Skip to main content

Towards Greater Equality and Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Life Expectations of the People
  • 99 Accesses

Abstract

Justice is often defined as the attainment of what is fair and right. It is also often related to the concept of equality, in which everyone gets due reward in accordance with what they deserve. Social justice has been a key issue in social philosophy since antiquity. Aristotle defines two particular forms of justice: rectificatory and distributive. Rectificatory justice implies the principal “equals should get equal.” Distributive justice employs geometric proportions: what each person receives is proportional to his merit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for example: Abercrombie et al. (2006), Jary and Jary (1991).

  2. 2.

    Rawls (1971).‬‬

  3. 3.

    Friedman (1962), Friedman and Friedman (1980).

  4. 4.

    Hayek (1982).

  5. 5.

    We will refer to the following all-Russian representative surveys conducted by the InstituteofComplex Social Research and the Institute of Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences: What Russians Dream About (March 2012, n = 1751); Poverty and the Poor in Modern Russia (April 2013, n = 1600); Middle Class in Modern Russia (February 2014, n = 1600). All survey samples represented population of the country by region, and on regional level—by type of settlement, age, and gender (except for the 2012 survey, which did not include respondents over 55 years of age). Hereafter we will refer to the surveys by their date.

  6. 6.

    Survey sample only included the respondents younger than 55 years old.

  7. 7.

    See, for example, post-hoc analysis based on WVS, Levada-Centre, Public Opinion Foundation, WCIOM, and IS RAS data: Urnov (2012).

  8. 8.

    The figure does not reflect answers “Partly agree, partly disagree” and “Don’t know”; based on a respondent sample of those younger than 55 years of age.

  9. 9.

    Rosstat data (http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/population/urov/urov_32g.htm).

  10. 10.

    The figure does not reflect answers “Partly agree, partly disagree” and “Don’t know”.

  11. 11.

    For comparability reasons, only the under-55 share of the 2006 sample was analysed here.

  12. 12.

    Hirschman and Rothschild (1973).

  13. 13.

    Based on the following survey data: Civil Activism: New Public Policy Actors (n = 1600, March 2014, IS RAS); 20 Years of Reforms through the Eyes of Russians (n = 1750, April 2011, IS RAS). Both surveys were designed following the same nationally representative sampling model.

  14. 14.

    Russians’ Political Views. Levada-Centre, press-release (July 29, 2013). http://www.levada.ru/29-07-2013/politicheskie-vzglyady-rossiyan.

References

  • Abercrombie, N., S. Hill, and B.S. Turner. 2006. The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., and R. Friedman. 1980. Free to Choose. New York: Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. 1982. Law, Legislation, and Liberty: A New Statement of the Liberal Principles of Justice and Political Economy, New pbk. ed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A., and M. Rothschild. 1973. The Changing Tolerance for Income Inequality in the Course of Economic Development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87 (4): 544–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jary, D., and J. Jary. 1991. Collins Dictionary of Sociology. London: Harper-Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.‬‬‬

    Google Scholar 

  • Urnov, M. Yu. 2012. What Is Justice? An Attempt to Analyze Mass Opinion [Chto est’ spravedlivost’? Popytka analyza massovykh predstableniy]. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’ 5: 71–88 [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Social Sciences Academic Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mareeva, S.V. (2021). Towards Greater Equality and Justice. In: Li, P., Gorshkov, M. (eds) Life Expectations of the People. Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2505-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2505-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2504-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2505-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics