Abstract
“If there is a trial, it must be proved”, so trial is based on proof and the proof is directed by legal standard of criminal proof, judges make judgments only when arriving the standard of criminal proof. The legitimacy of trial is closely related to the achievement of legal standard of criminal proof: under the system of divinity evidence, the legitimacy of judicial decision resorts to the indication of gods; under the system of legal evidence, formal legal reality intensifies the legitimacy of trial; under the discretionary evaluation system, the legitimacy of trial performances as formation of discretional evaluation of evidence of judge.
The third part of the article had been published on the Jilin University Journal, Social Sciences Edition.
Associate professor of Jilin University, Doctor of law. Research direction is criminal procedure law, evidence law.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Huang (2001, p. 243).
- 2.
Bayless (1996, p. 37).
- 3.
For a long time, the arguments about the standard of criminal proof, that is the argument between the legal truth and the objective truth.
- 4.
Wu (2014, p. 150).
- 5.
Shen (2015, p. 5).
- 6.
Strictly speaking, the investigation centralism and the trial centralism are not in corresponding categories. The latter one is corresponding to the “assemble-line” style, while the former one is the product derived from the “assemble-line” style. Based on the demands of the theoretical evidence, this paper directly makes them correspond to each other.
- 7.
Li (1992, p. 464).
- 8.
- 9.
Chen (2014b, pp. 179–181).
- 10.
Murphy (1997, p. 109).
- 11.
Min (2015, p. 42).
- 12.
Min (2015, p. 42).
- 13.
Wu (2014, p. 158).
- 14.
Shen (2015, p. 5).
- 15.
Chen (2014a, p. 254).
- 16.
Chen (2014a, p. 260).
- 17.
He (2001, p. 54).
- 18.
Li and Wang (2001, p. 126).
- 19.
Long (1999, p. 301).
References
Bayless, Michael D. 1996. The Principle of Law, trans. Wenxian Zhang etc., 37. Encyclopedia of China Publishing House.
Chen, Ruihua. 2012. Research on the Rule of Objective Verification. Studies in Law and Business 2.
Chen, Ruihua. 2014a. Criminal Evidence Law, 2nd ed., 254, 260. Peking University Publisher.
Chen, Ruihua. 2014b. The Relationship Between the Subjective Factor and the Objective Factor. China Legal Science 3: 179–181.
He, Jiahong. 2001. Research on the Aim and the Standard: Also on the Basic Concept and Category. Peking University Law Journal 6: 54.
Huang, Maorong. 2001. Method of Jurisprudence and Modern Civil Law, 243. China University of Political Science and Law Press.
Li, Xuedeng. 1992. A Comparative Study of Evidence Law, 464. Wu-Nan Book Publishing Company.
Li, Xuekuan, and Haiyan Wang. 2001. Research on the Hierarchies of Standard of Proof. China Legal Science 5: 126.
Long, Zongzhi. 1999. Research on the Relative Rationalism, 301. China University of Political and Law Press.
Long, Zongzhi. 2004. The Objective Verification and the Subjective Evaluation: The Two Kind of Pattern of Criminal Proof. Chinese Journal of Law 2.
Min, Chunlei. 2015. The Trial Centralism: The Understanding of Its Connotation and Realization Rath. Science of Law 3: 42.
Murphy, Peter. 1997. Murphy on Evidence, 6th ed., 109. Blackstone Press Limited.
Shen, Deyong. 2015. On the Reform of the Litigation System of the Principle of Trial Centered Criminal Procedure. China Legal Science 3: 5.
Wu, Zeyong. 2014. ‘Justice’ or ‘Utopia’?—Civil Procedural Proof Standard in Comparative Perspective. The Jurist 3: 150, 158.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 China University of Political Science and Law Press
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yang, B. (2021). The Multidimensional Studies of the Theory of the Standard of Criminal Proof Under the Principle of Trial Centered Criminal Procedure. In: Zhang, B., Tong, S., Cao, J., Fan, C. (eds) Facts and Evidence. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9639-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9639-1_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-9638-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-9639-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)