Skip to main content

On Tool Wear Prediction Using Artificial Neural Network and Regression Methodology During Machining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Smart Computing and Cyber Security (SMARTCYBER 2021)

Abstract

The present paper highlights the prediction of tool wear through artificial neural network (ANN) and regression methodology during machining of AISI 4340 steel. Abrasive nature of wear dominates more during experimental investigation. Flank wear model through quadratic regression yields high correlation coefficient (R2 = 0.961 close to unity) which indicates the goodness of fit of the model. Contour plots determine optimal parameters of low levels such as 0.4 mm depth of cut of 0.04 mm/rev feed and 50 m/min cutting speed to obtain minimal flank wear in machining. The average percentage of error between experimental to ANN is found to be only 2.02 whereas this error is maximum in regression model (18.94). Hence, model developed by ANN is found to be effective during machining study for flank wear prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asiltürk I (2012) Predicting surface roughness of hardened AISI 1040 based on cutting parameters using neural networks and multiple regression. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63(1–4):249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kpina B, Nwosu HU (2018) Modelling of cutting parameters in turning operation to enhance surface quality. Int. J Rec Eng Sci 10:17–23

    Google Scholar 

  3. Prakash DB, Krishnaiah DG, Shankar NVS (2016) Optimization of process parameters using Taguchi techniques when turning AISI 1040 steel with coated tools. Int J Mech Eng Technol 7(6):114–122

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basheer AC, Dabade UA, Joshi SS, Bhanuprasad VV, Gadre VM (2008) Modeling of surface roughness in precision machining of metal matrix composites using ANN. J Mater Process Technol 197(1–3):439–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Davim JP, Gaitonde VN, Karnik SR (2008) Investigations into the effect of cutting conditions on surface roughness in turning of free machining steel by ANN models. J Mater Process Technol 205(1–3):16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Escamilla I, Torres L, Perez P, Zambrano P (2008) A comparison between back propagation and the maximum sensibility neural network to surface roughness prediction in machining of Titanium ( Ti 6Al 4V) alloy. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 1009–1019

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ramesh S, Karunamoorthy L, Palanikumar K (2008) Fuzzy modeling and analysis of machining parameters in machining Titanium alloy. Mater Manuf Process 23(4):439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karayel D (2009) Prediction and control of surface roughness in CNC lathe using artificial neural network. J Mater Process Technol 209(7):3125–3137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Asiltürk I, Çunkaş M (2011) Modeling and prediction of surface roughness in turning operations using artificial neural network and multiple regression method. Expert Syst Appl 38(5):5826–5832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Risbood KA, Dixit US, Sahasrabudhe AD (2003) Prediction of surface roughness and dimensional deviation by measuring cutting forces and vibrations in turning process. J Mater Process Technol 132(1–3):203–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Özel T, Karpat Y (2005) Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 45(4–5):467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsourveloudis NC (2010) Predictive modeling of the Ti6Al4V alloy surface roughness. J Intell Robot Syst 60(3–4):513–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar R, Sahoo AK, Das RK, Panda A, Mishra PC (2018) Modelling of flank wear, surface roughness and cutting temperature in sustainable hard turning of AISI D2 steel. Proc Manufact 20:406–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sahu NK, Andhare AB, Andhale S, Abraham RR (2018) Prediction of surface roughness in turning of Ti-6Al-4V using cutting parameters, forces and tool vibration. In: IOP Conference Series, Mater Sci Eng 346(1): 1–12

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sahoo, A.K., Panda, A., Kumar, R. (2022). On Tool Wear Prediction Using Artificial Neural Network and Regression Methodology During Machining. In: Pattnaik, P.K., Sain, M., Al-Absi, A.A. (eds) Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Smart Computing and Cyber Security. SMARTCYBER 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 395. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9480-6_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics