Skip to main content

Between a Regional Hegemon and a Middle Power: The Case of Nigeria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Awkward Powers: Escaping Traditional Great and Middle Power Theory

Part of the book series: Global Political Transitions ((GLPOTR))

Abstract

Does Nigeria conform with the mainstays of established hierarchy in a global superstructure? If not, is the concept of ‘awkward powers’ useful to understand Nigeria’s role in the international system? This chapter aims to provide an empirical analysis of the concept of awkward powers presented in Chapter I, through the case of Nigeria. The dynamics of a rising Nigeria and the nature of its ascent require both a theoretical approach and regional knowledge to understand the stability implication in the African continent, as well as other regions that are facing emerging powers. This chapter reviews four definitional criteria—positional, normative/behavioural, identity, and systemic impact—and concludes that the case of Nigeria showcases the conceptual utility of the awkward middle power concept, specifically in the study of contemporary states which sit between regional hegemony and middle powerdom.

The author wishes to thank the editors for their assistance in revising this chapter. An earlier version of this research was presented at the 2019 Australian Political Science Association conference, for the panel titled “Escaping IR Theory? The Case for Awkward Powers”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gabriele Abbondanza and Thomas Wilkins, “The Case for Awkward Powers,” in Awkward Powers: Escaping Traditional Great and Middle Power Theory, eds. Gabriele Abbondanza and Thomas Wilkins (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021), 3–39.

  2. 2.

    World Bank, “World Bank Open Data,” 2019.

  3. 3.

    Adekeye Adebajo, “In Search of Warlords: Hegemonic Peacekeeping in Liberia and Somalia,” International Peacekeeping 10, no. 4 (2003).

  4. 4.

    Oluwaseun Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments to Nigeria and South Africa’s Hegemonic Competence in Africa,” in Nigeria-South Africa Relations and Regional Hegemonic Competence, ed. Oluwaseun Tella (Springer, 2018); Olusola Ogunnubi and Ufo Okeke-Uzodike, “Can Nigeria Be Africa’s Hegemon?,” African Security Review 25, no. 2 (2016).

  5. 5.

    Faruq Idowu Boge, “Old Allies and New Friends in Nigeria’s External Relations,” Covenant University Journal of Politics & International Affair 5, no. 2 (2017); Nduba Echezona, Contemporary Issues in World Order (Mekslink Publishers, 1992); Femi Aribisala, “Bolaji Akinyemi’s Concert of Medium Powers,” Financial Nigeria, January 2, 2013.

  6. 6.

    Andrew Fenton Cooper, Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers After the Cold War (New York: Macmillan, 1997), 14.

  7. 7.

    Andrew Fenton Cooper, Richard Higgott, and Kim Richard Nossal, Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order (Melbourne University Press, 1993); Carl Ungerer, “The ‘Middle Power’ Concept in Australian Foreign Policy,” Australian Journal of Politics and History 53, no. 4 (2007); Andrew Carr, “Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systemic Impact Approach,” Australian Journal of International Affairs 68, no. 1 (2014); Sangbae Kim, “Middle Power’s Diplomatic Strategies in the Perspective of Networks: Applying Theories of Structural Holes and Positional Power,” Kukje Jeongchi Nonchong 51, no. 3 (2011).

  8. 8.

    Thomas Wilkins, “Defining Middle Powers Through IR Theory: Three Images,” in Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asian Century: New Theories, New Cases, eds. Tanguy Struye de Swielande, Dorothée Vandamme, and David Walton (Routledge, 2018), 50.

  9. 9.

    Carr, “Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systemic Impact Approach,” 72.

  10. 10.

    World Bank, “World Bank Open Data.”

  11. 11.

    Economic Community of West African States [ECOWAS], “Trade,” accessed April 20, 2020, https://www.ecowas.int/ecowas-sectors/trade/.

  12. 12.

    Yolanda Spies, “The Equivocal Power of South Africa,” in Awkward Powers: Escaping Traditional Great and Middle Power Theory, eds. Gabriele Abbondanza and Thomas Wilkins (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021), 199–219.

  13. 13.

    World Bank, “World Bank Open Data.”

  14. 14.

    Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments,” 4.

  15. 15.

    Federal Republic of Nigeria, National Security Strategy (Abuja: Federal Republic of Nigeria, December 2019), 4, 6.

  16. 16.

    Cooper, Higgott, and Nossal, Relocating Middle Powers, 17.

  17. 17.

    World Bank, “World Bank Open Data.”

  18. 18.

    ECOWAS, “ECOWAS Moves for Continuous Support from Nigeria,” May 27, 2016, https://www.ecowas.int/ecowas-moves-for-continuous-support-from-nigeria/.

  19. 19.

    International Institute for Strategic Studies Defence and Military Analysis Programme [IISS Programme], “Military Balance + (Online),” accessed July 1, 2020.

  20. 20.

    IISS Programme, “Military balance + (Online)”.

  21. 21.

    Adebajo, “In Search of Warlords.”

  22. 22.

    Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments,” 13.

  23. 23.

    Belachew Gebrewold, “Legitimate Regional Powers? A Failed Test for Ethiopia, Nigeria, and South Africa,” African Security 7, no. 1 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Federal Republic of Nigeria, National Security Strategy (Abuja: Federal Republic of Nigeria, December 2019), 4, 6.

  25. 25.

    Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2018 (Berlin: Transparency International, 2018). www.transparency.org/cpi2018.

  26. 26.

    Wilkins, “Defining Middle Powers Through IR Theory: Three Images,” 53.

  27. 27.

    Olusola Ogunnubi, Hakeem Onapajo, and Christopher Isike, “A Failing Regional Power? Nigeria’s International Status in the Age of Boko Haram,” Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies 44, no. 3 (2017); Jacob Zenn, Unmasking Boko Haram: Exploring Global Jihad in Nigeria (Lynne Rienner, 2020); Adeoye O. Akinola, Olumuyiwa Temitope Faluyi, and Sultan Khan, eds., Boko Haram Terrorism and the Nigerian State: Politics and Policies (Springer, 2019); Edlyne Anugwom, The Boko Haram Insurgence in Nigeria: Perspectives from Within (Springer, 2018); Jideofor Adibe, Nigeria Without Nigerians?: Boko Haram and the Crisis in Nigeria’s Nation-Building (Adonis & Abbey, 2012); Ogunnubi, Onapajo, and Isike, “A Failing Regional Power?”

  28. 28.

    World Bank, “Poverty & Equity Data Portal—Nigeria,” 2020, http://povertydata.worldbank.org/poverty/country/NGA.

  29. 29.

    ECOWAS, “Basic Information,” accessed April 25, 2020, https://www.ecowas.int/.

  30. 30.

    ECOWAS, 2016 Annual Report “ECOWAS Common External Tariff (CET): Achievements, Challenges and Prospects”; ECOWAS, “Basic information.”

  31. 31.

    Ogunnubi and Okeke-Uzodike, “Can Nigeria Be Africa’s Hegemon?,” 115.

  32. 32.

    Jinmi Adisa, “Nigeria in ECOMOG: Political Undercurrents and the Burden of Community Spirit,” Small Wars & Insurgencies 5, no. 1 (1994); Ogunnubi and Okeke-Uzodike, “Can Nigeria Be Africa’s Hegemon?,” 120.

  33. 33.

    Kunle Amuwo, “Nigeria’s Continental Diplomatic Thrusts: The Limits of Africa’s Nominally Biggest Economy,” Policy Briefing of South African Institute of International Affairs, October 1, 2014.

  34. 34.

    Adebajo, “In Search of Warlords,” 65.

  35. 35.

    Ogunnubi and Okeke-Uzodike, “Can Nigeria Be Africa’s Hegemon?,” 118.

  36. 36.

    Thomas Wilkins and Lucas Rezende, “A Liminal and Transitional Awkward Power: Brazil Betwixt the Great and Middle Powers,” in Awkward Powers: Escaping Traditional Great and Middle Power Theory, eds. Gabriele Abbondanza and Thomas Wilkins (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021), 95–128.

  37. 37.

    Ogunnubi and Okeke-Uzodike, “Can Nigeria Be Africa’s Hegemon?,” 118.

  38. 38.

    UN News, “Service and Sacrifice: Honouring Nigeria’s Contribution to UN Peacekeeping,” UN News, February 16, 2018, https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/02/1002901.

  39. 39.

    Cooper, Niche Diplomacy, 15.

  40. 40.

    Ibid.

  41. 41.

    Friday Aworawo, “Nigeria and ECOWAS Since 1999: Continuity and Change in Multilateralism and Conflict Resolution,” Ihafa: A Journal of African Studies 8, no. 2 (2016).

  42. 42.

    Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments.”

  43. 43.

    Ogunnubi and Okeke-Uzodike, “Can Nigeria Be Africa’s Hegemon?”

  44. 44.

    Boge, “Old Allies and New Friends in Nigeria’s External Relations.”; Echezona, Contemporary Issues in World Order.

  45. 45.

    Echezona, Contemporary Issues in World Order, 17; Aribisala, “Bolaji Akinyemi’s Concert of Medium Powers.”

  46. 46.

    Bolaji Akinyemi, “Nigeria’s Position: Abacha’s Ambitions,” International Herald Tribune, June 10, 1997.

  47. 47.

    Aribisala, “Bolaji Akinyemi’s Concert of Medium Powers.”

  48. 48.

    Echezona, Contemporary Issues in World Order, 19.

  49. 49.

    Aribisala, “Bolaji Akinyemi’s Concert of Medium Powers.”

  50. 50.

    Olu Sanu quoted in Karl Magyar and Earl Conteh-Morgan, eds., Peacekeeping in Africa: ECOMOG in Liberia (St. Martin’s Press, 1998), 112.

  51. 51.

    Adekeye Adebajo, “Hegemony on a Shoestring: Nigeria’s Post-Cold War Foreign Policy,” in Gulliver’s Troubles: Nigeria’s Foreign Policy After the Cold War, eds. Adekeye Adebajo and Abdul Raufu Mustapha (University of Kwazulu-Natal, 2008); Chris Alden and Garth Le Pere, “South Africa in Africa: Bound To Lead?,” Politikon 36, no. 1 (2009); Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments.”

  52. 52.

    Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments,” 4.

  53. 53.

    ECOWAS, “ECOWAS Moves for Continuous Support from Nigeria.”

  54. 54.

    Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments,” 6.

  55. 55.

    Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments,” 6–7; Oluwaseun Tella, “Attractions and Limitations of Nigeria’s Soft Power,” Journal of Global Analysis 7, no. 2 (2017).

  56. 56.

    Adebajo, “In Search of Warlords,” 67.

  57. 57.

    “Africa Debate: Is Nigeria Ready to Lead the Continent?,” BBC, June 23, 2014, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-27885700.

  58. 58.

    John Adams and Joseph Ebegbulem, “Nigeria’s National Interest and Interventions in West African Conflicts: A Critical Analysis,” African Journal of Politics and Administrative Studies 9, no. 1 (2016): 70–84.

  59. 59.

    Carr, “Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systemic Impact Approach,” 71.

  60. 60.

    Joanne Wallis and Andrew Carr, Asia-Pacific Security: An Introduction (Georgetown University Press, 2016), 276; Carr, “Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systemic Impact Approach,” 79.

  61. 61.

    Thomas Wilkins, “Australia and Middle Power Approaches to Asia Pacific Regionalism,” Australian Journal of Political Science 52, no. 1 (2017): 114; Carsten Holbraad, Middle Powers in International Politics (Macmillan, 1984).

  62. 62.

    Holbraad, Middle Powers in International Politics.

  63. 63.

    Federal Republic of Nigeria, National Security Strategy, 55–56.

  64. 64.

    Ibid., 57.

  65. 65.

    Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments”.

  66. 66.

    Reuters, “Snapshot of Issues Surrounding Clinton’s Nigeria Visit,” Reuters, August 25, 2000.

  67. 67.

    Dapo Thomas, “History and Evolution of Nigeria-US Military, Security, and Political Relations,” International Relations and Diplomacy 6, no. 4 (2018): 214.

  68. 68.

    Thomas, “History and Evolution of Nigeria-US Military, Security, and Political Relations.”

  69. 69.

    Kimairis Toogood, Understanding the Emerging Relationship Between China and Africa: The Case of Nigeria, Policy Brief Series (George Mason University; Stimson Center, 2016).

  70. 70.

    Toogood, Understanding the Emerging Relationship Between China and Africa: The Case of Nigeria, 1.

  71. 71.

    Pieter D. Wezeman et al., “Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2018,” SIPRI Fact Sheet (March 2019): 8.

  72. 72.

    Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments,” 16; Tella, “AFRICOM: Hard or Soft Power Initiative?,” African Security Review 25, no. 4 (2016).

  73. 73.

    Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments,” 16.

  74. 74.

    Eghosa E. Osaghae, Crippled Giant: Nigeria Since Independence (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998); Adekeye Adebajo and Abdul Raufu Mustapha, Gulliver’s Troubles: Nigeria’s Foreign Policy after the Cold War (Scottsville, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2008); Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments,” 8.

  75. 75.

    Detlef Nolte, “How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics,” Review of International Studies 36, no. 4 (2010).

  76. 76.

    Adebajo, “In Search of Warlords,” 63.

  77. 77.

    Tella, “Internal, Regional and External Impediments”; Adebajo, “Hegemony on a Shoestring: Nigeria’s Post-Cold War Foreign Policy”; Adebajo, “In Search of Warlords.”

  78. 78.

    Ogunnubi and Okeke-Uzodike, “Can Nigeria Be Africa’s Hegemon?,” 119.

References

  • Abbondanza, Gabriele, and Thomas Wilkins. “The Case for Awkward Powers.” In Awkward Powers: Escaping Traditional Great and Middle Power Theory, edited by G. Abbondanza and T. Wilkins, 3–39. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, John, and Joseph Ebegbulem. “Nigeria’s National Interest and Interventions in West African Conflicts: A Critical Analysis.” African Journal of Politics and Administrative Studies 9, no. 1 (2016): 70–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebajo, Adekeye. “Hegemony on a Shoestring: Nigeria’s Post-Cold War Foreign Policy.” In Gulliver’s Troubles: Nigeria’s Foreign Policy After the Cold War, edited by Adekeye Adebajo and Abdul Raufu Mustapha. Kwazulu-Natal: University of Kwazulu-Natal, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebajo, Adekeye. “In Search of Warlords: Hegemonic Peacekeeping in Liberia and Somalia.” International Peacekeeping 10, no. 4 (2003): 62–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebajo, Adekeye, and Abdul Raufu Mustapha. Gulliver’s Troubles: Nigeria’s Foreign Policy After the Cold War. Scottsville, South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adibe, Jideofor. Nigeria Without Nigerians?: Boko Haram and the Crisis in Nigeria’s Nation-Building. 1st ed. London: Adonis & Abbey, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adisa, Jinmi. “Nigeria in Ecomog: Political Undercurrents and the Burden of Community Spirit.” Small Wars & Insurgencies 5, no. 1 (1994): 83–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akinola, Adeoye O., Olumuyiwa Temitope Faluyi, and Sultan Khan, eds. Boko Haram Terrorism and the Nigerian State: Politics and Policies. New York, NY: Springer, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinyemi, Bolaji. “Nigeria’s Position: Abacha’s Ambitions.” International Herald Tribune, June 10, 1997, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alden, Chris, and Garth Le Pere. “South Africa in Africa: Bound to Lead?” Politikon 36, no. 1 (2009): 145–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amuwo, Kunle. “Nigeria’s Continental Diplomatic Thrusts: The Limits of Africa’s Nominally Biggest Economy.” Policy briefing of South African Institute of International Affairs, October 1, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anugwom, Edlyne. The Boko Haram Insurgence in Nigeria: Perspectives from Within. New York, NY: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aribisala, Femi. “Bolaji Akinyemi’s Concert of Medium Powers.” Financial Nigeria, January 2, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aworawo, Friday. “Nigeria and Ecowas Since 1999: Continuity and Change in Multilateralism and Conflict Resolution.” Ihafa: A Journal of African Studies 8, no. 2 (2016): 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC. “Africa Debate: Is Nigeria Ready to Lead the Continent?” BBC, June 23, 2014. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-27885700.

  • Boge, Faruq Idowu. “Old Allies and New Friends in Nigeria’s External Relations.” Covenant University Journal of Politics & International Affair 5, no. 2 (2017): 21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Andrew. “Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systemic Impact Approach.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 68, no. 1 (2014): 70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew Fenton. Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers After the Cold War. New York: Macmillan, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Andrew Fenton, Richard Higgott, and Kim Richard Nossal. Relocating Middle Powers: Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echezona, Nduba. Contemporary Issues in World Order. Anambra, Nigeria: Mekslink Publishers, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Community of West African States. 2016 Annual Report “Ecowas Common External Tariff (Cet): Achievements, Challenges and Prospects”. Abuja: Economic Community of West African States, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Community of West African States. “Basic Information.” 2016. Accessed April 25, 2020. https://www.ecowas.int/.

  • Economic Community of West African States. “Ecowas Moves for Continuous Support from Nigeria.” May 27, 2016. https://www.ecowas.int/ecowas-moves-for-continuous-support-from-nigeria/.

  • Economic Community of West African States. “Trade.” 2016. Accessed April 20, 2020. https://www.ecowas.int/ecowas-sectors/trade/.

  • Federal Republic of Nigeria. National Security Strategy. Abuja: Federal Republic of Nigeria, December 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebrewold, Belachew. “Legitimate Regional Powers? A Failed Test for Ethiopia, Nigeria, and South Africa.” African Security 7, no. 1 (2014): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holbraad, Carsten. Middle Powers in International Politics. London: Macmillan, 1984.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Strategic Studies Defence and Military Analysis Programme [IISS Programme], “Military Balance + (Online).” 2020. Accessed July 1, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Sangbae. “Middle Power’s Diplomatic Strategies in the Perspective of Networks: Applying Theories of Structural Holes and Positional Power.” Kukje Jeongchi Nonchong 51, no. 3 (2011): 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magyar, Karl, and Earl Conteh-Morgan, eds. Peacekeeping in Africa: Ecomog in Liberia. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolte, Detlef. “How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics.” Review of International Studies 36, no. 4 (2010): 881–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogunnubi, Olusola, and Ufo Okeke-Uzodike. “Can Nigeria Be Africa’s Hegemon?” African Security Review 25, no. 2 (2016): 110–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogunnubi, Olusola, Hakeem Onapajo, and Christopher Isike. “A Failing Regional Power? Nigeria’s International Status in the Age of Boko Haram.” Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies 44, no. 3 (2017): 446–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osaghae, Eghosa E. Crippled Giant: Nigeria Since Independence. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters. “Snapshot of Issues Surrounding Clinton’s Nigeria Visit.” Reuters, August 25, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies, Yolanda. “The Equivocal Power of South Africa.” In Awkward Powers: Escaping Traditional Great and Middle Power Theory, edited by G. Abbondanza and T. Wilkins, 199–219. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tella, Oluwaseun. “Africom: Hard or Soft Power Initiative?” African Security Review 25, no. 4 (2016): 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tella, Oluwaseun. “Attractions and Limitations of Nigeria’s Soft Power.” Journal of Global Analysis 7, no. 2 (2017): 109–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tella, Oluwaseun. “Internal, Regional and External Impediments to Nigeria and South Africa’s Hegemonic Competence in Africa.” In Nigeria-South Africa Relations and Regional Hegemonic Competence, edited by Oluwaseun Tella, 3–23. New York: Springer, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Dapo. “History and Evolution of Nigeria-US Military, Security, and Political Relations.” International Relations and Diplomacy 6, no. 4 (2018): 209–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toogood, Kimairis. Understanding the Emerging Relationship Between China and Africa: The Case of Nigeria. Policy Brief Series. School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution; George Mason University; Stimson Center, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International. Corruption Perceptions Index 2018. Berlin: Transparency International, 2018. www.transparency.org/cpi2018.

  • UN News. “Service and Sacrifice: Honouring Nigeria’s Contribution to UN Peacekeeping.” UN News, February 16, 2018. https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/02/1002901.

  • Ungerer, Carl. “The ‘Middle Power’ Concept in Australian Foreign Policy.” Australian Journal of Politics and History 53, no. 4 (2007): 538–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, Joanne, and Andrew Carr. Asia-Pacific Security: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wezeman, Pieter D., Aude Fleurant, Alexandra Kuimova, Nan Tian, and Siemon T. Wezeman. “Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2018.” SIPRI Fact Sheet (March 2019): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, Thomas, and Lucas Rezende. “A Liminal and Transitional Awkward Power: Brazil Betwixt the Great and Middle Powers”. In Awkward Powers: Escaping Traditional Great and Middle Power Theory, edited by G. Abbondanza and T. Wilkins, 95–128. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, Thomas. “Australia and Middle Power Approaches to Asia Pacific Regionalism.” Australian Journal of Political Science 52, no. 1 (2017): 110–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, Thomas. “Defining Middle Powers through Ir Theory: Three Images.” In Rethinking Middle Powers in the Asian Century: New Theories, New Cases, edited by Tanguy Struye de Swielande, Dorothée Vandamme and David Walton, 45–61. Routledge, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. “Poverty & Equity Data Portal—Nigeria.” 2020. http://povertydata.worldbank.org/poverty/country/NGA.

  • World Bank. “World Bank Open Data.” 2019. https://data.worldbank.org/.

  • Zenn, Jacob. Unmasking Boko Haram: Exploring Global Jihad in Nigeria. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiye Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kim, J. (2022). Between a Regional Hegemon and a Middle Power: The Case of Nigeria. In: Abbondanza, G., Wilkins, T.S. (eds) Awkward Powers: Escaping Traditional Great and Middle Power Theory. Global Political Transitions. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0370-9_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics