Abstract
Understanding the variability of bacterial communities in lake ecosystems is important as they play numerous roles, e.g., microbial loop and biodegradation of organic contaminants. Rapid bacterial responses to environmental conditions can thus influence the whole lake ecosystems and indirectly affect other communities in the environments. This chapter describes bacterial communities at the genus level in the water and sediment of Tonle Sap Lake (TSL) with particular attention to their spatiotemporal shifts and relationships with physicochemical factors. Synechococcus was the most detected genus in both lake water and sediment possibly owing to its connectivity with phylum Cyanobacteria which changes its dominance under the hydrodynamics of this river–lake system (i.e., the Tonle Sap River (TSR) and TSL). Microcystis increased its dominance in lake water during the transition from dry to rainy season, while Clostridium was abundant in the sediment. Moreover, most of the genera in lake water, including Mycobacterium, Synechococcus, Methylosinus, Hydrogenophaga, Polynucleobacter, Dechloromonas, Methylocaldum, and Steroidobacter, were statistically related to physicochemical factors, especially dissolved oxygen (DO) and pH. However, Dolichospermum correlated with DO, while Microcystis, Fluviicola, and Sphingomonas correlated with pH. These results are beneficial for further understanding the habitat heterogeneity of microbial communities and their environmental adaptation mechanisms in aquatic ecosystems.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
1 Bacterial Communities in Lakes
In both soil and aquatic systems, bacterial communities perform key functions in ecosystem processes, such as material cycle, the decomposition of organic matter, and the breakdown of pollutants (Pesce et al. 2008; Gonzalez et al. 2012). Lakes are excellent systems for investigating bacterial community dynamics because lakes have not only a sharp boundary definition but also strong environmental gradients (Linz et al. 2017). Thus, lakes are biologically complex freshwater ecosystems that create habitats for a wide range of macro- and microorganisms (Carpenter et al. 2011; see also Chaps. 31, 32, 33 and 34). Lake water and sediments of different environmental habitats with their unique characteristics result in their unique bacterial community composition (BCC), and such difference accounts for different microbial biogeographies in lake environments (Lindström and Langenheder 2012; Yang et al. 2016). On the other hand, the establishment of BCC in environmental water may vary from location to location depending on community adaptation, community interactions, environmental factors, hydrology, and human activities (Newton et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2018). For instance, BCC varies with different physicochemical characteristics (Zwart et al. 2002; Chang et al., 2020) among lakes (Van der Gucht et al. 2005; Yang et al. 2016) and across space and time that represents habitat heterogeneity (Shade et al. 2008).
Tonle Sap Lake (TSL) has a unique and dynamic flood-pulse ecosystem driven by seasonal flooding from the Mekong River (Holtgrieve et al. 2013; see also Chap. 1), and TSL is arguably known as one of the world’s most productive freshwater lake ecosystems (Daly et al. 2020; see also Chaps. 31, 32, 33 and 34). As a result, the water volume change, flow direction, mixing of water and sediments, and others affecting BCC must be considered. A better understanding of the drivers and controls of bacterial communities (on spatial and longtime scales) would improve both our knowledge of the fundamental properties of those communities and our ability to predict community states (Linz et al. 2017). However, compared with that in temperate environmental water, the shifting of BCC in tropical environmental water as found in lakes has not been well understood (Ung et al. 2019). Furthermore, the comprehensive dataset of the shifting of BCC in water column and sediment in aquatic ecosystems is limited since studies have focused either on surface waters or sediments (Liu et al. 2013; Li et al. 2015; Chen et al. 2016; Hengy et al. 2017; Li et al. 2017; Wan et al. 2017).
2 Dominant Genera and their Spatiotemporal Distribution
The water and sediment samples in the TSL were collected at cross sections (CS) 1, 2, 3, and 4 (northwestern part); CS 5, 6, and 7 (southeastern part); and at three floating villages (Kampong Plouk (KP), Kampong Luong (KL), and Chhnok Tru (CT)). The surface water samples were collected using a water sampler (General Oceanics, Miami, FL, USA), while sediment samples were collected using a core sampler (Rigosha & Co., Ltd., Saitama, Japan). This sampling was conducted four times in December 2016 (Dec-16, dry season), March 2017 (Mar-17, the transition from dry to rainy season), and June and August 2017 (Jun-17 and Aug-17, rainy season) (see map of the study area (Fig. 1, Ung et al. 2019), published in Science of the Total Environment 664: 414-423. doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.351, as well as the detailed methods to measure physicochemical parameters and microbial communities).
The range (i.e., maximum–minimum) for the water depth of TSL was approximately 9.3 m (mean ± standard deviation, 3.9 ± 2.2), while, respectively, varied temperature of the surface water, 8.7 m (29.7 ± 1.8); electrical conductivity (EC), 21.5 mS/m (12.8 ± 2.3); dissolved oxygen (DO), 8.5 mg/L (6.8 ± 1.7); pH, 2.4 (7.9 ± 0.5); oxidation–reduction potential (ORP), 454 mV (213 ± 86); total dissolved solids (TDS), 95.3 mg/L (36.8 ± 33.1); and turbidity, 337 Nephelometric Turbidity Unit (NTU) (31 ± 58.5).
Based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence results from next-generation sequencing analysis, microbial communities in the lake water and sediment were chosen at the genus level for the major lineages set greater than 5% (see Figs. 27.1 and 27.2, respectively). Most of the genera were widely distributed in the lake water and sediment; however, their abundance depended on location and season. With relative abundance about 30%, Synechococcus was the most abundant and widely distributed genus in the lake water (Fig. 27.1). Considered as an important contributor to primary production in many freshwater lakes (Ruber et al. 2018), Synechococcus (also called picocyanobacteria; diameter, 0.2–2 μm; cell wall, Gram-negative type; see Hoiczyk and Hansel 2000; Bell and Kalff 2001; and Callieri et al. 2007) belongs to Cyanobacteria at the phylum level. In the study of Ung et al. (2019), the abundance of Cyanobacteria was highly measured during the high-water-level season (Dec-16 and Aug-17) in the southeastern part (CS 4–3 to 7–4) of the lake. Conversely, its high abundance was measured during the low-water-level season (Mar-17 and Jun-17) in the northwestern part (CS 1–1 to 3–5). These results seem to suggest that the water flow from the Tonle Sap River (TSR) to the TSL during rainy season and from the TSL to the TSR during dry season strongly affects the abundance of Cyanobacteria. Similarly, Cyanobacteria was also dominantly found in some freshwater lakes in the world, such as Lake Loosdrecht (the Netherlands), Lake Ijssel (the Netherlands), and Lake Soyang (South Korea) (Yadav et al. 2019). Moreover, the biodiversity of bacteria found in other freshwater lake ecosystems shows the existence of Synechococcus and Microcystis. In addition, they appear to mix with other genera, such as Aphanizomenon, Planktothrix, and Polynucleobacter, in lakes Loosdrecht (the Netherlands), Baikal (Russia), and Tanganyika (Africa).
Synechococcus was not only dominant in this lake water but also in its sediment (Fig. 27.2). Synechococcus in the sediment was highly observed during dry season (Mar-17), especially in the northwestern part of the lake, probably due to the water flow exchanges at the junction of the TSR and TSL. Those exchanges might play a role in the mixing process of the surface water and sediment in other parts of the lake. Another process was previously reported by Weisse (1993), in which a great interannual variability of Synechococcus was associated with the differences in weather conditions causing different spring mixing regimes and water column stabilization timing. Further characterization of these dynamics is necessary to truly understand the role of Synechococcus in environmental change, as well as that of other related microorganisms in this river–lake system.
On the other hand, Mycobacterium, Flavobacterium, Polynucleobacter, Methylosinus, Dechloromonas, and Methylocaldum were relatively dominant in the lake water of the northwestern part. Methylosinus and Methlocaldum, as methane-oxidizing bacteria, were highly detected in the northwestern part; this may be caused by the high concentration of methane, which is due to the methane fermentation of a high concentration of organic compounds and a low concentration of DO. It means that the northwestern part is the dead end of the lake, although a little water flow exists during the transition from dry to rainy season, and the area may tend to be a reductive environment. Dolichospermum and Sphingomonas were present in high abundance in the lake water of the southeastern part. Microcystis was also found in lake water, and its abundance increased during the transition from dry to rainy season in Jun-17. As shown in a recent study, during the bloom of Cyanobacteria in Lake Chaohu, Microcystis and Dolichospermum were the two major genera (Guan et al. 2020); specifically, the ranges of the cell diameter and colony size of Microcystis were small throughout the whole year, but those of Dolichospermum significantly changed over time and in different parts of the lake. It seems to be true that both genera coexist with the abundance of Cyanobacteria, which was also abundantly found in the water column of this river–lake system (Ung et al. 2019). Meanwhile, the most abundant genus in the sediment in Aug-17 is the Clostridium, which appeared in the northeastern part of the lake and is close to the floating village of KL. Generally, Clostridium sp. is known as a facultative anaerobic bacterium that can survive not only in the surface water but also in the sediment as fermentative microbes.
