Abstract
In the last few decades, various studies demonstrated numerous robotics applications that can tackle the problem of the aging population by supporting older people to live longer and independently at home. This article reviews the scientific literature and highlights how social robots can help the daily life of older people, and be useful also as assessment tools for mild physical and mental conditions. It will underline the aspects of usability and acceptability of robotic solutions for older persons. Indeed, the design should maximize these to improve the users’ attitude toward the actual use of the robots. The article discusses the advantages and concerns about the use of robotics technology in the social context with a vulnerable population. In this field, success is to assist social workers, not to replace them. We conclude recommending that care benefits should be balanced against ethical costs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Harper, C., Dogramadzi, S., Tokhi, M.O.: Developments in vocabulary standardization for robots and robotic devices. In: Mobile Robotics: Solutions and Challenges, pp. 155–162. World Scientific (2010)
Siciliano, B., Khatib, O.: Springer handbook of robotics. Springer (2016)
Conti, D., Di Nuovo, S., Cangelosi, A., Di Nuovo, A.: Lateral specialization in unilateral spatial neglect: a cognitive robotics model. Cogn. Process. 17, 321–328 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-016-0761-x
Di Nuovo, A., McClelland, J.L.: Developing the knowledge of number digits in a child-like robot. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 594–605 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0123-3
Di Nuovo, A., Jay, T.: Development of numerical cognition in children and artificial systems: a review of the current knowledge and proposals for multi-disciplinary research. Cogn. Comput. Syst. 1, 2–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1049/ccs.2018.0004
Cavallo, F., Esposito, R., Limosani, R., Manzi, A., Bevilacqua, R., Felici, E., Di Nuovo, A., Cangelosi, A., Lattanzio, F., Dario, P.: Robotic services acceptance in smart environments with older adults: user satisfaction and acceptability study. J. Med. Internet Res. 20, e264 (2018)
Matarić, M.J.: Socially assistive robotics: human augmentation versus automation. Sci. Robot. 2, eaam5410 (2017)
Wood, L.J., Zaraki, A., Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K.: Developing kaspar: a humanoid robot for children with autism. Int. J. Soc. Robot. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-019-00563-6
Wang, N., Di Nuovo, A., Cangelosi, A., Jones, R.: Temporal patterns in multi-modal social interaction between elderly users and service robot. Interact. Stud. 20, 4–24 (2019)
Conti, D., Cattani, A., Di Nuovo, S., Di Nuovo, A.: Are Future Psychologists Willing to Accept and Use a Humanoid Robot in Their Practice? Italian and English Students’ Perspective. Front. Psychol. 10, 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02138
Bowling, A.: Quality of life: Measures and meanings in social care research. (2014)
Pedersen, I., Reid, S., Aspevig, K.: Developing social robots for aging populations: a literature review of recent academic sources. Soc. Compass. 12, e12585 (2018)
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., Tanaka, F.: Social robots for education: a review. Sci. Robot. 3, eaat5954 (2018)
Conti, D., Cirasa, C., Di Nuovo, S., Di Nuovo, A.: “Robot, tell me a tale!”: a social robot as tool for teachers in kindergarten. Interact. Stud. 21, 221–243 (2020)
Allen, M.: Alexa, Can You Support People With Care Needs? (2018)
Prescott, T.J., Caleb-Solly, P.: Robotics in social care: a connected care EcoSystem for independent living (2017)
Sharkey, A., Sharkey, N.: Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf. Technol. 14, 27–40 (2012)
Leenes, R., Palmerini, E., Koops, B.-J., Bertolini, A., Salvini, P., Lucivero, F.: Regulatory challenges of robotics: some guidelines for addressing legal and ethical issues. Law, Innov. Technol. 9, 1–44 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2017.1304921
Draper, H., Sorell, T.: Ethical values and social care robots for older people: an international qualitative study. Ethics Inf. Technol. 19, 49–68 (2017)
Krägeloh, C.U., Bharatharaj, J., Kutty, S., Kumar, S., Nirmala, P.R., Huang, L.: Questionnaires to measure acceptability of social robots: a critical review. Robotics 8, 88 (2019)
Charisi, V., Davison, D., Reidsma, D., Evers, V.: Evaluation methods for user-centered child-robot interaction. In: 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 545–550. IEEE (2016)
Savela, N., Turja, T., Oksanen, A.: Social acceptance of robots in different occupational fields: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 10, 493–502 (2018)
Busch, B., Maeda, G., Mollard, Y., Demangeat, M., Lopes, M.: Postural optimization for an ergonomic human-robot interaction. In: 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 2778–2785. IEEE (2017)
Salvini, P., Laschi, C., Dario, P.: Design for acceptability: improving robots’ coexistence in human society. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 451–460 (2010)
Nam, T.: Citizen attitudes about job replacement by robotic automation. Futures 109, 39–49 (2019)
Stafford, R.Q., MacDonald, B.A., Jayawardena, C., Wegner, D.M., Broadbent, E.: Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6, 17–32 (2014)
Heerink, M., Albo-Canals, J., Valenti-Soler, M., Martinez-Martin, P., Zondag, J., Smits, C., Anisuzzaman, S.: Exploring requirements and alternative pet robots for robot assisted therapy with older adults with dementia. In: International Conference on Social Robotics, pp. 104–115. Springer (2013)
Wu, Y., Wrobel, J., Cornuet, M., Kerhervé, H., Damnée, S., Rigaud, A.-S.: Acceptance of an assistive robot in older adults: a mixed-method study of human–robot interaction over a 1-month period in the Living Lab setting. Clin. Interv. Aging 9, 801 (2014)
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46, 186–204 (2000)
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research (1977)
Jung, J., Song, H., Kim, Y., Im, H., Oh, S.: Intrusion of software robots into journalism: the public’s and journalists’ perceptions of news written by algorithms and human journalists. Comput. Hum. Behav. 71, 291–298 (2017)
Suprem, A., Mahalik, N., Kim, K.: A review on application of technology systems, standards and interfaces for agriculture and food sector. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 35, 355–364 (2013)
Marchant, G., Allenby, B., Arkin, R., Barrett, E., Borenstein, J., Gaudet, L., Kittrie, O., Lin, P., Lucas, G., O’Meara, R.: International governance of autonomous military robots’. Columbia Sci. Technol. Law Rev. 12, 272 (2010)
Palep, J.H.: Robotic assisted minimally invasive surgery. J. Minimal Access Surg. 5, 1 (2009)
Mubin, O., Stevens, C.J., Shahid, S., Mahmud, A. Al, Dong, J.-J.: A review of the applicability of robots in education. Technol. Educ. Learn. 1 (2013)
Di Nuovo, A., Conti, D., Trubia, G., Buono, S., Di Nuovo, S.: Deep learning systems for estimating visual attention in robot-assisted therapy of children with autism and intellectual disability. Robotics 7, 25 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/robotics7020025
Conti, D., Trubia, G., Buono, S., Di Nuovo, S., Di Nuovo, A.: Evaluation of a robot-assisted therapy for children with autism and intellectual disability. In: Annual Conference Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, pp. 405–415. Springer (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96728-8_34
Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Bisson, P., Marrs, A.: Disruptive technologies: advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute San Francisco, CA (2013)
Frey, C.B., Osborne, M.A.: The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 114, 254–280 (2017)
Commission, European: Special Eurobarometer 382-Public Attitudes Towards Robots. Belgium, Brussels (2012)
Kanda, T., Miyashita, T., Osada, T., Haikawa, Y., Ishiguro, H.: Analysis of humanoid appearances in human–robot interaction. IEEE Trans. Robot. 24, 725–735 (2008)
Conti, D., Di Nuovo, S., Buono, S., Di Nuovo, A.: Robots in education and care of children with developmental disabilities: a study on acceptance by experienced and future professionals. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9, 51–62 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0359-6
Conti, D., Commodari, E., Buono, S.: Personality factors and acceptability of socially assistive robotics in teachers with and without specialized training for children with disability. Life Span Disabil. 20, 251–272 (2017)
Rossi, S., Santangelo, G., Staffa, M., Varrasi, S., Conti, D., Di Nuovo, A.: Psychometric evaluation supported by a social robot: personality factors and technology acceptance. In: 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), pp. 802–807. IEEE (2018)
Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., MacDonald, B.: Acceptance of healthcare robots for the older population: review and future directions. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 319–330 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0030-6
Commission, European: Special Eurobarometer 460-Attitudes Towards the Impact of Digitisation and Automation on Daily Life. Belgium, Brussels (2017)
Taipale, S., de Luca, F., Sarrica, M., Fortunati, L.: Robot shift from industrial production to social reproduction. In: Social Robots from a Human Perspective, pp. 11–24. Springer (2015)
Takayama, L., Ju, W., Nass, C.: Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: what everyday people think robots should do. In: 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 25–32. IEEE (2008)
Isle of Wight Council: Social Care Digital Innovation Programme. Discovery phase report for exploring the potential for Cobots to support carers (2018)
Shishehgar, M., Kerr, D., Blake, J.: A systematic review of research into how robotic technology can help older people. Smart Health. 7, 1–18 (2018)
Steptoe, A., Shankar, A., Demakakos, P., Wardle, J.: Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 5797–5801 (2013)
Di Nuovo, A., Broz, F., Wang, N., Belpaeme, T., Cangelosi, A., Jones, R., Esposito, R., Cavallo, F., Dario, P.: The multi-modal interface of Robot-Era multi-robot services tailored for the elderly. Intel. Serv. Robot. 11, 109–126 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11370-017-0237-6
Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S., Loutfi, A.: A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2013, 3 (2013)
Li, J.: The benefit of being physically present: a survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 77, 23–37 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.01.001
Robinson, H., MacDonald, B., Kerse, N., Broadbent, E.: The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 14, 661–667 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.007
Fasola, J., Matarić, M.J.: A socially assistive robot exercise coach for the elderly. J. Hum. Robot Interact. 2, 3–32 (2013)
Chen, T.L., Bhattacharjee, T., Beer, J.M., Ting, L.H., Hackney, M.E., Rogers, W.A., Kemp, C.C.: Older adults’ acceptance of a robot for partner dance-based exercise. PLoS ONE 12, e0182736 (2017)
Prakash, A., Rogers, W.A.: Why some humanoid faces are perceived more positively than others: effects of human-likeness and task. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7, 309–331 (2015)
Brooke, J.: SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry. 189, 4–7 (1996)
Heerink, M., Kröse, B., Wielinga, B., Evers, V.: Of an interface robot and a screen agent by elderly users Categories and Subject Descriptors. People Comput. 430–439 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1163/016918609X12518783330289
Robot-Era project. http://www.robot-era.eu/robotera/
Varrasi, S., Di Nuovo, S., Conti, D., Di Nuovo, A.: A social robot for cognitive assessment. In: HRI’18 Companion: Conference on ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, 5–8 March 2018, pp. 269–270. Chicago, IL, USA (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3176995
Di Nuovo, A., Varrasi, S., Lucas, A., Conti, D., McNamara, J., Soranzo, A.: Assessment of cognitive skills via human-robot interaction and cloud computing. J. Bionic Eng. 16, 526–539 (2019)
Varrasi, S., Lucas, A., Soranzo, A., McNamara, J., Di Nuovo, A.: IBM cloud services enhance automatic cognitive assessment via human-robot interaction. In: Carbone, G., Ceccarelli, M., Pisla, D. (eds.) New Trends in Medical and Service Robotics, pp. 169–176. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2019)
Dahl, T., Boulos, M.: Robots in health and social care: a complementary technology to home care and telehealthcare? Robotics 3, 1–21 (2014)
Hudson, J., Orviska, M., Hunady, J.: People’s attitudes to robots in caring for the elderly. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9, 199–210 (2017)
Baisch, S., Kolling, T., Schall, A., Rühl, S., Selic, S., Kim, Z., Rossberg, H., Klein, B., Pantel, J., Oswald, F.: Acceptance of social robots by elder people: does psychosocial functioning matter? Int. J. Soc. Robot. 9, 293–307 (2017)
Mori, M.: Bukimi no tani [The uncanny valley]. Energy, 7(4) 33–35. (Translated by Karl F. MacDorman and Takashi Minato in 2005) within Appendix B for the paper Androids as an Experimental Apparatus: Why is there an uncanny and can we exploit it? In: Proceedings of the CogSci-2005 Workshop: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science, pp. 106–118 (1970)
Strait, M.K., Floerke, V.A., Ju, W., Maddox, K., Remedios, J.D., Jung, M.F., Urry, H.L.: Understanding the uncanny: both atypical features and category ambiguity provoke aversion toward humanlike robots. Front. Psychol. 8, 1366 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Conti, D., Di Nuovo, S., Di Nuovo, A. (2021). A Brief Review of Robotics Technologies to Support Social Interventions for Older Users. In: Zimmermann, A., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Human Centred Intelligent Systems. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 189. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5784-2_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5784-2_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-5783-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-5784-2
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)