Abstract
Theories of cultural planning and sustainability highlight cultural capacity building as the fourth pillar of sustainability, alongside social, economic, and environmental aims, and integration as a new framework for combining these four pillars. Seeing cultural participation as the core of the complex puzzle, we regard the digitization of art and media as an engine for changing the dynamics of participatory culture. Further, digitization rearticulates the power relations between cultural infrastructures (production) and cultural access and participation (consumption). This chapter examines the dynamics of online digital cultural participation by ethnic minority (EM) youth in Hong Kong. By analyzing a questionnaire survey data set of EM youth in Hong Kong (N = 561), we demonstrate the various capacities and aspirations of cultural activities online among ethnic minority youth. The data were collected via local community networks of social workers and social enterprises. The sample covers diverse ethnic minority groups in Hong Kong, such as Indonesians, Filipinos, Indians, Pakistanis, Nepalese, and others. A typology of digital cultural capacity will be attempted using a descriptive analysis to show the EM youth’s access and participation in cultural, arts, and leisure activities on the Internet, controlled by demographic background variables such as gender, age, and class. Our core argument is that baseline digital capacity established above is complicated by EM youth’s Community Capacity, i.e. education/information attainment; capacity of engaging social agencies that hold power; Social Capital, i.e. resources and networks embodied in life domains such as school, family, friendship, work, and ethnic community cohesion; and Cultural Identity, i.e. self-recognition/respect and intra- and inter-ethnic identity negotiation and development. Our discussion, with these tiers of indicators, provides critical insights into EM youth’s participation in online cultural activities and the barriers to their inter-cultural integration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arrow, K. (1972). Gifts and exchanges. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(4), 343–362.
Ashtiani, M., & Feliciano, C. (2015). Access and mobilization: How social capital relates to low-income youth’s postsecondary educational (PSE) attainment. Youth & Society, 50(4), 439–461.
Australia Council for the Arts. (2000). Arts in a multicultural Australia. Sydney: Australia Council.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). Arts and culture in Australia: A statistical overview. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
Badham, M. (2009). Cultural indicators: Tools for community engagement? The International Journal of the Arts in Society, 3(5), 67–75.
Balfe, J. (2003). Public participation in the arts and culture. In V. Morris & D. Pankratz (Eds.), The arts in a new millennium: Research and the arts sector (pp.51–63). Westport: Praeger.
Bawa, S., Williams, K., & Dong, W. (2010). Audience 2.0: How technology influences arts participation (Research Report #50). Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://arts.gov/publications/audience-20-how-technology-influences-arts-participation
Behtoui, A., & Neergaard, A. (2012). Social capital, status and income attainment in the workplace. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(1/2), 42–55.
Bhugra, D., Bhui, K., Mallett, R., Desal, M., Singh, J., & Leff, J. (1999). Cultural identity and its measurement: A questionnaire for Asians. International Review of Psychiatry, 11, 244–249.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for sociology of education (pp. 241–260). New York: Greenwood.
Bridgwood, A., & Skelton, A. (2000). The arts in England: Developing a survey of attendance, participation and attitudes. Cultural Trends, 10(40), 47–76.
Carr, D. S., & Williams, D. R. (1993). Understanding the role of ethnicity in outdoor recreation experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, 25, 22–38.
Catterall, J. S., Dumais, S. A., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2012). The arts and achievement in at-risk youth: Findings from four longitudinal studies (Research Report 55). National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED530822.pdf
Census and Statistics Department. (2016). Population by-census – Thematic report: Ethnic minorities. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong S.A.R. Government.
Chan, T. W., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). Class and status: The conceptual distinction and its empirical relevance. American Sociological Review, 72, 512–532.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
Consejo Nacional de la Cultura y las Artes. (2007). Encuesta de Consumo Cultural 2004–2005. Retrieved from https://www.mcu.es/libro/docs/MC/CD/ENCUESTA_CULTURA_CHILE.pdf
Couldry, N. (2006). Culture and citizenship: The missing link. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 9(3), 321–339.
Council of Europe. (2017, May). Cultural participation and inclusive societies. A thematic report based on the Indicator Framework on Culture and Democracy. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/cultural-participation-and-inclusive-societies-a-thematic-report-based/1680711283
Delaney, L., & Keaney, E. (2006). Cultural participation, social capital and civil renewal in the United Kingdom: Statistical evidence from national and international survey data. Dublin and London: Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), and Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR).
Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168.
Erni, J. N. (2012). Who needs strangers? Un-imagining Hong Kong Chineseness. Chinese Journal of Communication, 5(1), 1–10.
Erni, J. N. (2018). “用文化研究跟少數族裔同行.” 《行出一小步——從我到我們的社區實驗》 (作者:一小步). 香港: 突破出版社 (pp. 86–93).
Erni, J. N. (2019). Racialism. In S. Chu (Ed.), Hong Kong keywords (pp. 233–244). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
Erni, J. N., & Leung, L. (2014). Understanding South Asian minorities in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Ferguson, K. M. (2006). Social capital and children’s wellbeing: A critical synthesis of the international social capital literature. International Journal of Social Welfare, 15(1), 2–18.
Floyd, M. F., & Gramann, J. H. (1993). Effects of acculturation and structural assimilation in resource-based recreation: The case of Mexican Americans. Journal of Leisure Research, 25, 6–21.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Gaddis, S. M. (2018). Social capital in the creation of cultural capital, habitus, and achievement: Access vs. mobilization for low-income and racial minority adolescents. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3161606
Gesthuizen, M., Van der Meer, T., & Scheepers, P. (2009). Ethnic diversity and social capital in Europe: Tests of Putnam’s thesis in European countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 32(2), 121–42.
Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41(1), 48–67.
Hong Kong Arts Development Council. (2000). Public attitude on art (Arts poll 2000). Hong Kong: Arts Development Council. Retrieved from https://www.hkadc.org.hk/en/content/web.do?id=ff80818123dbba560123dbfd53e9001b
Hong Kong Arts Development Council. (2005). Hong Kong arts and cultural indicator. Hong Kong: Arts Development Council, International Intelligence on Culture, Cultural Capital.
Hutchison, R. (1988). A critique of race, ethnicity, and social class in recent leisure-recreation research. Journal of Leisure Research, 20, 10–30.
Jowell, T. (2004). Government and the value of culture. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
Karaganis, J. (2007). Structures of participation in digital culture. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Laitio, T. (2012). Counting what counts: Report on the Culture Watch Europe conference on cultural access and participation—From indicators to policies for democracy, Helsinki, June 30, 2012. Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/cwe/HelsinkiReport_en.pdf
Laurence, J. (2011). The effect of ethnic diversity and community disadvantage on social cohesion: A multilevel analysis of social capital and interethnic relations in UK communities. European Sociological Review, 27, 70–89.
LeRoux, K., & Bernadska, A. (2014). Impact of the arts on individual contributions to US civil society. Journal of Civil Society, 10(2), 144–164.
Madden, C. (2005). Indicators for arts and cultural policy: A global perspective. Cultural Trends, 14(3), 217–247.
Mercer, C. (2002). Towards cultural citizenship: Tools for cultural policy and development. Stockholm: Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation and Gidlunds Forlag, Hedemora.
Mercer, C. (2003). From indicators to governance to the mainstream: Tools for cultural policy and citizenship. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/200717403_From_Indicators_to_Governance_to_the_Mainstream_Tools_for_Cultural_Policy_and_Citizenship
Ministry for Culture and Heritage. (2009). Cultural indicators for New Zealand. Wellington: Ministry for Culture and Heritage.
Morrone, A. (2006). Guidelines for measuring cultural participation. Montreal, Canada: UNESCO-UIS.
Morrow, V. (2008). Conceptualizing social capital in relation to the well-being of children and young people: A critical review. Sociological Review, 47(4), 744–765.
National Arts Council. (2009). Population survey on the arts 2009. Singapore: National Arts Council. Retrieved from https://www.nac.gov.sg/static/doc/population_survey_of_the_arts_2009.pdf
National Endowment for the Arts. (1995). A practical guide to arts participation research. Available at: https://www.arts.gov/publications/practical-guide-arts-participation-research.
National Endowment for the Arts. (2009). 2008 survey of public participation in the arts. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://arts.gov/publications/2008-survey-public-participation-arts
Ng, S. L., Zhang, Y., Ng, K. H., Wong, H., & Lee, J. W. Y. (2018). Living environments and quality of life in Hong Kong. Asian Geographer, 35, 35–51.
Novak-Leonard, J. L., & Brown, A. S. (2011). Beyond attendance: A multi-modal understanding of arts participation. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://www.giarts.org/sites/default/files/beyond-attendance-multi-modal-understanding-of-arts-participation%20.pdf
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oustinoff, M. (2012). Les langues sur internet: De l'hégémonie de l'Anglais au règne de la traduction. Le Temps des médias 18(1), 124.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century: The 2006 Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174.
Silva, E., & Warde, A. (Eds.). (2010). Cultural analysis and Bourdieu’s legacy: Settling accounts and developing alternatives. Culture, economy and the social. London: Routledge.
South China Morning Post. (2018, October 31). Hong Kong must show it is home to all races. Editorial. South China Morning Post.
Statistical Research and Training Institute. (2011). Survey on time use and leisure activities 2001–2008. Japan: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Retrieved from https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/7657753/gbdki/97
TNS Opinion & Social. (2013). Cultural access and participation (Special eurobarometer 399). Brussels: European Commission.
Uganda Bureau of Statistics. (2010). Uganda national household survey 2009/2010. Kampala: Uganda Bureau of Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.ubos.org/UNHS0910/Appendix%20III-%20Questionnaire.pdf
Uslaner, E. M. (2012). Segregation and mistrust: Diversity, isolation, and social cohesion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Van Wel, F., Couwenbergh-Soeterboek, N., Couwenbergh, C., ter Bogt, T., & Raaijmakers, Q. (2006). Ethnicity, youth cultural participation and cultural reproduction in the Netherlands. Poetics, 34(1), 65–82.
Woolcock, M. (1980). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151–208.
Wu, A. (2018, May 20). Ethnic minorities are Hong Kongers too, and should be treated as such. South China Morning Post.
Yue, A., & Khan, R. (2015). New approaches to cultural measurement: On cultural value, cultural participation and cultural diversity. In L. MacDowall, M. Bardham, & E. Blomkamp (Eds.), Making culture count: The politics of cultural measurement. London: Palgrave.
Yue, A., Khan, R., & Brook, S. (2011). Developing a local cultural indicator framework in Australia: A case study of the city of Whittlesea. Journal of Culture and Local Governance, 3(1–2), 133–149.
Zhang, Y., & Leung, L. (2015). A review of social networking service (SNS) research in communication from 2006 to 2011. New Media & Society, 17(7), 1007–1024.
Acknowledgements
The work described in this paper was fully supported by a General Research Grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. HKBU12660516).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Erni, J.N., Zhang, N.Y. (2020). Ethnic Minority Youth as Digital Cultural Participants: Toward a Critical Indicator Study. In: Lam, S.Sk. (eds) New Media Spectacles and Multimodal Creativity in a Globalised Asia . Digital Culture and Humanities, vol 3. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7341-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7341-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-7340-8
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-7341-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)