Skip to main content

Social Behavior and Reasoning Through Multi-Agent Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multi Agent Systems

Abstract

In computer science, multi-agent systems are a relatively new sub-field composed of numerous interconnected computing elements known as agents. To satisfy their design intents, they can take decisions for themselves, i.e., they are capable to take autonomous decisions. Also, these agents are capable of communicating with other agents not only by commuting data but also by engaging in similar the kind of social activities that we all engage in every day of our lives, like, association, coordination, and the like. Social behavior is behavior among two or more organisms inside the identical species and encompasses any conduct wherein one member affects the other. For example, the interaction of two or more humans or organizations governed toward a common goal that is mutually beneficial. Whereas, social reasoning involves the propensity to illustrate inferences about others’ intentions, mentality, and actions or activities, in order to synchronize one’s own behaviors. In this chapter, we have developed a region-specific vaccination method using multi-agent framework. We have taken the help of the Mamdani fuzzy inference system to build this multi-agent framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Saqqar F, Al-Shatnawi AM (2020) Reasoning about group social commitments in multi-agent systems. J Ambient Intell Human Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02498-7

  2. Barua A, Mudunuri LS, Kosheleva O (2014) Why trapezoidal and triangular membership functions work so well: towards a theoretical explanation. J Uncert Syst 8:164–168

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conti M, Passarella A, Pezzoni F (2012) A model to represent human social relationships in social network graphs. In: Aberer K, Flache A, Jager W, Liu L, Tang J, Guéret C (eds) Social informatics. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35386-4_14

  4. Delafontaine M, Cohn AG, Van de Weghe N (2011) Implementing a qualitative calculus to analyse moving point objects. Exp Syst Appl 38:5187–5196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.10.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dong X, Cao YY, Lu XX, Zhang JJ, Du H, Yan YQ, Akdis CA, Gao YD (2020) Eleven faces of coronavirus disease 2019. Allergy Eur J Allergy Clin Immunol 75. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14289

  6. Dziura SL, Thompson JC (2014) Social-network complexity in humans is associated with the neural response to social information. Psychol Sci 25:2095–2101. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614549209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gharbi A (2020) A social multi-agent cooperation system based on planning and distributed task allocation. Information 11:271. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11050271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jamshidi A, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Yakhchali SH, Khaleghi S (2013) Developing a new fuzzy inference system for pipeline risk assessment. J Loss Prevent Process Ind 26:197–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2012.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ji C, Jiang D (2014) Threshold behaviour of a stochastic SIR model. Appl Math Model 38:5067–5079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2014.03.037

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Li L (2017) Behavior analysis in social networks. In: Alhajj R, Rokne J (eds), Encyclopedia of social network analysis and mining. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7163-9_110198-1

  11. Li Y, Li Y, Ma Z (2015) Computation tree logic model checking based on possibility measures. Fuzzy Sets Syst 262:44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2014.03.009

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Pan X, Han CS, Dauber K, Law KH (2007) A multi-agent based framework for the simulation of human and social behaviors during emergency evacuations. AI Soc 22:113–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-007-0126-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pourjavad E, Mayorga RV (2019) A comparative study and measuring performance of manufacturing systems with Mamdani fuzzy inference system. J Intell Manuf 30:1085–1097. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1307-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rabkina I, Forbus KD (2019) Analogical reasoning for intent recognition and action prediction in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on advances in cognitive systems. Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ruta M, Scioscia F, Loseto G, Gramegna F, Ieva S, Pinto A, Sciascio ED (2018) Semantic-based social intelligence through multi-agent systems. In: Cossentino M, Sabatucci L, Seidita V (eds) CEUR workshop proceedings, CEUR-WS, vol 2215, pp 96–102

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sheehan MM, Pfoh E, Speaker SL, Rothberg M (2020) Changes in social behavior over time during the covid-19 pandemic. Cureus 12. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10754

  17. Shum M, Kleiman-Weiner M, Littman ML, Tenenbaum JB (2019) Theory of minds: understanding behavior in groups through inverse planning. In: Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, vol 33, pp 6163–6170. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016163

  18. Talgeri A, Kumar A, Adithya B (2014) Domotics—a cost effective smart home automation system using wifi as network infrastructure. Int J Eng Res Appl 4:52–55. ISSN: 2248-9622

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thierry-Mieg Y (2015) Symbolic model-checking using its-tools. In: Baier C, Tinelli C (eds), Tools and algorithms for the construction and analysis of systems. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 9035. Springer, Berlin, pp 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46681-0_20

  20. Vyklyuk Y, Manylich M, Škoda M, Radovanović MM, Petrović MD (2021) Modeling and analysis of different scenarios for the spread of covid-19 by using the modified multi-agent systems—evidence from the selected countries. Res Phys 20:103662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103662

  21. Zangmeister Christopher D, Radney James G, Vicenzi Edward P, Weaver Jamie L (2020) Filtration efficiencies of nanoscale aerosol by cloth mask materials used to slow the spread of SARS CoV-2. ACS Nano 14:9188–9200. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c05025

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bhattacharya, I., Mondal, S., Gupta, S. (2022). Social Behavior and Reasoning Through Multi-Agent Systems. In: Gupta, S., Banerjee, I., Bhattacharyya, S. (eds) Multi Agent Systems. Springer Tracts in Human-Centered Computing. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-0493-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics