Abstract
Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is one of the important oilseed crops cultivated worldwide for its oil and confectionary purposes. Among the crops where heterosis has been successfully exploited, sunflower assumes importance as that of maize. Identification of the PET-1 cytoplasm along with the complementary fertility restoration system is a landmark achievement which paved the way for transformation of an ornamental crop to a commercial oil yielding crop. Breeding objectives are directed towards development of cultivars with high seed yield, early maturity, resistance to diseases (downy mildew, powdery mildew, rust, necrosis disease, Alternariaster leaf spot), insect pests (Helicoverpa, sucking pests) and tolerance to herbicides, besides improved content and quality of seed oil and protein. Genetic enhancement for widening the trait base exploited traditional breeding methods, mutation breeding and interspecific gene transfer. Interspecific hybridization was adopted as one of the key tools by various research groups due to the existence of a rich repertoire of genes in the wild Helianthus species, and several economically important traits such as cytoplasmic male sterility, resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, herbicide tolerance and seed quality traits were successfully introgressed. The past two decades witnessed advancements in molecular marker technology and genomics which have been successfully used in marker-assisted breeding for simple inherited traits, while traits governed by quantitative trait loci still remain a challenge for the breeders. Despite the availability of genes in wild Helianthus species, successful transfer to cultivar germplasm is hampered by crossability between cultivated sunflower (annual diploid) and Helianthus species varying in habit (diploid perennial) and ploidy (tetraploids, hexaploids) warranting the use of genetic engineering approaches. This chapter presents a comprehensive account of the history, botany, the extent of genetic diversity in cultivated and wild Helianthus species. Strategies are adopted for development of inbreds and hybrids, seed production methodology and progress with regard to exploitation of molecular marker and genomic resources in marker-assisted breeding.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
19.1 Introduction
Sunflower is an important annual edible oilseed crop of Asteraceae family grown globally over an area of 27.36 m. ha with a production of 56 mt (FAOSTAT 2019) and world average yield of 2048 kg/ha. Because of its wide adaptability to diverse agro-climatic situation, it is grown in all the countries crossing climatic and geographical boundaries. Being photo-insensitive and day neutral, it can be grown throughout the year, i.e. kharif, rabi and spring/summer, and it is an ideal crop for contingency cropping plan. Being a short duration crop, it can fit into various inter- and sequence cropping systems. Leading producing countries are Ukraine, Russia and Argentina, while countries like Belarus, France, Hungary, Romania, Kazakhstan, Turkey, Tanzania, China and India produce relatively smaller quantity. The highest-yielding countries are Hungary (3025 kg/ha), China (2847 kg/ha), Turkey (2794 kg/ha), Romania (2782 kg/ha), Ukraine (2560 kg/ha), Bulgaria (2375 kg/ha), France (2149 kg/ha) and Argentina (2039 kg/ha) with an average yield of >2.0 t/ha as against the lowest-yielding countries like India and Myanmar with <1.0 t/ha. The crop has become one of the important oilseed crops in India with an area of 2.4 lakh ha and a production of 2.6 mt of seed (2019–2020).
In India, sunflower is mostly grown in the Southern and Central Peninsula comprising Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra and Tamil Nadu. The highest (>50%) area of sunflower is covered by only a single state (Karnataka) with productivity of 785 kg/ha. It has spread to non-traditional states like Punjab, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh as an important oilseed crop and is grown in West Bengal, Bihar and Odisha as well. The productivity (891 kg/ha) of sunflower in India at present is far lower than the world average (2048 kg/ha). Despite high productivity in Punjab (1950 kg/ha), Gujarat (1820 kg/ha), Haryana (1743 kg/ha) and Telangana (1698 kg/ha), area under sunflower has declined drastically due to unavailability of better hybrids that can give more than 3.0 t/ha seed yield, price fluctuations, shift in cropping pattern, profitability of other crops compared to sunflower, withdrawal of private players from sunflower research, bird damage and vulnerability to several biotic and abiotic stresses during various stages of crop growth.
19.2 Economic Importance
In pre-historic times, the North American Indians for the first time found that the seeds of wild sunflowers were a rich source of food and domesticated the plant. Different colour dyes like purple, black and yellow extracted from ray florets of wild sunflowers were used to dye basketry materials. The Hopi Indians obtained a purple dye from deep purple achenes (Heiser Jr 1976) to decorate their bodies. In the southwest, people used it as an antidote to snake bites and to cure rattlesnake bites by chewing the fresh or dried root followed by sucking the snake bite wound (Camazine and Bye 1980). The Europeans also used oil as a remedy for heart diseases, pulmonary infections, cold and whooping coughs (Heiser Jr 1976). It was cultivated as an ornamental or garden plant, where the blooms were cherished for their beauty and the seeds were eaten by both humans and wildlife. The oil is used for human consumption, salad oil, making paints, soaps, as biofuel and candles. Sunflower oil has potential applications in the cosmetic industry (Oliveira et al. 2019). Sunflower meal is an excellent source of protein for human consumption and as a supplementary diet which enhances the animal growth and milk production. Sunflower cake is used in South Africa and Tanzania as the main component of livestock feeds. Some species of sunflowers are grown for fodder or silage.
19.3 Origin and History
The genus Helianthus is derived from the Greek word helios meaning sun and anthos meaning flower and belongs to the subdivision Tubiflorae and tribe Heliantheae. It is a member of the Asteraceae (Compositae) family and has a typical composite flower. The cultivated sunflower originated in North America from a diploid (2n = 34) annual wild H. annuus species (Smith 2014). Sunflower is native to North America, but commercialization of the plant took place in Russia. The American Indians were the first to domesticate the multi-headed ornamental plant into a single-headed plant with a variety of seed colours.
The beginning of domestication and the first steps of sunflower breeding date back to the time when it was cultivated by native Americans over 4000 years ago (Seiler et al. 2017). It was used in food, to obtain oil, for medical purposes, and as an ornamental plant. From its wild weedy forms, the crop has spread to Europe during the sixteenth century and later to former USSR wherein the crop was domesticated. Sunflower as a cultivated plant was reintroduced to North America from Europe in the late nineteenth century. After the Second World War, the introduction of Russian varieties into Europe and America had a decisive impact on the development of sunflower as a commercial oilseed crop. Sunflower oil on commercial scale was first produced in Russia between 1830 and 1840.
19.4 Floral Biology
In sunflower, the inflorescence which is a capitulum or head is most prominent because of its large size and conspicuous yellow colour of the ray florets. The capitulum is made up of two distinct flower types: outer single row of ray florets which are male sterile and the inner disc florets which are hermaphrodite and fertile. The disc florets are arranged in arcs radiating from the centre of the head. Each disc floret is made up of inferior ovary, two pappi (modified sepals) and a tubular corolla formed by the fusion of five petals except at the tip. The five anthers are also fused to form a tube (syngenesious) with filaments attached independently at the base of the corolla tube. The style is inside the anther tube with stigma divided at the tip. When the flower is fully developed, the style elongates and the bifid stigma curls outward.
19.5 Pollination Mechanism
The unfolding of outer ray florets indicates the beginning of flowering in sunflower. Opening of disc florets follows from the periphery proceeding gradually towards the centre of the head at the rate of one to four whorls per day. The flowering in the capitulum is completed in 7–10 days depending upon the size of the capitulum and prevailing weather. Anthesis takes place in the morning between 6:00 and 8:00 AM on warm sunny days. Anthesis is delayed if weather is cool, cloudy or wet. The staminal filaments rapidly elongate and exert the anther tube from the corolla. Pollen is dehisced within the anther tube. The style elongates and forces the two lobed pubescent stigmas up the anther tube. The stigma is not receptive at this stage because the two lobes are held together covering the inner receptive surface. The stigma pushes the dehisced pollen through the upper end of the anther tube, and the lobes separate exposing inner receptive surface. The sunflower to a large extent is protandrous as anthesis takes place first, accompanied by a time lag of 10:00–12:00 h in the maturation of male and female elements. Because of this, cross-pollination is favoured as a rule, and insects, particularly bees, play an important role in pollination. The pollen is spiny and well adapted for transmission by insects mainly by honey bees. Pollination and fertilization occur when the spiny viable pollen is transferred to the stigmatic surface. The achene is the fruit of the sunflower that consists of outer pericarp (hull), thin and papery inner seed coat and embryo (kernel). The achene is attached by a funiculus, but the seed coat is free from the inner wall of the pericarp. Seed is nonendospermic, and the embryo is the major portion and is made up of mostly cotyledons. The endosperm is largely made up of a single layer of aleurone cells coalesced with the seed coat.
19.6 Genetic Resources
Availability of appropriate genetic resources with wide diversity is the key to any crop improvement programme. Several germplasm collections have been stored in different gene banks across the world. The highest number of collections are maintained at USDA, USA (total 5217 accessions, of which 2616 are cultivated H. annuus accessions, 2597 are wild accessions including 1693 annual and 904 perennial and 4 are diverse CMS sources) (Terzić et al. 2020). The France collection at INRA maintains 3933 accessions, 2703 cultivated H. annuus accessions, 10 diverse CMS sources and 1214 wild accessions of which 804 accessions are annual and 410 are perennial species. In India, ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad gene bank maintains 3102 sunflower accessions. The collection includes exotic collection, augmented germplasm, inbreds, populations, genetic stocks, gene pools for high oil, high seed yield, autogamy, backcross-derived lines and wild species including their derivatives. Other countries that maintain sunflower germplasm accessions are Russia (1210), Argentina (922), Romania (681), Serbia (593), Germany (503) and Bulgaria (423). The lowest numbers of accessions are maintained in Spain (196). The collection may help improve economical traits related to yield and quality and also serve as the source for biotic and abiotic resistance genes. Further, the elite germplasm may help initiate sunflower breeding programmes in many countries. The details of germplasm collections in gene banks in different countries are presented in Table 19.1.
19.7 Wild Helianthus Species
Cultivated sunflower is diploid with chromosome number 2n = 2x = 34. The genus Helianthus includes 53 species, of which 39 are perennials and 14 annuals being maintained at the USDA-ARS, North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station (NCRPIS) in Ames, IA (Seiler and Jan 2014; Seiler et al. 2017). The 14 annual species are diploid (2n = 2x = 34), and the 39 perennial species include 26 diploids, three tetraploids (2n = 4x = 68), seven hexaploids (2n = 6x = 102), one mixoploid of either diploid or tetraploid and two mixoploids of tetraploid or hexaploid (Liu et al. 2017). Some species occur in dual ploidy series, such as H. ciliaris L., which displays both teraploid and hexaploid states, and H. decapetalus L., which exists in diploid and tetraploid forms (Atlagic 2004).
19.7.1 Utilization of Helianthus Species
The wild Helianthus species exhibit high variability for several agronomic attributes. Sunflower is one of the few crops where the use of wild Helianthus species in sunflower breeding programmes has produced significant results. Genes for disease (Seiler 2010) and insect resistance (Thompson et al. 1981), oil (Jovanka 2004) and protein content and quality (Miller et al. 1992), cytoplasmic male sterility (Horn 2002), herbicide tolerance (Al-Khatib et al. 1998; Al-Khatib and Miller 2000) or agronomic and physiological traits (Seiler et al. 2017) have been identified in wild Helianthus species and transferred into cultivated lines in the USSR, the USA and many East European countries. Interspecific hybridization paved the way for hybrid breeding in sunflower wherein several CMS and fertility restorer gene sources were derived from wild Helianthus species (Horn and Friedt 2006). The single most important breakthrough has been the discovery of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) via interspecific hybridization and Rf genes involving H. petiolaris, which allowed practical use of heterosis and development of hybrids worldwide (Leclercq 1969; Kinman 1970). In India, the sunflower variety LSF-8 with tolerance to downy mildew, rust and Alternariaster was derived from the cross involving H. tuberosus. The variety CO-5 (COSFV-5) with moderate resistance to Alternariaster leaf spot, rust and necrosis disease was derived from the gene pool of H. annuus x H. praecox (Sujatha et al. 2019). Using conventional methods of crossing, several prebred lines with altered plant architecture, high yield and oil content, maturity duration and inbuilt tolerance to major biotic stresses have been developed from crosses involving diploid annuals (Sujatha et al. 2008). Prebred lines derived from H. annuus × H. argophyllus crosses were found resistant to leafhopper (unpublished). Jacob et al. (2017) identified one sulfonylurea-based accession of H. praecox (PRA-1823) resistant to herbicides as well as to powdery mildew. Different diploid annual wild species like H. debilis, H. petiolaris, H. argophyllus, H. praecox and wild H. annuus are being utilized for broadening the genetic base of cultivated sunflower in India. Concerted efforts are warranted to overcome the deleterious effects of distant hybridization and combine desirable traits with high seed and oil yield. Information on the global scenario of the progress made in augmentation and maintenance of wild Helianthus sources and utilization for introgression of gene(s) for resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses and oil content and quality is reviewed in the article of Seiler et al. (2017).
19.8 Evolution of High Oil Sunflower
Transformation of an ornamental sunflower into a high oil yielding crop occurred in the USSR by 1769 and by 1830, and the manufacture of sunflower oil was done on a commercial scale. During the early nineteenth century, the Soviet plant breeder, Vasilii Stepanovich Pustovoit, in 1860, initiated selection for high oil content from local varieties which contained 30–33% oil content, and concerted efforts at several agricultural stations resulted in the gradual stepping up of oil content in the cultivars from 33 to 50%. Consequently, the seed oil content increase was 21%. In 1927, V.S. Pustovoit bred a new sunflower variety with 35% oil content. High oil sunflower varieties such as VNIIMK-3519, VNIIMK-6540, VNIIMK-8931, Peredovik, Armavirsky-3497 and VNIIMK-309 developed by Pustovoit and his associates enabled the spread of sunflower as an oilseed crop (Pustovoit 1964). Much of the change was achieved by breeding for thin hulls surrounding the kernels. Following Pustovoit’s method (Fig. 19.1), new early, broomrape-resistant, high oil content (45–48%) and high seed yielding varieties such as Krasnodarets, Armavirets, Chrnyanka-66 and Enissei were developed. These high oil selections found their way later on to all the continents, and most of the recently bred varieties owe their origin directly or indirectly to the materials bred in the USSR.
19.9 Inbreeding, Heterosis and Development of Hybrids
Inbreeding as a method for improving sunflower was used as early as 1922. Cardon (1922) described the available variation in sunflower varieties and attempted to isolate different types by self-pollination. Inbreeding was used in the Soviet Union during the 1920s to develop lines with improved oil percentage, strong single stems and resistance to diseases and insect pests (Calson et al. 1972; Jagodkin 1937; Voskoboinik and Soldatov 1974). Unrau and White (1944) recorded a 35% decline in seed yield after one generation of inbreeding in the cultivar Mennonite. Breeders soon realized that the value of inbreeding was to develop inbreds with certain desirable characteristics for subsequent crossing to produce synthetic cultivars or interline hybrids. Attia et al. (2014) observed 2.25% decrease in oil content due to inbreeding. Some of the results involving hybridization of inbred lines showed heterosis for plant height, head diameter, seed size and seed yield. To reduce inbreeding depression, Kovacik and Skaloud (1975) recommended sib cross in early inbred generation. Shvetsova (1979) observed no substantial differences between fertile lines and their male sterile counterparts for oil content in inbreeding. Schuster (1980) studied inbred lines for 25 generations and revealed mean inbreeding depressions for seed yield (61%), plant height (20%), capitulum diameter (21%), kernel/husk ratio (3%), crude oil content of achene (7%) and 1000 seed weight (22%). Tuberosa (1983) observed 41.7% decrease in achene yield, 4.2% in oil content and 44% in oil yield in S4 generation due to inbreeding. Gurev and Osipova (1986) studied a number of varieties and hybrids for the degree of inbreeding depression and found that the yield decreased by 33.0% in I1, 53.5% in I2, 46.5% in I3 and 45% in I4 generations.
As early as 1940, Putt in Canada carried out preliminary studies on heterosis breeding. Unrau and White (1944) reported 60.8% increase in seed yield and great uniformity in a hybrid compared to unimproved Mennonite. Heterosis studies carried out in sunflower have been presented for interline, inter-varietal and top-cross hybrids involving genetic and cytoplasmic male sterility. In a study of inter-varietal crosses, Kovacik (1959, 1960) observed good response with an increase in seed yield to the extent of 1 to 20% over the parents. While comparing progenies from selfed and crossed seeds, Kurnik and Zelles (1962) observed 18.7% more height, 4.2% higher seed yield, 10.8% higher 1000 seed weight and 3 days of delayed flowering in the plants from crossed seeds. Putt (1964) reported highly significant values of heterosis for seed yield and plant height in a diallel study involving ten inbred lines. In eight sunflower hybrids, Putt (1966) observed heterosis for plant height and seed yield. Reports from various countries indicate (Gundev 1966; Fick and Zimmer 1974; Putt and Dorrell 1975) heterosis to an extent of 61% in the crosses of inbred lines for seed yield and much greater uniformity in hybrids. Kolczowskii (1971) observed an average 10.4% heterosis in the F1s from 20 crosses among varieties of diverse origin in comparison with the better parent. Stoyanova et al. (1971) studied heterosis in 140 F1 hybrids obtained from crosses among 192 stabilised inbred lines and reported a heterosis of 25 to 29%. Ge (1971) observed heterosis of 15.9% for head diameter and 47.0% for a total number of seeds per head in certain sunflower hybrids. Heterosis of 12 to 21% for seed yield is reported by Klimov and Ermoshin (1977) in certain top-cross hybrids developed from 29 Soviet varieties and 3 testers. In India, Seetharam et al. (1977) studied the performance of hybrids produced by crossing four CMS and two fertility restorer lines and observed a significant positive heterosis for days to flowering, plant height, head diameter, test weight, oil content and seed yield. Sudhakar and Seetharam (1980) reported heterosis for seed yield up to 41.31% over the mid-parent and up to 5.24% over the better parent in 27 top-cross hybrids. Choudhary and Anand (1984) observed 62.8% heterosis for seed yield, 23.1% for oil content and negative heterosis (7.7%) for days to flowering over better parent. Singh et al. (1984) in a study on performance of variety × inbred crosses observed heterosis for yield to an extent of 47.0–206.0%. The studies of Shivaraju (1984) on ten F1 hybrids indicated an average heterosis to an extent of 175.0% for seed yield, 129.0% for the number of filled seeds and 6.87% for oil content. Giriraj et al. (1986) observed 15.2% heterosis for head diameter, −7.7% for days to flowering and 37.7% for the number of filled achenes.
The advantages of maize and other crops stimulated sunflower researchers to work towards hybrid development in the crop. Introduction of male sterility using GA3 tried on a large scale in many countries had inherent problems in exploiting heterosis satisfactorily in sunflower. Several workers (Luciano et al. 1965; Putt 1962) tried to develop hybrids based on the self-incompatibility mechanism. The occurrence of a higher proportion of selfs in hybrid seed plots came in the way of large-scale seed production of hybrids based on this system. Before the discovery of cytoplasmic male sterility and the corresponding fertility restoration system, genetic male sterility discovered as early as 1934 was tried to produce hybrids (Leclercq 1966; Putt and Heiser 1966). This system was widely explored in France and Romania despite the major disadvantage of removal of 50% plants in seed production plots and higher costs associated with seed production.
The most significant development leading to the large-scale exploitation of heterosis was the discovery of cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS) and restorer system first developed by Leclercq (1969) working at the French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) from the interspecific cross H. petiolaris Nutt. × H. annuus L. (the variety Armavirsky-9345) back crossed to H. annuus L. and identification of fertility restorer lines RHA-265 and RHA-266 derived from a composite cross by Kinman (1970) in the USA. After this discovery there has been a shift in the breeding emphasis from open-pollinated varieties (OPV) to development of single- and three-way cross hybrids. The first hybrid using CMS and genetic restoration system was available as early as 1972, and within a span of 5 years, the hybrids spread to many countries in Europe and America replacing the open-pollinated varieties. Today hybrids are predominantly cultivated worldwide, and > 95% of the area is covered by them.
19.10 Development of Sunflower Hybrids in India
The commercial cultivation of sunflower in India started in 1972 with the introduction of five Russian varieties [VNIIMK-8931 (EC-68413), Peredovik (EC-68414), Armavirskii-3497 (EC-68415), Armaverta (EC-69874) and Vashod (Sunrise)]. The value of hybrids and importance of heterosis breeding were recognized early with the inception of the All India Coordinated Research Project (AICRP) on Oilseeds in 1972–1973. A special project on ‘Promotion of Research and Developmental Efforts on Hybrids in Selected Crops-Sunflower’ was launched in 1989 as a thrust programme to develop hybrids for diverse situations. Experimental hybrids were developed at Bangalore in 1974–1975 using four CMS lines, namely, CMS-2A, CMS-124A, CMS-204A and CMS-234A, and two restorer lines, viz. RHA-266 and RHA-274, introduced from the USA. Based on seed yield, oil content, yield stability and synchronization of flowering in male and female parents, the first public sector hybrid BSH-1 (CMS-234A × RHA-274) was released for commercial cultivation from public sector in 1980 (Seetharam 1980). Since then, the hybrid base has been further widened in the country through AICRP centres. Till today, a total of 30 hybrids and 19 varieties were released in India from public sector (Sujatha et al. 2019). The salient features of hybrids released since 1980 are given in Table 19.2.
19.11 Major Breeding Objectives
19.11.1 Seed Yield
The main goal of plant breeding is to increase yield. Seed yield is a complex and polygenic controlled trait and strongly influenced by environmental conditions, and hence both additive (Sheriff and Appandurai 1985; Singh et al. 1989; Petakov 1992) and non-additive (Bajaj et al. 1997; Rether et al. 1998; Kumar et al. 1998; Goksoy et al. 2000; Cecconi et al. 2000) genetic effects play an important role in the inheritance of seed yield. Because of the importance of environmental effects, the heritability for seed yield is relatively low compared with other agronomic traits. Recurrent selection for general combining ability (gca), reciprocal recurrent selection, which capitalize on additive genetic variance, and recurrent selection for specific combining ability (sca), which capitalize on the non-additive portion of genetic variance, would be more effective breeding methods in improving seed yield. Seed yield consists of three main components: number of plants per hectare, seeds per plant and 1000 seed weight. Yield per unit area can be increased in a number of ways. One of the main approaches is to increase the seed number and seed size per head while maintaining or increasing plant number per unit area (Merrien 1992). To realize high seed yield in sunflower, parents that have good gca and sca for most yield components can be used in sunflower breeding (Tyagi 1988). Another most effective way of increasing the yield of sunflower is to exploit heterosis through hybrids. Sunflower seed yield may be increased significantly by breeding for seed size. According to Morozov (1947), the increase in 1000 seed mass by only 1.0 g brings an increase in seed yield of 40.0 kg/ha. To achieve high seed yield per unit area, many breeders consider it essential to develop a genotype capable of providing more than 1500 seeds per capitulum. A head size of 20 to 25 cm and flat shape are important in attaining this goal.
19.11.2 Oil Content and Quality
Sunflower seeds are mainly used for oil extraction, which is predominantly used for human nutrition. The oil concentration in sunflower may be reaching a plateau, but most breeders believe that selecting for higher oil content and oil quality in seed is still a very important and realistic objective when breeding for high oil and quality sunflower varieties and hybrids. According to Borodulina and Khachenko (1976), oil accumulation in sunflower seed begins on the first day after flowering and continues until physiological maturity. The period of most intensive oil accumulation takes place between the 15th and 22nd day after the beginning of flowering. It is a quantitatively inherited trait, and genetic variation is affected by additive genes. The heritability of this trait is relatively high to medium (Mokrani et al. 2002), and progress has been made in increasing oil content in sunflower. Hence, it can be improved through breeding methods like simple recurrent selection or through population improvement. Miller et al. (1987) reported that oleic acid was controlled by a major gene with partially dominant gene action. Hence, it is clear that breeding for high oleic content is possible in sunflower. Wild Helianthus species may also be utilized for increasing oil, protein content and quality in cultivated sunflower. Thompson et al. (1978, 1981) reported that H. niveus (Benth.) and H. salicifolius are potential sources for oil content. ‘Pervenets’ breeding lines contain a dominant mutation, which increases oleic acid content to more than 89% in the sunflower oil. Several QTLs have been identified on various linkage groups for seed oil content and altered fatty acid composition of sunflower oil. These QTLs had additive to dominant effects and closely related to domesticated related traits in sunflower (Leon et al. 2001; Burke et al. 2005; Ameena et al. 2016).
19.11.3 Diversification of Cytosterility System
Although more than 72 diverse CMS systems have been reported in sunflower, until now only one system based on PET-1 cytoplasm has been exploited commercially due to the non-availability of proper restorers and maintainers for other CMS lines. Such type of dependency on a single source of male sterility could lead to a narrow genetic base leading to a potential risk and high degree of genetic vulnerability in hybrid sunflower cultivation which can predispose the crop for some unforeseen situations of biotic and abiotic stresses in future years. Sunflower yields have plateaued with the currently available genotypes. Hence, it is essential to diversify the parental material (CMS and restorer base) to develop hybrids and varieties with high yield potential. Development of newer CMS sources should be complemented by identification of suitable restorers for effective hybrid seed production. Among several strategies available to overcome this problem, diversification of CMS sources itself is possibly the inexpensive and most effective method.
19.11.4 Biotic Constraints
Biotic stresses cause significant losses in crop plants and management of biotic stresses (diseases and pests) not only increases the cost of production but also has implications on environment and ecology (Bainsla and Meena 2016). The important diseases that cause significant yield losses in sunflower are Alternaria leaf spot [Alternariaster helianthi (Hansf.) Tub. and Nish.] (Carson 1985), powdery mildew (Golovinomyces orontii (Castagne) V.P. Heluta), downy mildew [Plasmopara halstedii (Farl.) Berl. & De Toni] (Gulya et al. 2013), sunflower necrosis disease (SND) (Bhat and Reddy 2016) and rust (Puccinia helianthi Schwein.) (Shtienberg and Zohar 1992). Sunflower production in India is constrained by the susceptibility of the released varieties/hybrids to a wide array of biotic stresses. In India, the major diseases and insect pests prevalent in sunflower-growing areas are SND, Alternariaster leaf spot, powdery mildew, downy mildew, Spodoptera litura and leafhoppers (Basappa and Santhalakshmi Prasad 2005). Sunflower leaf curl virus (SuLCV) also has become severe in India, and there reports on resistance sources for SuLCV from wild species are not available (Govindappa et al. 2011). Insect pests of sunflower are different in tropical and temperate countries. Crop losses due to insect pests in sunflower vary from place to place. Continuous cultivation of the crop subjected it to disease pressure with overlapping disease cycles. Host plant resistance is a major objective in most of the breeding programmes across the crop species including sunflower and is considered as one of the most viable options for enhancing the productivity. The level of resistance available in cultivated species/primary gene pool for some of the diseases and insect pests is rather low, and only a limited number of resistance sources are available. This limited resistance is inadequate to manage more virulent pathogenic strains of diseases that arise during intensive crop production. Therefore, the discovery and incorporation of new genes from wild species provide a means of complementing crop improvement programmes (Table 19.3). The chances of finding dominant genes containing resistance to economically important diseases are higher in wild species which if deployed effectively using new breeding tools including molecular and biotechnology can be an effective means of combating virulent pathogens.
19.11.5 Abiotic Constraints
Sunflower is generally grown in marginal lands, often in semiarid conditions, where abiotic stresses always act as a major limiting factor for its production and productivity in many parts of the world (Škorić 1987). Therefore, development of a heat-resistant sunflower breeding population or hybrid or breeding for resistance to drought, high temperature and salinity assumes priority for sustainable yield under abiotic stress conditions.
Drought is considered as the single most devastating environmental stress, which decreases crop productivity more than any other environmental stresses (Lambers et al. 2008). Chimenti et al. (2002) reported 5–56% yield reduction in sunflower if drought occurs immediately prior to anthesis. An appropriate strategy and criteria of selection are essential in selection for drought resistance. Restorer gene pool lines RGP-46-P3 and RGP-60-P1 developed through simple recurrent selection at ICAR-IIOR, Hyderabad, recorded low drought susceptibility index and good seed yield under moisture stress and were found promising for drought breeding. The use of landraces, cultivated hybrids and varieties has produced some positive results, but not to the extent that would secure stable sunflower production under drought conditions. The best results in enhancing drought resistance of cultivated sunflower have been achieved using wild Helianthus species. Some wild sunflower species have been reported as drought-tolerant species, and the introgression of traits from these species is expected to increase drought tolerance in cultivated breeding lines (Saucă et al. 2014). Among the related species, H. argophyllus was identified as particularly drought tolerant (Belhassen et al. 1996; Jan et al. 2014; Saucă et al. 2014; Hussain et al. 2017).
Seiler (2012) indicated that H. anomalus Blake and H. deserticola Heiser are highly adapted to desert and sandy areas and could be used as germplasm source for heat stress studies. Sideli et al. (2013) reported H. cusickii to be a potential source for genes for drought resistance.
Salinity is also another factor reducing sunflower yield in many countries including India. Identification of resistance sources from cultivated sunflower is very important for improvement of salinity tolerance of sunflower. Based on plant growth and survival, hybrids CSFH-12205, CO-2, KBSH-44 and DRSH-1 and inbreds, viz. COSF-1A and CMS-103A, were found tolerant at Gangavathi, and CSFH-12205, CO-2, KBSH-44, COSF-6A and COSF-7A were found tolerant at Machilipatnam (Anonymous 2018). Seiler et al. (1981) and Rogers et al. (1982) suggested that H. paradoxus would be a likely candidate for salt-tolerant genes. Miller and Seiler (2003) transferred salt-tolerant genes from H. paradoxus into cultivated sunflower and released two salt-tolerant maintainer lines, HA-429 and HA-430. Hajjar and Hodgkin (2007) suggests that H. paradoxus has a great potential to breed more salt-tolerant cultivated sunflowers, with hybrids developed using this trait potentially providing a 25% yield premium in saline soils. Shtereva et al. (2015) suggested that the diploid perennial species H. mollis could serve as an excellent candidate of salt-tolerant genes. Breeders should apply effective screening methods to identify the donor wild species that possess genes useful in breeding for abiotic stresses and equally effective breeding methods to transfer these genes into cultivated sunflower genotypes.
19.12 Breeding Approaches
19.12.1 Conventional Approaches
Sunflower is a highly cross-pollinated (allogamous) crop, and therefore breeding procedures suitable for cross-pollinated crops are utilized for improvement of sunflower. In general, introduction, mass selection, pedigree method, backcross breeding, recurrent selection and Pustovoit method of reserves and mutation breeding were used for sunflower improvement. The choice of the suitable breeding programme for the development of tolerant cultivars to a defined abiotic stress depends upon a number of factors: screening techniques, sources and mechanism(s) of tolerance, modes of gene action and heritability and their relationship to agronomic traits (Meena et al. 2016).
19.12.1.1 Introduction
Plant introduction consists of taking a genotype or a group of genotypes of plants into new environments where they were not grown earlier. In India, the first sunflower variety ‘EC-68415’ was developed in 1976 by AICRP (Sunflower) Centre, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, and released for Karnataka state through an introduction. Another short-duration (80–82 days) popular variety ‘Morden’ was developed through introduction from Canada in 1978. It was released for all India cultivation. Morden was very popular among sunflower growers due to its short stature, short duration and high seed yield.
19.12.1.2 Mass Selection
Mass selection is a method of selection of desirable plants from a population based on their phenotypic characteristics. This method has been used for cultivar improvement in sunflower for many years and was effective in developing cultivars with early maturity, higher oil percentage and resistance to diseases. The efficiency of mass selection depends on gene effects of the selected traits, their heritability, sample size and genotype × environment interaction. Mass selection is effective for characters controlled by additive genes (Gowda and Seetharam 2008). Many varieties like Fuksinka-3, Fuksinka-10, Omskiy Skorospeliy, etc. were developed in the Soviet Union through this method (Skoric 1992). Varieties like Guayacan INTA, Cordobes INTA, Manfredi INTA, etc. were also developed using mass selection in Argentina (Luciano and Davreux 1967). In India, the variety Surya (PKV-SUF-72-37) was developed by mass selection from Latur bulk and released for Maharashtra state in 1982. Still, this is one of the important breeding methods for sunflower improvement for many traits.
19.12.1.3 Pedigree Method
Pedigree selection is the most common procedure used to develop sunflower inbred lines. The procedure involves self-pollination of phenotypically desirable plants within existing cultivars, breeding populations or segregating generations of planned crosses. Fick and Swallers (1974) used this method to develop the first downy mildew-resistant restorer lines, viz. RHA-271, RHA-273 and RHA-274. Hulke et al. (2010) also developed new rust and downy mildew-resistant restorer line RHA-464 (Reg. No. GP-325; PI-655015; experimental ‘05187’), using pedigree method. In India, a large number of fertility restorer lines have been developed using the pedigree method (Meena et al. 2013). Jaffar et al. (2019) developed high oleic lines through pedigree method using PI-1806 × B-124 parents. In India, this is the only breeding method utilized by breeders for development of restorer lines and inbreds.
19.12.1.4 Backcross Method
Backcross selection refers to a form of breeding that uses a superior inbred that may nevertheless lack a particular trait. It is mainly used for the transfer of disease-resistant traits in superior inbred lines. But the fertility restorer lines are also developed by incorporating dominant restorer gene(s) by backcrossing using inbred lines of proven performance as the recurrent parent (Vranceanu and Stoenescu 1976). Backcross is also used for the transfer of disease resistance from related species to cultivated species. This method is also employed to transfer male sterility trait from a donor. New CMS lines are mostly developed in sunflower through the backcross method. High oleic acid (>90%) was identified in AOP-l and was used as a donor of this character in a backcross programme to incorporate the trait into commercial material. Liu et al. (2013) introgressed fertility restoration gene Rf6 for CMS-514A from an interspecific amphiploid (Amp) of H. angustifolius/P-21 (2n = 68) into cultivated sunflower by backcross method.
19.12.1.5 Recurrent Selection
Recurrent selection refers to the method of selecting special gene traits from the best sunflower family. Presently, recurrent selection appears to be the most promising method of increasing the frequency of desirable genotypes in a source population, thus enhancing the chance of isolating superior inbred lines. It is a useful method in sunflower breeding, especially for the establishment of the gene pool for different purposes, primarily of increased productivity and resistance to diseases, insects, drought and other stresses. The recurrent selection method has not been exploited in breeding programmes in India even though considerable progress has been achieved using this method in other countries like the USA and France (Virupakshappa 1987). Miller et al. (1977) obtained an increment of 12.2% of oil content after three cycles of simple recurrent selection. Miller and Hammond (1985) reported an increase in seed yield by 6.3% after three cycles of selection. Resistance for Sclerotinia sclerotiorum was obtained by Vear and De Labrouhe (1984) through three cycles of recurrent selection. Dr. Pustovoit in the USSR was a pioneer to practically utilize recurrent selection for oil improvement in which selection was based on progeny performance and subsequent cross-pollination is allowed only among superior progenies. Pustovoit (1964) was highly successful in improving oil content from about 30% in the early 1920s to over 50% in the present-day varieties. Shobha Rani and Ravikumar (2006) also improved partial resistance to Alternariaster leaf blight through sporophytic and gametophytic recurrent selection. Vear et al. (2007) reported significantly improved Sclerotinia head rot resistance after 15 cycles of recurrent selection. Harinarayana et al. (1980) noticed an improvement in seed yield, seed set and oil content through intra- and inter-population improvement. Powdery mildew-resistant restorer inbreds RGP-21-P4-S1–3 and RGP-50-P2-S1 were developed through population improvement after three cycles (Anonymous 2018). A wide range of variability was observed by Seneviratne et al. (2004) for plant height, days to maturity, head diameter, number of filled seeds and seed yield in C3 cycle (Anonymous 2018). Emphasis has to be laid on using recurrent selection for population improvement to act as a source for development of new parental lines, and the improvement of existing parental lines should receive more attention to achieve a real breakthrough in yield.
19.12.1.6 Mutation Breeding
This method was mostly used in cultivated sunflower for creating genetic variability through irradiation with gamma rays or chemical mutagens. Seed treatment with gamma irradiation has been extensively used to increase variability for several characteristics, such as days to flowering, seed weight, seed coat colour and oil content (Giriraj et al. 1990; Jambhulkar and Joshua 1999; Encheva et al. 2003) in cultivated sunflower. Genetic variability for resistance to Alternariaster leaf spot disease was induced by radiation or chemical mutagens (De Oliveira et al. 2004). Orobanche-resistant lines were developed through mutation breeding by Encheva et al. (2008, 2012, 2014). Cvejić et al. (2014) found changes in fatty acid and tocopherol content and composition in sunflower oil. Lofgren and Ramaraje-Lers (1982) isolated plants with resistance to sunflower rust in M2 and M3. Herbicide-resistant sunflower mutants were generated by induced mutagenesis (Bervill et al. 1992; Sala et al. 2008). Drumeva (2012) developed 159 new downy mildew, Phomopsis and Alternaria-resistant fertility restorer lines with desirable breeding characteristics by using the gamma ray-induced parthenogenesis method. Jan and Rutger (1988) reported induced male sterility in M1 heads of HA-89 treated with mitomycin C and streptomycin. Soldatov (1976) produced high-oleic sunflower variety ‘Pervenets’ by treating the seed of variety VNIIMK-8931 with 0.5% solution of dimethyl sulphate. In India, the sunflower variety Gujarat Sunflower-1 (GAUSUF-15) was developed through mutation breeding and released in 1993 all over India. Another variety CO-3 (TNAUSUF-10) was developed from CO-2 using 5KR gamma rays and released for Tamil Nadu state in 1995. The variety TAS-82 (TAS-82-8-1/3) was developed from Surya variety through mutation breeding in 2006 and recommended for Vidarbha region of Maharashtra state. Readers interested in additional information on mutations can refer to the article of Vasko and Kyrychenko (2019) on induced mutagenesis for the creation of new starting material in sunflower breeding.
19.12.2 Hybrid Seed Production
19.12.2.1 Development of A, B and R Lines
Hybrids developed using the CMS fertility restorer system require three parental lines, viz. CMS or ‘A’ line, fertility maintainer or ‘B’ line and a restorer line or ‘R’ line (male line). In hybrid development programme, inbred lines are developed by selfing or sib mating from adapted varietal populations, gene pools, local varietal populations, inter-varietal hybrids, composites, synthetics, single-cross and multiple-cross hybrids and interspecific hybrids, etc., over the generations and essentially evaluated for combining ability by inter-crossing among the best by following standard genetic model. Once the best combinations are identified based on high combining ability and per se performance, the female line is converted into cytoplasmic male sterile line (A line) with the original inbred as the isogenic maintainer line (B), and the male inbred line is converted into restorer line (R line). CMS lines are developed by repeated backcrossing using known CMS lines as a non-recurrent parent (female parent). About five to six backcrosses are required to derive a new CMS line genetically similar to the recurrent parent. The inbred, which was used as a recurrent parent (male parent), serves as a maintainer (B line). Derived CMS line will be employed as the female in seed production of hybrids along with the selected male line based on the combining ability and productivity. Wherever the hybrids show 100% fertility in F1, the ‘R’ lines may be used directly as the male parent. If the fertility restoration is partial or low in the F1 plants, fertility restorer lines are developed by crossing the selected best combiner as a recurrent parent to a known restorer line of proven performance. By six to seven backcrosses, R gene(s) may be transferred to the selected male line.
19.12.2.2 Maintenance of Parental Lines
Two methods of planting, viz. row method and block method, are followed for maintenance of the ‘A’ line (Fig. 19.2). The A × B crosses are used to maintain the ‘A’ line following separate row and block method of sowing. To take up the breeder/foundation seed production of female (A) line, the planting ratio of ‘A’ and ‘B’ is 3:1. To facilitate better pollination, mark the first two rows and last two rows of the seed plot and subsequently every fourth row with a wooden peg to plant these lines with ‘B’. The sowing of ‘A’ and ‘B’ lines should be taken up by engaging labourers separately. A and B lines in breeder/foundation stages are planted in 3:1 proportion in separate blocks. During anthesis, the pollen is collected from the ‘B’ line and pollinated on to ‘A’ line in respect of breeder/foundation seed production. This method ensures the production of high-quality hybrid seeds and meets the genetic standards.
19.12.2.3 Certified Hybrid Seed Production
To realize high productivity levels in the commercial scale, the supply of quality hybrid seed assumes importance. The production of high-quality seed of parental lines and the certified seed of hybrid requires systematic planning and management on the part of the seed producers (Fig. 19.3). As in the production of ‘A’ line, two methods, viz. row method and block method, are being followed to produce hybrid seed in sunflower (Fig. 19.4). The proportion of female to male is 3:1, i.e. three rows of female (seed parent) to one row of male (pollen parent). In recent times, the seed production agencies have faced serious seed quality problems as the seed lots of hybrids containing a high amount of ‘R’ line plants are contaminated during harvesting/drying in addition to different stages of post-harvest operations followed in the above 3:1 method.
In the suggested block system, A and R lines are planted in separate bocks in 3:1 ratio. At the time of anthesis, the pollen is collected separately from R lines and pollinated on to ‘A’ line in respect of certified seed production. This method ensures the production of high-quality hybrid seed and meets the genetic standards.
19.12.3 Limitations of Conventional Breeding
Traditional approaches to breeding crop plants with improved abiotic stress tolerances have so far met with limited success (Richards 1996). This is due to several contributing factors including the following: (1) the focus has been on yield rather than on specific traits; (2) the difficulties in breeding for stress tolerance traits, which include complexities introduced by genotype by the environment, or G × E interactions and the relatively infrequent use of simple physiological traits as measures of tolerance; and (3) desired traits can only be introduced from closely related species.
19.12.4 Molecular Breeding
Despite the large genome size (2871–3189 Mbp) of cultivated sunflower, concerted efforts led to the genome assembly up to the chromosome level with a total length of 3010 (Mb), protein count of 75,695 and GC content of 38.8% (PRJNA396063). Molecular markers have played a significant role in accelerating sunflower breeding programmes through marker-assisted selection (MAS) by virtue of their abundance, technical ease and detection at any development stage of the plant besides being not affected by environmental factors. To facilitate MAS, a number of molecular marker systems, namely, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), simple sequence repeat (SSR), sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR), cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS), insertion/deletion (INDEL), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and target region amplification polymorphism (TRAP) markers, have been developed and used for various molecular applications in sunflower (Berry et al. 1995; Gentzbittel et al. 1995, 1998; Jan et al. 1998; Flores Berrios et al. 2000; Burke et al. 2002; Mokrani et al. 2002; Bert et al. 2003, 2004; Langar et al. 2003; Yu et al. 2003; Rachid Al-Chaarani et al. 2004; Lai et al. 2005; Hu et al. 2007; Poormohammad Kiani et al. 2007; Yue et al. 2008). These markers have been extensively used in several applications like assessment of genetic relationships among genotypes, construction of linkage maps, tagging and mapping genes/QTLs of agronomic interest, development of genomic and cDNA libraries, map-based cloning and marker-assisted selection.
In sunflower, the first map was developed using RAPD markers (Rieseberg et al. 1993), followed by RFLP markers (Berry et al. 1995; Gentzbittel et al. 1995; Jan et al. 1998), AFLP markers (Gedil et al. 2001), SSR markers (Tang et al. 2003; Yu et al. 2003) and SNP markers (Lai et al. 2005; Bowers et al. 2012; Talukder et al. 2014; Celik et al. 2016; Livaja et al. 2016) covering the 17 linkage groups. These maps were further enriched with gSSRs, EST-SSRs, INDELs, TRAPs and SNPs (Hu et al. 2007; Heesacker et al. 2008), and a consensus map with 10,080 loci was constructed (Bowers et al. 2012). Recently, studies on large-scale SNP detection and generation of large sets of markers through genotyping by sequencing have been undertaken by several groups (Baute et al. 2016; Celik et al. 2016; Talukder et al. 2016; Mangin et al. 2017; Ma et al. 2017; Qi et al. 2017; ). For more information of molecular markers and marker-assisted breeding, readers may refer the articles of Dimitrijevic and Horn (2018).
Molecular markers for simple inherited traits like fertility restoration, herbicide tolerance, resistance to downy mildew, Orobanche cumana, rust, high stearic and oleic acid contents (β and γ tocopherols) have been successfully deployed in marker-assisted breeding programmes (Sujatha and Sujatha 2013). QTLs have been identified, but genome-wide association studies are required. However, for investigating complex traits controlled by polygenes, such as seed yield, oil content, resistance to Sclerotinia mid-stalk rot, black stem and abiotic stresses like drought, salinity and chilling. Of the various traits that have been improved through MAS, resistance to downy mildew was highly successful as the resistance was dominantly inherited (Dimitrijevic and Horn 2018).
With regard to the genetic resources, initial studies focused on development of biparental populations based on crosses involving elite breeding and introgressed lines (Berry et al. 1995; Horn et al. 2003; Livaja et al. 2016), land races (Kim and Rieseberg 1999), wild Helianthus species (Quillet et al. 1995; Ma et al. 2017) or the recombinant inbred lines (Tang et al. 2006; Talukder et al. 2016). These populations were used to map genes conferring resistance to downy mildew, QTLs governing Sclerotinia stalk rot resistance and seed quality traits, but owing to the disadvantages of the time and costs involved for deployment of individual populations, low resolution of mapping, mortality of the populations besides evaluation of only two alleles per locus alteration strategies were adopted. Understanding the need for assembling the association panels, researchers have directed their efforts towards this goal. Accordingly, association panels consisting of 433 cultivated accessions from the USA and Europe maintained at USDA and INRA, respectively (Mandel et al. 2011); 170 accessions representing Argentinian collections maintained at INTA (Filippi et al. 2015), which distinguished the maintainer and restorer gene pools; and 196 Spanish confectionery accessions maintained at CRF-INIA (Velasco et al. 2014) were characterized which disclosed large genetic variation for seed oil content, test weight and seed quality traits.
19.12.5 Trait Improvement Through Genetic Engineering
Despite the successes with traditional breeding methods and interspecific gene transfer for several traits such as cytoplasmic male sterility, fertility restoration gene(s), seed quality traits, resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses, biotechnological interventions are required for introgression of beneficial traits into cultivated sunflower. Direct and callus-mediated shoot organogenesis from different tissues such as cotyledons, hypocotyls, petioles, leaves and immature embryos is reported (Witrzens et al. 1988; Knittel et al. 1991; Pugliesi et al. 1991; Sujatha et al. 2012a). Regeneration through somatic embryogenesis using immature zygotic embryos, mature seeds and seedling tissues is also reported (Finer 1987; Mc-Cann Wilcox et al. 1988; Espinasse and Lay 1989; Sujatha and Prabakaran 2001). The key factors favouring organogenesis include genotype, explant type, age and physiological state of the cultured tissue, exogenous growth regulator combinations and their balance with endogenous growth regulators, etc. Shoot regeneration and quality of shoots are reported to be enhanced through the use of ethylene inhibitors like cobaltous chloride (CoCl2) and silver nitrate (AgNO3) molecules (Chraibi et al. 1992), preconditioning of explants with 5 mg/l BAP (Zhang and Finer 2015) and short-pulse treatments coupled with micrografting (Zhang and Finer 2016). Precocious flowering, hyperhydricity, poor rooting and abnormal morphogenesis are few other problems encountered in sunflower shoot cultures (Lupi et al. 1987; Freyssinet and Freyssinet 1988). Even after four decades of research carried out at several laboratories, availability of a reliable, efficient, reproducible and genotype-independent tissue culture-based regeneration system still continues to be a major limitation for application of genetic engineering tools in sunflower.
Genetic transformation experiments were largely through Agrobacterium-mediated techniques using explants with pre-existing meristems as target tissues such as shoot tips, mature embryos, immature embryos and cotyledons from mature seeds. The initial studies were chiefly aimed at optimization of variables for enhancing the transformation efficiency and mostly confined to characterization of primary transformants and the T1 generation plants. Owing to the amenability of sunflower to Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection, high frequency of transient expression is observed in most of the transformation experiments. However, conversion efficiency of transient to stable integration was rather limited besides leading to chimeras (Schrammeijer et al. 1990; Malone-Schoneberg et al. 1994; Grayburn and Vick 1995; Weber et al. 2003). Further, formation of chimeric shoots, low regeneration rate from transformed cells/calli, low Agrobacterium virulence, bacterial strain, extreme sensitivity to antibiotics, genotype dependence and lack of stable transmission of the introduced gene are major factors limiting the overall efficiency of the transformation systems reported so far. Attempts made at enhancing transformation efficiency by imposing wounding treatments using glass beads (Grayburn and Vick 1995; Alibert et al. 1999); sonication at 50 MHz (Weber et al. 2003); vacuum infiltration (Hewezi et al. 2003); digestion with macerating enzymes like cellulose, pectinase and macerozyme (Alibert et al. 1999; Weber et al. 2003); incubation with acetosyringone (Laparra et al. 1995); co-transformation with cytokinin synthesis (ipt) gene (Molinier et al. 2002); and dehydration and rehydration of target tissues (Hewezi et al. 2002) met with limited success. Among the commonly used reporter genes for selection of putative transformants (hygromycin, kanamycin and basta), kanamycin is used widely as the plant selection agent in sunflower due to ease of identification of green shoots (putatively transformed) from bleached shoots (untransformed). The problem of premature flowering has been overcome to some extent by incorporation of cytokinins like 2-isopentenyl adenine (2-iP) and kinetin, incubating the tissues at a temperature of 20 °C with 8/16 h light/dark photoperiod cycle or grafting of in vitro recovered putative transformants onto healthy root stocks (Weber et al. 2003; Sujatha et al. 2012b). Step-wise protocols for sunflower transformation are described by Lewi et al. (2006), Radonic et al. (2015) and Manavella and Chan (2009) for development of transformants and for transient expression analysis which can be used for gaining valuable insights of several biological processes through functional validation of genes.
While most of the genetic transformation studies undertaken in sunflower are aimed at establishment of the transformation system, transgenic development for agronomically desired traits was mainly for incorporation of resistance to biotic stresses (Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Alternariaster helianthi, necrosis disease) and resistance to abiotic stresses (drought, salinity). S. sclerotiorum is an economically important disease in the temperate regions causing root rot, mid-stalk rot and head rot, and oxalic acid has been identified as the key component in Sclerotinia infection. Genetic engineering for enhanced resistance to S. sclerotiorum is aimed at strategies to degrade oxalic acid and was through deployment of candidate genes like wheat germin oxalate oxidase (OXO) (Lu et al. 2000; Scelonge et al. 2000); coumarin phytoalexins (ayapin and scopoletin) (Urdangarin et al. 1999); and antifungal genes like glucanase, chitinase, osmotin gene and a ribosome inhibitor protein (Radonic et al. 2008). For conferring resistance to A. helianthi, transgenic lines harbouring β-1,3-glucanase (Manoj Kumar et al. 2011) and TVD1 gene (Sirisha et al. 2011) were developed. Sunflower necrosis disease (SND) incited by Tobacco streak virus of Ilarvirus group accounts for yield losses ranging from 10 to 80% in the tropics and sub-tropics (Jain et al. 2003). Deployment of TSV-CP gene in sense and antisense directions was undertaken for conferring resistance to SND (Pradeep et al. 2012; Singareddy et al. 2018; Sunderesha 2017).
Abiotic stresses like drought, salinity and heat have their effects not only on seed yield but also on the oil content. Candidate genes were deployed to increase tolerance to abiotic stresses such as suppression of proline dehydrogenase (ProDH1) gene for drought and salinity (Tishchenko et al. 2014). Studies at metabolic engineering towards improving oil stability and nutritional quality are targeted at development of high-oleic sunflower by knocking out delta-12-desaturase gene which encodes linoleic acid and lines with increased linoleic acid using PTGS technology (Lacombe et al. 2009; Chen et al. 2010).
Genome editing through CRISPR/cas9 technology is still in its infancy in case of sunflower. Innovative Genomics Institute, California, is at establishing tools for genome editing in sunflower (https://innovativegenomics.org/projects/establishing-tools-sunflower-genome-editing/).
19.13 Conclusions
One of the major challenges in sunflower would be to enhance productivity to the level of the world’s average. To achieve this, populations and hybrids superior to the presently grown cultivars need to be bred which should combine high seed yield (>3.0 t/ha), high oil content (>42.0%) and resistance to major pests like leafhopper and diseases like Alternariaster leaf spot, powdery mildew, downy mildew, necrosis, rust, stem rot, etc. Another important area of breeding research would be to enhance tolerance/resistance to abiotic stresses. Intensive and monocropping of sunflower has been the major cause for outbursts of diseases like rust, leaf spots, powdery mildew, sunflower necrosis disease, leaf curl virus and downy mildew which require immediate attention. Root rots are becoming severe in some parts of the country. Hence, development of hybrids with multiple resistance(s) will have to be the major thrust areas in the years to come. Public-private partnership is also very important for area expansion and development of high heterotic hybrids. Utilization of information being generated through genomic resources and tools assumes importance in tackling problems such as abiotic stresses and identification of physiological traits contributing to seed yield through genomic selection and GWAS. Wild Helianthus species displayed extensive variability for various qualitative and quantitative traits including tolerance/resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses which can be incorporated in cultivated sunflower through introgressive breeding and novel breeding techniques (cisgenics, genome editing).
References
Acimovic M (1998) Bolesti suncokreta. Feljton, Novi Sad
Alibert B, Lucas D, Le Gall V et al (1999) Pectolytic enzyme treatment of sunflower explants prior to wounding and cocultivation with Agrobacterium tumefaciens, enhances efficiency of transient β-glucuronidase expression. Physiol Plant 106:232–237
Al-Khatib K, Miller JF (2000) Registration of four genetic stocks of sunflower resistant to imidazolinone herbicides. Crop Sci 40:869–870
Al-Khatib K, Baumgartner JR, Peterson DE et al (1998) Imazethapyr resistance in common sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Weed Sci 46:403–407
Ameena P, Manivannan N, Chandirakala R et al (2016) Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling oil content, oleic acid and linoleic acid content in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Mol Breed 36:106
Anonymous (2018) Annual report. ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Rajendranagar, p 57
Atlagic J (2004) Roles of interspecific hybridization and cytogenetic studies in sunflower breeding. Helia 27:1–24
Attia MA, Bakheit BR, Abo-Elwafa A (2014) Inbreeding effects on some growth and yield traits of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Assiut J Agric Sci 45(1):33–44
Bainsla NK, Meena HP (2016) Breeding for resistance to biotic stresses in plants. In: Yadav P, Kumar S, Jain V (eds) Recent advances in plant stress physiology. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 379–411
Bajaj RK, Aujla KK, Chalal GS (1997) Combining ability studies in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Crop Improv 24(1):50–54
Basappa H, Santhalakshmi Prasad M (2005) Insect pests and diseases of sunflower and their management. Directorate of Oilseeds Research, Hyderabad
Baute GJ, Owens GL, Bocck DG et al (2016) Genome wide genotyping y sequencing data provide a high resolution iew of wild helianthus diversity, genetic structure, and interspecies gene flow. Am J Bot 103:2170–2177
Belhassen E, Castiglioni VPR, Chimenti C et al (1996) Looking for physiological and molecular markers for leaf cuticular transpiration using interspecific crosses between Helianthus argophyllus and H. annuus. In: Pouzet A (ed) Proceedings of the ISA symposium II: drought tolerance in sunflower, Beijing, China. 14 June 1996. International Sunflower Association, Paris, pp 39–45
Berry ST, León AJ, Hanfrey CC et al (1995) Molecular marker analysis of Helianthus annuus L. 2. Construction of an RFLP linkage map for cultivated sunflower. Theor Appl Genet 91:195–199
Bert PF, Jouan I, Tourvieille de Labrouhe D et al (2003) Comparative genetic analysis of quantitative traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) 2. Characterisation of QTL involved in developmental and agronomic traits. Theor Appl Genet 107:181–189
Bert PF, Dechamp-Guillaume G, Serre F et al (2004) Comparative genetic analysis of quantitative traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet 109(4):865–874
Bervill A, Delbut J, Bedergat R (1992) Mutagenic treatments performed on seeds of a sunflower hybrid variety with the purpose of obtaining bifenoxorglyphosate resistant mutants. Helia 15(16):53–58
Bhat BN, Reddy DRR (2016) Status of viruses infecting sunflower and strategies for their management. In: Gaur R, Petro N, Patil B, Stoyanooa M (eds) Plant viruses. Evolution and management. Springer, Singapore
