Skip to main content

Comparing the Predictive Accuracy of Machine Learning Algorithms for Neonatal Mortality Risk Classification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Machine Intelligence and Signal Processing

Abstract

Neonatal mortality is a major concern in developing countries and is a crude indicator of the prevalence of poverty in a society. Neonatal risk analysis is an important decision-making tool for gauging progress and penetration of medical services in a specific region, especially in developing countries. This research compares the accuracy of the predictions of various machine learning algorithms and the impact of different sampling techniques, when attempting to classify neonatal mortality. We have conducted different rounds of experiments with six sampling techniques and seven machine learning algorithms on a neonatal death dataset. Further, groups of three base classifiers chosen among the seven machine learning algorithms were made into six different ensemble combinations and trained to improve the classification accuracy. The proposed diagnostic support system with an ensemble of random forest classifier, Gaussian NB, and AdaBoost with pipeline sampling achieved an accuracy and ROC AUC scores above 98% and 96%, respectively. This decision support tool will facilitate medical practitioner to identify infants at risk of dying before 28 days of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. UNICEF Homepage, https://data.unicef.org/, last accessed 2021/04/29

  2. Sheth, P.D., Patil, S.T., Dhore, M.L.: Evolutionary computing for clinical dataset classification using a novel feature selection algorithm. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 1–8 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hsieh, M.H., Hsieh, M.J., Chen, C.M., Hsieh, C.C., Chao, C.M., Lai, C.C.: Comparison of machine learning models for the prediction of mortality of patients with unplanned extubation in intensive care units. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–7 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Neesha, J., Nur’Aini, A.R., Wahidah, H.: Data mining in healthcare—a review. Procedia Comput. Sci. 72, 306–313 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Seiffert, C., Khoshgoftaar, T., Van Hulse, J., Napolitano, A.: RUSBoost: a hybrid approach to alleviating class imbalance. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A Syst. Humans 40, 185–197 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chawla, N.V., Bowyer, K.W., Hall, L.O., Kegelmeyer, W.P.: SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 16, 321–357 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Z., Zoie, S.W., Kwok, L.T.: A framework of rebalancing imbalanced healthcare data for rare events’ classification: a case of look-alike sound-alike mix-up incident detection. J. Healthc. Eng. 1–11 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. He, H., Bai, Y., Garcia, E.A., Li, S.: ADASYN: adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning. In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, pp. 1322–1328. IEEE, Hong Kong (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sheenal, P., Hardik, P.: Survey of data mining techniques used in healthcare domain. Int. J. Inf. Sci. Tech. 6(1), 53–60 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pratyush, L., Sarthak, G., Taran, P.S., Madan, G.: Ensemble learning classification for medical diagnosis. In: International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security, vol. 6, pp. 1–5. IEEE, Patna (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Sivarajan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sivarajan, A., Bala Aditya, A., Sivasankar, E. (2022). Comparing the Predictive Accuracy of Machine Learning Algorithms for Neonatal Mortality Risk Classification. In: Gupta, D., Sambyo, K., Prasad, M., Agarwal, S. (eds) Advanced Machine Intelligence and Signal Processing. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 858. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0840-8_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics