Abstract
Widespread campaigns for optimising digital healthcare generally focus on promoting patient responsibilisation or self-responsibility, emphasising the need for encouraging the development of ‘informed patients’ who draw on digital resources as part of self-care strategies. Arguably, however, while ‘self-care’ often involves the promotion of patient self-responsibility, it simultaneously foregrounds other modes of ethical engagement, such as care for, or from, (known and unknown) others and concerns over states’ and corporations’ responsibilities for ensuring mental wellbeing. The broader literature on responsibility suggests that rather than unilaterally privileging personal responsibility, advanced liberal societies create a much more fertile and contested ground upon which multiple, ‘competing responsibilities’ flourish. Digital technologies add unique facets to how responsibility is enacted, reshaping experiences of time and space by enabling new forms of seemingly continuous, person-person and person-technology relations and consequently refracting users’ sense of where agency lies (i.e. in themselves, in their relations with [human] others, or in technologies themselves). Drawing on a case study of young New Zealanders’ uses of digital technology for promoting mental health, this chapter examines how a newly emerging ethics of care recasts understandings and enactments of responsibility for mental wellbeing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Interviews were conducted by the author and seven research assistants, following ethical approval from the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee.
- 3.
What was anticipated to be a summer spent interviewing 10–20 participants developed into a much larger, five-year study.
References
Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.
Albury, K., Byron, P., & Shaw, F. (2019). Introduction: The will to app: digitising public health. Media International Australia, 171(1), 3–8.
Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Malden, MA: Polity.
Bretherton, P., Piggin, J., & Bodet, G. (2016). Olympic sport and physical activity promotion: the rise and fall of the London 2012 pre-event pass participation ‘legacy’. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 8(4), 609–624.
Byron, P. (2019). ‘Apps are cool but generally pretty pointless’: LGBTIQ+ young people’s mental health app ambivalence. Media International Australia, 171(1), 51–65.
Carrithers, M. (1985). An alternative social history of the self. In M. Carrithers, S. Collins, & S. Lukes (Eds.), The category of the person: Anthropology, philosophy, history (pp. 234–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cook, J. (2016). Mindful in Westminster: The politics of meditation and the limits of neoliberal critique. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6(1), 141–161.
Danholt, P., & Langstrup, H. (2012). Medication as infrastructure. Culture Unbound, 4, 513–532.
DelVecchio Good, M.J. (2001). The biotechnical embrace. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 25(4), 395–410.
Dumit, J. (2012). Drugs for life: How pharmaceutical companies define our health. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Epstein, S. (1998). Impure science: aids, activism, and the politics of knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
European Commission. (2018). Communication on enabling the digital transformation of health and care in the digital single market: empowering citizens and building a healthier society. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/communication-enabling-digital-transformation-health-and-care-digital-single-market-empowering.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2020.
Fordyce, L. (2012). Responsible choices: situating pregnancy intention among Haitians in south Florida. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 26(1), 116–135.
Foucault, M. (1988). The history of sexuality, Vol. 3: The care of the self (trans: Hurley, R.). New York: Knopf Doubleday.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality, Vol. 2: The use of pleasure (trans: Hurley, R.). New York: Vintage Books.
Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics: Subjectivity and truth. P. Rabinow (Ed.) (trans: Hurley, R. et al.). New York: New Press.
Fullagar, S. (2007). Governing healthy families: Leisure and the politics of risk. In M. Casado-Diaz, S. Everett, & J. Wilson (Eds.), Social and cultural change: Making space(s) for leisure and tourism (pp. 67–78). Bristol: Leisure Studies Association.
Gershon, I. (2010). The break up 2.0: Disconnecting over new media. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Gibbon, S. (2006). Nurturing women and the BRCA genes: gender, activism and the paradox of health awareness. Anthropology & Medicine, 13(2), 157–171.
Gibson, K., & Carthwright, C. (2014). Young people’s experiences of mobile phone text counselling: balancing connection and control. Children and Youth Services Review, 43, 96–104.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gobby, B., Keddie, A., & Blackmore, J. (2018). Professionalism and competing responsibilities: moderating competitive performativity in school autonomy reform. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 50(3), 159–173.
Hage, G., & Eckersley, R. (2012). Introduction. In G. Hage & R. Eckersley (Eds.), Responsibility (pp. 1–11). Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Hunt, A. (2003). Risk and moralization in everyday life. In R.V. Ericson & A. Doyle (Eds.), Risk and morality (pp. 165–192). London: University of Toronto Press.
Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456.
Jasanoff, S. (Ed.) (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and social order. New York: Routledge.
Kelty, C. M. (2008). Responsibility: McKeon and Ricoeur. Anthropology of the Contemporary Research Collaboratory. arc Working Paper no. 12. http://hdl.handle.net/10524/1625. Accessed 20 September 2020.
Laidlaw, J. (2010). Agency and responsibility: Perhaps you can have too much of a good thing. In M. Lambek (Ed.), Ordinary ethics: Anthropology, language, and action (pp. 143–164). New York: Fordham University Press.
Laidlaw, J. (2014). The subject of virtue: An anthropology of ethics and freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Langstrup, H., & Winthereik, B.R. (2008). The making of self-monitoring asthma patients: mending a split reality with comparative ethnography. Comparative Sociology, 7, 362–386.
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). Cambridge and London: The MIT Press.
Lomborg, S., Thylstrup, N.B., & Schwartz, J. (2018). The temporal flows of self-tracking: checking in, moving on, staying hooked. New Media & Society, 20(12), 4950–4607.
Lupton, D. (2014). The commodification of patient opinion: the digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(6), 856–869.
Lupton, D. (2017). Personal data practices in the age of lively data. In J. Daniels, K. Gregory, & T. McMillan Cottom (Eds.), Digital sociologies (pp. 339–352). Bristol: Policy Press.
Lupton, D. (2019). ‘It’s made me a lot more aware’: a new materialist analysis of health self-tracking. Media International Australia, 171(1), 66–79.
Lupton, D., & Smith, G.J.D. (2018). ‘A much better person’: The agential capacities of self-tracking practices. In B. Ajana (Ed.), Metric culture: Ontologies of self-tracking practices (pp. 57–76). London: Emerald Publishing.
Madianou, M., & Miller, D. (2013). Polymedia: towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 16(2), 169–87.
Martin, A., Myers, N., & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 625–641.
McCarthy, E. (2007). Land of saints and tigers: the transformation of responsibility in Ireland. Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe, 7, 3–7.
McKeon, R. (1957). The development and significance of the concept of responsibility. Revue International de Philosophie, 1, 3–32.
Merle, R. (2019, April 4). Warren’s plan to jail more CEOs would upend legal standards, critics say. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/04/04/problem-with-elizabeth-warrens-plan-jail-more-ceos/. Accessed 10 August 2020.
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present: Administering economic, social and personal life. Malden, MA: Polity.
Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. London: Routledge.
Mol, A., Moser, I., & J. Pols, eds. (2010). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes, and farms. New York: Columbia University Press.
Mort, M., Roberts, C., Pols, J., Domenech, M., & Moser, I. (2013). Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: a framework derived from a multisited participative study. Health Expectations, 18, 438–449.
Oudshoorn, N. (2011). Telecare technologies and the transformation of healthcare. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pols, J. (2010). The heart of the matter: about good nursing and telecare. Health Care Analysis, 18, 374–388.
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011) Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106.
Rawolle, S., Rowlands, J., & Blackmore, J. (2017). The implications of contractualism for the responsibilisation of higher education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 38(1), 109–122.
Reed, A. (2005). ‘My blog is me’: texts and persons in UK online journal culture (and anthropology). Ethnos, 70(2), 220–242.
Reiser, S. J. (1985). Responsibility for personal health: a historical perspective. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 10, 7–17.
Renniger, B. J. (2015). ‘Where I can be myself.’ New Media & Society, 17(9), 1513–1529.
Rose, N. (2006). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schüll, N. D. (2016). Data for life: wearable technology and the design of self-care. BioSocieties, 11, 317–333.
Schwennesen, N. (2017). When self-tracking enters physical rehabilitation: from ‘pushed’ self-tacking to ongoing affective encounters in arrangements of care. Digital Health, 3, 1–8.
Schwennesen, N. (2019). Algorithmic assemblages of care: imaginaries epistemologies and repair work. Sociology of Health & Illness, 41(S1), 176–192 10.1111/1467-9566.12900
Sharon, T. (2015). Healthy citizenship beyond autonomy and discipline: tactical engagements with genetic testing. BioSocieties, 10, 295–316.
Shaw, F., & McCosker, A. (2019). Mental health support apps and ‘proper distance’: relational ethics in mHealth. Media International Australia, 171(1), 9–22.
Smith, J. (2017). From corporate social responsibility to creating shared value: Contesting responsibilization and the mining industry. In S. Trnka & C. Trundle (Eds.), Competing responsibilities: The ethics and politics of contemporary life (pp. 118–132). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Spoel, P., Harris, R., & Henwood, F. (2014). Rhetorics of health citizenship: exploring vernacular critiques of government’s role in supporting healthy living. Journal of Medical Humanities, 35, 131–147.
Thörn, H., & Svenberg, S. (2016). ‘We feel the responsibility that you shirk’: movement institutionalization, the politics of responsibility and the case of the Swedish environmental movement. Social Movement Studies, 15(6), 593–609.
Trnka, S. (2016). Digital care: agency and temporality in young people’s use of health apps. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 2, 248–265.
Trnka, S. (2017). One blue child: Asthma, responsibility and the global politics of health. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Trnka, S., & Trundle, C. (2014). Competing responsibilities: moving beyond neoliberal responsibilization. Anthropological Forum, 24(2), 136–153.
Trnka, S., & Trundle, C. (2017). Competing responsibilities: Reckoning personal responsibility, care for the other and the social contract in contemporary life. In S. Trnka & C. Trundle (Eds.), Competing responsibilities: The ethics and politics of contemporary life (pp. 1–24). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: Basic Books.
Weinberg, A. M. (1966). Can technology replace social engineering? Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 12(10), 4–8.
Weiner, K., & Will, C. (2018). Thinking with care infrastructures: people, devices and the home in home blood pressure monitoring. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(2), 270–282.
Welker, M. A. (2013). Enacting the corporation: An American mining firm in post-authoritarian Indonesia. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wesch, M. (2009). YouTube and you: experiences of self-awareness in the context collapse of the recording webcam. Explorations in Media Ecology, 8(2), 19–34.
Zigon, J. (2010). ‘HIV is god’s blessing’: Rehabilitating morality in neoliberal Russia. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to both reviewers for their feedback and to Rachel Douglas-Jones for her care and enthusiasm in shepherding this chapter to completion. I am indebted to the young people who shared their stories and to the student research assistants who contributed to this project: Andrea Merino Ortiz, Claire Black, Mira Bi, Shyla Rose Kelly, Imogen Spray, Thibaut Bouttier-Esprit, Brodie Quinn, and Miriama Aoake. This research was supported by the University of Auckland’s Faculty of Arts Summer Scholars Programme (2015–2020); the Faculty Research Development Fund; InternetNZ; and the Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden grant, ‘Ka Hao te Rangatahi: Fishing with a New Net? Rethinking Responsibility for Youth Mental Health in the Digital Age’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Trnka, S. (2022). Competing Responsibilities and the Ethics of Care in Young People’s Engagements with Digital Mental Health. In: Bruun, M.H., et al. The Palgrave Handbook of the Anthropology of Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7084-8_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7083-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7084-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)