3 Relationships between Dominant Genera and their Physicochemical Factors
Most of the dominant genera significantly correlated with the physicochemical factors of lake water, especially with DO and pH (Table 27.1). In addition to both variables, Mycobacterium (individually, still determined by ORP), Methylosinus (by ORP and EC), and Methylocaldum were determined by temperature, TDS, and turbidity; Steroidobacter was significantly correlated with water depth, temperature, EC, and TDS; and Hydrogenophaga with turbidity. It is possible that these microbes are adsorbed to the surface of minute solids such as inorganic and organic substances present in lake water. Therefore, as the concentration of TDS and/or turbidity increases, the abundance of those genera in lake water decreases. Besides DO and pH, Dechloromonas was also significantly related to EC, ORP, and TDS. As the physiological function of Dechloromonas is thought to be a reductive dichlorination from chlorine-containing materials, the abundance of this genus was related to ORP. In our further study, the relationships between the abundance of Dechloromonas and the original source or the concentration of chlorinated compounds in lake water must be verified.
Dolichospermum showed a significant correlation with DO in the water of TSL. This genus was also observed, in Missisquoi Bay (Lake Champlain), following low chlorine and mid-KMnO4 (287.7 mg·min/L) exposure (Moradinejad et al. 2020). Microcystis significantly correlated with temperature and pH, and in addition to these variables, Synechococcus significantly correlated with DO and ORP (Table 27.1). It means that their photosynthesis is significantly affected by these physicochemical factors. However, although pH showed a significant correlation with Microcystis and Synechococcus, it is difficult to directly relate them because of the complexity of pH. However, the consistency of trends remains seen; for example, in Western Lake Erie, the shifts of cyanobacterial community composition dominated by OTUs of Microcystis and Synechococcus, which dynamically fluctuated during the bloom, could be partitioned into components predicted by pH, temperature, chlorophyll a, and water mass movements (Berry et al. 2017).
Key Points
-
Synechococcus was the most detected genus in both lake water and sediment, while Microcystis increased its dominance in lake water during the transition from dry to rainy season.
-
Most of the genera in lake water were statistically related to physicochemical factors, especially DO and pH.
-
The succession of dominant species and their abundances might be regulated by the hydrodynamics of this river–lake system.
-
The microbial communities in lake water are sensitive to environmental fluctuations.
References
Bell T, Kalff J. The contribution of picophytoplankton in marine and freshwater Systems of Different Trophic Status and Depth. Limnol Oceanogr. 2001;46:1243–8.
Berry MA, Davis TW, Cory RM, Duhaime MB, Johengen TH, Kling GW, Marino JA, Den Uyl PA, Gossiaux D, Dick GJ, Denef VJ. Cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms are a biological disturbance to Western Lake Erie bacterial communities. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:1149–62.
Callieri C, Modenutti B, Queimaliños C, Bertoni R, Balseiro E. Production and biomass of picophytoplankton and larger autotrophs in Andean Ultraoligotrophic Lakes: differences in light harvesting efficiency in deep layers. Aquat Ecol. 2007;41:511–23.
Carpenter SR, Stanley EH, Vander Zanden MJ. State of the World's freshwater ecosystems: physical, chemical, and biological changes. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 2011;36:75–99.
Chang W, Sun J, Pang Y, Zhang S, Gong L, Lu J, Feng B, Xu R. Effects of different habitats on the bacterial community composition in the water and sediments of Lake Taihu. China Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27:44983–94.
Chen Y, Dai Y, Wang Y, Wu Z, Xie S, Liu Y. Distribution of bacterial communities across plateau freshwater Lake and upslope soils. J Environ Sci. 2016;43:61–9.
Daly K, Ahmad SK, Bonnema M, Beveridge C, Hossain F, Nijssen B, Holtgrieve G. Recent warming of Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia: implications for one of the World’s most productive inland fisheries. Lakes Reserv Res Manag. 2020;25:133–42.
Gonzalez A, King A, Robeson MS II, Song S, Shade A, Metcalf JL, Knight R. Characterizing microbial communities through space and time. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012;23:431–6.
Guan Y, Zhang M, Yang Z, Shi X, Zhao X. Intra-annual variation and correlations of functional traits in Microcystis and Dolichospermum in Lake Chaohu. Ecol Indic. 2020;111:106052.
Hengy MH, Horton DJ, Uzarski DG, Learman DR. Microbial community diversity patterns are related to physical and chemical differences among Temperate Lakes near Beaver Island, MI. PeerJ. 2017;5:e3937.
Hoiczyk E, Hansel A. Cyanobacterial cell walls: news from an unusual prokaryotic envelope. J Bacteriol. 2000;182:1191–9.
