Abstract
Populism is a much-debated concept, coupled with different forms, narratives, and applications. The conceptualization of populism is highly contested. Perhaps the largest body of scholars argue that populism is a divisive set of ideas or ideology that considers society ultimately separated into two hegemonic and antagonistic groups, “the pure people” versus “the corrupt elite” (Mudde 2004). The distinctive reliance on the polarization of “us” and “them” in populism draws on nationalist notions of exclusive belonging, the need for closure to protect the “us” from would-be infiltrators, and observance of prescribed gendered roles to ensure the continued rule of the majority (race/ethno-nation). The reproduction of the “us” is too crucial to leave unregulated, and gendered bodies are too vulnerable to violation and occupation to go without vigilance, that is, without surveillance and demographic policing. Gendered narratives support the anti-immigration features of populism and its curbs on democratic institutions, both in the service of national recovery and in its identification of potentially disloyal, suspect voices within the demos. Hence, there is an intricate connection between populism and gender, which is also essential in understanding the ways in which populism threatens all women’s reproductive rights and agency (Mostov, Frontiers in Sociology, 2021). This entry makes an attempt to highlight the connection between populism, gendered roles, toxic masculinity, and its impact on women’s agency.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Books
Anderson B (1983) Imagined communities. Verso, New York
Peterson VS (1998) Gendered nationalism: reproducing “us” versus “them”. In: Lorentzen LA, Turpin J (eds) The woman and war reader. New York University Press, New York
Taggart P (2000) Populism. Open University Press, Buckingham
Online Documents
Kourou NS (2020) Right-wing populism and anti-gender movements: the same coin with different faces. Global Political Trends Center. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep. Accessed 1 June 2022
Meret S (2015) Charismatic female leadership and gender: Pia Kjærsgaard and the Danish People’s Party. Patterns Prejud 49(1–2):81–102. https://www.tandfonline.com. Accessed 31 May 2022
Mostov J (2021) Frontiers in Sociology. https://www.frontiersin.org. Accessed 20 Jan 2022
Mudde C (2004) The populist zeitgeist, government and opposition. 39(4):541–563. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com. Accessed 31 May 2022
Mudde C, Rovira Kaltwasser C (2017) Populism: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. https://www.veryshortintroductions.com. Accessed 31 May 2022
Taş H (2022) Chronopolitics of national populism. Glob Stud Cult Power 29(2). https://www.tandfonline.com. Accessed 1 June 2022
Yilmaz I, Omer EF (2021) Populism, violence and authoritarian stability: necropolitics in Turkey. Third World Q 42(7). https://www.tandfonline.com. Accessed 1 June 2022
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Tabassum, S. (2023). Populism, Politics of Exclusion, and Women. In: Chacko Chennattuserry, J., Deshpande, M., Hong, P. (eds) Encyclopedia of New Populism and Responses in the 21st Century. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9859-0_85-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9859-0_85-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9859-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9859-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences