Abstract
This chapter discusses India’s democratic and secular set-up which allows for fluidity of religious identities to all Indian citizens and makes possible the creation of personal law boards that give different religious communities the freedom to practice their religion without any fear of state intrusion. However, the same personal law boards have been detrimental to women’s rights in general and even more so among women of minority religions. It details two-land mark judgements made in the Indian courts that brought justice to Muslim women in the light of the ills that plague divorced women. The author argues that the controversy arising out of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) has thrown the question of Muslim identity and women’s identity in public debates. The conclusion highlights potential problems of criminalizing those who might resort to the now-defunct instant unilateral divorce and underlines difficulties faced by Muslim women to suggest a way forward.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Acevedo, D. D. (2013). Secularism in the Indian ContextD [Abstract]. The Journal of American Bar Foundation, 38(1), law & social inquiry, 138–164. Retrieved December 25, 2020, from https://www.law.upenn.edu/cf/faculty/ddasacev/workingpapers/LSI-SecularismInTheIndianContext.pdf.
- 2.
Anderson, M. R. (1996, June). Occasional Paper 7: Islamic Law and the Colonial Encounter in British India. Retrieved December 25, 2020, from http://www.wluml.org/node/5627.
- 3.
Ibid., Para 7.
- 4.
Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum. (n.d.). Retrieved December 27, 2020, from https://www.law.cornell.edu/women-and-justice/resource/mohd_ahmed_khan_v_shah_bano_begum.
- 5.
Ibid., Para 3.
- 6.
Shankar, S. (2019, December 16). How Democratic Processes Damage Citizenship Rights: The Implications of CAA-NRC. Retrieved December 27, 2020, from https://www.cprindia.org/news/8339.
References
Acevedo, D. D. (2013). Secularism in the Indian ContextD [Abstract]. The Journal of American Bar Foundation, 38(1), law & social inquiry, 138–164. Retrieved December 25, 2020, from https://www.law.upenn.edu/cf/faculty/ddasacev/workingpapers/LSI-SecularismInTheIndianContext.pdf.
Anderson, M. R. (1996, June). Occasional Paper 7: Islamic Law and the Colonial Encounter in British India. Retrieved December 27, 2020, from http://www.wluml.org/node/5627.
Crimmins, J. (2019, January 28). Jeremy Bentham. Retrieved January 4, 2021, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/bentham/.
Diamant, J. (2020, May 30). The Countries with the 10 Largest Christian Populations and the 10 Largest Muslim Populations. Retrieved December 27, 2020, from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/01/the-countries-with-the-10-largest-christian-populations-and-the-10-largest-muslim-populations/.
Explanation Desk, S. (2020, February 7). Explained: What Is Female Genital Mutilation, and Why Is It Practised? Retrieved December 27, 2020, from https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-what-is-female-genital-mutilation-6254573/.
G. (1979, December 20). Law Commission of India, Eighty-first Report. Retrieved from https://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/51-100/report81.pdf.
Hameed, S. (2000, June 9). Retrieved January 1, 2021, from http://ncw.nic.in/content/voice-voiceless-status-muslim-women-part-3-best-practices-conclusions-and-recommendations.
Hasan, Z., Menon, R., & Vatuk, S. J. (2005). The Diversity of Muslim Women’s Lives in India. In The Diversity of Muslim Women’s Lives in India (pp. 18–58). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Judicial Aberrations on Gender Issues Are Worrisome. (2018, March 8). Retrieved December 27, 2020, from https://thewire.in/women/is-the-indian-judiciary-going-back-on-gender-justice.
Koundinya, S. (2010, August 27). The Concept of Mutah Marriage: Is It a Social Evil? Retrieved December 27, 2020, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1666848.
Mehrotra, I. (2018, November 05). No Respite from Poverty for Muslims. Retrieved December 27, 2020, from https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/no-respite-from-poverty-for-muslims/article25429598.ece.
Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum. (n.d.). Retrieved December 27, 2020, from https://www.law.cornell.edu/women-and-justice/resource/mohd_ahmed_khan_v_shah_bano_begum.
Nagarajan, A. (2020, February 12). In a Minority, but a Major Presence in Our Prisons—Times of India. Retrieved January 4, 2021, from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/in-a-minority-but-a-major-presence-in-our-prisons/articleshow/73266299.cms.
S. (1947, September 25). Retrieved December 27, 2020, from https://www.theguardian.com/century/1940-1949/Story/0,,105131,00.html.
Shankar, S. (2019, December 16). How Democratic Processes Damage Citizenship Rights: The Implications of CAA-NRC. Retrieved December 27, 2020, from https://www.cprindia.org/news/8339.
Thakur, P. (2017, October 9). Just 10% of Pending Cases Filed by Women. Retrieved December 27, 2020, from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/just-10-of-pending-cases-filed-by-women/articleshow/61001629.cms.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dua, K. (2022). Muslim Women in Modern India: Public Debates from Identity to Religious Freedom to the Citizenship Amendment Act. In: Yamahata, C. (eds) Social Transformations in India, Myanmar, and Thailand: Volume II. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7110-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7110-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7109-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7110-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)