Holtgrieve GW, Arias ME, Irvine KN, Lamberts D, Ward EJ, Kummu M, Koponen J, Sarkkula J, Richey JE. Patterns of ecosystem metabolism in the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia with links to capture fisheries. PLoS One. 2013;8:e71395.
Li D, Jiang X, Wang J, Wang K, Zheng B. Effect of sewage and industrial effluents on bacterial and archaeal communities of creek sediments in the Taihu Basin. Water. 2017;9:373.
Li J, Zhang J, Liu L, Fan Y, Li L, Yang Y, Lu Z, Zhang X. Annual periodicity in planktonic bacterial and archaeal community composition of eutrophic Lake Taihu. Sci Rep. 2015;5:15488.
Lindström ES, Langenheder S. Local and regional factors influencing bacterial community assembly. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2012;4:1–9.
Linz AM, Crary BC, Shade A, Owens S, Gilbert JA, Knight R, McMahon KD. Bacterial community composition and dynamics spanning five years in freshwater Bog Lakes. mSphere. 2017;2:e00169–17.
Liu Y, Yao T, Jiao N, Liu X, Kang S, Luo T. Seasonal dynamics of the bacterial Community in Lake Namco, the largest Tibetan Lake. Geomicrobiol J. 2013;30:17–28.
Moradinejad S, Trigui H, Guerra Maldonado JF, Shapiro J, Terrat Y, Zamyadi A, Dorner S, Prévost M. Diversity assessment of toxic cyanobacterial blooms during oxidation. Toxins. 2020;12:728.
Newton RJ, Jones SE, Eiler A, McMahon KD, Bertilsson S. A guide to the natural history of freshwater lake bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2011;75:14–49.
Pesce S, Bardot C, Lehours AC, Batisson I, Bohatier J, Fajon C. Effects of diuron in microcosms on natural riverine bacterial community composition: new insight into phylogenetic approaches using PCR-TTGE analysis. Aquat Sci. 2008;70:410–8.
Ruber J, Geist J, Hartmann M, Millard A, Raeder U, Zubkov M, Zwirglmaier K. Spatio-temporal distribution pattern of the picocyanobacterium Synechococcus in lakes of different trophic states: a comparison of flow cytometry and sequencing approaches. Hydrobiologia. 2018;811:77–92.
Shade A, Jones SE, McMahon KD. The influence of habitat heterogeneity on freshwater bacterial community composition and dynamics. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10:1057–67.
Ung P, Peng C, Yuk S, Tan R, Ann V, Miyanaga K, Tanji Y. Dynamics of bacterial Community in Tonle sap Lake, a large tropical flood-pulse system in Southeast Asia. Sci Total Environ. 2019;664:414–23.
Van der Gucht K, Vandekerckhove T, Vloemans N, Cousin S, Muylaert K, Sabbe K, Gillis M, Declerk S, De Meester L, Vyverman W. Characterization of bacterial communities in four Freshwater Lakes differing in nutrient load and food web structure. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005;53:205–20.
Wan Y, Ruan X, Zhang Y, Li R. Illumina sequencing-based analysis of sediment bacteria community in different trophic status freshwater lakes. Microbiologyopen. 2017;6:e00450.
Wang L, Zhang J, Li H, Yang H, Peng C, Peng Z, Lu L. Shift in the microbial community composition of surface water and sediment along an Urban River. Sci Total Environ. 2018;627:600–12.
Weisse T. Dynamics of autotrophic picoplankton in marine and freshwater ecosystems. In: Jones JG, editor. Advances in microbial ecology. New York: Plenum Press; 1993. p. 327–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2858-6_8.
Yadav AN, Yadav N, Kour D, Kumar A, Yadav K, Kumar A, Rastegari AA, Sachan SG, Singh B, Chauhan VS, Saxena AK. Bacterial community composition in lakes. In: Freshwater microbiology. London: Academic; 2019. p. 1–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817495-1.00001-3.
Yang J, Jiang H, Wu G, Liu W, Zhang G. Distinct factors shape aquatic and sedimentary microbial community structures in the lakes of Western China. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:1782.
Zwart G, Crump BC, Kamst-van Agterveld MP, Hagen F, Han SK. Typical freshwater bacteria: an analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences from plankton of lakes and Rivers. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2002;28:141–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ann, V., Ung, P., Peng, C., Fujii, M., Tanji, Y., Miyanaga, K. (2022). Bacterial Communities: Their Dynamics and Interactions with Physicochemical Factors. In: Yoshimura, C., Khanal, R., Sovannara, U. (eds) Water and Life in Tonle Sap Lake. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6632-2_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6632-2_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-6631-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-6632-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)