Skip to main content

Sociological Analysis of Social Trust in the Zoroastrian Community in Tehran

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethnic Religious Minorities in Iran

Abstract

Iran is a heterogeneous and pluralistic nation in terms of both ethnicity and religion. Ignoring the needs and demands of minorities upon manufacturing governmental policies and social and developmental planning weakens the minorities’ nationalistic cohesion, but it also consolidates their minority favoritism attitudes. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to sociologically analyze the factors affecting the social trust of Zoroastrians in Tehran and the main question of this study is, what factors may decrease or increase the Tehrani Zoroastrians’ social trust? According to the main purpose of this study and the status of the statistical population of the research, the theory of Putnam, Giddens, Coleman, Inglehart, Sztompka, Offe, and Johnson was selected as the theoretical framework of the study. For methodology, survey and multi-stage (cluster) sampling and sampling techniques were employed. Since most Zoroastrians live in specific parts of Tehran and given the principle of randomness of the sample, in this study, multi-stage cluster sampling was used to identify the respondents. This method is often used in large-scale studies, where the geographical distribution of people is scattered and wide. In this study, in the first stage, out of the twenty-two districts of Tehran, three districts (districts 4, 6, and 12), regions with the most Zoroastrian population, have been randomly selected. In the next stage, from each district, several neighborhoods with the most Zoroastrian population (Tehranpars, Amirabad, Takht Tavous, Yousefabad, and 30 Tir), and then from each neighborhood two or three blocks were selected. Finally, a number of houses were randomly selected from each block in the form of circular block; eventually, a single person from each household was selected, as the respondent, if he was a Zoroastrian. The statistical population of the study consists of all Zoroastrians living in Tehran, which according to the Zoroastrian Association of Tehran are about 7000 people. The sample size is 210 people. The results showed the social trust level of 20.9 percent of the respondents is low, the social trust level of 52.4 percent of respondents is moderate, and the social trust level of 26.7 percent of them is high. The relationship among the variables of socio-economic status, sense of social security, life satisfaction, sense of discrimination, social exclusion, and social trust is significant. Also, the factors of feeling of discrimination and social exclusion were found to have the greatest impact on social trust; however, any relationship among personal characteristics (except age) and social trust was denied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Asgari, H., and S. Sharafat. 2013. Analysis of Effective Factors on the Formation of Social Trust in Rural Communities’ Case Study: Hojdan Dasht Rural District, Mehran City. Rural Research 4 (4): 851–879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolourchi, N. 2018. The Sacred Defense: Sacrifice and Nationalism Across Minority Communities in Post-Revolutionary Iran. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 86 (3): 724–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cecolin, A. 2016. Iranian Jews in Israel Between Persian Cultural Identity and Israeli Nationalism. London, New York: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. 2011. Foundations of Social Theory. Trans. Manouchehr Sabouri. Tehran: Ney Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deihey, J. 2003. Lebensbedingungen und Wohlbefinden in Europa. In Datenreport, Bundeszentrale fur politische, ed. Statistiches Bundesamt. Bonn: Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durani, K. and Z. Rashidi. 2008. Examining the Definitions of Concepts and How the Dimensions of Social Capital (with Emphasis on Social Trust). Cultural Engineering Monthly, Third Year, No. 17–18, pp. 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzbad, M.M. 2011. Social Capital and Its Effect on Social Welfare: A Case Study of Rural Areas in Taleghan Region. Master Thesis in Social Welfare, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firoozi Zargar, A., and M. Elmi. 2013. Study of the Relationship Between Life Satisfaction and the Tendency to Social Anomalies Among the Youth of Bilesvar. Sociological Studies, Fifth Year, No. 20, pp. 23–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foltz, R. 2011. Zoroastrians in Iran: What Future in the Homeland? The Middle East Journal 65 (1): 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gholami, M.R., and R. Alizadeh. 2017. Sociological Analysis of the Concept of National Pride in Iran. National Studies Quarterly 4 (72): 119–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., and K. Bardsal. 2007. Sociology. Trans. Hassan Chavoshian. Tehran: Ney Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, S., and C. Vrooman. 2011. Dimensions of Social Exclusion, Towards an Improved Instrument. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyderabadi, A. 2011. Social Trust and Social Factors Affecting It (Research in the Cities of Mazandaran Province). PhD thesis in Sociology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. 1999. Trust: Well-Being and Democracy. In Democracy and Trust, ed. Warren Marke, 88–120. Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khademi, B., E. Dindar, and M.R. Irvani. 2011. Study of Factors Affecting Social Trust Among Students (Case Study of University Students in Jahrom). Social Sciences Quarterly, Fifth Year, No. 13, pp. 125–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohseni, M., and P. Salehi. 2003. Social Satisfaction in Iran. Tehran: Arun Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. 1993. Making Democracy Work Civic Traditional in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Democracy and Civic Traditions. Trans. Mohammad Taghi Del Afrooz. Tehran: Rosh Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei Hassanabadi, M. 2011. Evaluation of Effective Factors on Promoting People’s Social Trust in Religious Organizations (NGOs, NGOs) in Yazd City. Master Thesis in Cultural Affairs Management and Planning, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2019). Sociological theory in the contemporary era. Trans. Mohsen Talasi. Tehran: Scientific Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharipour, M., N. Razzaqi, and Kh. Gholamzadeh. 2011. Study of the Relationship Between Different Types of Trust and Social Trust Among Students of Mazandaran University. Social Studies of Iran, Fourth Year, No. 3, pp. 40–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sztompka, P. 2005. Trust a Sociological Theory. Trans. Fatemeh Golabi. Tabriz: Sotoudeh Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Trust Sociological Theory. Trans. Gholamreza Ghaffari. Tehran: Shirazeh Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajbakhsh, K. 2006. Social Capital: Trust, Democracy and Development. Trans. Afshin Khakbaz and Hassan Pouyan. Tehran: Shirazeh Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosoughi, M., and H. Aram. 2009. Study of Social Trust and Its Effective Factors in Khalkhal City (Ardabil Province). Journal of Social Sciences, Third Year, No. 3, pp. 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, S. 2005. Agent in Search of Actor. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hashemi, S.H., Amiri, S.R.S., Sabet, S.K. (2023). Sociological Analysis of Social Trust in the Zoroastrian Community in Tehran. In: Hosseini, S.B. (eds) Ethnic Religious Minorities in Iran. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1633-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics