Abstract
Positive peace is a key concept in peace and conflict studies. While the term acknowledges multiple layers of violence and aims to offer an alternative to oppression and exploitation embedded in society, scholarly work on positive peace has largely focused on identifying the structures of violence the term aims to overcome rather than on developing an epistemological framework for the concept itself. This chapter focuses on the epistemic limitations of the concept by interrogating how the term has been deployed and from where it has been enunciated. Drawing on the concept of coloniality, the chapter specifically addresses the absence of epistemic violence in the analysis of positive peace. The chapter outlines how peace and conflict studies as a field has not sufficiently engaged with how the genealogies and underpinnings of terms like positive and negative peace are fundamentally aligned with Western thought. The chapter argues if the current paradigm is a colonial system that is racist, capitalist, heterosexist, and ableist, a “positive peace” can only be theorized and approached by critically and intersectionally challenging coloniality and the epistemic violence(s) it produces.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amster, R., Finley, L., & Pries, E. (2015). Peace studies between tradition and innovation. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Azarmandi, M. (2017). Colonial Continuities – A study of anti-racism in Aotearoa New Zealand and Spain (Thesis, Doctor of Philosophy). University of Otago. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10523/7655
Azarmandi, M. (2018). The Racial Silence within Peace Studies. Peace Review, 30(1), 69–77.
Bajaj, M., & Chiu, B. (2009). Education for sustainable development as a permanent process peace education. Peace & Change, 34(4), 441–455.
Barash, D. P. (2017). Approaches to Peace. A Reader to Peace Studies. Oxford University Press.
Botes, J. (2003). Conflict Transformation: A Debate over Semantics or a Crucial Shift in Theory and Practice of Peace and Conflict Studies? International Journal of Peace Studies, 8(2), 1–27.
Brock-Utne, B. (1995). Educating all for positive peace: Education for positive peace or oppression? International Journal of Educational Development, 15(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0738-0593(94)00042-N
Brunner, C. (2015). Das Konzept epistemische Gewalt als Element einer Transdisziplinären Friedens- und Konflikttheorie. Friedensforschung in Österreich Bilanz Und Perspektiven. Jahrbuch Friedenskultur. Band 10, 38–53.
Brunner, C. (2016). Das Konzept der Epistemischen Gewalt als Element einer transdisziplinären Friedens- und Konflikttheorie. In W. Wintersteiner & L. Wolf (Eds.), Friedensforschung in Österreich: Bilanz und Perspektiven (pp. 38–53). Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.
Brunner, C. (2017). Friedensforschung und (De-)Kolonialität. ZeFKo. Zeitschrift Für Friedens- Und Konfliktforschung, 6(1), 149–163.
Byrne, S., Clarke, M. A., & Rahman, A. (2018). Colonialism and peace and conflict studies. Peace and Conflict Studies, 25(1).
Byrne, S., Matyók, T., Scott, I. M., & Senehi, J. (2019). Routledge companion to peace and conflict studies. Taylor & Francis.
Concannon, K., & Finley, L. L. (Eds.). (2015). Peace and social justice education on campus: Faculty and student perspectives. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Dittmer, C. (2018). Dekoloniale und Postkoloniale Perspektiven in der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. Verortungen in einem ambivalenten Diskursraum. Dekoloniale Und Postkoloniale Perspektiven in Der Friedens- Und Konfliktforschung, (January), 7–24.
Falk, R. A. (1975). A Study of Future Worlds. New York: Free Press.
Fanon, F. (1968). The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.
Funk-Unrau, N., & Peace. (2015). Toward the Canadianization and Indigenization of peace studies. Peace Research, 47(1/2), 29–45.
Galtung, J. (2013). Cultural Violence. In J. Galtung & D. Fisher (Eds.) Johan Galtung. Pioneer of Peace Research. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer, 41–58.
Galtung, J. (2014). Interview – Johan Galtung. Retrieved March 4, 2020, from https://www.e-ir.info/2014/05/27/interview-johan-galtung/
Galtung, J., & Fischer, D. (2013). Positive and negative peace. In J. Galtung (Ed.), Springer briefs on pioneers in science and practice (Vol. 5). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
Galván-álvarez, E. (2010). Epistemic violence and retaliation: The issue of knowledges in “Mother India”/Violencia y venganza epistemológica: La cuestión de las formas de conocimiento en Mother India. Atlantis, 32(2), 11–26.
Gilmore, R. W. (2007). Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Grosfoguel, R. (2003). Colonial Subjects: Puerto Ricans in a Global Perspective. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Grosfoguel, R., Oso, L., & Christou, A. (2014). “Racism”, intersectionality and migration studies: framing some theoretical reflections. Identities, (October 2014), 1–18.
Grewal, B. (2003). Johan Galtung: Positive and Negative Peace. School of Social Sciences, Auckland University of Technology. Retrieved from http://www.activeforpeace.org/no/fred/Positive_Negative_Peace.pdf
Haessly, J. (2010). Promoting a Culture of Peace. In U. Oswald Spring, A. Aharoni, R. V. Summy, & R. C. Elliot (Eds.), Peace Studies, Public Policy and Global Security – Vol III EOLSS Publications.
Hernández, R. (2019). Coloniality of the US/Mexico Border: Power, Violence, and the Decolonial Imperative. Phoenix: University of Arizona Press.
Hesse, B. (2004). Im/plausible deniability: Racism’s conceptual double bind. Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 10(1), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350463042000190976
Jenkins, T., & Reardon, B. A. (2007). Gender and peace: towards a gender-inclusive, holistic perspective. In C. Webel & J. Galtung (Eds.), Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies. New York: Routledge, 209–231.
King, M. L., Jr. (2018). Letter from Birmingham Jail. Penguin Random House UK.
Lentin, A. (2008). Europe and the silence about race. European Journal of Social Theory, 11(4), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008097008
Lugones, M. (2003). Pilgrimages/Peregrinajes: Theorizing Coalition Against Multiple Oppressions. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Lugones, M. (2008). Colonialidad y Género: Hacia un feminismo descolonial. In W. D. Mignolo, M. Lugones, M. Tlostanova, & I. Jiménez Lucena (Eds.), Género y descolonialiad. Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Signo, 13–53.
MacQueen, G. (2007). The spirit of war and the spirit of peace: understanding the role of religion. In J. Galtung & C. Webel (Eds.), Handbook of Peace and Conflict Studies. New York: Routledge, 319–332.
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2007). On the coloniality of being: Contributions to the development of a concept. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 240–270.
Maldonado-Torres, N. (2008). Against war: Views from the underside of modernity. Duke University Press.
Mignolo, W. D. (2000). Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Border Thinking and Subaltern Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mignolo, W. D., & Walsh, C. (2018). On decoloniality. Concepts analytics praxis. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2013). Coloniality of Power in Postcolonial Africa: Myths of Decolonization. Senegal: African Books Collective.
Quijano, A. (1992). “Raza”, “Etnia” y “Nación” en Mariátegui: Cuestiones Abiertas. In R. Forgues (Ed.), José Carlos Mariategui Y Europa: La otra cara del descubrimiento. Lima: Amauta, 167–188.
Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America. Neplantla: Views from South, 1(3), 533–580.
Reardon, B. A. (2015). Toward a Paradigm of Peace Retrospective Reflection on Toward. In B. A. Reardon & D. T. Snauwaert (Eds.), Betty A. Reardon: A Pioneer in Education for Peace and Human Rights (pp. 109–120). Heidelberg New York London: Springer Dordrecht.
Rogers, P. (2002). Losing Control: Global Security in the Twenty-first Century. London and Sterling, VA: Pluto Press.
Sandole, D. J. D. (2013). Peacebuilding. Cambridge/Malden: Polity Press.
Santos, B. d. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis.
Shields, P. M. (2017). Limits of negative peace, faces of positive peace. Parameters, 47(3), 5–14.
Shiva, V. (1990). Reductionist Science as Epistemological Violence. In: Nandy, Ashis (Ed.): Science, Hegemony and Violence. A Requiem for Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 232–256.
Spivak, G.C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? In: Nelson, Cary und Grossberg, Lawrence (Eds.): Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 271–313.
Smith Tuhiwai, L. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies - Research and Indigenous Peoples. Zed Books, University of Otago Press.
Taiaiake, A. (1999). Peace, power and righteousness: An indigenous manifesto. New York: Oxford University Press.
Turan, T. (2015). Positive peace in theory and practice: Strengthening the United Nations’s pre-conflict prevention role. Leiden: Brill.
Vázquez, R. (2011). Translation as Erasure: Thoughts on Modernity’s Epistemic Violence. Journal of Historical Sociology, 24(1), 27–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this entry
Cite this entry
Azarmandi, M. (2022). Freedom from Discrimination: On the Coloniality of Positive Peace. In: Standish, K., Devere, H., Suazo, A., Rafferty, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Peace. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0969-5_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0969-5_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0968-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0969-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences