the Tendency to Social Anomalies Among the Youth of Bilesvar. Sociological Studies, Fifth Year, No. 20, pp. 23–38.
Foltz, R. 2011. Zoroastrians in Iran: What Future in the Homeland? The Middle East Journal 65 (1): 73–84.
Gholami, M.R., and R. Alizadeh. 2017. Sociological Analysis of the Concept of National Pride in Iran. National Studies Quarterly 4 (72): 119–136.
Giddens, A., and K. Bardsal. 2007. Sociology. Trans. Hassan Chavoshian. Tehran: Ney Publishing.
Hoff, S., and C. Vrooman. 2011. Dimensions of Social Exclusion, Towards an Improved Instrument. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office.
Hyderabadi, A. 2011. Social Trust and Social Factors Affecting It (Research in the Cities of Mazandaran Province). PhD thesis in Sociology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch.
Inglehart, R. 1999. Trust: Well-Being and Democracy. In Democracy and Trust, ed. Warren Marke, 88–120. Cambridge University Press.
Khademi, B., E. Dindar, and M.R. Irvani. 2011. Study of Factors Affecting Social Trust Among Students (Case Study of University Students in Jahrom). Social Sciences Quarterly, Fifth Year, No. 13, pp. 125–158.
Mohseni, M., and P. Salehi. 2003. Social Satisfaction in Iran. Tehran: Arun Publications.
Putnam, R. 1993. Making Democracy Work Civic Traditional in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
———. 2001. Democracy and Civic Traditions. Trans. Mohammad Taghi Del Afrooz. Tehran: Rosh Publications.
Rezaei Hassanabadi, M. 2011. Evaluation of Effective Factors on Promoting People’s Social Trust in Religious Organizations (NGOs, NGOs) in Yazd City. Master Thesis in Cultural Affairs Management and Planning, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch.
Ritzer, G. (2019). Sociological theory in the contemporary era. Trans. Mohsen Talasi. Tehran: Scientific Publications.
Sharipour, M., N. Razzaqi, and Kh. Gholamzadeh. 2011. Study of the Relationship Between Different Types of Trust and Social Trust Among Students of Mazandaran University. Social Studies of Iran, Fourth Year, No. 3, pp. 40–53.
Sztompka, P. 2005. Trust a Sociological Theory. Trans. Fatemeh Golabi. Tabriz: Sotoudeh Publishing.
———. 2007. Trust Sociological Theory. Trans. Gholamreza Ghaffari. Tehran: Shirazeh Publishing.
Tajbakhsh, K. 2006. Social Capital: Trust, Democracy and Development. Trans. Afshin Khakbaz and Hassan Pouyan. Tehran: Shirazeh Publishing.
Vosoughi, M., and H. Aram. 2009. Study of Social Trust and Its Effective Factors in Khalkhal City (Ardabil Province). Journal of Social Sciences, Third Year, No. 3, pp. 133–153.
Watson, S. 2005. Agent in Search of Actor. New York: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hashemi, S.H., Amiri, S.R.S., Sabet, S.K. (2023). Sociological Analysis of Social Trust in the Zoroastrian Community in Tehran. In: Hosseini, S.B. (eds) Ethnic Religious Minorities in Iran. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1633-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1633-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-1632-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-1633-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)