Abstract
This chapter takes up West and Matthewman’s (2016) call for a strong program in the sociology of the war and the military. It first explores the ways in which two fields of research (the study of how militaries influence societies and of how societies influence militaries) have slowly grown apart from one another—while also growing away from the battlefield. In order to correct these developmental tendencies, the chapter offers a neo-Clausewitzian foundation for a strong program approach. Three features are particularly emphasized. First, that the field takes seriously the reciprocal character of interactions between the military, public and government. Second, that the density of war as a social event is comprehended, disaggregating war into three levels: the strategic, the operational, the tactical level. Finally, in order to prevent over-correcting and ignoring those aspects of military affairs not directly connected to war, I posit the enterprise level, which concerns the health and well-being of the military institution. Focusing on the dynamic role militaries play in shaping their publics and governments, and the ways in which they are affected in turn, will allow scholars to keep pace with the military’s own rapid evolution as a political actor.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Althusser, L. (2020). On ideology. New Left Books.
Avant, D. (1998). Conflicting indicators of ‘crisis’ in American civil-military relations. Armed Forces and Society, 24(3), 375–387.
Bacevich, A. J. (1998). Absent history: A comment on Dauber, Desch and Feaver. Armed Forces and Society, 24(3), 447–453.
Barkawi, T. (2011). From war to security: Security studies, the wider agenda and the fate of the study of war. Millennium, 39(3), 701–716.
Barkey, K. (1994). Bandits and bureaucrats: The Ottoman route to state centralization. Cornell University Press.
Basham, V., & Bulmer, S. (2017). Critical military studies as method: An approach to studying gender and the military. In R. Woodward & C. Duncanson (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of gender and the military (pp. 59–71). Palgrave Macmillan.
Belkin, A. (2003). Don‘t ask, don‘t tell: Is the gay ban based on military necessity? Parameters, 33, 108–119.
Biderman, A. D. (1967). What is the military? In S. Tax (Ed.), The draft: A handbook of facts and alternatives. University of Chicago Press.
Biderman, A. D. (1971). Toward redefining the military. Teachers College Record, 73, 47–58.
Biderman, A. D., & Sharp, L. M. (1968). The convergence of military and civilian occupational structures: Evidence from studies of military and civilian occupational structures. American Journal of Sociology, 73, 381–399.
Binkin, M., & Bach, S. J. (1977). Women and the military. The Brookings Institute.
Boene, B. (2000). Social science research, war and the military in the Unitd States: An outsider’s view of the field’s dominant national traditions. In G. Kummel & A. D. Prufert (Eds.), Military sociology: The richness of a discipline. Nomos.
Boothroyd, P. (2013). Clausewitz: His influence on current marine corps doctrine. Marine Corps Gazette, 97(7), 81–84.
Brooks, R. (2020). Paradoxes of professionalism: Rethinking civil-military relations in the United States. International Security, 44(4), 7–44.
Burk, J. (1998). The logic of crisis and civil-military relations theory: A comment on Desch, Feaver and Dauber. Armed Forces and Society, 24(3), 455–462.
Burk, J., & Espinosa, E. (2012). Race relations within the US military. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 401–422.
Butler, J. S. (1976). Inequality in the military: An examination of promotion time for black and white enlisted men. American Sociological Review, 41(5), 807–818.
Carreiras, H. (2006). Gender and the military: Women in the armed forces of Western democracies. Routledge.
Centeno, M. A., & Enriquez, E. (2016). War and society. Polity.
Clausewitz, C. (1984[1832]). On war. M. Howard, & P. Paret (trans.). Princeton University Press.
Cohen, E. A. (2002). Supreme command: Soldiers, statesmen and leadership in wartime (2002). Simon and Schuster.
Coletta, D., & Crosbie, T. (2021). The virtues of military politics. Armed Forces and Society, 47(1), 3–24.
Coser, L. (1956). The functions of social conflict. The Free Press.
Cotton, C. A. (1981). Institutional and occupational values in Canada’s army. Armed Forces and Society, 8(1), 99–110.
Crosbie, T. (2015). Coser, Lewis A. International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences. (2nd Edn).
Crosbie, T. (2020, February). “Michael Howard and military politics.” Texas national security review.
Dalfiume, R. M. (1969). Desegregation of the US armed forces: Fighting on two fronts, 1939–1953. University of Missouri Press.
Echevarria, A. J. (2007). Clausewitz and contemporary war. Oxford University Press.
Eisenhower, D.D. (1961). Farewell address. January 17. Box 38, Speech series, papers of Dwight D. Eisenhower as president, 1953–61, Eisenhower Library.
Feaver, P. D. (1998). Crisis as shirking: An agency theory of the souring of American civil-military relations. Armed Forces and Society, 24(3), 407–434.
Feaver, P. D. (2003). Armed servants: Agency, oversight and civil-military relations. Harvard UP.
Feaver, P. D. (2011). The right to be right: Civil-military relations and the Iraq surge decision. International Security, 35(4), 87–125.
Feaver, P. D., & Kohn, R. H. (2001). Soldiers and civilians: The civil-military gap and American national security. MIT Press.
Foner, J. D. (1974). Blacks and the military in American history: A new perspective. Praeger.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writiners, 1972–1977. Vintage.
Galloway, J. M. (1976). The impact of the admission of women to the service academies and the role of the woman line officer. American Behavioral Scientist, 19(5), 647–664.
Garnier, M. A. (1975). Technology, organizational culture and recruitment in the British military academy. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 3, 141–151.
Geva, D. (2013). Conscription, family, and the modern state: A comparative study of France and the United States. Cambridge University Press.
Goldman, N. L. (1973). The changing role of women in the armed forces. American Journal of Sociology, 78(4), 892–911.
Goldman, N. L. (1977). The utilization of women in the armed forces of industrialized nations. Sociological Symposium, 18, 1–23.
Goodpaster, A. J., & Huntington, S. P. (1977). Civil-military relations. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Hooks, G., & Smith, C. L. (2004). The treadmill of destruction: National sacrifice areas and native Americans. American Sociological Review, 69(4), 558–575.
Howell, A. (2018). Forget “militarization”: Race, disability and the “martial politics” of the police and of the university. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 20(2), 117–136.
Hudson, W. M. (2004). The continuing influence of Clausewitz. Military Review, 84(2), 60–62.
Huntington, S. P. (1957). The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Harvard University Press.
Janowitz, M. (1971). Military organization. In R. W. Little (Ed.), Handbook of military institutions. Sage.
Janowitz, M. (1977). From institutional to occupational: The need for conceptual clarity. Armed Forces and Society, 4(1), 51–54.
Janowitz, M. (2017). The professional soldier: A social and political portrait. Simon and Schuster.
Kelly, J., & Brennan, M. (2009). Alien: How operational art devoured strategy. Strategic Studies Institute.
Kestnbaum, M. (2005). Mars revealed: The entry of ordinary people into war among states. In J. Adams, E. S. Clemens, & A. S. Orloff (Eds.), Remaking modernity: Politics, history and sociology. Duke University Press.
Kestnbaum, M. (2009). The sociology of war and the military. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 235–254.
King, A. (Ed.). (2015). Frontline: Combat and cohesion in the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press.
King, A. (2019). Command: The twenty-first-century general. Oxford University Press.
Krulak, V. (1999). The strategic corporal: Leadership in the three block war. Marines Magazine.
Larson, A. D. (1974). Military professionalism and civil control: A comparative analysis of two interpretations. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 2, 57–72.
Lasswell, H. B. (1941). The garrison state. The American Journal of Sociology, 46, 455–468.
Levy, Y. (2019). Whose life is worth more?: Hierarchies of risk and death in contemporary wars. Stanford University Press.
Levy, G., & Sasson-Levy, O. (2008). Militarized socialization, military service and class reproduction: The experiences of Israeli soldiers. Sociological Perspectives, 51(2), 349–374.
Levy, Y. (1998). Militarizing inequality: A conceptual framework. Theory and Society, 27(6), 873–904.
Little, R. W. (1964). Buddy relations and combat performance. In M. Janowitz (Ed.), The new military. Russell Sage Foundation.
Lowrence, J. D., & Murdock, J. L. (2009). Political, military, economic, infrastructure, information (PMESII) effects forecasting for course of action (COA) evaluation. Air Force Research Laboratory.
Malešević, S. (2010). The sociology of war and violence. Cambridge University Press.
Malešević, S. (2017). The rise of organized brutality: A historical sociology of violence. Cambridge University Press.
Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. Oxford University Press.
Moskos, C. C., Jr. (1988). Soldiers and sociology. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
Moskos, C. C., Jr. (1966). Racial integration in the armed forces. American Journal of Sociology, 72(2), 132–148.
Moskos, C. C., Jr. (1973). The emergent military. Pacific Sociological Review, 16, 255–279.
Moskos, C. C., Jr. (1977). From institutions to occupations: Trends in military organization. Armed Forces and Society, 4, 41–50.
Moskos, C. C., Jr. (1986). Institutional/occupational trends in armed forces: An update. Armed Forces and Society, 12(3), 377–382.
Moskos, C. C., Jr., & Wood, F. R. (1988). The military: More than just a job? Pergamon-Brassey’s International Defense Publishers.
Orwell, G. (1949). Nineteen eighty-four. Secker and Warburg.
Perlmutter, A. (1977). The military and politics in modern times: On professionals, praetorians and revolutionary soldiers. Yale University Press.
Pommerin, R. (Ed.). (2011). Clausewitz goes global: Carl von Clausewitz in the 21st century. Miles Verlag.
Roxborough, I. (1994). “Clausewitz and the sociology of war. British Journal of Sociology, 45(4), 619–636.
Segal, D. R., & Segal, M. (1971). Models of civil-military relations at the elite level. In M. R. Van Gils (Ed.), The perceived role of the military. Rotterdam University.
Segal, D. R., Blair, D., Newport, F., & Stephens, S. (1974). Convergence, isomorphism and interdependence at the civil-military interface. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 2, 157–172.
Segal, D. R., & Yoon, Y. H. (1984). Institutional and occupations models of the army in the career force. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 12, 243–256.
Shils, E. A., & Janowitz, M. (1948). Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht in world war II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12(2), 280–315.
Simmel, G. (1955). Conflict & The web of group affiliations. In K. H. Wolff, & R. Bendix (trans.). The Free Press.
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge University Press.
Skocpol, T. (1994). Social revolutions in the modern world. Cambridge University Press.
Sorensen, H. (1994). New perspectives on the military profession: The I/O debate and esprit de corps reevaluated. Armed Forces and Society, 20(4), 599–617.
Stahl, M. J., Manley, R. T., & McNichols, C. W. (1978). Operationalizing the Moskos institution-occupation model: An application of Gouldner’s cosmopolitan-local research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 422–427.
Stillman, R. J., II. (1968). Integration of the Negro into the US armed forces. Praeger.
Tilly, C. (1990). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1992. Blackwell Publishing.
Van Doorn, J. (1965). The officer corps: A fusion of profession and organization. European Journal of Sociology, 6, 262–282.
Weber, M. (1963). Economy and society: An outline of an interpretive sociology. In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.). (Vol. 2). Bedminster Press.
Weber, M. (1968). From max weber: Essays in sociology. Oxford University Press.
West, B., & Matthewman, S. (2016). Towards a strong program in the sociology of war, the military and civil society. Journal of Sociology, 52(3), 482–499.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crosbie, T. (2021). Clausewitz and Military Politics: Theoretical Reflections on a Strong Program Approach to War and the Military. In: West, B., Crosbie, T. (eds) Militarization and the Global Rise of Paramilitary Culture . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5588-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5588-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5587-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5588-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)