Skip to main content

Ethnicity and Geopolitics of Rohingya Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Risks, Identity and Conflict

Abstract

Rohingya crisis is a long-standing festering issue where human rights should have been the focus. But that is not happening. It is being dwarfed by geopolitics, ethnicity, and religion. Here Buddhism—along with ethnicity—is coming at odds with Islam. There are reports of state-sponsored genocide against the Rohingya Muslims, aided by ultra-nationalist Buddhists monks. As a sequel, thousands of Rohingya refugees have taken shelter in a neighboring country such as Bangladesh. Even Malaysia and Saudi Arabia are sheltering them. The worst atrocities that befell on the Rohingyas—resulting in one million moved out of the country—were in August 2017 that started in 1977–1978. The exodus of refugees started from then onwards. The world conscience is stirred by this traumatic event, but no concrete and concerted efforts are being undertaken—even at the UN level—to stop this carnage. It is felt it is the geopolitical interests of China, India, and Russia that are dwarfing this disconcerting human tragedy. The paper attempts to address the issue mostly highlighting genocide, geopolitics, and ethnicity part of the crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    “In the Union of Myanmar where national races are residing, the culture, traditions and customs, language and social systems may appear to be different, but in essence they are all based on the common blood of Union Kinship and Union Spirit like a hundred fruits from a common stem. There can be no doubt whatsoever of the fact that our national races have lived together unitedly in the Union of Myanmar since time immemorial. Such interpretations of Burma’s history are rejected by most ethnic minority political parties, a number of which first took up arms to demand the complete secession of their territories. For the inhabitants of the Shan and Karenni States this meant that they were asserting a right to secession legally guaranteed to both territories in Burma’s first independence constitution in 1947” (Ethnic Groups in Burma Development, Democracy and Human Rights, 1994. Smith, Martin in collaboration with Annie Allsebrook, 1994).

References

  • Ahmed, Kamal Uddin. 2018. The Geopolitics of Rohingya Crisis. The Financial Express, June 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alam, J. 2018. The Rohingya of Myanmar: Theoretical Significance of the Minority Status. Asian Ethnicity 19 (2): 180–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, Eleanor, and Andrew Chatzky. 2018. The Rohingya Crisis. Council on Foreign Relations, December 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International, Myanmar. 2004. The Rohingya Minority: Fundamental Rights Denied.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, Jonah, and Shelly Culbertson. 2018. How the U.S. Can Help Resolve the Rohingya Crisis. Snapshot, January 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chenyang, Li, and Lye Liang Fook. 2010. China’s Policies Towards Myanmar: A Successful Model for Dealing with the Myanmar Issue. In Myanmar: Prospect for Change, ed. Li Chenyang and Wilhelm Hofmeister, 186. Singapore: Select Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forino, Giuseppe, Jason Von Meding, and Thomas Johnson. 2019. Religion Is not the Only Reason Rohingyas Are Being Forced Out of Myanmar. Global Geopolitics, June 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garver, John. 2011. China’s Increasingly Assertive Navalism. China Research Center 20 (1), April 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariharan, R. 2008. Myanmar: Wishing Away Su Kyi. South Asia Analysis Group Working Paper 2598, February 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan, Mahmood. 2019. Will Rohingyas Ever Return to Myanmar? The Daily Star, May 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindu Business Line. 2006. GAIL Buys 30 pc Stake in Myanmar Oil, Gas Block, December 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 2009. Perilous Plight: Burma’s Rohingya Take to the Seas, May 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Izzadeen, Ameen. 2019. Geopolitics Allows Myanmar to Cover Up Rohingya Massacre. Daily Mirror, April 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamdar, Bansari. 2018. Indian Rohingya Policy and the Rohingyas. The Diplomat, October 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanthan, Chris. 2017. Rohingya Genocide—Links to Corporatism, Geopolitics and Wahhabism. Nation of Change—Op-Ed, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, Sahar. 2017. The Danger of Linking the Rohingya Crisis to Terrorism. The Diplomat, October 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, Nicholas. 2018. I Saw a Genocide in Slow Motion. The New York Times, March 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Anand. 2005. India-Myanmar Gas Pipeline: With or Without Bangladesh? South Asia Analysis Group, Working Paper 1474, July 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuppuswamy, C.S. 2008. Indo-Myanmar Relations: Visit of Senior General Maung Aye. South Asia Analysis Group, Working Paper 2664, April 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defense. 2004a. Indian Navy. Annual Report 2003–4. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defense. 2004b. International Cooperation. Annual Report 2003–4. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defense. 2007. Annual Reports. New Delhi: Government of India, 2004–2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Defense. 2008–2009. International Cooperation. Annual Reports. New Delhi: Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, Sudha. 2005. Yangoon Still Under Beijing’s Thump. Asia Times, February 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saran, Shyam. 2003. Present Dimensions of Indian Foreign Policy. In Indian Foreign Policy: Challenges and Opportunities, ed. Atish Sinha and Madhup Mohta, 115. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samaranayake, Nilanthe. 2012. The Long Littoral Project: Bay of Bengal: A Maritime Perspective on Indo-Pacific Security. CNA Analysis and Solutions, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, Habib, Dr. 2019. The Myth of ‘Bengal Migration’ to Arakan Debunked. South Asia Journal, February 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Martin in Collaboration with Annie Allsebrook. 1994. Ethnic Groups in Burma Development, Democracy and Human Rights. London: Anti-Slavery International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, David I. 2010. Burma/Myanmar—What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, David I. 2013. Myanmar Sits on the Corner of an International Triangle. Global Times, December 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thawnghmung, Ardeth Maung, and Maung Aung Myoe. 2008. Myanmar in 2007: A Turning Point in the “Roadmap”. Asian Survey 48 (1): 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Economic Times. 2018. India Threatened by China-Myanmar Ties: Chinese Think-Tank, July 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Indian Express. 2013. Myanmar Seeks Arms from India, July 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, Whiteny. Oil, Gas, Geopolitics Guide US Hand in Playing the Rohingya Crisis. MPN News, September 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yhome, K. 2014. Myanmar and the Geopolitics of the Bay of Bengal. Observer Research Foundation, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawacki, Benjamin. 2017. Defining Myanmar’s “Rohingya Problem”. Human Rights Brief 20 (3): 18–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zee News. 2007. Myanmar Launches Operation to Flush Out NE Rebels, November 16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Karim, M.A. (2021). Ethnicity and Geopolitics of Rohingya Crisis. In: Ratuva, S., Hassan, H.A., Compel, R. (eds) Risks, Identity and Conflict. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1486-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics