Abstract
Emirati students are often schooled in traditional, teacher-led classrooms. However, when they reach the tertiary sector they are exposed to Western styles of teaching which aim to develop autonomous learners. One of the key effects of this culture clash is that feedback is sometimes neither delivered appropriately nor taken up as feed-forward. The aim of this action research project was to help foster feedback literacy in English as an Additional Language (EAL) students in an English Medium Institution (EMI) so that they would be better equipped to understand feedback as an academic literacy critical to their success going forward. This was achieved by treating the feedback process as a genre embedded within the curriculum, and, using some of the tools developed by Sydney School genre pedagogy, breaking the process down into stages where students were able to identify exactly what each part was trying to tell them with actionable and generalizable advice. A majority of students who engaged with the feedback achieved better results. This positively reinforced the students’ engagement with feedback, and led to greater take up in future assignments, thereby ameliorating their understanding of the feedback process and its value for them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 187–198.
Bilikozen, N. (2015). Academic literacy development and identity construction of undergraduates at an American university in the UAE. University of Sheffield.
Beaumont, C., O’Doherty, M., & Shannon, L. (2011). Reconceptualising assessment feedback: A key to improving student learning? Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 671–687.
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245–281.
Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219–233.
Carless, D. (2019). Feedback loops and the longer-term: Towards feedback spirals. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(5), 705–714.
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325.
Derewianka, B. (2015). The contribution of genre theory to literacy education in Australia. In J. Turbill, G. Barton & C. Brock (Eds.), Teaching Writing in Today's Classrooms: Looking back to looking forward . Norwood, Australia: Australian Literary Educators’ Association (pp. 69–86).
Dreyfus, S., Humphrey, S., Mahboob, A., & Martin, J. R. (2016). Genre pedagogy in higher education: The SLATE project. Palgrave Macmillan.
Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107.
Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of Educational Research, 83(1), 70–120.
Findlow, S. (2006). Higher education and linguistic dualism in the Arabian Gulf. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 19–36.
Foord, R. (2019). Student satisfaction rises but universities should do more to improve feedback. (2019, July 3). Retrieved from https://www.officeforstudents.org.uk/news-blog-and-events/press-and-media/student-satisfaction-rises-but-universities-should-do-more-to-improve-feedback/.
Forsythe, A., & Johnson, S. (2017). Thanks, but no-thanks for the feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 850–859.
Freimuth, H. (2014). Challenges to building a “Knowledge Society”: The role of literacy in promoting critical thinking in the UAE. Sheikh Saud Bin Saqr Al Qasimi Foundation for Policy Research: Policy Paper. No. 10.
Green, S. (2019). What students don’t make of feedback in higher education: An illustrative study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 83–94.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Systemic Background. In James D. Benson, & W. S. Greaves (Eds.), Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, Vol.1: Selected Theoretical Papers from the Ninth International Systemic Workshop. Ablex. Vol. 3 in The Collected Works, p. 192.
Hammoudi, F. A. (2007). UAE High School Students’ Perceptions of Teachers’ Feedback on Their Writing. (Master Dissertation). Retrieved from American University of Sharjah Theses & Dissertations. Retrieved from https://dspace.aus.edu:8443/xmlui/handle/11073/8814.
Hatherly-Greene, P. (2012). Cultural border crossings in the UAE. Sheikh Saud Bin Saqr Al Qasimi Foundation for Policy Research: Policy Paper. No. 6.
Hatakka, M. R. H. (2014). Indicators affecting the development of first year students’ academic literacy skills in an English-medium higher education institute in the Arabian Gulf region. (Doctoral thesis). University of Exeter, UK. Retrieved October 8, 2015, from http://hdl.handle.net/10871/15458.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hyland, F. (2001). Providing effective support: Investigating feedback to distance language learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning., 16(3), 233–247.
Martin, J. R. (2007). Metadiscourse: Designing interaction in genre-based literacy programs. In R. Whittaker, M. O’Donnell, & A. McCabe (Eds.), Language and literacy: functional approaches (pp. 95–122). Continuum.
Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 10–21.
Mohammedi, N. A. (2016). Exploring the Perceived and the Actual Written Feedback Preferences between Elf Students and Teachers in the UAE. Master of Education Dissertation. UAE University Scholarworks. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.uaeu.ac.ae/.
Mulliner, E., & Tucker, M. (2017). Feedback on feedback practice: perceptions of students and academics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(2), 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1103365
Muyksen, J., & Nour, S. (2006). Deficiencies in education and poor prospects for economic growth in the Gulf countries: The case of the UAE. Journal of Development Studies, 42(6), 957–980.
Painter, C. (1986). The role of interaction in learning to speak and learning to write. In C. Painter & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing to mean: Teaching genres across the curriculum. ALAA (Occasional Papers 9) (pp. 62–97).
Price, M., Rust, C., O’Donovan, B., Handley, K., & Bryant, R. (2012). Assessment literacy: The foundation for improving student learning. Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.
Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28, 4–13.
Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. Bristol: Equinox.
Rothery, J., & Stenglin, M. (1995). Exploring literacy in school English (Write it right resources for literacy and learning). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program.
Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144.
Shine, E. (2008). Written Feedback in a Freshman Writing Course in the UAE: Instructors and Students Perspectives on Giving, Getting, and Using Feedback. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from Massey Research Online https://mro.massey.ac.nz/.
Steen-Utheim, A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2019). To do or not to do with feedback. A study of undergraduate students’ engagement and use of feedback within a portfolio assessment design. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education., 44, 80–96.
Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 31–40.
Sutton, P., & Gill, W. (2010). Engaging feedback: Meaning, identity and power. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 4(1), 3–13.
Wingate, U. (2006). Doing away with ‘study skills.’ Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 457–469.
Winstone, N., & Carless, D. (2019). Designing effective feedback processes in higher education: A learning-focused approach. Routledge.
Zayed University. (2018). Zayed University: Fact Book. Dubai. Retrieved from https://www.zu.ac.ae/main/files/contents/open_data/factbook-2018-19.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Myers, T., Buchanan, J. (2022). Developing Feedback Literacy in Emirati Undergraduates. In: Coombe, C., Hiasat, L., Daleure, G. (eds) English Language and General Studies Education in the United Arab Emirates. English Language Teaching: Theory, Research and Pedagogy. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8888-1_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8888-1_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8887-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8888-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)