Skip to main content

Defining the Platform of Positive Peace

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Peace

Abstract

After a brief introduction of typical notions of peace, this chapter ventures to trace the idea of positive peace in recent scholarship to establish how the term is utilized in the PACS world. It then endeavors to introduce each editorial domain within this handbook including a synopsis of each form of intervention theoretically followed immediately by a summary of the chapters that inhabit the PALGRAVE Handbook of Positive Peace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addams, J. (1907). Newer ideals of peace. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annan, K. A. (2005). In larger freedom: Towards development, security and human rights for all: Report of the Secretary-General. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W. J. (2012). Relational ethics. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 749–753). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avruch, K. (2003). Does our field have a centre? Thoughts from the academy. International Journal of Conflict Engagement and Resolution, 1(1), 10–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhandari, H., & Yasunobu, K. (2009). What is social capital? A comprehensive review of the concept. Asian Journal of Social Science, 37(3), 480–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, L. K. (1998). Principled versus pragmatic nonviolence. Peace Review, 10(1), 79–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, D., Barnes, T., & Huyse, L. (Eds.). (2003). Reconciliation after violent conflict: A handbook. International Idea. Retrieved from http://www.idea.int/conflict/reconciliation/reconciliation_full.pdf

  • Bockarie, A. (2002). Peace education in a war-torn small state: The case of Sierra Leone. Peace Research, 34(2), 117–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boddice, R. (2011). Human-animal studies. In R. Boddice (Ed.), Anthropocentrism – Humans, animals, environments. Boston: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. (1978). Stable peace. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1970). I and Thou (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). Relationship. In Cambridge Dictionary. Retrieved March 10, 2020, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/relationship

  • Chizhik, E. W., & Chizhik, A. W. (2002). Decoding the language of social justice: What do privilege and oppression really mean? Journal of College Student Development, 43(6), 792–808.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devere, H. (2018). Exploring relationships for positive peace. Factis Pax: Journal of Peace Education and Social Justice, 12(1), 59–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firchow, P., & Anastasiou, H. (2016). Practical approaches to peacebuilding: Putting theory to work: Putting theory to work. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, D. P. (2007). Beyond war: The human potential for peace. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1964). An editorial. Journal of Peace Research, 1(1), 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (2014). A mini theory of peace. Galtung Institute. Retrieved March 10, 2020, from https://www.galtung-institut.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Mini-Theory-of-Peace.pdf

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, M. (2016). Opinion: Detached animals; humans growing away from nature – Western Herald: Opinion. Retrieved March 31, 2017, from http://www.westernherald.com/opinion/article_ebed082c-4d53-11e6-a7fd-d3f1267d0c5a.html

  • Griffiths, K., Coleman, C., Lee, V., & Madden, R. (2016). How colonisation determines social justice and Indigenous health – A review. Journal of Population Research, 33, 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, I. (2004). Peace education theory. Journal of Peace Education, 1(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, I. M., & Morrison, M. L. (2013). Peace education (3rd ed.). Jefferson: McFarland and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1986). Sisterhood: Political solidarity between women. Feminist Review, 23, 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (2013). Writing beyond race: Living theory and practice. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1903). Perpetual peace; a philosophical essay, 1795. London: S. Sonnenschein.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. L. (1964/2009). The Nobel Peace Prize 1964 Nobel Lecture, December 11. The Nobel Foundation. Retrieved from http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/1964/king-lecture.html

  • Lambourne, W., & Rodriguez Carreon, V. (2016). Engendering transitional justice: A transformative approach to building peace and attaining human rights for women. Human Rights Review: Dordrecht, 17(1), 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinas, E. (1978). Otherwise than being or beyond essence (A. Lingis, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Original work published 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manca, A. R. (2014). Social cohesion. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 6626–6628). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. A. (2020). What is social justice? Caritas Aotearoa New Zealand-The Catholic Agency for Justice, Peace and Development. Retrieved March 29, 2020, from https://caritas.org.nz/what-social-justice

  • Newsom, V. A., & Lee, W. (2009). On nourishing peace: The performativity of activism through the Nobel Peace Prize. Global Media Journal, 8(5), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramose, M. B. (2001). An African perspective on justice and race. Polylog: Forum for Intercultural Philosophy. Retrieved March 10, 2020, from https://them.polylog.org/3/frm-en.htm#s7

  • Randle, B. A. (2016). Liberty and justice for all, but what if I’m black? Race, Gender and Class, 23(1), 166–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, B. A. (1995). Educating for human dignity: Learning about rights and responsibilities. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, P. M. (2014). Bringing peace back in: Presidential address to the Peace Science Society, 2013. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 31(4), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894214530852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, G. (2005). Waging non-violent struggle. Boston: Hardy Merriman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, P. M., & Soeters, J. (2017). Peaceweaving: Jane Addams, positive peace and public administration. American Review of Public Administration, 47(3), 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standish, K. (2015). Cultural violence in the classroom: Peace, conflict and education in Israel. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standish, K., & Joyce, J. (2018). Yogic peace education. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019614564785

  • Stephan, M. J., & Chenoweth, E. (2008). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. International Security, 33(1), 7–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strier, R. (2007). Anti-oppressive research in social work: A preliminary definition. British Journal of Social Work., 37, 857–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, L., & Druckman, D. (2017). Drivers of durable peace: The role of justice in negotiating civil war termination. Group Decision and Negotiation, 26, 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. B. J. (1988). One world, many worlds: Struggles for a just world peace. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, T. (2003). Nonviolence is who? Gene Sharp and Gandhi. Peace & Change, 28(2), 250–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Q. (1954). Criteria for judging the relevance of researches on the problems of peace. In Research for peace (pp. 3–98). Oslo: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katerina Standish .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Standish, K., Devere, H., Suazo, A.E., Rafferty, R. (2022). Defining the Platform of Positive Peace. In: Standish, K., Devere, H., Suazo, A., Rafferty, R. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Positive Peace. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0969-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics