Abstract
Agriculture is integral to the world economy and as a means to feed the world populace. The priorities can be multipronged including to overcome famine and eradicate poverty; for economic diversification, industrialization, and investments; and to ensure sustainable resource utilization and environmental management. The excessive utilization of chemical fertilizers, though managed to improve the yield, also kills the pests, weeds, and microflora, with destructive impact on the natural ecosystem. Plant-associated microbes have great potentials to assist in enhancing the yield and plant resilience against pests and diseases. Genetic technology using microorganisms and their metabolites has been applied to increase the nutrient uptake and productivity and control plant stresses and responses to pests. Microbiological tools could enhance environmental health and promote agricultural sustainability. However, the side effects of microbial residents and contaminants must be addressed. This chapter discusses the functions and contributions of microorganisms in promoting health and fertility of soil. Different types of microbial sources and strains are highlighted. The use of natural and biological-based fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, and insecticides in agriculture is elaborated. The importance of microbiome for sustainable agriculture and soil and environmental health is discussed.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Agricultural soil
- Microbes
- Soil health
- Biofertilizers
- Biopesticides
- Bioherbicides
- Bioinsecticides
- Bioremediation
- Microbiome
- Sustainable agriculture
12.1 Introduction
Human population is expected to reach nine billion by the year 2050, which may lead to the need to increase the food yield by 70%, from the current productivity. To meet the increasing demand of food supply, the quality of the crop and output must be enhanced, and this is very much dependent on the soil health for agricultural applications. The interactions between plants and the ecosystems where the biodiversity and microbial communities can thrive in symbiosis must be understood. Conservation of soil health ensures steady supply of food (Atapattu and Kodituwakku 2009). Soil health refers to the soil ecosystem and the ability of the soil to adapt to agronomic activities and various environmental conditions and also enhance the crop yield and improve plant health (Kibblewhite et al. 2008; Lal 2016). The fertility of the soil is dependent on the physical, chemical, and biological factors. The physical characteristics of the soil include the texture, structure, and architecture and water retention capability. The chemical conditions of the soil include the salinity, acidity, and alkalinity, while the biological factor constitutes the microbial communities residing in the soil (Johns 2017). Microbes are the most diversified groups of the organisms making up more than half of the biomass on earth (Bar-On et al. 2018).These microbes have significant functions in sustaining the biogeochemical cycles, and the plants have significant contributions to maintain the food chain by utilizing the microbes present in the soil (Curtis and Sloan 2005).
The microbial population includes microalgae, cyanobacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, bacteria, and lichens. These microbiota are present in the biological soil crust (BSC), the uppermost part of the earth, and could play a major role in enhancing agricultural productivity (Manjunath et al. 2016). Photosynthetic carbon is deposited in the plant roots. The root system and the rhizospheric zone are therefore important areas of microbial activities and their interactions with the plants. Microbiota acting as bioinoculants promote plant growth by establishing symbiosis in the root system. Among the beneficial microbiota for plants are plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and plant growth-promoting fungi (PGPF) (Singh et al. 2017). Diversified metabolic activities of various microbes contribute towards the provision of major elements such as phosphorus, potassium, and carbon, influencing the soil characteristics and ultimately the crop yield. The diversity and abundance of the microbial resources are therefore important to be conserved. The soil microbes, especially the bacteria and fungi, involve in the recycling of the nutrients and the detoxification and recycling of wastes for soil health and agricultural practices (Singh et al. 2017; Aislabie et al. 2013; De Vero et al. 2019).
12.2 Microbial Sources
12.2.1 Microalgae and Cyanobacteria
Microalgae and cyanobacteria are “beneficial microbes” and important components of the food web, having the ability to grow in extreme environments. Microalgal species such as Chlorococcum, Chlamydomonas, and Scenedesmus produce polysaccharides, while cyanobacteria are known specifically for having nitrogen-fixing capacities (Singh et al. 2011). The importance of cyanobacteria, as illustrated in Fig. 12.1, includes in the recycling of nutrients, decomposition of organic wastes, degradation of toxic chemicals, and as producers of metabolites such as enzymes, hormones, etc. which are essential for soil health and plant growth (Mallavarapu et al. 2000; Renuka et al. 2018).
Excessive farming practices make agricultural lands more vulnerable and are the leading cause of decrease in soil fertility, with 30% of the farmable land undergoes soil degradation. Among all soil microbes, 27% of the total biomass contribution is from microalgae (Abinandan et al. 2019). During climatic changes, green algae and cyanobacteria are responsible for the production of organic content. High organic matter in the soil can be the result of algal cell lysis which releases exopolysaccharides, leading to increased oxidizable carbon in the soil which is the necessary constituent of organic matter. This organic matter is the source of carbon available to plants and also for the growth of soil microorganisms. In order to prevent the leaching of minerals, algae are in competition with higher plants. A few species of Cyanobacteria like Nostoc colonize root systems of plants which ease the transportation of minerals and metabolites as well (Osman et al. 2010; Li et al. 2010; Svircev et al. 1997).
Cyanobacterial biofilms when used under non-flooded conditions aid in nitrogen fixation and solubilization of phosphate, necessary for plant growth (Prasanna et al. 2014). Cyanobacteria is responsible for the production of oxidizable and soluble carbon along with enhanced paddy yield, in post-harvested soil. Besides carbon residues, cyanobacterial inoculation promotes grain yield, which is responsible for plant growth, without utilizing manure. Next to nitrogen is the organic phosphorus present in the upper layer of the soil, which is 20–80% of the total phosphorus (de Mulé et al. 1999; Steffens et al. 2010). Phosphate-solubilizing bacteria convert insoluble phosphate to soluble form, which is readily taken up by the plants. However, soil microalgae incorporate inorganic phosphates and convert it into polyphosphates by making it readily available to plants. Furthermore, cyanobacteria can also produce enzymes that are responsible for the degeneration of inorganic phosphate, making it available to plants. They can also solubilize mineral rock having phosphates in it by producing phthalic acid (Sharma et al. 2013; Whitton et al. 1991).
Cyanobacterial biofilm fertilizers have caught attention owing to the lesser quantity of chemical fertilizers used and also because of lower cost. Cyanobacterial films made of Anabaena-Trichoderma viride enhance maize hybrid production by conserving 60 kg per ha and raise accessible N2 in soil from 20 to 60 kg/hectare (Prasanna et al. 2015). Likewise, biofilms utilizing different species like Anabaena-Serratia and Anabaena-Pseudomonas result in phosphate activities and acetylene reduction in wheat cultivation. Biofilms increase the content of soil micronutrients like iron (13–46%) and zinc (15–41%) (Adak et al. 2016).
30% of the total land undergoes degradation, and the degraded soils contain saline, alkaline, and acid sulfate which can be improved with the use of fertilizers. These, however, can have harmful effects on soil health. Soil characteristics can be restored with the application of microbes. Combinations of cyanobacterial modifications and natural chemical additives can have big impacts on the soil stability along with improving its water holding capacity (Nkonya et al. 2016; Xiong et al. 2018). Soil health is about maintaining the balance between soil organisms and their surroundings. Soil algae synthesize some compounds which are hydrophobic in nature and may exhibit water repellence characteristics. Algal metabolites which are hydrophobic in nature, help to halt soildegradation by binding the mineral particles (Doerr et al. 2000; Malam Issa et al. 2009).
12.2.2 Fungi
Fungi are among the most significant class of microbes which are beneficial for the growth and productivity of plants and crops (Karun et al. 2018). Useful fungi assist plant development by enhancing solubility of micronutrients (Zn, P,K) and release of plant growth regulators (gibberellins, auxin, ethylene, and cytokinin) and the release of enzymes (gluconase, cellulases, and glycosidase which aid in cell wall lysis) (Ahmed Nouh 2019; Pandya and Saraf 2010). They degrade the soil organic matter and maintain the nutrient and carbon balance. Certain species of fungi are sorbents of harmful metals like Cd, Cu, Hg, Pb, and Zn and entrap these toxic metals into their fruit-bearing bodies (Žifčáková et al. 2016; Baldrian 2003).
Soil fungi, depending on their functions, are categorized into three types: as biological controllers, as regulators of ecosystem, and for the degradation of organic waste matter and bioconversion of compounds (Gardi et al. 2009). Species which act as regulators of ecosystem regulate physiological processes in soil and determine the soil structure formation. Biological controllers maintain the progression of various organisms present in the plants’ soil as mycorrhizal fungi regulate uptake of nutrients and enhance plant growth (Bagyaraj and Revanna 2017). Fungal communities influence the growth of plant through mechanisms like mutualism and cyclization effect, and availability of nutrients. Fungi also stabilize organic matter of the soil, necessary for soil health, and play important part in nitrogen fixation, production of hormone, and root pathogen control (Wagg et al. 2014; Hannula and van Veen 2016; Treseder and Lennon 2015; Jayne and Quigley 2014; Baum et al. 2015).
The health of soil is determined by its capability to sustain ecosystem, maintain biological productivity, and improve the well-being of plants and other living organisms (humans and animals). Biodiversity of soil fungal has major role in upgrading the quality of soil and agricultural productivity. Fungi transfer nutrients necessary for plant development through the decomposition of organic matter. They shield the plants against pathogenic microbes which otherwise would affect the soil health. Soil management is therefore essential to ensure future production of food and to minimize soil degradation. Fungal communities are responsible in establishing the plant biodiversity, ecosystem, and productivity (Wagg et al. 2014; Frac et al. 2015; Abawi and Widmer 2000). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) are among the useful microbes in soils significant for agricultural purposes. Inoculation with AMF has major contribution towards increasing the crop yield. AMF symbiosis improves root and plant growth, promotes soil architecture, encourages nutrient cyclization, and improves plant resistance to stressful conditions, and enhances uptake of diffusion-limited nutrients like P, Zn and Cu (Smith and Read 2010; Thilagar and Bagyaraj 2013).
Some antagonistic fungi like Glomus or Trichoderma species are used to fight plant diseases caused by fungal pathogens. Trichoderma sp. (Pythium, Phoma, Fusarium, Alternaria, Sclerotinia, Botrytis, etc.) could inhibit over 60% of pathogenic species on plants such as cucumbers, peppers, cabbages, tomatoes, cereals, and ornamentals. Various species of Trichoderma such as T. virens, T. atroviride, T. asperellum, T. harzianum, and T. viride play important role in biological control and are termed as biostimulants for agricultural crops. Other contributions of fungi necessary for plant and soil health are inoculation by microbial association of AMF with PGPR and other microbes important in nitrogen fixation and phosphorus solubilization. AMF and PGPR influence the development of plant and microbial diversity, and soil activity (Dawidziuk et al. 2016; López-Bucio et al. 2015).
Genera Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, Phytophthora, and Pythium are the main associations of pathogenic fungi which are present in soil and are of much significance globally as well as on local level. Biodiversity of soil fungi and techniques to enhance the communities of beneficial fungal species are important for soil protection and sustained plant yield (Frąc et al. 2018). For example, Beauveria bassiana are naturally-occuring fungi and Metarhizium anisopliae are entomopathogenic fungi. The spores originating from these fungi germinate and nourish upon coming into contact with the target insect cuticle and kill the insect by draining its nutrients. The mycelium of Verticillium lecanii, an entomopathogenic fungi, releases toxin cyclodepsipeptide, termed as bassianolide, and other toxins (like dipicolinic acid), which poison scale insects, whiteflies, and aphids, leading to their death. L. lecanii species are employed in agriculture and horticulture as biological pesticide and control insect pests like whiteflies, aphids, etc. (Singh et al. 2017).
12.2.3 Bacteria
Bacteria, being the most abundant organisms on earth, could easily make up more than 1011 (100 billion) cell numbers in one teaspoon of agricultural soil. As an important group of soil microbes, bacteria perform variety of different functions in recycling of nutrients, water dynamics, and disease alleviation. Some bacteria release substances which aid in binding of soil particles and transform them into small aggregates and thereby influence water mobility. These aggregates promote water penetration and water holding capacity of soil. In addition, various bacterial species fight against pathogens in plant roots (Knudsen 2006).
Depending on functions, bacteria fall into four categories. Majority of bacteria are decomposers which convert soil organic matter into other forms beneficial to the organisms in soil. Besides this, they decompose pesticides and contaminants in soil, thereby increasing soil health. Mutualists constitute the second group of bacteria that establish associations with plants. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria are the best among mutualists. Pathogenic bacteria comprise the third group which include the following species: Zymomonas, Erwinia, and few species from Agrobacterium. Lithotrophs, also called chemoautotrophs, are the fourth group which make use of the N, S, Fe, and H, rather than the carbon compounds, and play important part in nitrogen cycling and detoxification of contaminants (Ingham et al. 1985). Rhizobium genus involves nitrogen-fixing bacteria through symbiotic associations and includes Rhizobium leguminosarum, Rhizobium tripoli, Rhizobium phaseoli, Rhizobium lupine, Rhizobium meliloti, and Rhizobium japonicum (Young et al. 2006).
PGPR (the term introduced by Joe Kloepper in the 1980s) include Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas fluorescens, and Pseudomonas putida. PGPR are responsible for inducing resistance in plants against viral, bacterial, and fungal diseases and other insects, and this mechanism is called Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR). In agriculture and horticulture, Bacillus polymyxa is employed as inoculants where the plants are shielded by these biofilms from pathogens. Synergism between bacteria and plant roots changes the physical characteristics of the root hairs (Lavakush et al. 2014; Yegorenkova et al. 2013).
Pseudomonas fluorescens, a non-pathogenic PGPR, enhance plant development, control damage caused by pathogens, and stabilize plant roots. They have tremendous influence on plant development utilizing direct or indirect mechanisms. Kocuria turfanensis isolated from rhizospheric soil is capable of solubilizing phosphate and producing indole-3-acetic acid (IAA, a plant hormone important in microbe-plant interactions) (Prasad et al. 2015). Frateuria aurantia, a Potassium-mobilizing Proteobacteria, has the ability to mobilize usable potash to the plant roots or soil. It can perform its function in any type of soil, more specifically in soil low in potassium content, thereby enhancing the soil health (Johansen et al. 2005).
12.3 Applications of Microbes
12.3.1 Plant Growth Regulators
Plant growth regulators, either synthetic or naturally produced hormones, are important in agriculture to control plant growth and development. These may not be hazardous if utilized as per the recommendation at the right dosage. Microbes residing in the rhizosphere of the plants also have the ability to produce and supply auxin, a regulator of plant growth, as secondary metabolites. The plant morphological changes can be the consequence of the various ratios of plant hormones produced by the rhizosphere bacteria and roots. The production of compounds which possess physiological impacts on the development and growth of plants involves different soil microbes like fungi, bacteria, and algae (Ahemad and Kibret 2014). These include by transforming the plant growth root structure to promote rhizobacteria (PGPR) and promoting phytohormones like IAA, cytokinins, and gibberellic acid and the synthesis of metabolites such as antimicrobials. There are many PGPR and symbiotic, pathogenic, and free rhizobacterial species which produce auxins in the rhizosphere to induce and increase root formation (Han et al. 2005). Many beneficial fungi are associated with the antagonistic effects on the pathogenic fungi, by synthesizing antibiotics, and involved in the plant defense mechanisms by infecting the spores, hyphae, or sclerotia of pathogenic fungi, thereby taking part in biological control (Mejía et al. 2008). A number of degradable enzymes are produced, e.g., cytinases, gluconates, and proteins, as biological control agents. Many Trichoderma strains have colonized various plant roots, thereby importantly improving the development and growth of plant. In Arabidopsis, Trichoderma virens promotes both biomass and lateral root growth via an auxin-dependent mechanism (Contreras-Cornejo et al. 2009). The synthesis of Sm1 (small protein 1), an elicitor protein, is normally linked to the promotion of the systemic and local resistance (Živković et al. 2010).
Phosphorus is obtained by the plants from the earth in the form of phosphate. The mobility of this element is very less in the plant unlike other macronutrients. The role of phosphorus-soluble microorganisms (PSMs) is therefore significant in phosphorus-based nutrition, increasing their supply to plants by releasing organic and mineral soil P pools through solvent and mineralization (Kalayu 2019). The mechanisms which are involved in the solubility of phosphorus include by reducing the soil pH through microbial organic acids and mineralization of organic phosphorus by acid phosphatase. Maximum adaptability of phosphorus-soluble bacteria (PSB) is feasible in association with other mycorrhizal fungi or beneficial bacteria (Satyaprakash et al. 2017). Bacteria are found to be more capable than fungi for phosphorus solubility (Sharma et al. 2013). Advantageous microflora, e.g., Penicillium, produces an organic acid that diffuses the phosphate in the soil to be easily utilized by the plant roots. In soil bacterial communities, heterozygous species of Bacillus and Pseudomonas, Enterobacter, and endosymbiotic Rhizobia have been reported as productive types of phosphate solvents. The latest estimate is that PSB is around 1–50% in common soils, whereas phosphate-soluble fungi make up about 0.1–0.5% of the population (Panhwar et al. 2011).
Potassium (K) is a significant component of plant nutrition which performs numerous biological activities to sustain the quality of plant growth. Potassium is normally found in soil in large amount. The total potassium content on the top surface of the soil is in the range of 3000–1,000,000 kg/ha (Bertsch and Thomas 1985). There are four distinct forms of potassium in water: soluble, interchangeable, non-interchangeable, and structural or mineral soils (Sparks and Huang 1985). The quantity of potassium delivered by the soil depends on the variation in the parameters of soil, e.g., pH, texture, moisture content, soil tiling, oxygen level, and temperature, and topographical and biochemistry (Basak and Biswas 2008). Feldspars are a group of rocks made up of mica, potash, or rock phosphate, where potassium can be extracted through microbial reactions and plants, converting the unavailable K organic acids into available form and secreted during the nutrient cycle (Sessitsch et al. 2013).
12.3.2 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)
Compounds possessing low molecular weight (<300 g/mol) such as alcohol, ketones, aldehydes, and hydrocarbons are among the common VOCs (Choudhary et al. 2008). These may be a signaling response between plants and the microbes, and the VOCs typically exhibit coordinated responses to the numerous stimuli in plants and microorganisms (Ortíz-Castro et al. 2009). VOCs are highly vaporizing under normal conditions, and they enter the atmosphere resulting in an increase in vapor pressures. Arabidopsis rhizosphere has been detected with VOC emission, attributable to the biological stressors (Steeghs et al. 2004). Many volatile substances, e.g., alcohol, acids, ketones, aldehydes, terpenes, and esters, are constitutionally produced or specifically induced due to different negative or positive interactions with microorganisms. The excretion of VOCs, e.g., 2,3-butanediol and acetoin, from PGPR strains such as Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis, and Enterobacter cloacea, enhance the development of Arabidopsis thaliana significantly with the production of bioactive VOCs (Ryu et al. 2004). Rhizobacterial strains emit VOCs which can behave as signaling molecules to the plant to react with microorganism, and this ultimately triggers the response of plant towards the colonizing microflora. Plant volatiles with lower molecular mass, e.g., green leaf components and terpenes, behave as signaling molecules for various organisms living at different trophic levels (Farmer 2001). It is important to understand the mechanism of VOCs against the pathogens in plants, and the building up of volatile components in the plant-rhizobacteria system and in nature.
12.3.3 Biotic Elicitors
Elicitors are involved in the mechanisms of plant defense (Thakur and Sohal 2013). Elicitor molecules such as methyl jasmonate, salicylic acid, and Nitric oxide (NO), induce the production of secondary metabolites, e.g., phytoalexins, glucosinolates, and alkamides, as stress responses, for example, to microbial pathogens (Yang et al. 1997). Jasmonic acid and methyl esters of jasmonic acid are signalling transducers in the cell suspension cultures of Rauvolfia canescens and Eschscholzia californica upon treatment with yeast elicitor (Roberts and Shuler 1997). Jasmonic acid elicitor reduces cell growth of Morinda elliptica but with enhanced anthraquinones, total carotenoids, vitamin C and E, and lipid peroxidation and hydrogen peroxide levels. With 6 days treatment, glutathione reductase enzymes are elevated, while ascorbate peroxidase level is only half that of control, and catalase is completely reduced (Chong et al. 2005). The molecular basis of signalling exchange between microbial pathogens and the hosts necessitates characterization and purification of specific elicitor-binding proteins which ultimately lead to the activation of defence mechanism.
12.3.4 Bioremediation
Bacteria, archaea, and fungi play an important role in bioremediation to metabolize pollutants. Microorganisms break down and eat complex molecules, convert them into innoxius, natural substances (Kumar et al. 2011), thus ultimately dispose of the pollutants rapidly and reduce the environmental pollution. The organisms employed in the bioremediation process are known as bioremediators and a process in which a fungi is utilized to remediate certain area is called mycoremediation (Rhodes 2014). The fungal mycelium secretes acids and extracellular enzymes that are capable of breaking down the plant fibers including cellulose and lignin. Wood thin fungi are specifically efficient in the decomposition of harmful constituents of petroleum and aromatic pollutants such as chlorinated compounds (Rhodes 2014). Mycofiltration removes water wastes and microorganisms using fungal mycelia to filter the soil. Various REDOX reactions are generally performed by the bioremediators for the oxidation of toxic contaminants. However, this may require the right microbial species to oxidize specific pollutant to achieve effective bioremediation.
During drought, plants regulate physiological responses such as the increase in abscisic acid content, accumulation of specific metabolites, expression of aquaporin, and vacuolar H-pyrophosphatase to maintain cell homeostasis through osmotic adjustment (Gornall et al. 2010). Concentrations of ethylene reach higher levels, which inhibit the plant growth and thereby enhance the root-to-shoot ratio. Therefore, the large-scale root system increases the area of water absorption. There are also accumulations of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) that may significantly affect the cell integrity, function, and plant survival. Optimal microbial colonization may involve the endosphere and the rhizosphere where mycorrhizal fungi and plant-growth promoting bacteria (PGPB) can modulate bacterial physiological responses (Vacheron et al. 2013) and thereby help to enhance the plant tolerance under severe environmental conditions. Pot and in vitro experiments have confirmed the ability of endosphere and rhizosphere bacteria to improve tolerance of plant during growth and stress. Microbial vaccines, for instance, increase growth of plant up to 40%, indicating the potential of PGP microorganisms in agriculture (Pérez-Montaño et al. 2014). The role of microorganisms in the adaptation of plants towards drought may depend on the composition of microbiome which varies greatly in a specific ecological state (Marasco et al. 2012), as it also depends on the taxonomic characteristic of the respective plant species.
Adventitious microbes can inhibit the development of phytopathogens by competing for nutrients and space, thus reducing the nutrient availability to the pathogens (Marasco et al. 2012). Disease-resistant soil microflora is typically controlled via hostile microbes that are capable of creating a wide type of antibiotics (Mohseni et al. 2013). Penicillium, Aspergillus, Trichoderma, and the antagonistic actinomycetes are producers of various antibiotics. Many species of Trichoderma are strong antagonistic invaders and the antibiotics produced by hostile microorganisms can have biological and biochemical impacts on plant pathogens present in the soil (Rahul et al. 2014).
12.3.5 Biocontrol
Microbial biopesticides and biofertilizers are the latest developments in the field of eco-friendly agriculture (Bhardwaj et al. 2014). Living microorganisms in biofertilizers are applied to the surface of plant, soil, or seeds, to colonize rhizome, and supply primary nutrients to the host (Tanti 2015). Biopesticides are the microorganisms that generate, acquire, and induce systemic resistance against the pathogens, as antibiotics, HCNs, siderophores, or hydrolytic enzymes. Native microorganisms are commonly used for the development of bioinsecticides and biopesticides as well as for pest and disease control to promote plant growth. A bacterium known as Rhizobium can also be used as a biofertilizer in agriculture.
Rhizobia is known for its capability to make symbiotic interactions with leguminous plants by colonizing root nodules (Bagali 2012; Wang and Martínez-Romero 2000). Nitrogen is reduced by bacteria to produce ammonia and this can provide for efficient rhizobium strains to the soil, to enhance the soil productivity and improve the growth of plant by improving nutrient availability. Rhizobium biofertilizer in legumes could substitute chemical N2 by 30–35% when Rhizobium biofertilizer is applied together with the chemical fertilizers (Mia et al. 2010). Similarly, Acetobacter, Rhizobium, Azorhizobium, Aspergillus, Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Penicillium, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, etc. are also effective in promoting plant growth. However, the scientific synthesis and utilization of microbial formation is significant during the development of agriculture sustainability.
The use of competitive natural rivals to reduce the number of pathogens is known as biological control. Natural rivals include antagonists and competing microbes which destroy or prevent living pathogenic organisms. The biological control agents less harmful, simpler, and less expensive than the chemical pesticides. Bacteria are commonly introduced in the roots and seeds of plants to control different microbial attacks. For example, non-pathogenic Streptomyces strains control the crust of the potato caused by the scab (Neeno-Eckwall and Schottel 1999). The different functions of rhizosphere microbes are illustrated in Fig. 12.2. Antagonistic activity of Streptomyces is linked to the production of secondary antifungal metabolites and extracellular hydrolytic enzymes. The interaction of Pseudomonas fluorescens as a biocontrol against the soft rot potato pathogen Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica, is attributable to the production of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol (Cronin et al. 1997).
The management of plant nutrient may involve the microbes enhancing the availability of the macro- and micronutrients in the rhizosphere through the microbial-community consortium. These include associative N2 fixation, reduced levels of ethylene, and the assembly of phytohormones, siderophores and regulators for development and VOCs emission, thus promoting nutrient uptake and mycorrhizal function (Rana et al. 2012). Direct stimulation involves the synthesis of phytohormones like gibberellin, cytokinin, auxin, and biological nitrogen fixation, such as dissolving minerals, e.g., Fe and P, elevation of enzymes and siderophores, and systemic resistance. Bacillus, Aspergillus, Trichoderma, Streptomyces, Pseudomonas, and Beauveria are known strains as biological control agents for plants. The mechanisms include their antagonistic activity, immunity, synthesis of elicitor molecules, and environmental stress. Another mechanism for crop control is phytoextraction (Rana et al. 2012). Phytoextraction utilizes minor element accumulation in plants which aggregates contaminants in the respective tissues or cells. Once the pollutants are absorbed, the plants can be removed by cutting. The process of phytoextraction can be developed through soil modification, which increases the accessibility of trace ingredients in the soil. The bacteria associated with the plant facilitate the accessibility of small components in rhizosphere, and this is one of the established defence mechanism and stress responses in the plant-bacterial colonization and interactions (Santhanam et al. 2014) which can be of great assistance in the phytoremediation of soils polluted with trace elements.
12.3.6 Different Types of Microbes
The microbial stimulation of plant growth can be attributed to the ability for biological N2 fixing, production of plant phytohormones e.g., gibberellic acids, indole acetic acid, and cytokinins; and biological control of phytopathogens by antifungal, antibiotic, anti-bacterial or, iron-chelating agents, induction of nutrient uptake, acquired resistance of host, and improved bioavailability of minerals (Verma et al. 2019; Suman et al. 2016a; Kour et al. 2017; Yadav et al. 2016a; Lottmann et al. 2000; Huang et al. 2009). Some of these bacteria also exhibit psychrotolerant characteristic (Verma et al. 2015). The efficiency of crop productions can be improved through the applications of microorganisms in agriculture (Table 12.1).
Utilizing N2-fixing microorganisms as biofertilizers is among the most effective, eco-friendly, and favorable methods to improve the crop product and growth. The examples of N-fixing bacteria include Azotobacter, Arthrobacter, Azospirillum, Enterobacter, Bacillus, Gluconacetobacter, Cerattia, Pseudomonas, Herbaspirillum, and Klebsiella (Table 12.1) (Elbeltagy et al. 2001; Boddey et al. 2003; Wei et al. 2014). The PGPBs are also able to transform insoluble phosphorus into a soluble form (orthophosphate). Rhizospheric B-soluble microorganisms grown in symbiosis with rice, wheat, pulses, and maize could dissolve boron (B), the mineral critical for crop quality and yields, and these include Azotobacter, Burkholderia, Arthrobacter, Halolamina, Enterobacter, Pantoea, Citrobacter, Pseudomonas, and Azotobacter (Table 12.1) (Suman et al. 2016a; Gaba et al. 2017; Singh et al. 2016; Yadav et al. 2017a). The applications of phytase and phytospecific microorganisms also have great potentials (Kumar et al. 2013; Singh et al. 2014). The availability of adequate organic P (as phytate) in the soil enhances the importance of phytate-hydrolyzing microorganisms. The utilization of phytase-producing bacterial isolates (Cellulosimicrobium sp., Advenella sp., Achromobacter sp., Bacillus sp., and Tetradios bacterial sp.) result in enhanced plant growth. This is due to the synthesis of plant growth hormones and siderophores, solubility of P, and inhibition of plant pathogenic fungi (Kumar et al. 2013; Singh et al. 2014). These reduce the utilization of P fertilizers, thereby protecting the environment from P contamination and contributing towards sustainable agriculture. Excessive P could lead to serious environmental pollution in aquatic ecosystem (Kumar et al. 2015). Phytase-generating microbes or those phytases which are neutral furthermore can serve as the diet of aquatic organisms (Huang et al. 2009; Kumar et al. 2014).
These beneficial PGP microorganisms are capable of producing siderophores (iron-chelating substances), antibiotics, chitinases, different pigments having fluorescent properties, and HCN (Yadav et al. 2016a; Lottmann et al. 2000). Siderophore production by microbes inhibits the development of crop pathogens and introduces Fe to the crops. Siderophores have been associated with indirect and direct enhancement of plant growth by PGP microorganisms. Microorganisms with multifunctional PGP properties may be used as environment-friendly biological fertilizers (Verma et al. 2015, 2019; Suman et al. 2016a; Kour et al. 2017).
The salinity of soil is a major issue in a large number of fields, and the high concentration of salt causes soil infertility. Hypersaline soils are present in excess of saline soils and Na+ − negatively charged clay particles. The growth of plants/crops is hindered by the higher levels of Na salt in soils. The accumulation of salts, e.g., NaCl, CaCl2, and MgCl2, happens constantly by the weather process (the rock is broken to release soluble salts). Beneficial microorganisms are linked to the roots of various plants with the help of root exudates. Epiphytic microorganisms are connected to the phyllosphere component of the plant because of the release of adhesive materials by the plants. Therefore, the interaction of plant microorganisms has been established, and the community of microbes has used elements of exudates as sources of energy (Yadav et al. 2015a, 2017b). Isolated microorganisms from growing crops in the high salinity/salty ecosystems possess the ability to promote plant development. Plant microorganisms that are rhizospheric, endophytic, and epiphytic have assisted in the growth of plant in vitro and in vivo, under osmotic pressure. Direct plant mechanisms through NH3, HCN, siderophore (iron-sealing compounds), and other metabolites protect the plants from different pathogens and facilitate plant growth under harsh environment (Singh et al. 2016; Verma et al. 2016; Yadav et al. 2015a, 2017c) (Table 12.2).
While halotolerant/halophilic bacteria bacteria may enhance the growth of plant based on increased multifunctional PGP properties, biofertilizers improve germination, length of shoots and roots, biomass, and N2, for higher yields and increased NPK (nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium) contents, chlorophyll content, and soil protein, and elevate tolerance to salinity (Yadav et al. 2015b, 2017c, d, 2018a; Kumar et al. 2016, 2017; Verma et al. 2013, 2015; Vazquez et al. 2000; Kaur et al. 2017; Suman et al. 2016b; Yadav 2015).
Plant microorganisms produce hormones that regulate plant growth, such as cytokinins, IAA (indole acetic acids), and gibberellic acids. The production of IAA is the most abundant and is synthesized by plant-microbial interactions, for example, endophytic, epiphytic, and rhizosphere microorganisms. Gibberellic acids are also common hormones produced by rhizosphere microorganisms, while the synthesis of cytokinins is possible by liposphere/epiphytic microorganisms. The synthesis of growth regulators by various groups of microorganisms gives many benefits to plants, e.g., growth of root, absorption of water, and the uptake of nutrients from soil-to-plant, and enhances stress tolerance, e.g., heat, cold, dryness, as well as salinity (Yadav 2015; Verma et al. 2014; Yadav et al. 2018b; Suman et al. 2015). Microorganisms with the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity could reduce ethylene levels during high salinity. These include Bacillus, Arthrobacter, Bicriteria, Methylobacterium, Phenazacillin, Enterobacter, Pantoja, Pseudomonas, Penicillium, Rhizobium, Rhizobacteria, and Cerattia (Yadav et al. 2018b; Glick 2020). Plant microorganisms may also involve indirectly in the PGP activities with the production of NH3, HCN, siderophore (iron-chelating compounds), antimicrobial products, pigments, antibiotics, and hydrolytic enzymes chitinases, (β-1, 3),-glucanase, pectinases, and cellulases (Yadav et al. 2016a, b; Verma et al. 2016). These properties and characteristics play their role in protecting plant crops from different kinds of pathogens of plant, and the use of such microorganisms as biofertilizers may enhance the crop productivity (Verma et al. 2018). The most efficient and excellent microorganisms that increase the growth of plant via direct mechanisms of PGP are Aeromonas, Bacillus, Photobacterium, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Trichoderma, and Xanthomonas. The utilization of microorganisms as biofertilizers as a substitute to chemical fertilizers improve soil health and promote green agriculture. Rhizospheric microorganisms basically make colonies in the roots and stimulate plant growth under natural and saline environment. Halophilic microorganisms contribute to the development plants via different PGP activities even under salinity (Verma et al. 2013, 2014, 2016; Kumar et al. 2017; Yadav et al. 2018b).
12.4 Healthy Soil and Eco-Friendly Environment
Seed treatments in the form of microbial vaccines transport microbes straight into the rhizosphere of plant, with narrow soil areas surrounding the roots where plants directly interact with the microbes (Philippot et al. 2013). This is an area where intensive microbial activity occurs that depends on the growth of microbes and the availability of nutrients and other molecules, e.g., antibiotics and plant growth regulators. The rhizosphere colonizing species are beneficial microbes that have major role in agriculture with the potential to enhance plant growth through different mechanisms (Babalola et al. 2009).
12.4.1 Biofertilizers
Microorganisms in the soil help to improve productivity of agriculture. The naturally available living organisms are biofertilizers and biopesticides to help the growth of plant and overcome pests, weeds, and diseases. Friendly microbes help plants in the absorption of higher quantity of nutrients through. “Nutrient recycling” and “capture” the energy needed. In return, the waste by-products of the plants serve as food to the microbes. As excessive utilization of chemical fertilizers to meet the demand for agricultural products is one of the major reason for environmental pollution, biological fertilizers are increasingly seen as the antidote. Advantages of biofertilizers are illustrated in Fig. 12.3. Soil bacteria and specific types of fungi known as phosphorus-soluble microorganisms (PSMs) could convert insoluble forms of phosphates into solvable forms of phosphates by releasing organic acids (Meena et al. 2016). The soil pH is decreased by these acids. Rhizobium, blue-green algae (BGA), and Azolla are considered plant-specific biofertilizers, while Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Vesicular Arbuscular Mycorrhiza (VAM), and phosphorus soluble bacteria (PSB) are broad-spectrum biofertilizers (Gupta 2004; Teotia et al. 2016).
The major sources of biofertilizers are fungi, bacteria, and cyanobacteria. Other soil bacteria (Azospirillum and Azotobacter) can fix atmospheric nitrogen, thereby enriching the nitrogen content in the soil through the symbiotic interaction with the plants. Glomus is a genus of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi. Plants which interact with the VAM exhibit improved nutrient uptake such as the P uptake, tolerance to root-burn pathogens, drought and salinity, and overall improvement in the plant development. Autotrophic microbes, i.e., Cyanobacteria, found in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, may retrieve N2, and the blue-green algae help to add organic matter into the soil and enhance its productivity. Phosphate (PO4−3) and N2 are significant for the development of plant, and both are easily available from natural resources. PO4−3 has a significant role, directly or indirectly, during plant maturity, for N2 fixation and for the quality and yield of the crop. A fungus such as Penicillium bile produces organic compound with acidic properties, to help in the dissolution of PO4−3 from the soil, which eventually reaches the soil for the absorption by the plant roots. Rhizobium which reside in nodules on the roots of the plant are involved in the extraction of N2 from air and conversion of nitrogen into a usable organic form. Those plants which possess larger populations of friendly bacteria residing in their roots can utilize naturally occurring nitrogen instead of depending on expensive fertilizers. Biofertilizers assist the plants in the utilization of all the nutrients present in the air and soil, and this finally lead to the reduction of the quantity of chemical fertilizers utilized.
12.4.2 Biopesticides
Biopesticides are obtained from natural sources, e.g., plants, animals, bacteria, and certain minerals. These sources can be fungi, e.g., Bavaria sp., neem extract, Bacillus sp., and pheromones. Baking soda, canola oil, bacteria, fungi, viruses, protozoa, nematodes, and other biologically active, safe substances are all considered as biopesticides, if they are used to control pests in eco-friendly manner. The advantages include for efficient control of pests, plant weeds, and diseases along with environmental and human protection. Biopesticides have found significant application in those areas facing pesticide resistance, and environmental concerns, and in the niche markets aiming to reduce the utilization of chemical pesticides (Mazid et al. 2011). The most commonly known microbes are Bacillus thuringiensis (BT), which produce a protein that may kill specific pests or insects in potatoes, cabbage, and other crops. The basic requirement is that the biopesticide only kills the target organisms but not the non-targetted ones or humans. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are functionally diversified bacterial groups that possess higher capability as biopesticides and biofertilizers. They are cost-friendly and eco-friendly substitutes to chemical fertilizers or other synthetic counterparts (Mazid et al. 2011). Some microorganisms which are pathogenic to plants can be genetically-modified to control pests and weeds. The best example is BT which has been successfully utilized as a specific, safe, and effective tool for insect pest control (Roh et al. 2007). BT is effective against Black flies and mosquitoe larvae, but may be harmful to moths and butterfly caterpillars larvae. The target insect species determine whether a certain BT type synthesizes a protein that binds to a gut receptor of larvae or merely by starving the larvae (Kumar et al. 2008).
Microbial pesticides as biological control agents are safe as compared to other conventional synthetic pesticides (Buss and Park-Brown 2002). The formulas (inoculants) of seed coating make use of adventitious organisms to safeguard the seedlings. Biopesticides have a short life span and, unlike synthetic pesticides, do not have harmful effects on animals and ecosystems, as they are super selective with specific targets of the class/type of insect. Traditional pesticide sprays, such as dust, liquid drains, liquid concentrations, wet powders, or granules, are used and the specific feature of each product determines the most effective ways for delivery of agents to the target pests (Nicholson 2007).
The rod-shaped bacteria are the bacterial pathogens of the Bacillus used for pest control and they usually reside in soil. The products with Bacillus thuringiensis Kurstaki destroy a variety of kite caterpillars and butterflies. In contrast, Bacillus papillae (milky spore disease) destroys the larvae of Japanese beetle, but it shows no response against the annual white grub (Cyclocephala mask), which is usually associated with pasture. BT has been the most commonly used microbial pesticide in the United States since the 1960s. BT products are commercially manufactured in huge industrial fermentation tanks. When the bacteria survive and reproduce under optimal conditions, the cells synthesize spores and toxic crystalline protein known as endotoxin. Most existing commercial BT products consist of toxic proteins and spores, but only a few toxin fractions can be cultured (Mueller and Sachs 2015; Singh and Trivedi 2017). Pesticides marketed under the trade names Zapidemic, Doom, Grub Attack, and the common name “milky spore disease” consists of Bacillus papilla and Bacillus lentimorbus.
The production and utilization of pesticides based on virus is limited. In contrast to BT, the living host insects must produce the insect viruses. Therefore, the product is expensive, time-consuming and less efficient as compared to the already present synthetic chemical pesticides. However, many insect viruses are related to the same species or pests of the forest, such as the gypsy moth, spruce budworm, Douglas-fir tusk moth, and Pine sawdust. They are not attainable commercially, but they are being prepared and utilized by the Forest Services of the United States. Forest pests are specifically better targets to be attacked by viral pathogens as the stability of the forest environment takes an important part in the cycling of pathogen (transmitted from one generation to another). Forest canopy have a significant part in the protection of viral cells from being destroyed by UV radiation. Baculovirus affects pests such as corn bores, flea beetles, potato beetles, and aphids (Berendsen et al. 2012). A special breed is employed as an agent to control the bertha army worm, which attacks flax, canola, and other vegetable crops. Traditional pesticides have no effect on the worm until it reaches a point when there has been extensive damage. Other pest viruses tested for use as pesticides include alfalfa looper, armyworm, soybean looper, imported cabbage, and cabbage looper. However, few of these viruses are manufactured and trialed in the fields and none of them has been recorded or marketed in a commercial manner. Both the cooling moth GV and the Heliothis nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV) are simultaneously registered and commercially produced by the US EPA, but these items are no longer attainable.
A large number of insect hosts are naturally infected by protozoan pathogens. Although these pathogens destroy their host insects, they are necessary for their long-term impacts. A significant and general result of the infection of protozoa is the reduction in the number of organisms produced by affected insects. Although pathogens of protozoa possess an important character in the natural population, some pesticides appear to favor development. The species in genera Nosema and Vairimorpha have potentials as insecticides (Weinzierl et al. 1995). The pathogens invade the larvae of the lepidopterans and insects of the Orthoptera (grasshopper and related pests). Protozoan microsporidian is currently available for the manufacturing of registered pesticides. Microbial pesticides offer protection for animals and humans because they are essentially non-toxic and non-pathogenic. Many of the microbial pesticides produce significant effects against narrow range of pest types, and because these pesticides are likely to deactivate rapidly in the environment, consumers should select the pest targets and the formulation having the most efficient and effective application.
12.4.3 Bioherbicides
Weeds are competing with crops for water, sunlight, nutrients, and space, as well as block drainage and irrigation systems, leading to poor quality of crop with deposit of weed seeds in the harvest. Weeds can be controlled by bioherbicides. Bioherbicide utilization, in place of chemical herbicides, lead to an increasingly successful strategies of integrated management (Hoagland 2007). Bioherbicides include phytopathogenic microorganisms or microbial compounds that can be used for the control of weed. Many microorganisms and phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi have bio-herbicidal functionality, and have been described in patents as the agents of weed control. The phytotoxic constituents of many chemical agents as well as other secondary compounds produced by such pathogens may also be poisonous to other mammals. In addition, the translocation, intake, metabolism, and persistence of these phytotoxins and the environmental impacts of increased chemical herbicide applications to other microbial communities are not well-understood. Microbes may contain aggressive genes which may invade the defence genes of weed, thus ultimately leading to death. The advantage of using bioherbicides is that it stays for longer period in the environment during the season of growth. It is cost-effective as compared to synthetic herbicides, so it can decrease the cost of cultivation. In addition, bioherbicide is not dangerous to the environment and does not affect non-target organisms (Singh et al. 2006).
12.4.4 Bioinsecticides
Similar to viruses, fungi sometimes behave as significant agents to control and inhibit the population of insect. Most of the species which create infections in insect are dispersed by the spores of conidia known as conidiophores. The conidia spread from different fungi possess different capability and the germination requires high humidity or free water. Contrary to bacterial spores or virus cells, the conidia of fungal spores originating from the cuticle synthesizes specific structures which can invade and enter the body of the insect. As the fungal infection grows, the toxins kill the infected insects. The advantage is the fungus are not killed by the long-term effects of the parasites (Berendsen et al. 2012). The fungus causes diseases in about fields and none of them has been recorded or marketed in a used as bioinsecticides. Techniques involving fermentation are employed for mass production of fungi. Spores are packed so that they may be spread to areas where the insects can be infected. After plantation, the spores utilize enzymes to enter the insect body. Once injected into the insect, they start to reproduce and ultimately lead to the insect death. Fungal agents have been recommended to have the best potential for chronic pest control. The biological pesticides attack in multiple ways, that the plant resistance to pests may be much increased.
12.5 Microbiome and Sustainable Agriculture
The aim of sustainable agriculture is to achieve high productivity of animals and plants through economical approach, making use of flexible and adaptable technology, with minimum disturbance to the environment. It needs to address the negative impacts of agrochemicals (pesticides, mineral fertilizers) with the applications of symbiotic microbes that facilitate nutrient supply to the livestock and crops, and provide control against biohazards (pests, pathogens) and abiotic stressors (including climate fluctuation and pollution) (Yang et al. 2009). This highlights the significance of microorganisms with respect to sustainable agro-practices and health of environment (Wang et al. 2009). This is attributable to the genetic dependence of the plants on the symbiotic interactions with the surroundings. The potential of plant-microbial symbiosis extends beyond the environmental impacts, as it also involves nitrogen fixation (Franche et al. 2009) and the molecular and ecological processes with multiple pathways for mutual co-evolution and adaptation of the microbes and the plants (Arnold et al. 2010). For the fungi-plant interactions, the host genotype is an important parameter for the spreading of fungal component (mycobionts) and for the development of the specificist-mutualist and specio-genetic continuum interactions (Peay et al. 2010). In the case of leguminous crops, highly active rhizobia strains can be utilized to provide nodulation to support N2 fixation for sufficient symbiotrophic nitrogen nutrition, using moderate levels of N-fertilizer (Provorov and Tikhonovich 2003). Maximum productivity can be attained by considering the species-specific and genotype-specific types of nutrition (Provorov et al. 1998). The use of beneficial microbes in agro-practices could reduce the use of inorganic fertilizers, water, pesticides and herbicides, without affecting the crop yield (Andrews et al. 2010). Intact tropical forests have been reported to accumulate and recycle higher quantities of N than the temperate forests, attributable to the abundance of N-fixing plants and sustained transport of bioavailable N within the ecosystem (Hedin et al. 2005). The optimal nutrients should lead to efficient formation of the colonies within the host, and the symbiosis can be enhanced according to the specificity of the host (Provorov and Vorobyov 2009). Microbial symbionts or their derivatives represent a promising area for sustainable agricultural technology for plant development and protection. Future prospects of microbial applications include the production of novel multipartite ecto- and endosymbiotic interactions which are based on extensive molecular (metagenomic) and genetic investigation. The basic strategy is to prepare composite inoculants that mimic the microbial communities linked to the natural plants. To balance plant-host metabolism, a combination of P- and N-providing sebum, including endosymbiotic rhizobia + VAM-fungi, appears promising. Some of the issues are related to the opportunistic or common pathogens of humans, which are often present in endophytic communities, including Klebsiella, Escherichia, Salmonella, Enterobacter, and Staphylococcus species (Shtark et al. 2010; Ryan et al. 2008). Productive handling of symbiotic communities of microbes is possible by utilizing molecular tools based on the pools of microbes that constantly migrate between soil, animal, and plant bodies in agricultural and natural ecosystems (Kupriyanov et al. 2010).
A few bacteria, e.g., agro-bacteria and rhizobia, are employed to deliver seed inoculants to the plants. The importance of microorganisms such as Azoarcus sp. to plants is that it serves as grass endophyte (Hurek and Hurek 2003). These types of bacteria mostly support rice crops and they do not harm the environment. After the seeds are sown in the soil, there is a significant role of bacteria in its germination. The bacteria thrive in the seed, which feeds them. Bacteria enhance soil fertility by providing nutrients for plant growth. They assist in food softening in the seeds, which facilitate the plants to grow from the seeds. Bacteria not only play significant part in the early stages of plant development, but also provide protection against pests and tolerance against stressors such as drought (Parke et al. 1983).
12.5.1 Benefits of Mycorrhizal Fungi
Growth of mycorrhizal plants could tolerate adverse conditions such as drought (Parke et al. 1983), soil pathogens, transplantation, poor soil nutrient, and soil contamination (Leyval et al. 1997). Improvement in plant growth and enhanced resistance to unfavorable conditions is often associated with the increased nutrient and water uptake, which is feasible through comprehensive hyphal networks with enhanced root area for assimilation. The impact of mycorrhizal fungi on the plant development, as illustrated in Fig. 12.4, includes enhanced root system growth and improved nutrient/water absorption and utilization. In Eucalyptus globulus, the dry weight of the plant is associated positively with the extent of mycorrhiza-colonized root. The benefits of ectomycorrhiza become more apparent in the establishment and development of young transplants in horticulture and forest care (Munro et al. 1999; Scagel and Linderman 1998).
The mycorrhizal symbiosis could improve phosphorus content through a wide range of hypercellular networks. This permits plant root to cross the phosphorus depletion area and reach a stable phosphorus-rich area where the fungus dissolves. Phosphorus, in many cases, can compensate for the effect of mycorrhizal infection on the plant survival under mycorrhizal control. However, increased P content may also lead to reduced mycorrhizal infection. Generally, the beneficial effects of mycorrhiza on the plants disappear as a result of excessive supply of phosphorus. The application of stimulants in conventional agriculture has often overlooked the beneficial symbiotic activity of mycorrhizal fungi (Jacott et al. 2020).
12.5.2 Soil and Environmental Health
Certain communities of microbes influence plant physiology, rhizome, and nutrient soil physiochemical properties directly or indirectly through metabolism. PGPR are the significant constituents of integrated farming, helping in nourishing crops with essential nutrients, and help to address the uptake of atmospheric nitrogen; the soluble and aggregated phosphorus; and the conversion microelements such as Mo, Zn, Cu, etc. into plant constituents. The production of hormones that promote plant development, such as indole acetic acid and gibberellic acid and polysaccharides, helps to improve the soil structure, thereby improving the soil health and increase the crop production. The amount of nutrients like K, Zn, Ca, Fe, Mn, and Cu can be improved by the proton pump ATPase (Mantelin and Touraine 2004). There are many reports on the importance of PGPR in maintaining soil fertility (Singh et al. 2018). PGPR vaccination of seeds has improved the value of accessible phosphorus, populations of microbes, acid and alkaline phosphate, dehydrogenase activity in soil, and high yields from irrigated seeds (Hemashenpagam and Selvaraj 2011).
The problems and solutions for healthy environment through the management of microorganisms can be achieved by combining the understanding in environmental biotechnology with microbial ecology (Damjanovic et al. 2017), to improve the quality of the environment, safety, sustainability, and human health (Umesha et al. 2018). The molecular biology tools based on polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and microbial DNA development can detect the identity and function of individual microbes. The latest technologies on high-throughput genetic and proteomic techniques could identify particular genes along with their metabolic activities. The whole genome of microbes which is once “unusable” can now be reconstituted utilizing current advancements in biology, computing, materials, and engineering. The focus has now shifted to the use of communities of microbes (Demain 2000), for bioremediation of polluted water, sludge, sewage, and sediment; or for soil detoxification; or for extraction of renewable energy from biomass, pathogens, or contaminants, while reducing their hazardous effects.
12.6 Conclusion
The application of commercial fertilizers and synthetic chemicals as pesticides have improved the crop yield, but with equally huge impact on the environment from the polluted and contaminated ecosystems. The growing concern over food safety has led to the development of more eco-friendly techniques, moving away from the toxic synthetic chemicals. Exploiting the links between soil microbial communities and the crops is the right approach to increase food production at low environmental cost while meeting the demand of growing world population. The two main strategies in the management of the soil microbes are based on the development of microbial vaccines or dealing with naturally occurring microbial populations. There has been an increasing interest in the use of biofertilizers, biopesticides, bioherbicides, and bioinsecticides to improve the crop quality and yield. The improvement of plant-microbial symbiotic relationships involve the extent of biocontrol exerted by the microbes, optimal microbial communities, soil modifications, and the types of soil and crops. Microbiological technologies, sustainable approaches, and improvement in regulatory framework could lead the way for emerging microbial-based solutions and new agro-practices with increased productivity.
Abbreviations
- BI:
-
BioDesign Institute
- CEB:
-
Center for Environmental Biotechnology
- ISR:
-
Induction of Systemic Resistance
References
Abawi GS, Widmer TL (2000) Impact of soil health management practices on soilborne pathogens, nematodes and root diseases of vegetable crops. Appl Soil Ecol 15:37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00070-6
Abbaspoor A, Zabihi H, Movafegh S, Hossein M, Akbari, Akbari Asl MH (2009) The efficiency of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield and yield components of two varieties of wheat in salinity condition. Am-Eurasian J Sustain Agric 3:824–828
Abinandan S, Subashchandrabose SR, Venkateswarlu K, Megharaj M (2019) Soil microalgae and cyanobacteria: the biotechnological potential in the maintenance of soil fertility and health. Crit Rev Biotechnol 39(8):981–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2019.1654972
Adak A, Prasanna R, Babu S, Bidyarani N, Verma S, Pal M, Shivay YS, Nain L (2016) Micronutrient enrichment mediated by plant-microbe interactions and rice cultivation practices. J Plant Nutr 39(9):1216–1232. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1148723
Ahemad M, Kibret M (2014) Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Univ Sci 26(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2013.05.001
Ahmed Nouh F (2019) Endophytic fungi for sustainable agriculture. Microb Biosyst 4:31–44. https://doi.org/10.21608/MB.2019.38886
Aislabie J, Deslippe J, Dymond J (2013) Soil microbes and their contribution to soil services. In: Ecosystem services in New Zealand: conditions and trends. Manaaki Whenua Press, Lincoln, pp 143–161
Ali SZ, Sandhya V, Grover M, Linga VR, Bandi V (2011) Effect of inoculation with a thermotolerant plant growth promoting Pseudomonas putida strain AKMP7 on growth of wheat (Triticum spp.) under heat stress. J Plant Interact 6(4):239–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2010.545147
Ali S, Charles TC, Glick BR (2014) Amelioration of high salinity stress damage by plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes that contain ACC deaminase. Plant Physiol Biochem 80:160–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.04.003
Alvarez M, Sueldo R, Barassi CJCRC (1996) Effect of Azospirillum on coleoptile growth in wheat seedlings under water stress, pp 101–107
Andrews M, Hodge S, Raven JA (2010) Positive plant microbial interactions. 157(3):317–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00440.x
Arnold AE, Lamit LJ, Gehring CA, Bidartondo MI, Callahan H (2010) Interwoven branches of the plant and fungal trees of life. New Phytol 185(4):874–878
Arzanesh MH, Alikhani HA, Khavazi K, Rahimian HA, Miransari M (2011) Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) growth enhancement by Azospirillum sp. under drought stress. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 27(2):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-010-0444-1
Ashraf M, Hasnain S, Berge O, Mahmood T (2004) Inoculating wheat seedlings with exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria restricts sodium uptake and stimulates plant growth under salt stress. Biol Fertil Soils 40(3):157–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-004-0766-y
Atapattu SS, Kodituwakku DC (2009) Agriculture in South Asia and its implications on downstream health and sustainability: a review. Agric Water Manag 96(3):361–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.09.028
Babalola OO, Kirby BM, Le Roes-Hill M, Cook AE, Cary SC, Burton SG, Cowan DA (2009) Phylogenetic analysis of actinobacterial populations associated with Antarctic Dry Valley mineral soils. Environ Microbiol 11(3):566–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01809.x
Bagali S (2012) Review: nitrogen fixing microorganisms. Int J Microbiol Res 3:46–52. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ijmr.2012.3.1.61103
Bagyaraj D, Revanna A (2017) Soil biodiversity: role in sustainable horticulture. In: Peter KV (ed) Biodiversity in horticultural crops, vol 5. Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, pp 1–18
Baldrian P (2003) Interactions of heavy metals with white-rot fungi. Enzym Microb Technol 32(1):78–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(02)00245-4
Bar-On Y, Phillips R, Milo R (2018) The biomass distribution on earth. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:201711842. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1711842115
Barra PJ, Inostroza NG, Acuña JJ, Mora ML, Crowley DE, Jorquera MA (2016) Formulation of bacterial consortia from avocado (Persea americana mill.) and their effect on growth, biomass and superoxide dismutase activity of wheat seedlings under salt stress. Appl Soil Ecol 102:80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.02.014
Basak B, Biswas D (2008) Influence of potassium solubilizing microorganism (Bacillus mucilaginosus) and waste mica on potassium uptake dynamics by Sudan grass (Sorghum vulgare Pers.) grown under two Alfisols. Plant Soil 317:235–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9805-z
Baum C, El-Tohamy W, Gruda N (2015) Increasing the productivity and product quality of vegetable crops using arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a review. Sci Hortic 187:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.03.002
Berendsen RL, Pieterse CM, Bakker PA (2012) The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci 17(8):478–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001
Bertsch PM, Thomas GW (1985) Potassium status of temperate region soils. In: Munson RD (ed) Potassium in agriculture. Wiley Online Library, pp 129–162. https://doi.org/10.2134/1985.potassium.c7
Bhardwaj D, Ansari MW, Sahoo RK, Tuteja N (2014) Biofertilizers function as key player in sustainable agriculture by improving soil fertility, plant tolerance and crop productivity. Microb Cell Factories 13:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-13-66
Bhise KK, Bhagwat PK, Dandge PB (2017) Synergistic effect of Chryseobacterium gleum sp. SUK with ACC deaminase activity in alleviation of salt stress and plant growth promotion in Triticum aestivum L. 3 Biotech 7(2):105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0739-0
Boddey RM, Urquiaga S, Alves BJR, Reis V (2003) Endophytic nitrogen fixation in sugarcane: present knowledge and future applications. Plant Soil 252(1):139–149. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024152126541
Buss EA, Park-Brown SG (2002) Natural products for insect pest management. J UF/IFAS Publication ENY-350 URL: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/IN197
Chong TM, Abdullah MA, Fadzillah NM, Lai OM, Lajis NH (2005) Jasmonic acid elicitation of anthraquinones with some associated enzymic and non-enzymic antioxidant responses in Morinda elliptica. Enzym Microb Technol 36:469–477
Choudhary D, Johri B, Prakash A (2008) Volatiles as priming agents that initiate plant growth and defence responses. Curr Sci 94:595–604
Contreras-Cornejo HA, Macías-Rodríguez L, Cortés-Penagos C, López-Bucio J (2009) Trichoderma virens, a plant beneficial fungus, enhances biomass production and promotes lateral root growth through an auxin-dependent mechanism in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 149(3):1579–1592. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.130369
Cronin D, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Fenton A, Dunne C, Dowling DN, O'Gara F (1997) Ecological interaction of a biocontrol Pseudomonas fluorescens strain producing 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol with the soft rot potato pathogen Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica. 23(2):95–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.1997.tb00394.x
Curtis TP, Sloan WT (2005) Exploring microbial diversity—a vast below. Science 309(5739):1331–1333. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1118176
Damjanovic K, Blackall LL, Webster NS, van Oppen MJH (2017) The contribution of microbial biotechnology to mitigating coral reef degradation. 10(5):1236-1243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12769
Dawidziuk A, Popiel D, Kaczmarek J, Strakowska J, Jedryczka M (2016) Optimal Trichoderma strains for control of stem canker of brassicas: molecular basis of biocontrol properties and azole resistance. BioControl 61(6):755–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-016-9743-2
De Vero L, Boniotti MB, Budroni M, Buzzini P, Cassanelli S, Comunian R, Gullo M, Logrieco AF, Mannazzu I, Musumeci R, Perugini I, Perrone G, Pulvirenti A, Romano P, Turchetti B, Varese GC (2019) Preservation, characterization and exploitation of microbial biodiversity: the perspective of the Italian network of culture collections. Microorganisms 7(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120685
Demain AL (2000) Microbial biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol 18(1):26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(99)01400-6
de Mulé MCZ, de Caire GZ, de Cano MS, Palma RM, Colombo K (1999) Effect of cyanobacterial inoculation and fertilizers on rice seedlings and postharvest soil structure. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30(1–2):97–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103629909370187
Doerr SH, Shakesby RA, Walsh RPD (2000) Soil water repellency: its causes, characteristics and hydro-geomorphological significance. Earth Sci Rev 51:33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0012-8252(00)00011-8
Egamberdieva D, Kucharova Z (2009) Selection for root colonising bacteria stimulating wheat growth in saline soils. Biol Fertil Soils 45(6):563–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-009-0366-y
Elbeltagy A, Nishioka K, Sato T, Suzuki H, Ye B, Hamada T, Isawa T, Mitsui H, Minamisawa K (2001) Endophytic colonization and in planta nitrogen fixation by a Herbaspirillum sp. isolated from wild rice species. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:5285–5293. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.11.5285-5293.2001
Farmer EE (2001) Surface-to-air signals. Nature 411(6839):854–856. https://doi.org/10.1038/35081189
Frac M, Jezierska-Tys S, Yaguchi T (2015) Occurrence, detection, and molecular and metabolic characterization of heat-resistant Fungi in soils and plants and their risk to human health. Adv Agron 132:161–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2015.02.003
Frąc M, Hannula SE, Bełka M, Jędryczka M (2018) Fungal biodiversity and their role in soil. Health 9(707). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00707
Franche C, Lindström K, Elmerich C (2009) Nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with leguminous and non-leguminous plants. Plant Soil 321:35–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9833-8
Gaba S, Singh RN, Abrol S, Yadav AN, Saxena AK, Kaushik R (2017) Draft genome sequence of Halolamina pelagica CDK2 isolated from natural Salterns from Rann of Kutch, Gujarat, India. Genome Announc 5(6). https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.01593-16
Gardi C, Montanarella L, Arrouays D, Bispo A, Lemanceau P, Jolivet C, Mulder C, Ranjard L, Römbke J, Rutgers M, Menta C (2009) Soil biodiversity monitoring in Europe: ongoing activities and challenges 60(5):807–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01177.x
Glick BR (2020) Introduction to plant growth-promoting Bacteria. In: Beneficial plant-bacterial interactions. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44368-9_1
Gornall J, Betts R, Burke E, Clark R, Camp J, Willett K, Wiltshire A (2010) Implications of climate change for agricultural productivity in the early twenty-first century. 365(1554):2973–2989. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0158
Gupta AK (2004) The complete technology book on biofertilizers and organic farming. National Institute of Industrial Research Press, Delhi, pp 242–253
Han J, Sun L, Dong X, Cai Z, Sun X, Yang H, Wang Y, Song W (2005) Characterization of a novel plant growth-promoting bacteria strain Delftia tsuruhatensis HR4 both as a diazotroph and a potential biocontrol agent against various plant pathogens. Syst Appl Microbiol 28(1):66–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2004.09.003
Hannula SE, van Veen JA (2016) Primer sets developed for functional genes reveal shifts in functionality of fungal community in soils. Front Microbiol 7:1897–1897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01897
Hedin L, Brookshire EN, Menge D, Barron A (2005) The nitrogen paradox in tropical forest ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:613–635. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110246
Hemashenpagam N, Selvaraj TJJoeb (2011) Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus and plant growth promoting rhizomicroorganisms (PGPR's) on medicinal plant Solanum viarum seedlings. 32(5):579–583
Hoagland RE (2007) Myrothecium verrucariu fungus: a bioherbicide and strategies to reduce its non-target risks. Allelopathy J 19(1) 179-170-2007 v.2019 no.2001
Huang H, Shao N, Wang Y, Luo H, Yang P, Zhou Z, Zhan Z, Yao B (2009) A novel beta-propeller phytase from Pedobacter nyackensis MJ11 CGMCC 2503 with potential as an aquatic feed additive. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 83(2):249–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1835-1
Hurek T, Hurek BR (2003) Azoarcus sp. strain BH72 as a model for nitrogen-fixing grass endophytes. J Biotechnol 106:169–178
Ingham RE, Trofymow JA, Ingham ER, Coleman DC (1985) Interactions of bacteria, fungi, and their nematode grazers: effects on nutrient cycling and plant growth 55(1):119–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942528
Jacott CN, Charpentier M, Murray JD, Ridout CJ (2020) Mildew Locus O facilitates colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in angiosperms. New Phytol 227(2):343–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16465
Jayne B, Quigley M (2014) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhiza on growth and reproductive response of plants under water deficit: a meta-analysis. Mycorrhiza 24(2):109–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-013-0515-x
Jha A, Saxena J, Sharma V (2013) Investigation on phosphate solubilization potential of agricultural soil bacteria as affected by different phosphorus sources, temperature, salt, and pH. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 44(16):2443–2458. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.803557
Johansen JE, Binnerup SJ, Kroer N, Mølbak L (2005) Luteibacter rhizovicinus gen. nov., sp. nov., a yellow-pigmented gammaproteobacterium isolated from the rhizosphere of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55(Pt 6):2285–2291. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63497-0
Johns C (2017) Living soils: the role of microorganisms in soil health. Fut Direct Int:1–7
Kalayu G (2019) Phosphate solubilizing microorganisms: promising approach as biofertilizers. Int J Agron 2019:4917256. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4917256
Karun N, Sharma B, Sridhar K (2018) Biodiversity of macrofungi in Yenepoya campus, Southwest India. Microb Biosyst 3. https://doi.org/10.21608/mb.2018.12354
Kaur R, Saxena A, Sangwan P, Yadav AN, Kumar V, Dhaliwal H (2017) Production and characterization of a neutral phytase of Penicillium oxalicum EUFR-3 isolated from Himalayan region. Nusantara Biosci 9:68–76. https://doi.org/10.13057/nusbiosci/n090112
Kibblewhite MG, Ritz K, Swift MJ (2008) Soil health in agricultural systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 363(1492):685–701. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2178
Knudsen GR (2006) Bacteria, fungi and soil health. In: Idaho Potato Conference. University of Idaho, Moscow, ID
Kour D, Rana K, Verma P, Yadav A, Kumar V, Singh D (2017) Biofertilizers: eco-friendly technologies and bioresources for sustainable agriculture. In: Proceeding of international conference on innovative research in engineering science and technology
Kumar S, Chandra A, Pandey KC (2008) Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic crop: an environment friendly insect-pest management strategy. J Environ Biol 29(5):641–653
Kumar A, Bisht BS, Joshi V, Dhewa TJIJoES (2011) Review on bioremediation of polluted environment: a management tool 1:1079–1093
Kumar V, Singh P, Jorquera MA, Sangwan P, Kumar P, Verma AK, Agrawal S (2013) Isolation of phytase-producing bacteria from Himalayan soils and their effect on growth and phosphorus uptake of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29(8):1361–1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1299-z
Kumar V, Sangwan P, Verma AK, Agrawal S (2014) Molecular and biochemical characteristics of recombinant β-propeller phytase from Bacillus licheniformis strain PB-13 with potential application in aquafeed. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 173(2):646–659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-014-0871-9
Kumar V, Singh D, Sangwan P, Gill PK (2015) Management of environmental phosphorus pollution using phytases: current challenges and future prospects. In: Kaushik G (ed) Applied environmental biotechnology: present scenario and future trends. Springer India, New Delhi, pp 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2123-4_7
Kumar V, Yadav AN, Saxena A, Sangwan P, Dhaliwal H (2016) Unravelling rhizospheric diversity and potential of phytase producing microbes. SM J Biol 2:1009
Kumar V, Yadav AN, Verma DP, Sangwan P, Saxena A, Kumar K, Singh B (2017) β-Propeller phytases: diversity, catalytic attributes, current developments and potential biotechnological applications. Int J Biol Macromol 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.134
Kupriyanov AA, Semenov AM, Van Bruggen AHC (2010) Transition of entheropathogenic and saprotrophic bacteria in the niche cycle: animals-excrement-soil-plants-animals. Biol Bull 37(3):263–267. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359010030076
Lal R (2016) Soil health and carbon management. Food Energy Secur 5(4):212–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.96
Lavakush YJ, Verma JP, Jaiswal DK, Kumar A (2014) Evaluation of PGPR and different concentration of phosphorus level on plant growth, yield and nutrient content of rice (Oryza sativa). Ecol Eng 62:123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.013
Leyval C, Turnau K, Haselwandter K (1997) Effect of heavy metal pollution on mycorrhizal colonization and function: physiological, ecological and applied aspects. Mycorrhiza 7(3):139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005720050174
Li HQ, Jiang XW (2017) Inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) improves salt tolerance of maize seedling. Russ J Plant Physiol 64(2):235–241. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443717020078
Li ZP, Han CW, Han FX (2010) Organic C and N mineralization as affected by dissolved organic matter in paddy soils of subtropical China. Geoderma 157(3):206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.04.015
López-Bucio J, Pelagio-Flores R, Herrera-Estrella A (2015) Trichoderma as biostimulant: exploiting the multilevel properties of a plant beneficial fungus. Sci Hortic 196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.08.043
Lottmann J, Heuer H, De Vries J, Mahn A, Düring K, Wackernagel W, Smalla K, Berg G (2000) Establishment of introduced antagonistic bacteria in the rhizosphere of transgenic potatoes and their effect on the bacterial community. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 33(1):41–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00725.x
Mahmood A, Turgay OC, Farooq M, Hayat R (2016) Seed biopriming with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: a review. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92(8). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw112
Malam Issa O, Défarge C, Trichet J, Valentin C, Rajot JL (2009) Microbiotic soil crusts in the Sahel of Western Niger and their influence on soil porosity and water dynamics. Catena 77(1):48–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.12.013
Mallavarapu M, Kantachote D, Singleton I, Naidu R (2000) Effects of long-term contamination of DDT on soil microflora with special reference to soil algae and algal transformation of DDT. Environ Pollut (Barking, Essex : 1987) 109:35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00231-6
Manjunath M, Kanchan A, Ranjan K, Venkatachalam S, Prasanna R, Ramakrishnan B, Hossain F, Nain L, Shivay YS, Rai AB, Singh B (2016) Beneficial cyanobacteria and eubacteria synergistically enhance bioavailability of soil nutrients and yield of okra. Heliyon 2(2):e00066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00066
Mantelin S, Touraine B (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria and nitrate availability: impacts on root development and nitrate uptake. J Exp Bot 55(394):27–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh010
Marasco R, Rolli E, Ettoumi B, Vigani G, Mapelli F, Borin S, Abou-Hadid AF, El-Behairy UA, Sorlini C, Cherif A, Zocchi G, Daffonchio D (2012) A drought resistance-promoting microbiome is selected by root system under desert farming. PLoS One 7(10):e48479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048479
Mazid S, Kalita JC, Rajkhowa RC (2011) A review on the use of biopesticides in insect pest management. Int J Sci Adv Technol 1(7):169–178
Meena V, Bahadur D, Maurya B, Kumar A, Meena R, Meena S, Verma J (2016) Potassium-solubilizing microorganism in evergreen agriculture: an overview. In: Meena VS, Maurya BR, Verma JP, Meena RS (eds) Potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. Springer India, New Delhi, pp 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_1
Mejía L, Rojas E, Maynard Z, Bael S, Arnold A, Hebbar P, Samuels G, Robbins N, Herre E (2008) Endophytic fungi as biocontrol agents of Theobroma cacao pathogens. Biol Control 46:4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.012
Mia M, Shamsuddin Z, Wahab Z, Marziah M (2010) Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR) inoculation on growth and nitrogen incorporation of tissue-culture Musa plantlets under nitrogen free hydroponics condition. Aust J Crop Sci 4
Mishra PK, Bisht SC, Ruwari P, Selvakumar G, Joshi GK, Bisht JK, Bhatt JC, Gupta HS (2011) Alleviation of cold stress in inoculated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings with psychrotolerant Pseudomonads from NW Himalayas. Arch Microbiol 193(7):497–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-011-0693-x
Mohseni M, Norouzi H, Hamedi J, Roohi A (2013) Screening of antibacterial producing actinomycetes from sediments of the Caspian Sea. Int J Mol Cell Med 2(2):64–71
Mueller UG, Sachs JL (2015) Engineering microbiomes to improve plant and animal health. Trends Microbiol 23(10):606–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2015.07.009
Munro RC, Wilson J, Jefwa J, Mbuthia KW (1999) A low-cost method of mycorrhizal inoculation improves growth of Acacia tortilis seedlings in the nursery. For Ecol Manag 113(1):51–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00414-9
Nautiyal C, Srivastava S, Chauhan P, Seem K, Mishra A, Sopory S (2013) Plant growth-promoting bacteria Bacillus amyloliquefaciens NBRISN13 modulates gene expression profile of leaf and rhizosphere community in rice during salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 66C:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.01.020
Neeno-Eckwall EC, Schottel JL (1999) Occurrence of antibiotic resistance in the biological control of potato scab disease. Biol Control 16(2):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1999.0756
Nicholson GM (2007) Fighting the global pest problem: preface to the special Toxicon issue on insecticidal toxins and their potential for insect pest control. Toxicon 49(4):413–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.11.028
Nkonya E, Mirzabaev A, Von Braun J (2016) Economics of land degradation and improvement–a global assessment for sustainable development. Springer Nature, Switzerland
Ortíz-Castro R, Contreras-Cornejo HA, Macías-Rodríguez L, López-Bucio J (2009) The role of microbial signals in plant growth and development. Plant Signal Behav 4(8):701–712. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.8.9047
Osman M, El-Sheekh M, El-Naggar A, Gheda S (2010) Effect of two species of cyanobacteria as biofertilizers on some metabolic activities, growth, and yield of pea plant. Biol Fertil Soils 46:861–875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-010-0491-7
Ozdal M, Sezen A, Koc K, Algur Ö (2016) Isolation and characterization of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and their effects on improving growth of wheat. J Appl Biol Sci 10:41–46
Pandya U, Saraf M (2010) Role of single fungal isolates and consortia as plant growth promoters under saline conditions. Res J Biotechnol 5:5–9
Panhwar QA, Radziah O, Zaharah AR, Sariah M, Razi IM (2011) Role of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on rock phosphate solubility and growth of aerobic rice. J Environ Biol 32(5):607–612
Parke EL, Linderman RG, Black CH (1983) The role of ectomycorrhizas in drought tolerance of douglas-FIR seedlings 95(1):83–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1983.tb03471.x
Peay KG, Bidartondo MI, Elizabeth Arnold A (2010) Not every fungus is everywhere: scaling to the biogeography of fungal–plant interactions across roots, shoots and ecosystems. 185(4):878–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03158.x
Pérez-Montaño F, Alías-Villegas C, Bellogín RA, del Cerro P, Espuny MR, Jiménez-Guerrero I, López-Baena FJ, Ollero FJ, Cubo T (2014) Plant growth promotion in cereal and leguminous agricultural important plants: from microorganism capacities to crop production. Microbiol Res 169(5):325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.011
Philippot L, Raaijmakers JM, Lemanceau P, van der Putten WH (2013) Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat Rev Microbiol 11(11):789–799. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3109
Piernik A, Hrynkiewicz K, Wojciechowska A, Szymańska S, Lis MI, Muscolo A (2017) Effect of halotolerant endophytic bacteria isolated from Salicornia europaea L. on the growth of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.) under salt stress. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63(10):1404–1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2017.1286329
Prasad R, Kumar M, Varma A (2015) Role of PGPR in soil fertility and plant health. In: Egamberdieva D, Shrivastava S, Varma A (eds) Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and medicinal plants. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13401-7_12
Prasanna R, Babu S, Devi N, Kumar A, Sodimalla T, Monga D, Mukherjee A, Kranthi S, Gokte-Narkhedkar N, Adak A, Yadav K, Nain L, Saxena A (2014) Prospecting cyanobacteria-fortified composts as plant growth promoting and biocontrol agents in cotton. Exp Agric 51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479714000143
Prasanna R, Hossain F, Babu S, Devi N, Adak A, Verma S, Shivay Y, Nain L (2015) Prospecting cyanobacterial formulations as plant-growth-promoting agents for maize hybrids. S Afr J Plant Soil 32:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02571862.2015.1025444
Provorov NA, Tikhonovich IA (2003) Genetic resources for improving nitrogen fixation in legume-rhizobia symbiosis. Genet Resour Crop Evol 50(1):89–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022957429160
Provorov NA, Vorobyov NI (2009) Host plant as an organizer of microbial evolution in the beneficial symbioses. Phytochem Rev 8(3):519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-009-9140-x
Provorov NA, Saimnazarov UB, Bahromov IU, Pulatova DZ, Kozhemyakov AP, Kurbanov GA (1998) Effect of rhizobia inoculation on the seed (herbage) production of mungbean (Phaseolus aureusRoxb.) grown at Uzbekistan. J Arid Environ 39(4):569–575. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1998.0379
Rahul K, Amrita K, Mukesh S (2014) Trichoderma: a most powerful bio-control agent-a review. J Trends Biosci 7(24):4055–4058
Rana A, Saharan B, Nain L, Prasanna R, Shivay YS (2012) Enhancing micronutrient uptake and yield of wheat through bacterial PGPR consortia. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 58(5):573–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2012.716750
Rana KL, Kour D, Verma DP, Yadav AN, Kumar V, Dhaliwal H (2016) Diversity and biotechno-logical applications of endophytic microbes associated with maize (Zea mays L.) growing in Indian Himalayan regions. In: Proceeding of 86th Annual Session of NASI & Symposium on “Science, Technology and Entrepreneurship for Human Welfare in the Himalayan region”, p 80
Renuka N, Guldhe A, Prasanna R, Singh P, Bux F (2018) Microalgae as multi-functional options in modern agriculture: current trends, prospects and challenges. Biotechnol Adv 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.04.004
Rhodes CJ (2014) Mycoremediation (bioremediation with fungi) – growing mushrooms to clean the earth. Chem Spec Bioavailab 26(3):196–198. https://doi.org/10.3184/095422914X14047407349335
Roberts SC, Shuler ML (1997) Large-scale plant cell culture. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8(2):154–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(97)80094-8
Roh JY, Choi JY, Li MS, Jin BR, Je YH (2007) Bacillus thuringiensis as a specific, safe, and effective tool for insect pest control. J Microbiol Biotechnol 17(4):547–559
Rojas-Tapias D, Moreno-Galván A, Pardo-Díaz S, Obando M, Rivera D, Bonilla R (2012) Effect of inoculation with plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) on amelioration of saline stress in maize (Zea mays). Appl Soil Ecol 61:264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.01.006
Ryan RP, Germaine K, Franks A, Ryan DJ, Dowling DN (2008) Bacterial endophytes: recent developments and applications. FEMS Microbiol Lett 278(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00918.x
Ryu C-M, Farag MA, Hu C-H, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW, Paré PW (2004) Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134(3):1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.026583
Santhanam R, Groten K, Meldau DG, Baldwin IT (2014) Analysis of plant-Bacteria interactions in their native habitat: bacterial communities associated with wild tobacco are independent of endogenous Jasmonic acid levels and developmental stages. PLoS One 9(4):e94710. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094710
Satyaprakash M, Sadhana EUB, Vani S (2017) Phosphorous and phosphate solubilising Bacteria and their role in plant nutrition. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 6:2133–2144. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2017.604.251
Scagel CF, Linderman RG (1998) Influence of ectomycorrhizal fungal inoculation on growth and root IAA concentrations of transplanted conifers. Tree Physiol 18:739–747. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/18.11.739
Sessitsch A, Kuffner M, Kidd P, Vangronsveld J, Wenzel WW, Fallmann K, Puschenreiter M (2013) The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem 60(100):182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.012
Sharma SB, Sayyed RZ, Trivedi MH, Gobi TA (2013) Phosphate solubilizing microbes: sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springerplus 2(1):587. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-587
Shtark O, Borisov A, Zhukov V, Provorov N, Tikhonovich I (2010) Intimate associations of beneficial soil microbes with host plants. In: Dixon GR, Tilston EL (eds) Soil microbiology and sustainable crop production. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 119–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9479-7_5
Siddikee MA, Glick BR, Chauhan PS, Yim W, Sa T (2011) Enhancement of growth and salt tolerance of red pepper seedlings (Capsicum annuum L.) by regulating stress ethylene synthesis with halotolerant bacteria containing 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid deaminase activity. Plant Physiol Biochem 49(4):427–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.01.015
Singh BK, Trivedi P (2017) Microbiome and the future for food and nutrient security. Microb Biotechnol 10(1):50–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12592
Singh HP, Batish DR, Kohli RK (2006) Handbook of sustainable weed management. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Singh DP, Prabha R, Yandigeri MS, Arora DK (2011) Cyanobacteria-mediated phenylpropanoids and phytohormones in rice (Oryza sativa) enhance plant growth and stress tolerance. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 100(4):557–568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-011-9611-0
Singh P, Kumar V, Agrawal S (2014) Evaluation of phytase producing bacteria for their plant growth promoting activities. Int J Microbiol 2014:426483. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/426483
Singh RN, Gaba S, Yadav AN, Gaur P, Gulati S, Kaushik R, Saxena AK (2016) First high quality draft genome sequence of a plant growth promoting and cold active enzyme producing psychrotrophic Arthrobacter agilis strain L77. Stand Genomic Sci 11(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-016-0176-4
Singh S, Singh V, Pal K (2017) Importance of micro organisms in agriculture. Clim Environ Change Impact Chall Solut 1:93–117
Singh R, Ahirwar N, Tiwari J, Pathak J (2018) Review on sources and effect of heavy metal in soil: its bioremediation. Int J Res Appl Nat Soc Sci 2018:1–22
Smith SE, Read DJ (2010) Mycorrhizal symbiosis. Academic Press, Cambridge, MA
Sparks DL, Huang PM (1985) Physical chemistry of soil potassium. In: Munson RD (ed) Potassium in agriculture. Wiley Online Library, pp 201–276. https://doi.org/10.2134/1985.potassium.c9
Steeghs M, Bais HP, de Gouw J, Goldan P, Kuster W, Northway M, Fall R, Vivanco JM (2004) Proton-transfer-reaction mass spectrometry as a new tool for real time analysis of root-secreted volatile organic compounds in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 135(1):47–58. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.104.038703
Steffens D, Leppin T, Luschin-Ebengreuth N, Min Yang Z, Schubert S (2010) Organic soil phosphorus considerably contributes to plant nutrition but is neglected by routine soil-testing methods. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 173(5):765–771. https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.201000079
Suman A, Verma DP, Yadav AN, Srinivasamurthy, Singh A, Prasanna R (2015) Development of hydrogel based bio-inoculant formulations and their impact on plant biometric parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Microb Ecol 5. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.503.103
Suman A, Verma P, Yadav AN, Srinivasamurthy R, Singh A, Prasanna R (2016a) Development of hydrogel based bio-inoculant formulations and their impact on plant biometric parameters of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 5(3):890–901
Suman A, Yadav AN, Verma P (2016b) Endophytic microbes in crops: diversity and beneficial impact for sustainable agriculture. In: Singh DP, Singh HB, Prabha R (eds) Microbial inoculants in sustainable agricultural productivity, Research perspectives, vol 1. Springer India, New Delhi, pp 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2647-5_7
Svircev Z, Tamas I, Nenin P, Drobac A (1997) Co-cultivation of N2-fixing cyanobacteria and some agriculturally important plants in liquid and sand cultures. Appl Soil Ecol 6(3):301–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(97)00022-X
Tanti A (2015) Emergence in mapping microbial diversity in tea (Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze) soil of Assam, north-East India: a novel approach. Eur J Biotechnol Biosci 3:20–25
Teotia P, Kumar V, Kumar M, Shrivastava N, Varma A (2016) Rhizosphere microbes: potassium solubilization and crop productivity – present and future aspects. In: Meena VS, Maurya BR, Verma JP, Meena RS (eds) Potassium solubilizing microorganisms for sustainable agriculture. Springer India, New Delhi, pp 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2776-2_22
Thakur M, Sohal BS (2013) Role of elicitors in inducing resistance in plants against pathogen infection: a review. ISRN Biochem 2013:762412–762412. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/762412
Thilagar G, Bagyaraj D (2013) Influence of different arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi on growth and yield of chilly. Proc Natl Acad Sci India Section B Biol Sci 85:71–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-013-0262-y
Tiwari S, Singh P, Tiwari R, Meena KK, Yandigeri M, Singh DP, Arora DK (2011) Salt-tolerant rhizobacteria-mediated induced tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and chemical diversity in rhizosphere enhance plant growth. Biol Fertil Soils 47(8):907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-011-0598-5
Treseder KK, Lennon JT (2015) Fungal traits that drive ecosystem dynamics on land. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79(2):243–262. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00001-15
Turan M, Gulluce M, Şahin F (2012) Effects of plant-growth-promoting Rhizobacteria on yield, growth, and some physiological characteristics of wheat and barley plants. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 43(12):1658–1673. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2012.681739
Umesha SK, Singh PP, Singh R (2018) Chapter 6: Microbial biotechnology and sustainable agriculture. In: Singh RL, Mondal S (eds) Biotechnology for sustainable agriculture. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, England, pp 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812160-3.00006-4
Vacheron J, Desbrosses G, Bouffaud ML, Touraine B, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Muller D, Legendre L, Wisniewski-Dyé F, Prigent-Combaret C (2013) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front Plant Sci 4:356. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00356
Vazquez P, Holguin G, Puente ME, Lopez-Cortes A, Bashan Y (2000) Phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms associated with the rhizosphere of mangroves in a semiarid coastal lagoon. Biol Fertil Soils 30(5):460–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050024
Verma DP, Yadav AN, Kazy S, Saxena A, Suman A (2013) Elucidating the diversity and plant growth promoting attributes of wheat (Triticum aestivum) associated acidotolerant bacteria from southern hills zone of India. Nat J Life Sci 10:219–227
Verma DP, Yadav AN, Kazy S, Saxena A, Suman A (2014) Evaluating the diversity and phylogeny of plant growth promoting bacteria associated with wheat (Triticum aestivum) growing in central zone of India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 3:432–447
Verma P, Yadav AN, Khannam KS, Panjiar N, Kumar S, Saxena AK, Suman A (2015) Assessment of genetic diversity and plant growth promoting attributes of psychrotolerant bacteria allied with wheat (Triticum aestivum) from the northern hills zone of India. Ann Microbiol 65(4):1885–1899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-014-1027-4
Verma P, Yadav AN, Khannam KS, Kumar S, Saxena AK, Suman A (2016) Molecular diversity and multifarious plant growth promoting attributes of Bacilli associated with wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) rhizosphere from six diverse agro-ecological zones of India. J Basic Microbiol 56(1):44–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201500459
Verma DP, Yadav AN, Kumar V, Khan M, Saxena A (2018) Microbes in termite management: potential role and strategies. In: Khan MA, Ahmad W (eds) Termites and sustainable management: volume 2 - economic losses and management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68726-1_9
Verma P, Yadav AN, Khannam KS, Mishra S, Kumar S, Saxena AK, Suman A (2019) Appraisal of diversity and functional attributes of thermotolerant wheat associated bacteria from the peninsular zone of India. Saudi J Biol Sci 26(7):1882–1895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2016.01.042
Wagg C, Bender SF, Widmer F, van der Heijden MGA (2014) Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(14):5266–5270. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1320054111
Wang ET, Martínez-Romero E (2000) Sesbania herbacea–rhizobium huautlense nodulation in flooded soils and comparative characterization of S. herbacea-Nodulating rhizobia in different environments. Microb Ecol 40(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002480000010
Wang HR, Wang MZ, Yu LH (2009) Effects of dietary protein sources on the rumen microorganisms and fermentation of goats. J Anim Vet Adv 8:1392–1401
Wei C-Y, Lin L, Luo L-J, Xing Y-X, Hu C-J, Yang L-T, Li Y-R, An Q (2014) Endophytic nitrogen-fixing Klebsiella variicola strain DX120E promotes sugarcane growth. Biol Fertil Soils 50(4):657–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-013-0878-3
Weinzierl R, Henn T, Koehler PG, Tucker CL (1995) Microbial Insecticides, University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu (Accessed 12 July 2021)
Whitton BA, Grainger SL, Hawley GR, Simon JW (1991) Cell-bound and extracellular phosphatase activities of cyanobacterial isolates. Microb Ecol 21(1):85–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02539146
Xiong W, Jousset A, Guo S, Karlsson I, Zhao Q, Wu H, Kowalchuk GA, Shen Q, Li R, Geisen S (2018) Soil protist communities form a dynamic hub in the soil microbiome. ISME J 12(2):634–638. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.171
Yadav AN (2015) Bacterial diversity of cold deserts and mining of genes for low temperature tolerance, PhD Dissertation. IARI New Delhi, India
Yadav AN, Sachan SG, Verma P, Saxena AK (2015a) Prospecting cold deserts of north western Himalayas for microbial diversity and plant growth promoting attributes. J Biosci Bioeng 119(6):683–693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.11.006
Yadav AN, Sharma D, Gulati S, Singh S, Dey R, Pal KK, Kaushik R, Saxena AK (2015b) Haloarchaea endowed with phosphorus solubilization attribute implicated in phosphorus cycle. Sci Rep 5(1):12293. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep12293
Yadav AN, Sachan SG, Verma P, Kaushik R, Saxena AK (2016a) Cold active hydrolytic enzymes production by psychrotrophic bacilli isolated from three sub-glacial lakes of NW Indian Himalayas. J Basic Microbiol 56(3):294–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201500230
Yadav AN, Ghosh Sachan S, Verma DP, Saxena A (2016b) Bioprospecting of plant growth promoting psychrotrophic bacilli from cold desert of north western Indian Himalayas. Indian J Exp Biol 54:142–150
Yadav AN, Verma P, Singh B, Chauhan V, Suman A, Saxena AK (2017a) Plant growth promoting bacteria: biodiversity and multifunctional attributes for sustainable agriculture. J Adv Biotechnol Microbiol 5(5):1–16
Yadav AN, Verma DP, Kour D, Rana KL, Kumar V, Singh B, Chauhan V, Sugitha TCK, Saxena A, Dhaliwal H (2017b) Plant microbiomes and its beneficial multifunctional plant growth promoting attributes. Int J Environ Sci Nat Resour 3:1–8. https://doi.org/10.19080/IJESNR.2017.03.555601
Yadav AN, Verma P, Singh B, Chauhan V, Suman A, Saxena AKJABM (2017c) Plant growth promoting bacteria: biodiversity and multifunctional attributes for sustainable agriculture. Adv Biotechnol Microbiol 5(5):1–16
Yadav AN, Verma P, Sachan S, Saxena AJEME (2017d) Biodiversity and biotechnological applications of psychrotrophic microbes isolated from Indian Himalayan regions 1:48–54
Yadav AN, Verma DP, Kumar V, Sangwan P, Mishra S, Panjiar N, Gupta V, Saxena A (2018a) Biodiversity of the Genus Penicillium in Different Habitats. In: Gupta VK, Rodriguez-Couto S (eds) New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63501-3.00001-6
Yadav AN, Kumar V, Dhaliwal HS, Prasad R, Saxena AK (2018b) Chapter 15: Microbiome in crops: diversity, distribution, and potential role in crop improvement. In: Prasad R, Gill SS, Tuteja N (eds) Crop improvement through microbial biotechnology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 305–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63987-5.00015-3
Yaish MW, Antony I, Glick BR (2015) Isolation and characterization of endophytic plant growth-promoting bacteria from date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera L.) and their potential role in salinity tolerance. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 107(6):1519–1532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-015-0445-z
Yang Y, Shah J, Klessig DF (1997) Signal perception and transduction in plant defense responses. Genes Dev 11(13):1621–1639. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.11.13.1621
Yang J, Kloepper JW, Ryu CM (2009) Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci 14(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2008.10.004
Yegorenkova I, Tregubova K, Ignatov V (2013) Paenibacillus polymyxa Rhizobacteria and their synthesized exoglycans in interaction with wheat roots: colonization and root hair deformation. Curr Microbiol:66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-012-0297-y
Yildirim E, Turan M, Donmez MF (2008) Mitigation of salt stress in radish (raphanus sativus l.) by plant growth: promoting rhizobacteria. Rom Biotechnol Lett 13:3933–3943
Young JP, Crossman LC, Johnston AW, Thomson NR, Ghazoui ZF, Hull KH, Wexler M, Curson AR, Todd JD, Poole PS, Mauchline TH, East AK, Quail MA, Churcher C, Arrowsmith C, Cherevach I, Chillingworth T, Clarke K, Cronin A, Davis P, Fraser A, Hance Z, Hauser H, Jagels K, Moule S, Mungall K, Norbertczak H, Rabbinowitsch E, Sanders M, Simmonds M, Whitehead S, Parkhill J (2006) The genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum has recognizable core and accessory components. Genome Biol 7(4):R34. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2006-7-4-r34
Žifčáková L, Větrovský T, Howe A, Baldrian P (2016) Microbial activity in forest soil reflects the changes in ecosystem properties between summer and winter. Environ Microbiol 18(1):288–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.13026
Živković S, Stojanović S, Ivanović Ž, Gavrilović V, Popović T, Balaž J (2010) Screening of antagonistic activity of microorganisms against Colletotrichum acutatum and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Arch Biol Sci 62(3):611–623
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aslam, A.A. et al. (2022). Applications of Microbes in Soil Health Maintenance for Agricultural Applications. In: Inamuddin, Ahamed, M.I., Prasad, R. (eds) Application of Microbes in Environmental and Microbial Biotechnology. Environmental and Microbial Biotechnology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2225-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-2225-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-2224-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-2225-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)