Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Algorithms for Intelligent Systems ((AIS))

Abstract

Prediction of protein functions is one of the major challenges of the post-genomic era. Comprehension of protein functions has an important role in understanding the complicated mechanisms in various organisms. Different projects have identified novel protein sequences through high-throughput experiments, and structural genomics approaches are being used to identify their 3D structures. The generation of information about protein function could increase biological understanding and drug development as many diseases change these protein functions. In-silico protein function prediction is a difficult task due to the diversity of protein functions and multi-functionality in proteins. There is a requirement for annotations in a standard and machine-readable form to integrate them into workflows. The quality of the predictions also needs to be checked. Machine learning methods can integrate different features in workflows, give accurate predictions, and also measure the quality of predictions. Machine learning methods are also more useful as compared to traditional methods due to their ability to understand input–output relation without using a fixed model and work efficiently using noisy and non-linear data. In this article, we review the application of different machine learning methods for protein function prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhao XM, Chen L, Aihara K (2008) Protein function prediction with high-throughput data. Amino Acids 35(3):517–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0077-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chou K, Shen H (2007) Recent progress in protein subcellular location prediction. Anal Bio-chem 370(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2007.07.006

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashburner M, Ball C, Blake J et al (2000) Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The gene ontology consortium. Nat Genet 25(1):25–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/75556

  4. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA et al (1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25(17):3389–3402. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rost B (2002) Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. J Mol Biol 318:595–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00016-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hulo N, Bairoch A, Bulliard V et al (2008) The 20 years of PROSITE. Nucleic Acids Res 36(1):D245–D249. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sigrist CJ, Cerutti L, Hulo N et al (2002) PROSITE: a documented database using patterns and profiles as motif descriptors. Brief Bioinform 3(3):265–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/3.3.265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Enault F, Suhre K, Claverie JM (2005) Phydbac “Gene Function Predictor”: a gene annotation tool based on genomic context analysis. BMC Bioinform 6:247. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pavlidis P, Gillis J (2013) Progress and challenges in the computational prediction of gene function using networks: 2012–2013 update. F1000Res. 2:230. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-230.v1

  10. Ye Y, Godzik A (2004) FATCAT: a web server for Xexible structure comparison and structure similarity searching. Nucl Acids Res 32:W582–W585. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh430

  11. Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM (1996) Derivation of 3D coordinate templates for searching structural databases: application to Ser-His-Asp catalytic triads in the serine proteinases and lipases. Protein Sci 5:1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.5560050603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gherardini PF, Helmer-Citterich M (2008) Structure-based function prediction: approaches and applications. Brief Funct Genomics 7(4):291–330. https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/eln030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chou K (1995) A novel approach to predicting protein structural classes in a (20–1)-D amino acid composition space. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics 21(4): 319–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340210406.

  14. Chou K (2001) Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudoamino acid composition. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 43(3):246–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.1035

  15. Scholkopf B, Smola AJ (2005) Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 16(3):781–781. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2005.848998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Xie H, Wasserman A, Levine Z et al (2002) Large-scale protein annotation through gene ontology. Genome Res 12(5):785–794. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.86902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shah AR, Oehmen CS, Webb-Robertson B (2008) SVM-HUSTLE—an iterative semi-supervised machine learning approach for pairwise protein remote homology detection. Bioinformatics 24(6):783–790. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA (2002) An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucl Acids Res 30(7):1575–1584. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.7.1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pasquier C, Promponas VJ, Hamodrakas SJ (2001) PRED-CLASS: cascading neural networks for generalized protein classification and genome-wide applications. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 44(3):361–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.1101

  20. Nair R, Rost B (2003) LOC3D: annotate sub-cellular localization for protein structures. Nucl Acids Res 31(13):3337–3340. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang X, Wei R, Zhang T, Gu Q (2008) Using the concept of Chou’s pseudo amino acid composition to predict apoptosis proteins subcellular location: an approach by approximate entropy. Protein Pept Lett 15(4):392–396. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986608784246443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sikder A, Zomaya A (2006) Improving the performance of Domain discovery of protein domain boundary assignment using inter-domain linker index. BMC Bioinform 7(5):S6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-S5-S6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomson R, Hodgman TC, Yang ZR et al (2003) Characterizing proteolytic cleavage site activity using bio-basis function neural networks. Bioinformatics 19(14):1741–1747. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Niu B, Cai Y, Lu W (2006) Predicting protein structural class with AdaBoost learner. Protein Pept Lett 13(5):489–492. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986606776819619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen W, Liu X, Huang Y et al (2012) Improved method for predicting protein fold patterns with ensemble classifiers. Genet Mol Res 11(1):174–181. https://doi.org/10.4238/2012.January.27.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Date SV, Marcotte EM (2003) Discovery of uncharacterized cellular systems by genome-wide analysis of functional linkages. Nat Biotechnol 21(9):1055–1062. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dale JM, Popescu L, Karp PD (2010) Machine learning methods for metabolic pathway prediction. BMC Bioinform 11(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-15

  28. Chen X, Han B, Fang J et al (2008) Large-scale protein-protein interaction prediction using novel kernel methods. Int J Data Min Bioinform 2(2):145–156. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJDMB.2008.019095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lobley A, Swindells MB, Orengo CA et al (2007) Inferring function using patterns of native disorder in proteins. PLoS Comput Biol 3(8):e162. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030162

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors confirm there is no conflict of interest in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasha Hasija .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Biswas, S., Hasija, Y. (2022). Machine Learning Methods for Protein Function Prediction. In: Bansal, R.C., Zemmari, A., Sharma, K.G., Gajrani, J. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Emerging Power System. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4103-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics