Skip to main content

Linguistic, Cognitive, Social, and Educational Perspectives on English Academic Literacy Development in the Asia-Pacific

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific
  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

English academic literacy development has become an increasingly important subject of inquiry in globalized and internationalized universities in Asian-Pacific areas. Research into English academic literacy is multifaceted, cutting across the cognitive, social, textual, and discourse practices intertwined with the various activities involved in lexical knowledge processing, interdisciplinary learning, and knowledge building. This diverse and broad scope entails a further critical inquiry into the different facets of academic literacy development processes from linguistic, social, cognitive, and educational perspectives. This chapter discusses major theoretical traditions and analyses four lines of inquiry in the current literature to highlight the major progress in the field and to identify the gaps in promoting the intertwined linguistic, social, and cognitive processes of English literacy development in classroom settings. Key pedagogical and methodological questions emerging from this analysis can prompt insightful discussions on bridging the hiatus between theory and practice, specifically academic literacy in classroom teaching through information technology. This systematic literature review further identifies the prominent role of learning theories (e.g., socio-cognitive theories, knowledge building, etc.) in designing, implementing, and developing English academic literacy in Asian-Pacific areas. We discuss theoretical, methodological, and educational implications and consider future directions for integrating research and educational practices to help develop the multiple dimensions of English academic literacy in classroom contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthony, L. (2016). Introducing corpora and corpus tools into the technical writing classroom through Data-Driven Learning (DDL). In Discipline-specific writing (pp. 176–194). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apridayani, A., Yungkun, N., Thoch, K., & Rukthong, A. (2021). Writing strategies for argumentative essay and short research reports: The case of Thai EFL learners. Journal of Asia TEFL, 18(1), 300–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardiasih, L. S., Emzir, & Rasyid, Y. (2019). Online collaborative writing technique using wiki: How effective is it to enhance learners’ essay writing? Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(2), 531–546. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.2.6.531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D. R. (2019). Conceptualisation of second language writing strategies and their relation to student characteristics. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(1), 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2007). Learning-oriented assessment: Conceptual basis and practical implications. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, D. (2020). Longitudinal perspectives on students’ experiences of feedback: A need for teacher-student partnerships. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(3), 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2004). Learning, assessment, and collaboration in computer-supported collaborative learning. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. L. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 87–112). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, C. K. K., & Yang, Y. (2018). Developing scientific inquiry in technology-enhanced learning environments. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K. W. Lai (Eds.), Second handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 161–180). Springer International Publishing AG.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J.-Y. (2014). The use of general and specialized corpora as reference sources for academic English writing: A case study. ReCALL, 26(2), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., & Flowerdew, J. (2018). A critical review of research and practice in data-driven learning (DDL) in the academic writing classroom. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(3), 335–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., & Li, D. L. (2021). Instructed concept appropriation for developing knowledge of second language academic discourse context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 101001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.1011001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coxhead, A. (2020). Academic vocabulary. In S. Webb & S. A. Webb (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (Vol. 2, 97–110). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C. (2005). Information technology and innovation in language education. Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowerdew, L. (2015). Using corpus-based research and online academic corpora to inform writing of the discussion section of a thesis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 58–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, N., & Ruegg, R. (2020). The provision of student support on English medium instruction programmes in Japan and China. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 45, 100846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, A. (2008). Using online corpora to develop students’ writing skills. ELT Journal, 63(4), 364–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong, H., & Barlow, M. (2022). A corpus-based analysis of research article macrostructure patterns. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 58, 101138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, K., Wang, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2022). Using chatbots to scaffold EFL students’ argumentative writing. Assessing Writing, 54, 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heap, J. L. (1985). Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: Reading lessons. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(3), 245–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, W. C., & Liu, G. Z. (2019). Genre-based writing instruction blended with an online writing tutorial system for the development of academic writing. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 34(1), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqy021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2022). Titles in research articles: Changes across time and discipline. Learned Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, T., Su, Y., & Lei, J. (2020). Exploring the blended learning design for argumentative writing. Language, Learning and Technology, 24(2), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. (2018). A study on English-medium instruction programs in Korean universities: Based on the importance of English for academic purposes program. Cross-Cultural Studies, 53, 251–277. https://doi.org/10.21049/ccs.2018.53.251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, G., Zhang, Q., Lucas, K., Sun, Y., & Gao, J. (2022). A corpus-based investigation on noun phrase complexity in L1 and L2 English writing. English for Specific Purposes, 67, 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M. (2004). Academic literacies: A pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2018). Metacognition and metacognitive instruction in second language writing classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 52(6), 1085–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Cargill, M., Gao, X., Wang, X., & O’Connor, P. (2019). A scientist in interdisciplinary team teaching in an English for research publication purposes classroom: Beyond a ‘cameo role’. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 40, 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., & Evans, S. (2012). Structural patterns in empirical research articles: A cross-disciplinary study. English for Specific Purposes, 31(3), 150–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Chiu, M. M., & Law, N. W. (2011). Collaborative argumentation and justifications: A statistical discourse analysis of online discussions. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 946–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, X., Casal, J. E., Liu, Y., Kisselev, O., & Yoon, J. (2021). The relationship between syntactic complexity and rhetorical move-steps in research article introductions: Variation among four social science and engineering disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 52, 101006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagao, A. (2019). Assessing the development of English learners’ understanding of the discussion genre. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(3), 927–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, J., Watterson, C., da Silva, A. S., & Kithulgoda, E. (2023). Rhetorical features of high-graded and low-graded engineering case study responses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 61, 101206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Cheng, B. H., & Sabelli, N. (2011). Organizing research and development at the intersection of learning, implementation, and design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pessoa, S., Miller, R. T., & Kaufer, D. (2014). Students’ challenges and development in the transition to academic writing at an English-medium university in Qatar. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(2), 127–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proske, A., Narciss, S., & McNamara, D. S. (2012). Computer-based scaffolding to facilitate students’ development of expertise in academic writing. Journal of Research in Reading, 35(2), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01450.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purser, E. (2011). Developing academic literacy in context: Trends in Australia. In M. Deane & P. O’Neill (Eds.), Writing in the disciplines: Universities into the 21st century (pp. 30–47). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Su, Y., Liu, K., Lai, C., & Jin, T. (2021). The progression of collaborative argumentation among English learners: A qualitative study. System, 98, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, M. F., Wang, C., & Zhang, L. J. (2022). Assessing self-regulatory writing strategies and their predictive effects on young EFL learners’ writing performance. Assessing Writing, 51, 100573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tono, Y., Satake, Y., & Miura, A. (2014). The effects of using corpora on revision tasks in L2 writing with coded error feedback. ReCALL, 26(2), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingate, U. (2012). Using Academic Literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A ‘literacy’ journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wingate, U. (2018). Academic literacy across the curriculum: Towards a collaborative instructional approach. Language Teaching, 51(3), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. Q., Zhang, L. J., & Parr, J. M. (2022). Incorporation peer feedback in writing instruction: Examining its effects on Chinese English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) learners’ writing performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching., 0. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0078

  • Yasuda, S. (2022). Natural scientists’ perceptions of authorial voice in scientific writing: The influence of disciplinary expertise on revoicing processes. English for Specific Purposes, 67, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, H. (2015). Facilitating metacognitive processes of academic genre-based writing using an online writing system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(6), 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, S. L., & Liu, C. H. (2021). Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework. Assessing Writing, 48, 100525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, T., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Taking stock of a genre-based pedagogy: Sustaining the development of EFL students’ knowledge of the elements in argumentation and writing improvement. Sustainability, 13, 11616. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111616

  • Zhao, K., & Chan, C. K. K. (2014). Fostering collective and individual learning through knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(1), 63–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, K., & Lei, C. L. (2017). Technology-enhanced content and language integrated learning in Chinese tertiary English classes: Potentials and challenges. In H. Reinders, D. Nunan, & B. Zou (Eds.), Innovation in language learning and teaching: The case of China. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, K., Wang, Z. J., & Cai, L. (2013). Promoting English academic writing in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Foreign Language Teaching, 2013(5), 56–60.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Zhao, K., Bai, X. (2023). Linguistic, Cognitive, Social, and Educational Perspectives on English Academic Literacy Development in the Asia-Pacific. In: Lee, W.O., Brown, P., Goodwin, A.L., Green, A. (eds) International Handbook on Education Development in Asia-Pacific. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2327-1_138-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2327-1_138-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2327-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2327-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics