Abstract
Nuclear remains concern the materiality of spent radioactive substances and, at the very same time, a question of the abstractions used to think about nuclear materials into the future. As a question of matter, the existence of long-lived radioactive uranium and plutonium deposits means contemplating forms of materiality that often remain harmful to organic life for at least 100,000 years. Countries such as Sweden, Finland, the UK, the USA, and France are now beginning the process of developing so-called permanent underground storage facilities for long-lived nuclear waste, raising the question of how to communicate memory of these storage sites into the distant future. Fields as diverse as nuclear semiotics, future literacy, decolonial approaches to nuclearity, and environmental semiosis together consider how to communicate nuclear waste sites in ways that are no longer founded on human onto-epistemological frames. As long-lived nuclear waste increases in volume into the twenty-first century, nuclear remains emerge today as a problem of how to develop alternative abstractions of thought capable of thinking and communicating radioactive matter into futures far exceeding human life. Pushing back against common sense understandings of the future, in this chapter I develop the relationship between nuclear remains and speculative empiricism as an approach to thinking nuclear waste futures more openly in terms of the contingencies of future events. Speculative empiricism is notable for this task because it provides a way to consider the creation of abstractions as central to apprehending the open possibilities of singular future events.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The terms ‘long-lived’ and ‘short-lived’ radioactivity are not without their problems, not least because these thresholds are framed by the lifeworld of the organism. Short-lived nuclear waste, including technological waste in moderate proximity to a nuclear reactor, is so-called because it remains hazardous to organic life for 100–300 years. Long-lived waste, including spent nuclear fuel made up of uranium and plutonium deposits that have undergone fission reaction, far exceeds the life of any organism and is hazardous for anything between 10,000 and 100,000 years, after which it is expected to return close to pre-reaction levels of radioactivity.
References
Bjornerud, M. (2018). Timefulness: How thinking like a geologist can help save the world. Princeton University Press.
Bonnet, F. (2017). The infra-world. Urbanomic.
Brodie, P., & Velkova, J. (2021). Cloud ruins: Ericsson’s Vaudreuil Dorion data centre and infrastructural abandonment. Information, Communication & Society, 24(6), 869–885.
Brown, K. (2019). Manual for survival: A Chernobyl guide to the future. Penguin.
Connolly, W. (2013). The fragility of things. Duke University Press.
Dawney, L. (2021). The multiple temporalities of infrastructure: Atomic cities and the memory of lost futures. Environment and Planning D, 39(3), 405–422.
Dawney, L., Harris, O., & Sørensen, T. (2017). Future world: Anticipatory archaeology, materially affective capacities and the late human legacy. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 4(1), 107–129.
Debaise, D. (2017). Speculative empiricism: Revisiting Whitehead. Edinburgh University Press.
Derrida, J. (2010). Athens, still remains: The photographs of Jean-François Bonhomme. Fordham University Press.
Doel, M. (2019). Rewriting the disaster: Body-bagged earthworks, postmortem landscapes, and the de-scription of Fukushima. GeoHumanities, 5(1), 237–266.
Drogan, M. (2016). The nuclear imperative: Atoms for peace and the development of US policy on exporting nuclear power, 1953-1955. Diplomatic History, 40(5), 948–974.
Holtorf, C., & Högberg, A. (2020). What lies ahead?: Nuclear waste as cultural heritage of the future. In Cultural heritage and the Future (pp. 144–158). Routledge.
Ialenti, V. (2020). Deep time reckoning: How future thinking can help earth now. MIT Press.
Joyce, R. (2020). The future of nuclear waste: What art and archaeology can tell us about securing the world’s most hazardous material. Oxford University Press.
Keating, T. (2019). Pre-individual affects: Gilbert Simondon and the individuation of relation. Cultural Geographies, 22, 211–226.
Macfarlane, A. (2003). Underlying Yucca Mountain: The interplay of geology and policy in nuclear waste disposal. Social Studies of Science, 33(5), 783–807.
Parikka, J. (2019). Remain(s) scattered. In I. Jucan, J. Parikka, & R. Schneider (Eds.), Remain. University of Minnesota Press.
Parisi, L. (2012). Speculation: A method for the unattainable. In C. Lury & N. Wakeford (Eds.), Inventive methods (pp. 246–258). Routledge.
Routley, R., & Routley, V. (1978). Nuclear energy and obligations to the future. Inquiry, 21(1–4), 133–179.
Storm, A. (2018). Atomic fish: Sublime and non-sublime nuclear nature imaginaries. In G. Rispoli & C. Rosol (Eds.), Azimuth: Technology and the sublime (VI/12, pp. 59–75).
Storm, A. (2019). When we have left the nuclear territories. In R. Harrison & C. Sterling (Eds.), Deterritorializing the future (pp. 318–343). Open Humanities Press.
Sagan, C. (1978). Murmurs of earth: The Voyager interstellar record. Ballantine Books.
Savransky, M. (2021). Around the day in eighty worlds: Politics of the pluriverse. Duke University Press.
Van Wyck, P. (2004). Signs of danger: Waste, trauma, and nuclear threat. University of Minnesota Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1949). Science and the modern world. New American Library.
Williams, N. (2020). Non-representational theory. In A. Kobayashi (Ed.), International encyclopaedia of human geography, Vol. 9 (pp. 421–427, 2nd ed.). Elsevier.
Acknowledgements
I want to thank Nina Williams, Anna Storm, and members of Linköping’s Stripe and Green Room seminar groups for their help and valuable comments on an earlier version of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Keating, T. (2022). Nuclear Remains: For a Speculative Empirical Approach. In: Williams, N., Keating, T. (eds) Speculative Geographies. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0691-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0691-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-0690-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-0691-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)