Abstract
The changing communication landscape and declining institutional support for science communication pose significant challenges for science communicators, including community disagreement about what counts as ‘good’ science communication practice. In this chapter, we investigate the emerging online practices of science communicators in Canada. We focus on how science communicators are adapting and thriving online and what they value. Using social media research tools and survey data gathered from communicators, we found that social media communicators of science in Canada are focused in areas including conservation advocacy, women in STEM, science-art and combating misinformation. Social media communicators of science were more likely to be involved in informal community networks rather than professional associations. While there were similarities, we found significant differences in emerging practices in Quebec and other provinces in Canada, and in the main representations and motivations of communicators. Popular social media communicators in Quebec tended to be associated with traditional science media platforms. Social media communicators in our study continued to value engagement, relevance, writing quality, accessibility and accuracy. However, some were also motivated to promote inclusivity, to represent diversity and to overcome marginalization through their communication. It will be important for researchers and professional organizations to better understand the role of online networks and networking for professional development and support for emerging science communication practices. Communication practices motivated by a desire to promote equity and inclusivity in STEM are also increasingly important and require more attention from science communication researchers and practitioners.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Public Policy Forum, The shattered mirror: news, democracy and trust in the digital age, 2017, https://shatteredmirror.ca/.
- 2.
Resolve to engage in 2017, Nature, 2017, 541:5.
- 3.
Reflections: 100 voices for Canadian science communication, Science Borealis, no date, https://scienceborealis.ca/100-voices-for-canadian-science-communication/.
- 4.
Mapping the new landscape of science communication in Canada, http://mapscicommcanada.labjor.unicamp.br/.
- 5.
Greater Montréal: the perfect place to study, Montréal International, March 2020, https://www.montrealinternational.com/app/uploads/2020/03/montreal_attractiveness-factors_students_2020-1.pdf.
- 6.
Regrouper les musées scientifiques pour les sauver, Radio-Canada, 11 January 2019.
- 7.
Social networking in Canada—statistics & facts, Statista, 2019, https://www.statista.com/topics/2729/social-networking-in-canada/.
- 8.
Historical trends in the usage of content languages for websites, W3techs.com, March 2020, https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/content_language.
References
Barel-Ben David Y, Garty ES, Baram-Tsabari A (2020) Can scientists fill the science journalism void? Online public engagement with science stories authored by scientists. Plos one 15(1):e0222250
Boon S (2017) Science funding in Canada should include science communication. Watershed moments: thoughts from the hydrosphere. https://snowhydro1.wordpress.com/2017/09/13/science-funding-in-canada-should-include-science-communication/
Bruns A, Highfield T, Lind RA (2012) Blogs, Twitter, and breaking news: The produsage of citizen journalism. In: Lind RA (ed) Produsing theory in a digital world: the intersection of audiences and production in contemporary theory, vol 80, Digital Formations. Peter Lang Publishing, pp 15–32
Burns TW, O’Connor DJ, Stocklmayer SM (2003) Science communication: a contemporary definition. Public Underst Sci 12(2):183–202
Bucchi M (2013) Style in science communication. Public Underst Sci 22(8):904–915
Bucchi M (2017) Credibility, expertise and the challenges of science communication 2.0. Public Underst Sci 26(8):890–893
CEFRIO (2018) L’usage des médias sociaux au Québec, NETendances 9(5). https://cefrio.qc.ca/media/2023/netendances-2018_medias-sociaux.pdf
Chen A (2018) Scolding female scientists for embracing Instagram doesn’t solve the gender gap in STEM. The Verge, 16 May. https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/16/17128808/scicomm-gender-diversity-women-stem-instagram
Davies SR, Horst M (2016) Science communication: culture, identity and citizenship. Springer, Berlin
Dawson E (2014) ‘Not designed for us’: how science museums and science centers socially exclude low-income, minority ethnic groups. Sci Educ 98(6):981–1008
Dawson E (2019) Equity, exclusion and everyday science learning: the experiences of minoritised groups. Routledge, London
Gordon B (2018) Instagram should not be dismissed for scicomm. Science, 29 March. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/instagram-should-not-be-dismissed-scicomm
Hermida A (2019) The existential predicament when journalism moves beyond journalism. Journalism 20(1):177–180
Irwin A, Horst M (2016) Communicating trust and trusting science communication-some critical remarks. J Sci Commun 15(6):L01
Jarreau PB, Cancellare IA, Carmichael BJ, Porter L, Toker D, Yammine SZ (2019) Using selfies to challenge public stereotypes of scientists. PLoS ONE 14(5):1–23
Marks GS (2018) A scientist responds to that ‘Science’ Instagram essay. Massive Science, 20 March. https://massivesci.com/articles/instagram-science-sam-women-representation/
Medvecky F, Leach J (2019) An ethics of science communication. Springer Nature
Metcalfe J, Riedlinger M (2020) Public understanding of science: popularisation, perceptions and publics. In: Gruber DR, Olman LC (eds) The Routledge handbook of language and science. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon, pp 32–46
Nisbet M (2017) Ending the crisis of complacency in science. Am Sci 105(1):18–20
OIF (Organisation international de la francophonie) (2005) La Charte TV5. https://www.bakom.admin.ch/dam/bakom/fr/dokumente/ir/internat_akt/charta_von_tv5_monde.pdf.download.pdf/charte_tv5_monde.pdf
Peters HP (2014) Scientists as public experts: expectations and responsibilities. In: Bucchi M, Trench B (eds) Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology. Routledge, pp 86–98
Pitre R (1994) La culture scientifique et technique et les politiques scientifiques au Québec: le rôle de l’OCDE, In: Schiele B (ed) When science becomes culture, Proceedings II, Multimondes, Sainte-Foy
Riedlinger M, Barata G, Schiele A (2019) The landscape of science communication in contemporary Canada: a focus on anglophone actors and networks. Cultures Sci 2(1):51–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/209660831900200105
Schiele A, Riedlinger M (2018) Science communication in Canada: initial findings from a survey of ACS affiliates and their communication activities, A report for the Association des communicateurs scientifiques du Québec. University of the Fraser Valley
Shapiro A (2020) Looking back: a d of Canadian science communication. https://medium.com/@alanyshapiro/looking-back-a-decade-of-canadian-science-communication-79afd8431afd
Strapagiel L (2018) These women scientists refuse to stop taking selfies for science. Buzz Feed News, 23 April. https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/laurenstrapagiel/women-scientists-selfies
Van Dijck J, Poell T (2013) Understanding social media logic. Media Commun 1(1):2–14
Weingart P, Taubert N (2017) The future of scholarly publishing. African Minds, Cape Town
Wright M (2018) Instagram won’t solve inequality. Science 359(6381):1294–1294
Yammine SZ, Liu C, Jarreau PB, Coe IR (2018) Social media for social change in science. Science 360(6385):162–163
Zaringhalam M, Vijayaraghavan R, Simonis J, Ramirez K, Zelikova J (2018) Journal editors should not divide scientists. Science 360(6385):163–164
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a Social Science and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC) Partnership grant (892-2017–2019) held by Juan Pablo Alperin at Simon Fraser University (SFU), Michelle Riedlinger at the University of the Fraser Valley (UFV) and Science Writers and Communicators of Canada (SWCC). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We are grateful for the continued support of Juan Pablo Alperin from the School of Publishing at SFU and the assistance of Shelley McIvor, Janice Benthin and Tim Lougheed from SWCC and Stéphanie Thibault from the Association des Communicateurs Scientifiques du Québec.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 China Science and Technology Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Riedlinger, M., Schiele, A., Barata, G. (2021). Emerging Practices in Science Communication in Canada. In: Schiele, B., Liu, X., Bauer, M.W. (eds) Science Cultures in a Diverse World: Knowing, Sharing, Caring. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5379-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-5379-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-5378-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-5379-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)