Borodulina AA, Khachenko LN (1976) Accumulation and metabolism of fatty acids in seeds of a high oleic sunflower mutant. Fiziol Rast 23:952–957
Bowers JE, Bachlava E, Brunick RL et al (2012) Development of a 10,000 locus genetic map of the sunflower genome based on multiple crosses. G3 2:721–729
Burke JM, Tang S, Knapp SJ et al (2002) Genetic analysis of sunflower domestication. Genetics 161:1257–1267
Burke JM, Knapp SJ, Rieseberg LH (2005) Genetic consequences of selection during the evolution of cultivated sunflower. Genetics 171:1933–1940
Calson EC, Knowles PF, Dille JE (1972) Sunflower varietal resistance to sunflower moth larvae. Calif Agric 26(6):11–13
Camazine S, Bye RA (1980) A study of the medical ethnobotany of the Zuni Indians of New Mexico. J Ethnopharmacol 2:365–388
Cardon PV (1922) Sunflower studies. J Am Soc Agron 14:69–72
Carson ML (1985) Epidemiology and yield losses associated with Alternaria blight of sunflower. Phytopathology 7:1151–1156
Cecconi F, Geetani M, Srebernich R et al (2000) Diallel analysis in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) genetic and phenotypic correlations for some agronomical and physiological characters. In: Proceedings of the 15th international sunflower conference, June 12–15, Toulouse, France, vol vol 2, pp E1–E6
Celik I, Bodur S, Frary A et al (2016) Genome-wide SNP discovery and genetic linkage map construction in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) using a genotyping by sequencing (GBS) approach. Mol Breed 36:133
Chen Z, Wang ML, Barkley NA et al (2010) A simple allele-specific PCR assay for detecting FAD2 alleles in both A and B genomes of the cultivated peanut for high-oleate trait selection. Plant Mol Biol Rep 28:542–548
Chimenti CA, Pearson J, Hall AJ (2002) Osmotic adjustment and yield maintenance under drought in sunflower. Field Crops Res 75:235–246
Choudhary SK, Anand IJ (1984) Heterosis and inbreeding depression in sunflower. Crop Improv 11:15–19
Chraibi KMB, Castelle JC, Latche A et al (1992) A genotype-independent system of regeneration from cotyledons of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). The role of ethylene. Plant Sci 86:215–221
Cvejić S, Miladinović D, Jocić S (2014) Mutation breeding for changed oil quality in sunflower. In: Tomlekova NB, Kozgar MI, Wani MR (eds) Mutagenesis: exploring genetic diversity of crops, Wageningen Academic Publishers, pp 77–96
De Oliveira MF, Neto AT, Leite RMVBC et al (2004) Mutation breeding in sunflower for resistance to Alternaria leaf spot. Helia 27(41):41–50
Dedic B, Terzic S, Atlagic J et al (2012) Screening perennial Helianthus species for powdery mildew. In: Proceedings of the 18th international sunflower conference, Mar Del Plata & Balcarse, Argentina
Dimitrijevic A, Horn R (2018) Sunflower hybrid breeding: from markers to genomic selection. Front Plant Sci 8:2238
Drumeva M (2012) Developing sunflower fertility restorer lines from commercial hybrids by using in vitro technique. Agric Sci Technol 4(4):361–364
Encheva J, Christov M, Nenov N et al (2003) Developing genetic variability in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by combined use of hybridization with gamma radiation or ultrasound. Helia 26:99–108
Encheva J, Shindrova P, Penchev E (2008) Developing mutant sunflower lines (Helianthus annuus L.) through induced mutagenesis. Helia 31(48):61–72
Encheva J, Shindrova P, Encheva V et al (2012) Mutant sunflower line R12003, produced through in vitro mutagenesis. Helia 35(56):19–30
Encheva J, Georgiev G, Nenova N et al (2014) Application of classical methods as sunflower breeding program in Dobrudja agricultural institute general-Toshevo. Turkish J Agric Nat Sci 1:673–681
Espinasse A, Lay C (1989) Shoot regeneration of callus derived from globular to torpedo embryos from 59 sunflower genotypes. Crop Sci 29:201–205
FAOSTAT 2019. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 21 Dec 2020
Fick GK, Swallers CM (1974) RHA-271, RHA-273 and RHA-274 sunflower parental lines for producing downy mildew resistant hybrids. North Dakota Farm Res 32:7–9
Fick GN, Zimmer DE (1974) Fertility restoration in confectionary sunflowers. Crop Sci 14:603–605
Filippi CV, Aguirre N, Rivas JG et al (2015) Population structure and genetic diversity characterization of a sunflower association mapping population using SSR and SNP markers. BMC Plant Biol 15:52
Finer JJ (1987) Direct somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature embryos of hybrid sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) on a high sucrose-containing medium. Plant Cell Rep 6:372–374
Flores Berrios E, Gentzbittel L, Kayyal H et al (2000) AFLP mapping of QTLs for in vitro organogenesis traits using recombinant inbred lines in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet 101:1299–1306
Freyssinet M, Freyssinet G (1988) Fertile plant regeneration from sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) immature embryos. Plant Sci 56:177–181
Ge CF (1971) Study on the utilization of hybrid vigour in sunflower. Lianoing Agric Sci 3:11–14
Gedil MA, Wye C, Berry ST et al (2001) An integrated RFLP-AFLP linkage map for cultivated sunflower. Genome 44:213–221
Gentzbittel L, Vear F, Zhang YX et al (1995) Development of a consensus linkage RFLP map of cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet 90:1079–1086
Gentzbittel L, Mouzeyar S, Badaoui S et al (1998) Cloning of molecular markers for disease resistance in sunflower, Helianthus annuus L. Theor Appl Genet 96:519–525
Giriraj K, Shivaraju N, Hiremath SR (1986) Studies on heterosis and inbreeding depression in selected cross combination of sunflower. J Oilseeds Res 31(1):67–72
Giriraj K, Hiremath SR, Seetharam A (1990) Induced variability for flowering, seed weight and oil content in parental lines of sunflower hybrid BSH-1. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 50:1–7
Goksoy AT, Turkec A, Turan ZM (2000) Heterosis and combining ability in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Indian J Agric Sci 70(8):525–529
Gong L, Hulke BS, Gulya TJ et al (2012) Molecular tagging of a novel rust resistance gene R12 in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet 126:93–99
Govindappa MR, Shankergoud I, Shankarappa KS et al (2011) Molecular detection and partial characterization Begomovirus associated with leaf curl disease of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in southern India. Plant Pathol J 10:29–35
Gowda J, Seetharam A (2008) Response to mass and SI selection for autogamy, seed yield and oil content in sunflower populations (Helianthus annuus L.). Helia 31:101–110
Grayburn WS, Vick BA (1995) Transformation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) following wounding with glass beads. Plant Cell Rep 14:285–289
Gulya T, Kandel H, McMullen M et al (2013) Prevalence and incidence of sunflower downy mildew in North Dakota between 2001 and 2011. Plant Health Prog 14:20
Gundev AI (1966) Prospects of breeding sunflower for heterosis. Shorn Rab Most Kult 3:15–21
Gurev BP, Osipova LS (1986) Inheritance of yield in sunflower lines following inbreeding. Maslichnye Kultury 5:30–31
Hajjar R, Hodgkin T (2007) The use of wild relatives in crop improvement: a survey of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica 156:1–13
Harinarayana G, Anantharaman PV, Achuta K et al (1980) Breeding sunflower populations. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 40(1):212–215
Heesacker A, Kishore VK, Gao W et al (2008) SSRs and INDELs mined from the sunflower EST database: abundance, polymorphisms, and cross-taxa utility. Theor Appl Genet 117:1021–1029
Heiser CB Jr (1976) The sunflower. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, p 198
Hewezi T, Perrault A, Alibert G et al (2002) Dehydrating immature embryo split apices and rehydrating with Agrobacterium tumefaciens: a new method for genetically transforming recalcitrant sunflower. Plant Mol Biol Rep 20:335–345
Hewezi T, Jardinaud F, Alibert G et al (2003) A new protocol for efficient regeneration of a recalcitrant genotype of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by organogenesis induction on split embryonic axis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 73:81–86
Horn R (2002) Molecular diversity of male sterility inducing and male-fertile cytoplasms in the genus Helianthus. Theor Appl Genet 104(4):562–570
Horn R, Friedt W (2006) Fertility restoration of new CMS sources in sunflower (Helianthus annum L.). Plant Breed 116(4):317–322
Horn R, Kusterer B, Lazarescu E et al (2003) Molecular mapping of the Rf1 gene restoring pollen fertility in PET1 based F1 hybrids in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet 106:599–606
Hu J, Yue B, Vick BA (2007) Integration of trap markers onto a sunflower SSR marker linkage map constructed from 92 recombinant inbred lines. Helia 30:25–36
Hulke BS, Mileer JF, Gulya TJ (2010) Registration of the restorer oilseed sunflower germplasm RHA-464 possessing genes for resistance to downy mildew and sunflower rust. J Plant Regist 4(3):249–254
Hussain MM, Rauf S, Riaz MA et al (2017) Determination of drought tolerance related traits in Helianthus argophyllus, Helianthus annuus, and their hybrids. Breed Sci 67:257–267
Jacob J, Sujatha M, Varaprasad KS (2017) Screening of cultivated and wild Helianthus species reveals herbicide tolerance in wild sunflowers and allelic variation at Ahasl1 (acetohydroxyacid synthase 1 large subunit) locus. Plant Genet Res 15(5):421–429
Jaffar J, Rauf S, Naveed A et al (2019) Marker assisted selection for developing of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) progenies for high oil and oleic acids contents. J Agric Res 57(3):137–144
Jagodkin IG (1937) Application of method of inbreeding and diallel crossing in sunflower growing. Selektsiya Semenovodstvo 1:21–27
Jain RK, Bhat AI, Varma A (2003) Sunflower necrosis disease-an emerging viral problem. In: Technical bulletin-1, Unit of Virology. IARI, New Delhi, p 11
Jambhulkar SJ, Joshua DC (1999) Induction of plant injury, chimera, chlorophyll and morphological mutations in sunflower using gamma rays. Helia 22:63–73
Jan CC, Rutger JN (1988) Mitomycin C and streptomycin induced male sterility in cultivated sunflower. Crop Sci 28:792–795
Jan CC, Vick BA, Miller JK et al (1998) Construction of a RFLP linkage map for cultivated sunflower. Theor Appl Genet 96:15–22
Jan CC, Seiler GJ, Hammond JJ (2014) Effect of wild Helianthus cytoplasms on agronomic and oil characteristics of cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Breed 133:262–267
Jovanka A (2004) Roles of interspecific hybridization and cytogenetic studies in sunflowerbreeding/el papel de la hibridización de interspecies e investigaciones citogenéticas en laselección de girasol/rôles de l’hybridation interspécifique et des études cytogénétiques dansla culture du tournesol. Helia 27(41):1–24
Kim SC, Rieseberg LH (1999) Genetic architecture of species differences in annual sunflowers: implication for adaptive trait introgression. Genetics 153:965–977
Kinman ML (1970) New developments in the USDA and state experiment station sunflower breeding programs. In: Proc. fourth int. sunflower conference, Memphis, Tenn, pp 181–183
Klimov MM, Ermoshin SA (1977) Intervarietal hybridization of sunflower. Selektsiya Semenovodstvo 6:61–62
Knittel N, Escandon AS, Hahne G (1991) Plant regeneration at high frequency from mature sunflower cotyledons. Plant Sci 73:219–226
Kolczowskii A (1971) A comparison of the F1 and F2 interline sunflower hybrids grown for oil. Aklimatyz Nasiennityo Hodowla Roslin 15:71–86
Kovacik A (1959) A study of the effect of inter varietal hybridization on yield, husk and oil content of sunflower seed in F1 and F2. Pol'nohospodarstyo 6:823–842
Kovacik A (1960) The influence of inter varietal hybridization on morphological characters of F1 and F2 sunflower hybrids. Sborn Cssl Adk Zemed Ved Radarostlinna Vyroba 33:447–466
Kovacik A, Skaloud V (1975) The results of many years inbreeding and the possibilities of their elimination by sib crosses in sunflower. Sci Agric Bohem 7(1):19–24
Kumar AA, Ganesh M, Janila P (1998) Combining ability analysis for yield and yield contributing characters in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Ann Agric Res 19:437–440
Kurnik E, Zelles J (1962) Physiological heterosis in hybrid progenies of members of sunflower clones. III. The characterization of hybrid vigour on the basis of developmental physiology. Iregsz Bull 2:63–70
Lacombe S, Souyris I, Berville AJ (2009) An insertion of oleate desaturase homologous sequence silences via siRNA the functional gene leading to high oleic acid content in sunflower seed oil. Mol Genet Genomics 281:43–54
Lai Z, Livingstone K, Zou Y et al (2005) Identification and mapping of SNPs from ESTs in sunflower. Theor Appl Genet 111:1532–1544
Lambers H, Chapin FS, Pons TL (2008) Plant physiological ecology, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Langar K, Lorieux M, Desmarais E et al (2003) Combined mapping of DALP and AFLP markers in cultivated sunflower using F9 recombinant inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet 106(1068):1074
Laparra H, Burrus M, Hunoid R et al (1995) Expression of foreign genes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) - evaluation of three gene transfer methods. Euphytica 85:63–74
Leclercq P (1966) Une sterility male utilize pour la production‘d’ hybrids simples de tournesol. Ann Amel Des Plant 16:135–144
Leclercq P (1969) Une sterilite cytoplasmique due tournesol. Ann Amel Plant 21:45–54
Leon AJ, Lee M, Andrade FH (2001) Quantitative trait loci for growing degree days to flowering and photoperiod response in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet 102:497–503
Lewi DM, Hopp HE, Escandon AS (2006) Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). In: Wang K (ed) Methods in molecular biology V.343. Agrobacterium protocols, vol vol 1. Humana Press Inc, Totowa, pp 291–298
Liu Z, Wang D, Feng J et al (2013) Diversifying sunflower germplasm by integration and mapping of a novel male fertility restoration gene. Genetics 193(3):727–737
Liu Z, Seiler GJ, Gulya TJ et al (2017) Triploid production from interspecific crosses of two diploid perennial Helianthus with diploid cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L). G3 7:1097–1108
Livaja M, Unterseer S, Erath W et al (2016) Diversity analysis and genomic prediction of Sclerotinia resistance in sunflower using a new 25 K SNP genotyping array. Theor Appl Genet 129:317–329
Lofgren JR, Ramaraje-Lers NV (1982) Chemically induced mutations in sunflower. In: Proceedings of the 10th international sunflower conference, Surfers Paradise, Australia, March 15–18th. International Sunflower Association, Toowoomba, pp 264–267
Lu G, Bidney D, Bao Z et al (2000) Constitutive promoters and Sclerotinia disease resistance in sunflower. In: Proceedings of the 15th international sunflower conference, Toulouse, France 12–15 June
Luciano A, Davreux M (1967) Producción de girasol en Argentina. Publicación Técnica No 37. Estación EEA Pergamino—INTA
Luciano A, Kinman AL, Smith JD (1965) Heritability of self incompatibility in the sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Crop Sci 5:529–532
Lupi MC, Bennici A, Locci F et al (1987) Plantlet formation from callus and shoot tip culture of (Helianthus annuus L). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 11:47–55
Ma GJ, Markell SG, Song QJ et al (2017) Genotyping-by-sequencing targeting of a novel downy mildew resistance gene Pl20 from wild Helianthus argophyllus for sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet 130:1519–1529
Madhavi KJ, Sujatha M, Raja Ram Reddy D et al (2005) Biochemical characterization of resistance against Alternaria helianthi in cultivated and wild sunflowers. Helia 28:13–24
Malone-Schoneberg J, Scelonge CJ, Burrus M et al (1994) Stable transformation of sunflower using Agrobacterium and split embryonic axis explants. Plant Sci 103:199–207
Manavella PA, Chan RL (2009) Transient transformation of sunflower leaf discs via an Agrobacterium-mediated method: applications for gene expression and silencing studies. Nat Protoc 4:1699–1707
Mandel JR, Dechaine JM, Marek LF et al (2011) Genetic diversity and population structure in cultivated sunflower and a comparison to its wild progenitor, Helianthus annuus L. Theor Appl Genet 123:693–704
Mangin B, Bonnafous F, Blanchet N et al (2017) Genomic prediction of sunflower hybrids oil content. Front Plant Sci 8:1633
Manoj Kumar A, Sundaresha S, Rohini S (2011) Transgenic sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) with enhanced resistance to a fungal pathogen Alternaria helianthi. Trans Plant J 5:50–56
Mc-Cann Wilcox A, Cooley G et al (1988) A system for routine plantlet regeneration of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L) from immature embryo derived callus. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 14:103–110
Meena HP, Sujatha M, Varaprasad KS (2013) Achievements and bottlenecks of heterosis breeding of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in India. Indian J Genet 73(2):123–130
Meena HP, Bainsla NK, Yadav DK (2016) Breeding for abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. In: Yadav P, Kumar S, Jain V (eds) Recent advances in plant stress physiology. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 329–378
Merrien A (1992) Some aspects of sunflower crop physiology. In: Proceedings of the 13th international sunflower conference, September 7–11, Pisa, Italy, vol 2, pp 481–499
Miller JF, Hammond JJ (1985) Improvement of yield in sunflower utilizing reciprocal full-sib selection. In: Proceedings of the 11th sunflower conference, Mar del Plata, Argentina, pp 715–717
Miller JF, Seiler GJ (2003) Registration of five oilseed maintainer (HA-429 and HA-433) sunflower germplasm lines. Crop Sci 43:2313–2314
Miller JF, Fick GN, Cedeno JR (1977) Improvement of oil content and quality in sunflower. Agronomy:64
Miller JF, Zimmerman DC, Vick BA (1987) Genetic control of high oleic acid content in sunflower oil. Crop Sci 27:923–926
Miller JF, Seiler GJ, Jan CC (1992) Introduced germplasm use in sunflower inbred and hybrid development. The use of plant introductions in cultivar development. Part 2. In: Crop science society of Americana special publication no 20, pp 151–166
Mokrani L, Gentzbittel L, Azanza F et al (2002) Mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci for grain oil content and agronomic traits using AFLP and SSR in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L). Theor Appl Genet 106:149–156
Molinier J, Thomas C, Brignou M et al (2002) Transient expression of ipt gene enhances regeneration and transformation rates of sunflower shoot apices (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Cell Rep 3:251–256
Morozov VK (1947) Sunflower selection in USSR. Pishchepromizdat, Moscow, pp 1–272
Oliveira VS, Oliveira RL, Goes R et al (2019) Physicochemical composition, fatty acid profile and sensory attributes of the meat of young Nellore bulls fed sunflower cake from the biodiesel industry. Livest Sci 227:97–104
Petakov D (1992) Application of Griffing’s methods in determination of combining ability of sunflower self-pollinated lines. In: Proceedings of the 13th international sunflower conference. September 7–11, Pisa, Italy, vol vol 2, pp 1205–1210
Poormohammad Kiani S, Grieu P, Maury P et al (2007) Genetic variability for physiological traits under drought conditions and differential expression of water stress-associated genes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet 114:193–207
Pradeep K, Satya VK, Selvapriya M et al (2012) Engineering resistance against tobacco streak virus (TSV) in sunflower and tobacco using RNA interference. Biol Plant 56:735–741
Pugliesi C, Cecconi F, Mandolfo A et al (1991) Plant regeneration and genetic variability from tissue cultures of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Breed 106:114–121
Pustovoit V (1964) Conclusions of work on the selection and seed production of sunflowers. Agrobiology. (Transl. R.P. Knowles, Agriculture Canada, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, 1965 6:672–697
Putt ED (1962) The value of hybrids and synthetics in sunflower seed production. Can J Plant Sci 42:488–500
Putt ED (1964) Heterosis and combining ability in diallel crosses of 10 inbreds of sunflower. In: Abstract of the annual meetings of the American Society of Agronomy held at Kansas City Missouri, Nov 15–19, p 126
Putt ED (1966) Heterosis, combining ability and predicted synthetics from a diallel cross in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Can J Plant Sci 46:59–67
Putt ED, Dorrell DG (1975) Breeding for sunflower production. In: Harapiak JT (ed) Oilseed and pulse crops in Western Canada. Modern Press, Saskatoon, pp 185–201
Putt ED, Heiser CB (1966) Male sterility and partial male sterility in sunflower. Crop Sci 6:165–168
Qi LL, Talukder ZI, Hulke BS et al (2017) Development and dissection of diagnostic SNP markers for the downy mildew resistance genes PlArg and Pl8 and marker-assisted gene pyramiding in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Mol Gen Genomics 292:1–13
Qi LL, Ma GJ, Li XH et al (2019) Diversification of the downy mildew resistance gene pool by introgression of a new gene, Pl35, from wild Helianthus argophyllus into oilseed and confection sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet 132:2553–2565
Quillet MC, Madjidian N, Griveau Y et al (1995) Mapping genetic factors controlling pollen viability in an interspecific cross in Helianthus section Helianthus. Theor Appl Genet 91:1195–1202
Quresh J, Jan CC, Gulya TJ (1993) Resistance to sunflower rust and its inheritance in wild sunflower species. Plant Breed 110:297–306
Rachid Al-Chaarani G, Gentzbittel L, Huang XQ (2004) Genotypic variation and identification of QTLs for agronomic traits, using AFLP and SSR markers in RILs of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet 109:1353–1360
Radonic LM, Zimmermann JM, Zavallo D et al (2008) Introduction of antifungal genes in sunflower via agrobacterium. Electron J Biotechnol 11:1–3
Radonic LM, Lewi DM, Lopez NE et al (2015) Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Methods Mol Biol 1224:47–55
Rether AG, Sandha GS, Bajaj RK et al (1998) Genetic analysis for oil yield and its components in sunflower. (Helianthus annuus L.). Crop Improv 25(2):226–228
Richards RA (1996) Dening selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regul 20:57–166
Rieseberg LH, Choi H, Chan R et al (1993) Genomic map of a diploid hybrid species. Heredity 70:285–285
Rogers CE, Thompson TE, Seiler GJ (1982) Sunflower species of the United States. Published by the National Sunflower Association, Bismarck, p 75
Sala CA, Bulos M, Echarte AM (2008) Genetic analysis of an induced mutation conferring imidazolinone resistance in sunflower. Crop Sci 48:1817–1822
Santhalakshmi Prasad M, Sujatha M, Alivelu K et al (2017) Sources of resistance to Alternariaster leaf blight in sunflower pre-breeding lines derived from interspecific crosses and wild helianthus species. Crop Prot 92:70–78
Saucă F, Lazăr D, Lazăr C (2014) Preliminary results on creating new sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) with resistance to drought based on interspecific hybridization with wild silver leaf sunflower (Helianthus argophyllus Torr. and A. Gray). Sci Pap Ser A Agron 57:322–324
Scelonge C, Wang L, Bidney D et al (2000) Transgenic Sclerotinia resistance in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). In: Proceedings of the 15th international sunflower conference, 12–15 June 2000. Toulouse, France, pp K66–K71
Schrammeijer B, Sijmons CP, Peter JM et al (1990) Meristem transformation of sunflower via agrobacterium. Plant Cell Rep 9:55–60
Schuster W (1980) Untersûchungen ûber Ausairkungen einerfortgesetzten Inzîtchtûng von I0 bis I25 aul verschiedene Merkmale der Sonnenblume (H. annuus L.). Z Pflanzenzuchtg 84(2):148–167
Seetharam A (1980) Hybrid sunflower brighten the prospects of sunflower cultivation. Indian Farm 24(12):15
Seetharam A, Ravi Kumar RL (2003) Breeding for insect pest resistance in sunflower. In: Proceeding of national seminar on stress management in oilseeds for attaining self-reliance in vegetable oils, pp 271–283
Seetharam A, Kusuma Kumari P, Patil NM et al (1977) Performance of hybrids of sunflower produced by means of cytoplasmic male sterility. SABRAO J 9:51–55
Seiler GJ (2010) Utilization of wild Helianthus species in breeding for disease resistance. In: Proceedings of the International Sunflower Association (ISA) symposium sunflower breeding on resistance to diseases, pp 36–50
Seiler GJ (2012) Utilization of wild helianthus species in sunflower breeding. In: Kovacevic Z, Skoric D, Sakac Z (eds) Sunflower genetics and breeding international monogram. Serbian Acad. Science and Arts, Novi Sad, pp 355–413
Seiler GJ, Jan CC (2014) Wild sunflower species as a genetic resource for resistance to sunflower broomrape (Orobanche cumana Wallr.). Helia 37(61):129–139
Seiler GJ, Cuk L, Rogers CE (1981) New and interesting distribution records for Helianthus paradoxus Heiser (Asteraceae). Southwest Nat 26:431–432
Seiler GJ, Qi LL, Marek LF (2017) Utilization of sunflower crop wild relatives for cultivated sunflower improvement. Crop Sci 57:1083–1101
Seneviratne KGS, Ganesh M, Ranganatha ARG et al (2004) Population improvement for seed yield and oil content in sunflower. Helia 27(41):123–128
Sheriff NM, Appandurai R (1985) Genetic variability in some quantitative traits of sunflower. Madras Agric J 72(9):539–540
Shivaraju N (1984) Heterosis, inbreeding depression, correlation and path coefficient analysis in selected cross combinations of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). M.Sc. (Agri.) Thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore
Shobha Rani T, Ravikumar RL (2006) Sporophytic and gametophytic recurrent selection for improvement of partial resistance to Alternaria leaf blight in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Euphytica 147:421–431
Shtereva L, Vassilevska-Ivanova R, Kartzeva T et al (2015) Salt tolerance of two sunflower genotypes: Helianthus annuus and interspecific line Helianthus annuus × Helianthus mollis. Genet Plant Physiol 5(1):61–73
Shtienberg D, Zohar D (1992) Fungicidal disease suppression and yield losses associated with sunflower rust in Israel. Crop Prot 1:529–534
Shvetsova VP (1979) Effect of inbreeding and hybridization on the fatty acid composition of sunflower seed oil. In: Buyl. NTI PO maslich Kulturum, Vsesoyuzngi Institut No 3, pp 21–25
Sideli GM, Schierenbeck KA, Van Tassel DL (2013) Evaluation of interspecific hybrids between wild perennial sunflower and domesticated sunflower for crop use with limited irrigation. In: Abstract presented at the 24th graduate student meeting of the California botanical society, April 14 2013, Berkely California
Singareddy V, Sheri VR, Muddanuru T et al (2018) Genetic engineering of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) for resistance to necrosis disease through deployment of the TSV coat protein gene. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 135:263–277
Singh SB, Labana KS, Virk DS (1984) Heterosis in variety × inbred crosses of sunflower. Crop Improv 11:35–38
Singh SB, Labana KS, Virk DS (1989) Detection of epistatic, additive and dominant variation in sunflower. Indian J Genet Plant Breed 47(3):243–247
Sirisha CH, Sravani M, Sri Rami Reddy D et al (2011) Genetic transformation of sunflower using TVD 1 for resistance against Alternaria leaf spot disease. In: 21–23 March 2011 World Congress on Biotechnology. Springer, Singapore
Škorić D (1987) FAO sunflower sub-network report 1984–1986. In: Škorić D (ed) Genetic evaluation and use of helianthus wild species and their use in breeding programs. FAO, Rome, pp 1–17
Skoric D (1988) Sunflower breeding. Journal of Edible Industry, Uljarstvo 25:3–75
Skoric D (1992) Achievements and future directions of sunflower breeding. Field Crop Res 30:231–270
Smith BD (2014) The domestication of Helianthus annuus L. (sunflower). Veg Hist Archaeobot 23:57–74
Soldatov K (1976) Chemical mutagenesis for sunflower breeding. In: Proceedings of the 7th international sunflower conference, Krasnodar, USSR. International Sunflower Association, Toowoomba, pp 179–182
Stoyanova I, Ivanov PI, Georgiev I (1971) Nasledovanja na njakoj priznaci v F1 pri slančogleda. Genetika i Selekcija 4: 3-14
Sudhakar D, Seetharam A (1980) Studies on the performance of top cross hybrids in sunflower. Sunflower Newsl 3(4):7–9
Sujatha M, Lakshminarayana M (2006) Resistance to Spodoptera litura (Fabr.) in Helianthus species and backcross derived inbred lines from crosses involving diploid species. Euphytica 155:205–213
Sujatha M, Prabakaran AJ (2001) High frequency embryogenesis in immature zygotic embryos of sunflower. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 65:23–29
Sujatha M, Prabakaran AJ (2006) Ploidy manipulation and introgression of resistance to Alternaria helianthi from wild hexaploid Helianthus species to cultivated sunflower (H. annuus L.) aided by anther culture. Euphytica 152:201–215
Sujatha M, Sujatha K (2013) Current status of molecular markers and marker assisted selection in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). In: Malik CP, Sanghera GS, Wani SH (eds) Conventional and non-conventional interventions in crop improvement. New Delhi, MD Publications Pvt Ltd, pp 53–86
Sujatha M, Prabakaran AJ, Chattopadhyay C (1997) Reaction of wild sunflowers and certain interspecific hybrids to Alternaria helianthi. Helia 20:15–24
Sujatha M, Prabakaran AJ, Sudhakara Babu SN et al (2003) Differential reaction of recombinant interspecific inbred lines of sunflower to red rust incited by Puccinia helianthi. Helia 26(39):25–36
Sujatha M, Prabakaran AJ, Sangam L et al (2008) Cytomorphological and molecular diversity in backcross-derived inbred lines of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Genome 51:282–293
Sujatha M, Vijay S, Vasavi S et al (2012a) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cotyledons of mature seeds of multiple genotypes of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 110:275–287
Sujatha M, Vijay S, Vasavi S et al (2012b) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of cotyledons of mature seeds of multiple genotypes of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L). Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 110:275–287
Sujatha M, Meena HP, Mukta N et al (2019) Varieties and hybrids of sunflower. ICAR-Indian Institute of Oilseeds Research, Hyderabad, p 60
Sunderesha S (2017) Development of coat protein mediated transgenic sunflower against sunflower necrosis virus disease. University of Agricultural Sciences GKVK, Bengaluru
Talukder ZI, Gong L, Hulke BS et al (2014) A high-density SNP map of sunflower derived from RAD-sequencing facilitating fine-mapping of the rust resistance gene R12. PLoS One 9:e98628
Talukder ZI, Seiler GJ, Song Q et al (2016) SNP discovery and QTL mapping of Sclerotinia basal stalk rot resistance in sunflower using genotyping-by sequencing. Plant Genome 9:1–16
Tang S, Heesacker A, Kishore VK et al (2003) Genetic mapping of the Or5 gene for resistance to race E in sunflower. Crop Sci 43:1021–1028
Tang S, Leon A, Bridges WC et al (2006) Quantitative trait loci for genetically correlated seed traits are tightly linked to branching and pericarp pigment loci in sunflower. Crop Sci 46:721–734
Terzić S, Boniface MC, Marek L et al (2020) Gene banks for wild and cultivated sunflower genetic resources. Oilseeds & Fats and Crops and Lipids 27(9):2–14
Thompson TE, Zimmermann DC et al (1978) Evaluation of Helianthus species for disease resistance and oil content and quality. In: Proceedings of the 8th international sunflower conference, Minneapolis, MN. Int. Sunflower Assoc, Toowoomba, pp 497–501
Thompson TE, Zimmermann DC, Rogers CE (1981) Wild Helianthus as a genetic resource. Field Crops Res 4:333–343
Tishchenko OM, Komisarenko AG, Mykhalska SI et al (2014) Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) in vitro and in planta using LBA4404 strain harboring binary vector pBi2E with dsRNA-suppressor of proline dehydrogenase gene. Cytol Genet 48:218–226
Tuberosa R (1983) Inbreeding effects in a population of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Genet Aggr 37(3/4):411–419
Tyagi AP (1988) Combining ability analysis for yield components and maturity traits in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). In: Proceedings of the 12th international sunflower conference. July 25–29, Novi Sad, Yugoslavia, vol vol 2, pp 489–493
Unrau J, White WJ (1944) The yield and other characters of inbred lines and single crosses of sunflower. Sci Agric 24:516–528
Urdangarin C, Regente MC, Jorrin J et al (1999) Sunflower coumarin phytoalexins inhibit the growth of the virulent pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. J Phytopathol 147:441–443
Vasko VO, Kyrychenko VV (2019) Induced mutagenesis for the creation of new starting material in sunflower breeding. Helia 42(70):17–36
Vear F, De Labrouhe DT (1984) Recurrent selection for resistance to Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in sunflowers using artificial infections. Agronomie 4(8):789–794
Vear F, Serre F, Roche S et al (2007) Improvement of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum head rot resistance in sunflower by recurrent selection of a restorer population. Helia 30(46):1–12
Velasco L, Fernandez-Cuesta A, Fernandez-Martinez JM (2014) Variability of seed quality traits in a collection of Spanish landraces of confectionary sunflower. Crop Pasture Sci 65:242–249
Virupakshappa K (1987) Sunflower and rapeseed improvement in France—a report USA, Bangalore, p 29
Voskoboinik LK, Soldatov KI (1974) The research trends in the field of sunflower breeding for heterosis at the All Union Research Institute for Oil Crops (VNIIMK). In: Proceedings of the 6th international sunflower conference, Bucharest, Romania, pp 383–389
Vranceanu AV, Stoenescu F (1970) Immunity to sunflower downy mildew due to a simple dominant gene. Probl Agric 22:34–40
Vranceanu AV, Stoenescu R (1976) Breeding for pollen fertility restoration in sunflowers. In: Proc. of 7th international sunflower conference, Krasnodar, USSR, vol vol 1, pp 287–295
Weber S, Friedt W, Landes N et al (2003) Improved Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.): assessment of macerating enzymes and sonication. Plant Cell Rep 21:475–482
Witrzens B, Scowcroft WR, Downes RW et al (1988) Tissue culture and plant regeneration from sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and interspecific hybrids (H. tuberosus x H. annuus). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 13:61–76
Yu JK, Tang S, Slabaugh MB et al (2003) Towards a saturated molecular genetic linkage map for sunflower. Crop Sci 43:367–387
Yue B, Radi SA, Vick BA et al (2008) Identifying quantitative trait loci for resistance to Sclerotinia head rot in two USDA sunflower germplasms. Phytopathology 98:926–931
Zhang Z, Finer JJ (2015) Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) organogenesis from primary leaves of young seedlings preconditioned by cytokinin. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 123:645–655
Zhang Z, Finer JJ (2016) Low Agrobacterium tumefaciens inoculum levels and a long co-culture period lead to reduced plant defense responses and increase transgenic shoot production of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 52:354–366
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meena, H.P., Sujatha, M. (2022). Sunflower Breeding. In: Yadava, D.K., Dikshit, H.K., Mishra, G.P., Tripathi, S. (eds) Fundamentals of Field Crop Breeding. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9257-4_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9257-4_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-9256-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-9257-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)